Jump to content
Create New...

In Indianapolis, It's GM Workers vs Gm Workers


CSpec

Recommended Posts

In Indianapolis, It's Autoworkers versus Autoworkers

The Atlantic

GM's bankruptcy was structured as something called a 363 sale, in which you create a new company which buys the assets you want the reorganized firm to keep, and leave the remaining assets in the old company, which then tries to sell them for whatever they're worth and gives creditors the money. Needless to say, the assets left inside the old company are often not as valuable as the ones the company keeps--they may have little value at all. So when "Old GM" found a buyer for its Indianapolis stamping plant, that was a happy piece of news; if it's not sold, the plant will be shut down in September of next year.

Unfortunately, it's not quite that easy. The new buyer, JD Norman, says it can't afford prevailing GM wage rates, and wants the local to agree to lower pay scales. Thanks to "successor clauses" in the contract, the local has to agree to reopen the contract; otherwise, the successor has to abide by the UAW contract. JD Norman says it will not buy the plant if the successor clause is in effect.

A faction within the union consists of what are known as "GM Gypsies"--workers who have transferred to this plant from other GM plants that were shut down. They're trying to put in enough time to retire on full benefits, which means they don't want to take permanent jobs at JD Norman; they feel that unless they can get something very close to what GM pays, they seem to think they're better off with a plant shutdown, which makes everyone eligible for transfer.

However, there are workers in the plant who don't want to transfer. Indianapolis is their home. They're angry at the gypsies for trying to shut down a plant that is good for the local community, and good for them. I've heard that these folks are disproportionately close to retirement, in which case they're eligible to take their GM pension, and then go to work for JD Norman at reduced wages.

As you can see from the link above, JD Norman is taking it's case to the web, hoping to persuade workers that they'll be better off if they agree to a new contract. But though the company is making hopeful noises, other observers seem skeptical. The gypsies may win the day, in which case everyone else is out of a job that would still have paid pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search