Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

The ignition was in the floor. It had a rear hatchback, not a trunk. The hood was hinged at the front, so it opened away from the windshield. And many of its owners — including Jerry Seinfeld’s character on his long-running sitcom — were intensely loyal.

Auto enthusiasts across the country were dismayed by the news Friday that General Motors was planning to shut down Saab, the Swedish carmaker it bought two decades ago, after a deal to sell it fell apart.

Even with its modest and steadily declining sales, Saab long stood out as a powerful brand in spite of itself.

“It wasn’t designed to be a fashion statement,” said Ron Pinelli, president of Autodata, which tracks industry statistics. “It was designed to provide transportation under miserable weather conditions.”

But in the process, Saab became a statement of its own. The American competition had floaty rides and Japanese cars were tight on space. By contrast, a Saab had taut steering, requiring drivers to actively guide the car as it powered through ice and snow.

Priced several thousand dollars above Japanese rivals, Saabs featured front-wheel drive and turbo-charged engines, and many were sold with manual transmissions.

Saab sales were always strongest in the Northeast, home for a time to the company’s American headquarters in Connecticut. Many Saab owners consider the brand’s glory days to be the 1980s, when Americans began buying cars again after a recession and energy crisis.

Mr. Pinelli, who was selling Volvos at the time, said he admired his Swedish rival. “The cars were communicative,” he said. “They didn’t try to numb the experience like cars do today.”

The cars had odd touches. Swedish engineers assumed drivers would be wearing gloves, so they designed big buttons for the dashboard, Mr. Pinelli said. Though the cars were compact, with long hoods and short rear ends, there was plenty of headroom inside.

“They were quirky; they were strange,” said Ray Wert III, editor in chief of Jalopnik.com, a Web site for auto enthusiasts.

American sales for Saab peaked at 48,250 in 1986, when it added the larger Saab 9000 to a lineup focused on its bread and butter car, the Saab 900.

Saab, as well as Volvo, gained a yuppie following, leading the Detroit car companies, which were eager to win over younger consumers, to buy them.

The Ford Motor Company acquired Volvo in 1999. G.M. bought half of Saab in 1990 and took management control after Saab’s auto business was split from Scania, the Swedish maker of big trucks. G.M. took full ownership in 2000.

Rather than preserve its Swedish underpinnings, however, G.M. made Saab part of a strategy to share engineering with the rest of its operations.

It expanded the lineup, building Saabs from the same platforms as Opels, Chevrolets and Buicks, and it even enlisted Subaru of Japan to produce some cars.

The strategy led to a sales revival of sorts from the late 1990s, when Mr. Seinfeld drove a black 1996 Saab 900 SE convertible on his show, until the middle of this decade, with sales helped by rebates and inexpensive lease deals.

The blanket approach “seemed to make sense to General Motors,” Mr. Wert said. “Unfortunately, it killed what made Saab Saab.”

Saab sales plummeted in 2008 when it became clear that G.M. was looking to cut Saab loose. Saab sold fewer than 22,000 cars in the United States last year and has managed sales of just 7,812 in all of 2009 — fewer than Buick alone sold last month.

Now Saab, a brand that once had one of the clearest identities in the industry, seems headed for extinction just as automakers are searching for more distinctive designs to help set them apart.

“It’s a shame that Saab is a victim,” Mr. Pinelli said.

Link: (Article and Pics) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/19/business/19brand.html?_r=1&src=twt&twt=nytimesbusiness

Posted (edited)

>>"Quirky but Loved "<< by exactly 104 individual people worldwide.

>>"American sales for Saab peaked at 48,250 in 1986"<< someone look thru my saab comments, find where I said 'saab peaked in the '80s', and I meant in relevence, not necc sales. I remember the brand & it's image then, it was the go-to source for turbo cars (which then were uncommon & 'new'), and yes; it was quirky. The company blitzed the (print) media with advertising. But saab has failed to bring anything new to the table since the '80s (except for numerous proprietory designs of Torx fasteners), it's like if Cadillac were still marketing all FWD, chopped-down, gutless, wire-wheel-capped marshmellows ALA 1985 in 2009. You CAN'T do that and expect to survive, even as part of a huge conglomerate. And saab partially dug their own grave via nationalistic pride in fighting GM and the economies of scale they sold themselves in order to take advantage of. Oblivious.

>>"Auto enthusiasts across the country were dismayed by the news Friday that General Motors was planning to shut down Saab"<<

Damn, I somehow missed the numerous articles documenting the country-wide dismay at the news that Pontiac was being discontinued. Someone point me to them.

Saab has been a collosal waste of time & money for GM, easily among the top 5 mistakes in the Corporation's history. A black hole. And the Core Divisions have suffered because of it (terminally in the case of Olds & Pontiac). That's unacceptable in IMO.

Edited by balthazar

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search