Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

I spent yesterday at the Pontiac Nationals and Summit Raceway Park in Norwalk Ohio. This is the largest gathering of Pontiacs in the world. With over 500 Show cars and 500 plus Pontiac powered race cars this is the big time Pontiac event.

I went expecting a wake or a lot of people mad at GM. I found few brought up the end of Pontiac. If they did say anything they were not thilled with the loss but most of them have not cared for many of the recent pontiacs for years.

Note many of Pontiac's best sellers from the last 30 years were not on the show field. There were many G8, GTO and Solstice but no G6, Sunbird, Vibe, G5, Grand Am, or SUV based vehicles other than one Aztek.

Either way while most were not thrilled with the Pontiac loss they were not as upset as many on the web.

I did nail down my class for the 5 time 1st place awards in a row. I have 3 more first and 2 more seconds to go with these from previous years. This has been a well run and fun well judged events and one of the few I show at anymore.

Posted

You went expecting to see a somber crowd? Classic Poncho fans have ignored the new offerings of their favorite GM division for years. The new GTO was a flop in their eyes, the Solstice was too small for their daily needs, and the G8 was 'too little, too late' (the rest - G5, G6, Vibe, Torrent weren't worth their time). At a small all-GM show I attended in April, I overheard a bunch of men around a '38 Pontiac sedan talk about the end of Pontiac, but they weren't all that sad (they were saying 'who's next?'). I read both Pontiac Enthusiast and High Performance Pontiac magazines and many classic Poncho fans/owners have shunned the brand once 'corporate' engines took over (geez, what year was that, 1979 or 1981?). The brand will never be dead as long as the classic Poncho owners keep their cars alive. BTW hyperv6, I'm not singling you out, just commenting on the topic.

Glad to hear you took an award. What Pontiac do you own?

Posted
I went expecting a wake or a lot of people mad at GM. I found few brought up the end of Pontiac. If they did say anything they were not thilled with the loss but most of them have not cared for many of the recent pontiacs for years.

Pretty much as I would expect. In my experience, traditional Poncho fans only give modern Pontiacs a small consideration before buying a Mazda, Maxima or 3 series for a daily driver. The few diehards that would buy ONLY Pontiacs (like me) are few and far between.

I feel that the idea that one is not thrilled by the loss is that Pontiac was the last chance that GM could build a decent, affordable sports sedan/coupe... like the G8... because its obvious that GM feels Chevy is fine with 20 year old W-bodies and Cadillac is a good excuse to charge an arm and leg for the same thing (CTS-V, STS-V).

Posted

Been to this event several times.

Just about any RWD Pontiac is represented and revered, the crowd just doesn't care about the FWD junk.

But then, those aren't really Pontiacs anyway.

Posted (edited)

THe Pontiac crowd at one point was if it was a post 1979 Post 400 car it was not a Pontiac. Then thing began to mellow. The Pontiac people began to embrace the Firebird and Trans Ams of the 3rd 4th gen. In time the supercharged cars were also accepted. They did not and still are ok with FWD as long as it was a performance car.

The bottom line is if the Pontiac was not a real performance car they did not care about it. People bought Pontiac in mostly for the performace image of ability of each car. The last Pontiacs few where real performance cars as they could not go like hell or even turn better than an average car. It is just sad if you could not sell a Pontiac to a Pontiac fan who do you think will buy them?

I expected a little grumble but we had little

I have a 1985 Fiero SE that I have added the Herb Adams suspension, T tops and my own ground FX too. I also have a 1990 Fiero Nose badge that was documented and was one of the few to get out of Pontiac. I have almost always had a positive response by most at the Pontiac events. Most come by and say I like what you have done. Many will stop by and tell how they either had one or still have one and loved it.

The funny thing is the 1979 Trans Am is often considered the last real Pontiac but many forget the 1974-88 Fiero 4 cylinder was the last true 100% Pontiac. Note it was based on the P body only sold by Pontiac, the 4 cylinder Iron Duke was a Pontiac engine and the car was built in Pontiac Michigan. Even the cars like the old GTO shared frames and other major parts with other GM cars as well assembly lines.

The new GTO, SSEI. Solstice, GTP and G8 all were well accepted by the large crowd as each represented real performance. Now the Aztek and if a G6 had shown up I would say unless it was tubed out no one would care.

Many GTP owners are racing and are fast. There have even been a few in the 11's and One in the 10's. They have gotten respect.

carweb7.jpg

mycar3.jpg

This is my go cart. I have had it 25 years this week and have enjoyed it. I bought it new when I could not afford the insurance on a TA bad then because of my age. I get this out for a little open top time and go to a cruise in or show once in a while. I have a lot of Pontiac buddies and play with their old iron often. One day I will get back to one of the older cars but keep the Fiero.

In fact today I was tinkering on a old 64 GTO today. Once my buddy gets it ready I will take it and detail it for him as long as I get to steal it from him for the weekend. A tripower and 4 speed can be a lot of fun.

Edited by hyperv6
Posted
You went expecting to see a somber crowd? Classic Poncho fans have ignored the new offerings of their favorite GM division for years. The new GTO was a flop in their eyes, the Solstice was too small for their daily needs, and the G8 was 'too little, too late' (the rest - G5, G6, Vibe, Torrent weren't worth their time). At a small all-GM show I attended in April, I overheard a bunch of men around a '38 Pontiac sedan talk about the end of Pontiac, but they weren't all that sad (they were saying 'who's next?'). I read both Pontiac Enthusiast and High Performance Pontiac magazines and many classic Poncho fans/owners have shunned the brand once 'corporate' engines took over (geez, what year was that, 1979 or 1981?). The brand will never be dead as long as the classic Poncho owners keep their cars alive. BTW hyperv6, I'm not singling you out, just commenting on the topic.

Glad to hear you took an award. What Pontiac do you own?

I don't understand why the new GTO was such a flop? I really like the look of it, and I liked the engine choices too. As far as comared to the old I would prefer the new simply because of the newer engines, and suspension.

Posted (edited)
I don't understand why the new GTO was such a flop? I really like the look of it, and I liked the engine choices too. As far as comared to the old I would prefer the new simply because of the newer engines, and suspension.

To be honest it was not a flop it just left some wanting more.

The facts are it made money even in low numbers.

Lutz came in and was faced with a division with no RWD performance and no plans or money to make one.

He looked to Holden and got it done cheap, profitable and in a very short time. It was only to carry Pontiac till the Zeta arrived. But the Zeta was delayed not do to Lutz'e ideas but do to cost redesigns.

They were so short money the true duel exhaust and hood scoopes had to wait till the second year as GM had so little money avaiable they could not be done in 04.

The GTO did what it was ment to do Provide Pontiac with RWD performance ASAP, buy time till the Zeta came and not cost GM money. It did all three not counting placing the Zeta delay on Pontiac.

What was a failure was a GM system the killed the Firebird with no performance plan in place. Then they bring Lutz in to fix it but with what. No plans for a real perfomance car and no money to make one. Not many could have even pulled the Holden deal off or provide a RWD car any cheaper or faster. If he had not done this and waited for a Bird it would have never happend.

Edited by hyperv6
Posted
To be honest it was not a flop it just left some wanting more.

The facts are it made money even in low numbers.

Lutz came in and was faced with a division with no RWD performance and no plans or money to make one.

He looked to Holden and got it done cheap, profitable and in a very short time. It was only to carry Pontiac till the Zeta arrived. But the Zeta was delayed not do to Lutz'e ideas but do to cost redesigns.

They were so short money the true duel exhaust and hood scoopes had to wait till the second year as GM had so little money avaiable they could not be done in 04.

The GTO did what it was ment to do Provide Pontiac with RWD performance ASAP, buy time till the Zeta came and not cost GM money. It did all three not counting placing the Zeta delay on Pontiac.

What was a failure was a GM system the killed the Firebird with no performance plan in place. Then they bring Lutz in to fix it but with what. No plans for a real perfomance car and no money to make one. Not many could have even pulled the Holden deal off or provide a RWD car any cheaper or faster. If he had not done this and waited for a Bird it would have never happend.

Don't listen to hyperv6, he doesn't know his a$$ from a hole in the ground. Even Lutz said this car was a flop.

Link: http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti...p;rssfeed=rss01

The Old School GTO Boyz rejected this car, because it didn't look like a GTO, it looked like a Chevy Cavalier. They gave it the thumbs down and that was the beginning of the end for it, that and all the reasons Lutz stated above in the link ...

Posted
To be honest it was not a flop it just left some wanting more.

The facts are it made money even in low numbers.

Lutz came in and was faced with a division with no RWD performance and no plans or money to make one.

He looked to Holden and got it done cheap, profitable and in a very short time. It was only to carry Pontiac till the Zeta arrived. But the Zeta was delayed not do to Lutz'e ideas but do to cost redesigns.

They were so short money the true duel exhaust and hood scoopes had to wait till the second year as GM had so little money avaiable they could not be done in 04.

The GTO did what it was ment to do Provide Pontiac with RWD performance ASAP, buy time till the Zeta came and not cost GM money. It did all three not counting placing the Zeta delay on Pontiac.

What was a failure was a GM system the killed the Firebird with no performance plan in place. Then they bring Lutz in to fix it but with what. No plans for a real perfomance car and no money to make one. Not many could have even pulled the Holden deal off or provide a RWD car any cheaper or faster. If he had not done this and waited for a Bird it would have never happend.

Spot on, Hyper.

Posted

Lutz comments were at the release of the new G8 and were directed at the weak points that were clear to everyone. He also held a different veiw untill he had to change it to promote the new Zeta. Bob is not dumb and will do what it takes to move or promote a car.

"First, it was introduced at the end of a design cycle, making it seem dated despite never having been seen on these shores. It was also overpriced and poorly distributed (too many in the midwest, too few in SoCal, where the drift kids are).

2004 15,725

2005 11,069

2006 13,948

First, it was introduced at the end of a design cycle, making it seem dated despite never having been seen on these shores. It was also overpriced and poorly distributed (too many in the midwest, too few in SoCal, where the drift kids are). We're right on board with the Lutz These numbers were not far off from what was intended. The truth is the new Mustang coming out stole a lot of thunder with its styling and cheaper price.

A true failure is more like a Lincoln Backwood truck a few years back they only sold in the hundreds if I recall.

The bottom line is GM did not take a loss here and made money and sold 75% of the intended possible cars that could be imported. Some here who have a anti Holden bias and want you to only see what they want you to see. The GTO was not a perfecty plan but also was not a failure.

Also note most of these cars were never sold at massive discounts. Only a few of the remaining 06 cars were discounted much and not much at that. Today many lower mileage cars are still holding their value. The ones that are cheap are usally beat up pretty well.

Just for kicks the G8 sold in 2008 were 15,002 units. Not the intended 40,000 units they had hoped. 2009 units 15,691. I think the G8 fell farther below the number of expected sales but I would also not term the car a failure either. Just bad timing and planning by GM.

Posted

Sorry in the above comment I should have stated that 40,000 units for the G8 were possible. I believe Pontiac never expected it would sell that that many. But again because of the deal with Holden they still made money on tha car. Not a major investment into it on Pontiacs behalf and most of the burden of cost was on Holden.

To call the GTO and G8 a failure is a little harsh. The honest assesement is they were more of a disapointment than a total failure based on more than just product issues.

Posted
To call the GTO and G8 a failure is a little harsh. The honest assesement is they were more of a disapointment than a total failure based on more than just product issues.

They were failures, and because of it, both vehicles are dead in North America or soon will be ...

Posted
They were failures, and because of it, both vehicles are dead in North America or soon will be ...

At least they sold to enthusiasts, unlike the mediocre W-Grand Prix which was 77% fleet when it went out...

Rob

Posted
At least they sold to enthusiasts, unlike the mediocre W-Grand Prix which was 77% fleet when it went out...

Rob

Was that somehow supposed to hurt me? It didn't. I have the 07 Grand Prix GXP, 09 Solstice GXP targa, 09 G8 GXP and the 69 Pontiac A Body Custom-S. I have quite the nice little fleet ...

As for the rest of you who are Pontiac fans, as I am, I would suggest you get your Pontiac while you still can ...

Posted

>>"69 Pontiac A Body Custom-S"<<

??? Did you think that was part of the actual name ? Wierd way to name your car.

>>"I would suggest you get your Pontiac while you still can ..."<<

There will always be Pontiacs 'to get', esp for those that value 'real' Pontiacs. :wink:

Posted
Was that somehow supposed to hurt me? It didn't. I have the 07 Grand Prix GXP, 09 Solstice GXP targa, 09 G8 GXP and the 69 Pontiac A Body Custom-S. I have quite the nice little fleet ...

As for the rest of you who are Pontiac fans, as I am, I would suggest you get your Pontiac while you still can ...

They'll be plenty of Pontiacs for years which I can buy without giving money to GM, just as I can find Oldsmobiles today.

Quite frankly, I'm glad that you aren't at BMW anymore, as they may get my voting dollar... and I'd hate to think that my money ended up in your paycheck. You're return to GM is just another reason not to buy GM... the idea that GM has people on payroll actively trying to help snuff out any enthusiasm for their business is just mind-boggling.

Is this supposed to hurt you? No. I don't expect anything spineless to feel pain.

Posted
They'll be plenty of Pontiacs for years which I can buy without giving money to GM, just as I can find Oldsmobiles today.

Quite frankly, I'm glad that you aren't at BMW anymore, as they may get my voting dollar... and I'd hate to think that my money ended up in your paycheck. You're return to GM is just another reason not to buy GM... the idea that GM has people on payroll actively trying to help snuff out any enthusiasm for their business is just mind-boggling.

Is this supposed to hurt you? No. I don't expect anything spineless to feel pain.

Well that's a little harsh, a point of order, "I'm not on GM's payroll until September 1st!" :P

Posted
As for the rest of you who are Pontiac fans, as I am, I would suggest you get your Pontiac while you still can ...

Well, if I know you like I think I do, I better get off my a$$ and into my Pontiac dealer ASAP to see what deal they offer me on a 2009 Pontiac G8 V6 sedan. It will likely be my last chance to see if I can drive away in a brand new Pontiac :(

Posted

Hell we will have G3's for years to come with as many they have left.

There are only three Pontiacs built since the last bird worth having. As a Comp G owner I can't wait to trade it off in a year or so. Not a bad car but far from great. Good thing I got it new $10,000 off sticker it will help on the resale value loss.

Posted (edited)
They were failures, and because of it, both vehicles are dead in North America or soon will be ...

No, they were victims of GM misconduct and sabotage.

They, along with Solstice and Firebird, were the only Pontiacs worth a damn in the last two decades - who's fault is that ?

Edited by Camino LS6
Posted
No, they were victims of GM misconduct and sabotage.

They, along with Solstice and Firebird, were the only Pontiacs worth a damn in the last two decades - who's fault is that ?

No sabotage just failure of the old GM system to know or understand what to do with Pontiac.

Posted (edited)
See how naive he is Camino? You and I both know better ...

Ok Sabotage.... Who, What, Why, When, and Were? It ain't bragging if you can back it up. I would like to hear your smoking gun on the grassy noll version.

By the way I thought you also stated several times here that GM was going under in 3-5 years?

Why the new hitch?

Edited by hyperv6
Posted (edited)
3608062528_2de251258c.jpg

A new feud has sparked.

What fued? I just want to know what he view is on this. I tend to ignore most of his post so I may have missed what his thoughts on this were. I never really heard the sabotage angle.

As for his staying at GM I just wonder what changed his mind. He was telling us GM was going down and then tells us he is staying. I wonder if the future outlook good enough to convince him to stay.

Edited by hyperv6
Posted

It's easy to see Hyper, just look back to when these cars were introduced. Cross-reference that with GM press releases during the critical time of initial promotion for these then new models.

It becomes obvious quickly.

Those cars were actively campaigned against from within.

Posted (edited)
OK Sabotage.... Who, What, Why, When, and Where? It ain't bragging if you can back it up. I would like to hear your smoking gun on the grassy knoll version.

By the way I thought you also stated several times here that GM was going under in 3-5 years?

Why the new hitch?

First of all, I see Hooked on Phonics still isn't working for you, but hope springs eternal ... :P I fixed your spelling and grammar mistakes, see the words in bold.

I really don't have the time to take the uninitiated by the hand and point every little thing out to them. Check my post, everything I have ever said is there, my post speak for themselves and always will ... Some wise people here (you know who you are :smilewide: ) read everything I post two or three times to glean as much information as possible from them. For those that have the understanding, they are a gold mine ...

GM would have gone under if they didn't clean house as they just did, GMNA executives are leaving by the boatload as we speak, with most of them gone by October 1st. For a former GME employee, Detroit looks to me like Liberation day in Paris. One key factor for me to return to GM, (see I retired from GME) was the placement of almost every key position within GM, with GME employees. My official start date with the new General Motors Company is September 1st.

Wish me luck ... :P

Edited by PCS
Posted
It's easy to see Hyper, just look back to when these cars were introduced. Cross-reference that with GM press releases during the critical time of initial promotion for these then new models.

It becomes obvious quickly.

Those cars were actively campaigned against from within.

Sorry I did not consider that sabotage I just considered that the GM way of doing things and part of the broken system they were.

I guess we see the same thing but just call it different things.

The same thing happend in the P body program when the Vette people saw the new plans for the Fiero at a time they were worried about getting the go ahead for a C5. THey feared lost sales to a lower priced sports car would hurt their chances of approval. Also much of the same divsion infighting went on for years. Just look at Pontiac in the 60's.

I was told this face to face by John Schinella. "Chevy sells more cars so Chevy get more say". This was on a evening he was mad a John Middlebrook for not showing the 1990 Fiero. He showed me photos that were not to have been let out of GM. The Vette team working to finish off the Fiero was also confirmed by several other GM people who worked in the program at the end. I saw the paperwork for the last meeting and it was pretty much a done deal when they walked into the room. They let Pontiac present their plan then killed it once they were done.

Often Pontiac's short comings can be lead right back to Chevy.

Thanks for the reply and having character. While we may not always agree, you always have my respect!

Posted
What fued? I just want to know what he view is on this. I tend to ignore most of his post so I may have missed what his thoughts on this were. I never really heard the sabotage angle.

As for his staying at GM I just wonder what changed his mind. He was telling us GM was going down and then tells us he is staying. I wonder if the future outlook good enough to convince him to stay.

Ah we all get our turn to spar with PCS. I'll even go so far as to say that it's become something of an institution around here. The list of contenders runs a mile long. I'm on that list. Camino, even. Now you join the ranks, good sir.

As Camino said, Pontiac was ultimately left to rot and wither on the vine, was campaigned against and shot down by a large majority when it was a part of GM. The proof is there with every action GM made concerning Pontiac. It even runs so far as to after the cancellation of the Pontiac brand. Witness the back-and-forth debacle concerning what GM should do with Zeta/the G8 in North America.

He was telling us the Old GM was going down, and that it did. I don't want to speak for PCS (he'll do that himself should he feel the need to) but I would venture a guess that he considers the Old GM and the new General Motors Company two different entities. And he is ultimately right, although they seem to think quite similarly as far as I'm concerned.

Posted

Like I said Pontiac getting short changed was nothing new They have always had to fight for what they got over the year. It just got to the point there was too few people left to fight for them. The fight over the G8 was only the last in many Pontiac battles that can be documented over the years.

The Fiero fight was one of the worst. Not only did Pontiac go against many in GM to build the car. Pontiac sold their soul to the UAW in the Pontiac MI plant to build it. When GM pulled the car out from under them it left many bitter people on all sides even up to today. It took over 20 years before many would even talk much about it. One of the program managers I Know will still not say anything in public today because of what may be said to him by GM. He said he may speak out once he retires in a few years.

Even the Firebird fight in the 60's got very ugly too.

As for the list I'm not on the Dear John list, nor do I care to join. I have better things to do.

Posted
Sorry I did not consider that sabotage I just considered that the GM way of doing things and part of the broken system they were.

I guess we see the same thing but just call it different things.

The same thing happend in the P body program when the Vette people saw the new plans for the Fiero at a time they were worried about getting the go ahead for a C5. THey feared lost sales to a lower priced sports car would hurt their chances of approval. Also much of the same divsion infighting went on for years. Just look at Pontiac in the 60's.

I was told this face to face by John Schinella. "Chevy sells more cars so Chevy get more say". This was on a evening he was mad a John Middlebrook for not showing the 1990 Fiero. He showed me photos that were not to have been let out of GM. The Vette team working to finish off the Fiero was also confirmed by several other GM people who worked in the program at the end. I saw the paperwork for the last meeting and it was pretty much a done deal when they walked into the room. They let Pontiac present their plan then killed it once they were done.

Often Pontiac's short comings can be lead right back to Chevy.

Thanks for the reply and having character. While we may not always agree, you always have my respect!

And you have mine (as does PCS).

I just differ with both of you on philosophy, strategy, and priority when it comes to GM.

The mediocrity of the current "plan" and the persistence of political decision-making disgusts me.

The handling of Pontiac is a microcosm of all that is wrong with GM.

Posted
And you have mine (as does PCS).

I just differ with both of you on philosophy, strategy, and priority when it comes to GM.

The mediocrity of the current "plan" and the persistence of political decision-making disgusts me.

The handling of Pontiac is a microcosm of all that is wrong with GM.

I agree wholeheartedly.

Posted
The handling of Pontiac is a microcosm of all that is wrong with GM.

This we fully agree on. For GM to improve they need to change this. I hope with the office cleaning it will bring a better way of getting GM to work as a corperation and not just a bunch of divisions.

Everyone on the same page would solve a lot of issues. Family infighting is just not a good thing on any level.

Posted
This we fully agree on. For GM to improve they need to change this. I hope with the office cleaning it will bring a better way of getting GM to work as a corperation and not just a bunch of divisions.

Everyone on the same page would solve a lot of issues. Family infighting is just not a good thing on any level.

Some of the issues at Pontiac were no doubt due to dealers as well...weren't the rebadges (G3, G5, Torrent) just there to placate the dealers who wanted to compete w/ Chevy dealers?

With some polish, the G6 could have been a competitive product, I think..had interesting styling and a variety of body styles, unique within GM. And of course, the G8 and Solstice were great products...

Rob

Posted
Some of the issues at Pontiac were no doubt due to dealers as well...weren't the rebadges (G3, G5, Torrent) just there to placate the dealers who wanted to compete w/ Chevy dealers?

They supposedly were... but then again, GM should have made them (and made them competitive) in the first place. With the brands divided among dealerships as Chevy and BPG, BPG needs the G3 and G5 to fill the niche below the G6... its absurd to not have Pontiac, the affordable brand of BPG to have models in the subcompact range. As for the Torrent, I feel that if it was given some Pontiac swagger, it could have been an affordable alternative to the Cayenne.

Of course, now Buick-GMC dealers will pressure GM to make a G3 and G5 for Buick... once they recover from the dealership-closing-phobias Old GM inflicted.

Posted
It's easy to see Hyper, just look back to when these cars were introduced. Cross-reference that with GM press releases during the critical time of initial promotion for these then new models.

It becomes obvious quickly.

Those cars were actively campaigned against from within.

+1

Posted
First of all, I see Hooked on Phonics still isn't working for you, but hope springs eternal ... :P I fixed your spelling and grammar mistakes, see the words in bold.

I really don't have the time to take the uninitiated by the hand and point every little thing out to them. Check my post, everything I have ever said is there, my post speak for themselves and always will ... Some wise people here (you know who you are :smilewide: ) read everything I post two or three times to glean as much information as possible from them. For those that have the understanding, they are a gold mine ...

GM would have gone under if they didn't clean house as they just did, GMNA executives are leaving by the boatload as we speak, with most of them gone by October 1st. For a former GME employee, Detroit looks to me like Liberation day in Paris. One key factor for me to return to GM, (see I retired from GME) was the placement of almost every key position within GM, with GME employees. My official start date with the new General Motors Company is September 1st.

Wish me luck ... :P

What? You're coming back? When did I miss this? :mind-blowing::neenerneener:

Posted
They'll be plenty of Pontiacs for years which I can buy without giving money to GM, just as I can find Oldsmobiles today.

Quite frankly, I'm glad that you aren't at BMW anymore, as they may get my voting dollar... and I'd hate to think that my money ended up in your paycheck. You're return to GM is just another reason not to buy GM... the idea that GM has people on payroll actively trying to help snuff out any enthusiasm for their business is just mind-boggling.

Is this supposed to hurt you? No. I don't expect anything spineless to feel pain.

Isn't that a little childish and harsh?

I'm guessing you don't understand PCS, but grow up already.....

Posted
As for the Torrent, I feel that if it was given some Pontiac swagger, it could have been an affordable alternative to the Cayenne.

Are you serious?

Posted
Are you serious?

Quite. 80% of the performance and 80% of the quality for 40% of the price. Affordable alternative, not a exact match. Drop the height a bit, stiffen the suspension and drop in a LS4 or L76 and 6 speed manual.

I happen to like the Torrent better than the Equinox and the Chevy split horizontal grill.

Posted (edited)
Quite. 80% of the performance and 80% of the quality for 40% of the price. Affordable alternative, not a exact match. Drop the height a bit, stiffen the suspension and drop in a LS4 or L76 and 6 speed manual.

I happen to like the Torrent better than the Equinox and the Chevy split horizontal grill.

Maybe more like 5% of the quality... you ever seen the interior of a Cayenne? Worlds nicer than the Torrent.

Delusional thinking at best... it's a FWD/transverse V6 model, you can't just 'drop in a V8'...

Now if Caddy had done an SRX-v (1st gen SRX), that would have been a sweet Cayenne competitor.

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
Posted
Maybe more like 5% of the quality... you ever seen the interior of a Cayenne? Worlds nicer than the Torrent.

Yeah, just like the rest of the '05 era interiors. GM needing to improve interiors across the board is a given.

Delusional thinking at best... it's a FWD/transverse V6 model, you can't just 'drop in a V8'...

Its not delusional. Its engineering. Ist gen SRX has a V8... its an inch wider. Same with the Impala LS4. Saturn Vue has a 4 cylinder... its not a V-4 shorty. Granted, I have not pulled a theta apart and poked around with a tape measure. There are people putting V8s in Fieros and Solstices in their barn, I think ten highly paid engineers at GM could figure out how to put a V8 in a theta. I'll bet at some point in the future, somebody will.

Hmmm... *checks eBay for Torrent with blown engine*.

Now if Caddy had done an SRX-v (1st gen SRX), that would have been a sweet Cayenne competitor.

Yeah... at 80% of the price. You still get what you pay for... but average folks like some spice, as well.

Posted

Torrent as a Cayenne competitor, now thats the funniest thing I've read in a long time. The Torrent wasn't even an acceptable alternative to the Escape, CR-V or RAV-4, who in their right mind would consider a FWD Chevy w/cheap rebadge package competition for a Porsche?

Posted
Quite. 80% of the performance and 80% of the quality for 40% of the price. Affordable alternative, not a exact match. Drop the height a bit, stiffen the suspension and drop in a LS4 or L76 and 6 speed manual.

I happen to like the Torrent better than the Equinox and the Chevy split horizontal grill.

I have to say that it would be interesting..... :scratchchin:

Posted (edited)
There are people putting V8s in Fieros and Solstices in their barn, I think ten highly paid engineers at GM could figure out how to put a V8 in a theta. I'll bet at some point in the future, somebody will.

Meh...it would just be an average FWD CUV with a V8 stuffed in, horrible handling from being nose heavy. What is the point? I'm sure someone with enough tools and time could stuff a V8 into a Cobalt. Again, what's the point? Just a waste of effort. It would still be a sow's ear, so to speak.

Look at the V8 W-bodies...adding a V8 to a mediocre platform doesn't make it any less mediocre.

On the other hand, the V8 Trailblazer SS was pretty nicely done since it was designed for the engine, let down by the cheapo interior.

Rob

Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
Posted
Meh...it would just be an average FWD CUV with a V8 stuffed in, horrible handling from being nose heavy. What is the point? I'm sure someone with enough tools and time could stuff a V8 into a Cobalt. Again, what's the point? Just a waste of effort. It would still be a sow's ear, so to speak.

Look at the V8 W-bodies...adding a V8 to a mediocre platform doesn't make it any less mediocre.

On the other hand, the V8 Trailblazer SS was pretty nicely done since it was designed for the engine, let down by the cheapo interior.

Rob

Uh... I hate FWD... I would expect a V8 Torrent to start with an AWD version! Granted, its still FWD biased, but it seems that GM thinks this is the hot ticket for the new SRX.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search