Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

[ocnblu]

I've never met poetry, so no. Not yet. But if he's cute...

[/ocn]

:P

Seriously, I got to the point where I wondered that if Emerson, Thoroeu, or Dickinson were around today and heard experts' analysis of their work, would they nod in agreement, bust up laughing, or kill themselves again because its so woefully wrong?

Some things don't need to be analyzed that much, just appreciated for whatever you get from it. I love teacher's that say you read a poem wrong. Y'okay...

Posted

Ugh, reminds me of reading Shakespearean stuff in high school. Nothing they said meant what you thought it meant. Never before had I loved footnotes so much.

Posted

Emily Dickinson (sp?) was fun.

I bet you haven't analyzed Allen Ginsberg's Howl yet.

I'm analyzing her "I started Early–Took my Dog" right now for AP Lit.

My teacher's cool though because he agrees that it's okay to disagree as long as you have a good thesis and assertions!

Posted

Some of it is so damn difficult though!

This one's easy just by recognizing its structure and her use of capitalization. Plus, her use of dashes help analyzation quite a bit.

Posted (edited)

Very baseline analyzation of a few lines:

The poet then portrays sexual innuendo to liken the reader, proving that sex sells. Intriguing the observer, Dickinson writes, “And made as He would eat me up– As wholly as a Dew Upon a Dandelion’s Sleeve– And then–I started–too–.”(13-16) The syntax, “eat me up” is used to signal the man, “He,” indulging in her body to make love. Optimistically, she uses multiple allegorical words to represent this man, the “Dew;” his actions with a soft word, “Upon;” and herself as a tender being, the connotative definition of “Dandelion.” Finally, in the last line, she distorts the words, separating them from one another to amplify her instincts during this event: nervous and hesitant. The reader perceives this affair, which hinders his/her possible observation of this poem being about a walk to the beach, intriguing interest in the literature.

Good? Not?

Edited by NOS2006
Posted

analyzation >> analysis. Making up words is fun, but don't use it in the actual papers. English professors get really bitchy about that.

Analyzing poetry is a lot of fun. Actually, I don't really like much poetry unless I'm analzying it.

Posted

I like Edgar Allen poe & Robert Frost. Frost lived on a farm just a few towns over in N.H. for a good part of his life. Back in college I rote a paper on Sylvia Plath. So damn depressing. :(

Posted

I've never analyzed a poem; my high school realized that doing that is why no one reads it anymore. I'm taking a Shakespeare class this semester, but we just discuss what happens.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search