Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm with Reg when it comes to the Camaro.  It is on that line for me, bordering on too retro.  Anything past the neo-retro of the Camaro and it is a complete deal breaker.

It is cool to borrow styling cues here and there, inject some heritage into modern styling, that is fine.  Blatantly copying past designs is not.  You really only appeal to a small group of diehard enthusiasts who would love to feel like they are 20 years old again.  With muscle cars, you kind of have to do that in order to sell cars (GTO is a prime example).  With the entire lineup of retroized cars, it will be extremely hard to redesign them.  How is GM going to redesign the HHR?  Chrysler the PT?  BMW the Mini?  VW the New Beetle?  Besides minor facelifts and model line additions, it cannot be done.

While I tend to agree, keep in mind that the Camaro was based on the '69 Camaro which is quite possible one of the most recognised and memorable muscle cars ever built.. I'd venture to say that the Impala plays the retro game a little safer an more discrete.

I agree with whoever said that it needs to be like the current CTS in that it BORROWS cues from classic Chevrolets (Cadillacs) but isn't a clone.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search