Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interactive Review:

2011 Chevrolet Camaro LT Convertible RS

med_gallery_51_146_699114.jpg

It's still a bit cold to take our top off, but joining us this week is a 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible LT RS. Being a V6, it's a step down in power from last week's Cadillac CTS-V Coupe, but not many 4-seat cars below the CTS's price range can match it's power output anyway. Two of my first impressions are these:

1. You can feel the weight gain over the standard coupe.

2. This car needs a reverse parking camera more than the CTS Coupe does mostly due to the undersized mirrors that are a styling necessity on this car.

Media Gallery: 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible

Posted

So I assume the rearward visibility is worse than the coupe (w/ the top up). How's the trunk space w/ the top down? How's the noise w/ the top up?

Posted

So I assume the rearward visibility is worse than the coupe (w/ the top up). How's the trunk space w/ the top down? How's the noise w/ the top up?

Yes, rearward visibility is worse than the coupe. GM would do well to offer lane change warning/blind spot warning in this version of the car. I actually had difficulty pulling out into traffic at one intersection today because it's at an odd angle. I experienced no such problems with the CTS-V Coupe.

Trunk space is minimal either way..... but it's microscopic with the top down.

Noise... well it's no Buick Lacrosse inside. It's mostly muted, but there were two occasions where a train came by and I thought one of the rear windows was down.

Posted

Is structural rigidity really as good as other reviews claim (on par with the coupe)?

Does the car look bad/cheap without the tonneau cover hiding the folded top?

Posted

Is structural rigidity really as good as other reviews claim (on par with the coupe)?

Does the car look bad/cheap without the tonneau cover hiding the folded top?

I wouldn't call it on par with the coupe, but it's better than other convertibles.

See for yourself... I don't have the tonneau cover hiding the folding top in any of the pictures. It actually looks very clean.

Posted

The top itself, how's the material? The headliner? The folding operation? Does it seem nice?

Drove a Miata yesterday, and maaaan, the body quivers in that thing made me ill, in an '04 with 55k miles. I hope the Camaro feels better over bumps than the MX-5.

Posted

1. About the weight gain being noticeable: is it more noticeable in straight line performance or in turns?

2. Much has been written and said about the interior: How does build/material quality help or detract from the car's appeal?

Posted

1. About the weight gain being noticeable: is it more noticeable in straight line performance or in turns?

2. Much has been written and said about the interior: How does build/material quality help or detract from the car's appeal?

1. More in the straight line. I haven't clocked 0-60, but I wouldn't be surprised if other outlets refer to it as "leisurely"

2. The build quality, fit and finish is really tight on this one (as was the last), but at $36,000 no automatic climate control? no full color DIC? the speedometer is still hard to read, thank god for the HUD.

Posted

The top itself, how's the material? The headliner? The folding operation? Does it seem nice?

Drove a Miata yesterday, and maaaan, the body quivers in that thing made me ill, in an '04 with 55k miles. I hope the Camaro feels better over bumps than the MX-5.

Folding operation is superb, I'm going to try and get a video of it.

Material quality on both sides of the seems sturdy.

Posted

See for yourself... I don't have the tonneau cover hiding the folding top in any of the pictures. It actually looks very clean.

I'm glad to see that GM is using some of the space wasted by making the rear so high to hide the retracted top... it looks good, even without the cover.

How is the headroom with respect to the structural parts of the top? Is most of the area above the driver's head cloth? Or is there any pesky bars that will make themselves evident as soon as you drive over a bump?

I assume the side window height it the same, so getting under the roof is the same limbo as the hardtop.

Posted

Top down, it actually doesn't look like ass. Nice.

Bingo...my thoughts e

The top itself, how's the material? The headliner? The folding operation? Does it seem nice?

Drove a Miata yesterday, and maaaan, the body quivers in that thing made me ill, in an '04 with 55k miles. I hope the Camaro feels better over bumps than the MX-5.

Folding operation is superb, I'm going to try and get a video of it.

Material quality on both sides of the seems sturdy.

...'blu....try an 05 up...much more stalbe in the Miata...

and as for the convertible Camaro...much higher quality stuff than the MX-5....but a 33k car rather than a 21k car...what I'd expect....

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search