Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

...when I was out getting my breakfast.

Man!

Is it ever unattractive from the rear!

I've only seen one so far in person, a few weeks ago. I really wanted to like it from what I'd seen online, but in person...the rear is too short and tall, IMO..the edge of the decklid seems to be 4 feet off the ground..very polarizing design...

Posted

I've seen a couple, back end is way too big. The car looks more bulky than sleek or sporty. The grille on the current CTS is an improvement, but I like the first generation's body more, it was much more sleek. The current car looks wide and over weight.

Posted

So after this car fails to sell 100K copies a year, people will cite this meh excuse for a coupe as proof that nobody wants coupes.

This is what worries me.

Coupes need to be good-looking, and this one just isn't.

Posted (edited)

a cadillac coupe of any kind is never going to sell more than 10-15k units a year now. and one with a price north of 50, I'll be surprised if they sell 5,000 of them.

a- very few people have any interest in coupes, crossovers, sedans, and trucks are what folks are in tune with

b- if they do want a coupe often they are young and broke

c- and then there are those that buy BMW's, Camaros, and Mustangs anyways.

ATS coupe may have a shot at selling. But CTS coupe exists more in the lineup for gravy sales and for image more than to generate an assload of sales volume.

that's probably exactly why it has polarizing styling and a useless rear. those few that want it and will pay for it, will want it bad.

Edited by regfootball
  • Agree 1
Posted

cadillac has more dealers in the US to support so volume is important, and they do not have the global sales BMW does for the brand. So each model Caddy sells in the US has to do its part not only with profit potential, but also with volume.

that just underscores why the XTS matters.

if caddy makes 10k on each of 40k XTS the first year, that adds 400M to the profit ledger for GM.

Posted

This is what worries me.

Coupes need to be good-looking, and this one just isn't.

Depends what color it's in.

There are 2 2008+ CTS's in my neighborhood. Someone's got a 2009 Black Raven CTS4 Sedan with the 3.6DI and someone else recently bought a Black Raven 2011 CTS4 Coupe. Honestly the Sedan is my favorite but that coupe also looks absolutely rakish in black. The silver/white/gray just doesn't do it justice like black does.

Posted

a cadillac coupe of any kind is never going to sell more than 10-15k units a year now. and one with a price north of 50, I'll be surprised if they sell 5,000 of them.

a- very few people have any interest in coupes, crossovers, sedans, and trucks are what folks are in tune with

b- if they do want a coupe often they are young and broke

c- and then there are those that buy BMW's, Camaros, and Mustangs anyways.

ATS coupe may have a shot at selling. But CTS coupe exists more in the lineup for gravy sales and for image more than to generate an assload of sales volume.

that's probably exactly why it has polarizing styling and a useless rear. those few that want it and will pay for it, will want it bad.

A very rational post, sir....

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search