Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

We all know how kids are. They anxiously await that first taste of freedom that comes with a driver's license, but a lot of them just aren't ready for driving life. Which car do you nominate as C&G's Best First Car, 2006?

I nominate the 1973 Chevy Impala four door hardtop with a transplanted 2.5L Iron Duke engine, 3 on the tree transmission, and no power steering or brakes. That should keep 'em out of trouble while learning to drive in a most basic way.

I truly believe everyone should know how to drive a manual transmission, and we should all know how to handle a vehicle with no power steering or brakes. Everything else would be cake, and ya never know when you'll need to escape your captors and your only means is... a 1973 Impala with an Iron Duke, three speed on the column, and no power assists.

Posted

I have to nominate my first car. A 1966 Dodge Coronet 440 Station wagon. " Cream of Wheat" power steering, touchy drum brakes, anemic 273 V8, Big as a house, Bias ply "maypops" and non-functional HVAC/defrost. Talk about a learning curve! I became an expert on replacing drum brakes in a hurry and learned a ton about general auto mechanics courtesy of this car.

PWIGS (Pics when I get scanner)

Posted

I thought my first car was cool, albeit a hand me down. It was an immaculate 1976 Olds Cutlass Supreme coupe - light metallic blue, white landau, blue cloth interior, color keyed rally wheels and, powering it all, the unmistakable velvety purr of Oldsmobile's version of the ubiqutous 350 V8. As far as I know, it lived at least through the summer of 1992, when I finished a grad program at Univ. of Ill. and I sold it to a guy who farmed outside of Champaign, IL. Who would have ever thought that a car that knew every inch of pavement on "the 405," LA's famous San Diego Freeway, would end up in bucolic retirement near "Cham-bana."

Posted

A 2006 Mercedes S500 out of warranty coverage. If you can fix that thing by yourself on a shoestring budget, you should win a scholarship to MIT.

Posted

I've still never driven a manual. :(

You're missing 50% of the driving experience from the standpoint of an enthusiast. I've only met a few people in my life who prefered atuo after having driven both.

Esp. in little econoboxes it's everything. A manual trans. makes a crappy car liveable & inversely a automatic can run a great car like a VW GTi or BMW 328i.

Anyway my nomine:

1983 Caprice 4.3 with highway gears and out of balance tires. 1983 is still pre-emissions in Mass though so you can avoiud the worry of a old car failing the sniff test.

Posted

Realistically:

A Chevy Cobalt.

That's one of the first things I thought of when I first got my car. Thanks to the copious amounts of glass, the smallish C-pillar, the big mirrors, and the high driving position, it is really easy to see out of with no noticeable blind spots. The 2.2L provides sufficient power, but not enough to get anyone in trouble.

Posted (edited)

My choice is a Chevy Kodiak.

Or a

1955 Caddy with a 3 cylinder engine. No powered drum brakes. Manual rack and pinion steering. with AC.

A stick is fun and its a must in econboxes. But city driving sucks with a stick. So thats why i have autos. but if i go put to the country i rent a stick car for the weekend.

Edited by capriceman
Posted

wait what was i thinking this should be it

Thanks WMJ

Posted Image

Posted

I've still never driven a manual. :(

you are missing out. manual's are just fun to drive, exert the most power out of any engine, and you get such control over the car. I don't know that I would be totally satisfied without one.

That said, I nominate my first car, the Nissan 240sx hatchback, stickshift LE with leather sport seats. Best handling car I've driven so far, and good little engine with a nice sweet spot.

Posted

Hmm... first car, eh?

To me, a first car should be... Reliable, inexspensive, safe, simplistic, and efficient. That excludes... anything that isn't Japanese. Nowhere near what I'd want, but... it's what CR and others tell me is right. :D

Haha... nah, although the constant issues were annoying, my GA wasn't a bad first car. It was cheap, somewhat fun, looked good, and I like it. What more could I possibly ask? Other than it being a 240SX? :P

Posted

1980s Volvo 240. Slow, super safe, and VERY durable.

The only car I've every experienced to be as durable as a 240 is a Caprice, a car I would NEVER put in a teenager's hand because of the power.

Posted

My first car was a '67 Dodge Polara. 3 spd automatic with after market a/c. I think it was Sears a/c, actually. The car was 12 years old when I got it. It had a little bit of rust (amazing for this neck of the woods) and the a/c still worked. It had 97,000 miles on it. I bought it for $50 and gave my buddy a set of speakers.

My next two vehicles were both Dodge's and were 4 cylinders with manugal transmissions (it was the anemic '80s after all).

Manual trannies were fun until I moved to the city. Nothing fun about shifting on the freeway in stop and go traffic. Give me a smooth shifting automatic GM tranny any day.

Posted

IMO:

Must be semi-old. Teenagers in general do not deserve new or semi-new cars. Parents argue wanting their kids to be safe to justify buying newer cars. Buy them an old boat - they'll be plenty safe.

Must be something they'll have to work on. This will either teach them to work on their own car, or appreciate the importance of doing well in school so they can get a good job and afford to pay someone $80 an hour to fix it for them.

Can be somewhat cool, but unless they save up & buy their own car, the first car should not be more about being cool than being safe & getting from A to B. Teenagers generally act like idiots with their first car, doubly so if it's a cool car.

Posted

Teenagers generally act like idiots with their first car, doubly so if it's a cool car.

Not me. I didn't want it to malfunction nor have it taken away. I was pretty conservative when I first started driving. I still am, but am a lot more relaxed.

Posted (edited)

My first car:

1998 Chevrolet Camaro 3.8L Automatic Four Speed. It's got tasteful exterior modifications along with enough performance to take out an '85 Monte Carlo SS, '96 Impala SS, and a '94 Mustang GT (in 0-60 and 1/4 mile).

EDIT: oops! Took this thread the wrong way. haha

Edited by NOS2006
Posted
I was lucky, I didn't have my first accident until I was in college, I ran into the back end of a big Dodge pickup in stop-n-go traffic with a massive receiver hitch on it that veed my S-10 bumper like a pretzel... the really stupid thing is, I did it while looking at a girl standing in a parking lot talking to her friends. It broke one of my headlights out, $h! fell all out on the road... but to save face, I kept on going until I was out of her sight. What a dumbass! :P
Posted

You don't realize the percentage of "first cars" that end up wrecked, clearly.

I guess I should consider myself lucky. The only body mishap in the first Cutlass was the rust that formed between the vinyl landau top and the beltline...that was everywhere in those cars. It rained into the trunk as I was near the end of grad school, so on Saturday mornings I would get up and scoop it out.

I always wondered what the dude who farmed near Champaign, Illinois did with my car and how much longer he kept it. I wanted to drive it back across the plains and over the Rockies to Portland to complete the car's "circle trip" but my parents said "United...one way ticket" instead.

Posted

You don't realize the percentage of "first cars" that end up wrecked, clearly.

You don't realize that as a result of your trying to start stuff by responding negatively to my posts on a frequent basis after I have repeatedly and kindly asked you to cease and desist I have put you on "Ignore" and only see your posts when others quote them, clearly.

---

To everyone else, I think my list speaks for itself: practical, fuel-efficient (first-time drivers tend to be low on cash), safe, high-quality, enjoyable to drive and stylish. I really don't know what ocn's issue is regarding my list. Most of the people at my HS received new or late-model cars. Most of the people kept their cars in good shape and took care of them. The few who didn't tended to be the few who received (or bought on their own) beater cars. Those people in the old beater cars by and large were also the ones with the most extensive injuries when they were involved in accidents because the beaters they drove had already been in previous accidents or lacked modern safety equipment like air bags, seat belt tensioners, effective safety cages, etc.

Now, granted this is entirely anecdotal, but what would you care more about, your new or late-model car you bought or received...or some POS beater that is "just wheels" and is missing all but one of its hubcaps?

Posted (edited)

I agree with your list Croc, but also think about the fact that those who drive the "beaters" may not be able to afford anything more. I could look at the high school I went to, but that would be a bad example because I live in an affluent neighborhood where it is pretty common to see 16 year olds driving brand new 50k+ cars. Hell, there is a kid down the street that just turned 16 and got a new Range Rover. This type of situation isn't all that common, it's just one extreme. The other extreme of coruse would be barely even being able to afford a late model car let alone an older beater.

I'd have to whip out statistics, but I'm not going to so I'm not positive, but I'd think, for the average family, it probably wouldn't be practical to spend money on a new or late model car where chances are they would have to make payments, when they could just spend a few grand for an older car to act as a set of wheels to get the kid from point A to point B.

Edited by Nick
Posted (edited)

See, the original topic had no qualifications in it, and Oldsmoboi recommended a Cobalt and NOS recommended a 1998 Camaro (late-model IMO) and ocn waits until I post my list not only to criticize it, but to imply that I am ignorant of crash percentages as a result of my list.

Also, I am well aware of the monetary issue, but it's a pretty well-known fact that cars are less safe old than new due to corrosion, general wear and tear, and other incidents that come from owning and operating a car. If an old beater is all that can be afforded, fine, but that doesn't mean I have to recommend it, especially when a new or late-model compact car can be had for about a hundred dollars per month via a leasing program. A part-time minimum wage job at McDonald's can cover that no problem with money to spare. There are options.

Edited by Croc
Posted

I work in a bodyshop, so I see wrecked cars every day all the time. Just last week, I totalled an '01 Celica with the front end completely wiped out, $11k in damage... driven by a new driver. The week before, we repaired an '05 Cobalt coupe with front end damage. The family paid out of their own pockets to repair it... over $2000, just so the kid's insurance wouldn't skyrocket.

A new driver's safety is of paramount concern, of course. It should be at the top of the list, but why spend the money for a brand new car with requisite high insurance rates when the odds are stacked so steeply against you?

There are plenty of 5 to 8 year old cars out there that are just fine for first-time drivers who are just getting the hang of things. To me, it doesn't make economic sense to spend the money for a brand new car for a 16 year old. If the kid proves him or herself a safe driver after a couple of years in the older car, the second car can be a reward, whether the parents help purchase it, or the kid works for it.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search