Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWl5UasH4Zc?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWl5UasH4Zc?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWl5UasH4Zc?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

:breakdance:

Posted

No, Bozo The Clown. It was apparently built by an older gentleman who had the time and money to accomplish something classically American. It's what's known as a "sleeper", for the uninitiated. It's real, and it's spectacular.

Posted

Interesting...looks like someone did a RWD conversion...wonder what the drivetrain is under there...would have been even more of a sleeper if they could have built it without the lame 'outlaw' style hood scoop.

Posted

Five hundred seventy-two cubic inches of Chevrolet Big Block power... wouldn't fit under the stock hood.

Posted (edited)

I like the car... but the point of this competition is... what exactly.... increase the shareholder value for Bridgestone?

I think smoky burnouts are an element of the drag racing subculture.

Five hundred seventy-two cubic inches of Chevrolet Big Block power... wouldn't fit under the stock hood.

Probably got a tunnel ram w/ carburators or something that wouldn't fit under the stock hood. But more interesting, what is drivetrain--transmission, rear axle, etc? Wondering what dirty bits were used to cnvert a DTS to RWD..

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
Posted

As one of my friends said after a wild ride in my 55 Chevy (back when I had it)...now we are runnin under GM power, boys....

Bottom of the lake

You no like?

Posted

I like the car... but the point of this competition is... what exactly.... increase the shareholder value for Bridgestone?

I always thought burnouts were to impress 16 year old girls, but this makes sense, assuming people of 68's ilk have the foresight to buy Bridgestone stock.

Posted

I always thought burnouts were to impress 16 year old girls, but this makes sense, assuming people of 68's ilk have the foresight to buy Bridgestone stock.

...yeah I don't get burnouts either. Just seems like trailer park kulture to me.

Posted

But more interesting, what is drivetrain--transmission, rear axle, etc? Wondering what dirty bits were used to cnvert a DTS to RWD..

Yeah, I want to know the same. Hopefully, Car Craft or someone will do a feature on this sleeper.

Knowing what most FWD cars look like underneath, I'm convinced that you could make a bolt-in RWD conversion for any large FWD car. Or nearly bolt-in. If Roush could do it for the Focus, DTS should be easy.

Not sure I care for the BB 572 approach. Its just too easy to get power from a LSx nowadays. That would have fit under the hood... and completed the sleeper look.

If anyone has any links to the construction of this beast, I'd like to see them. My Bonne still needs a tranny... maybe it needs the engine turned 90 degrees, as well. ;-)

Posted

assuming people of 68's ilk have the foresight to buy Bridgestone stock.

But buying stock would mean having a certain degree of faith in the banking and financial sectors.

Posted (edited)

Would have looked much better w/o the stupid scoop...and what's up w/ the old time air cleaner--this engine has a carburator? How old-school. An EFI LSx would have been a more modern approach that could have yielded a sleeper...

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
Posted

Here is the car

Hmm... Amazing that someone would do this to a perfectly good, 4 year old car. I figured they started off with something that had a terminal problem.

Interesting pictures... too bad they are too small to tell exactly whats going on... and the shop's website is terribly short on detail. _IF_ I was paying big bucks for something like this, I'd want to have a detailed idea of what they were doing.

While they kept the gauges working, its obvious that this is no longer computer controlled or emissions legal. I can't help but wonder if a cleaner conversion could have been done, with less of the body being chopped up.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search