Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Ford's hybrid tech was done completely in-house. They just copied Toyota's system and made a couple of modifications, it was just close enough that Ford and Toyota made an agreement so Toyota wouldn't sue.

Posted
>>"...the point i was emphasizing was to lament the once great and biggest carmaker in the world STILL having nothing to compete in one of the most relevant and significant segments in the world..."<<

Understood, but realize that this 'most relevent segment', as defined by unique-bodied hybrid vehicles, is basically populated by ONE car, and outside of that car, those manufacturers that even offer hybrids are all tied for second.

Perhaps if the U.S. Government had paid for 100% of the Volt's R&D, it'd have been out for the better part of a decade, too.

you're right. should i cut GM slack for not reaching pole position first? it isn't necessarily defined as unique-bodied hybrids, moreso i would view it as hybrid alternatives in the mainstream family car market. that would exclude crossovers since the biggest segments of the mainstream market are sedans. by those retrictions there are plenty of alternatives already offered though none with the impact and volume of prius. you're asking me to relax my standards, but knowing what GM is capable of in terms of engineering it baffles me the expenditures and wasted resources. GMT 900 hybrids? come on. their great pieces of engineering. how many are they going to build? what's the restriction of the price level in order to get into one? what limits is GM themselves imposing on production capacity?

GM needs a better PR unit. everyone is all hopped up on hybrid pills, so why didn't GM go ask for money a year ago to help them compensate for toyota's own government intervention in building the prius.

Posted
I'm not friends with any country. I did have a beer with Luxembourg one time.

I like Japanese beers, sushi, teryaki, etc. I've liked Japanese consumer electronics for decades--heck, my last 3 TVs have been Japanese (Sony, Toshiba, Sony), had a Toshiba laptop (ruined by Vista inside), and my home theatre gear is mostly Japanese (Sony, Yamaha). But I prefer Apple for my MP3 player and newest laptop.

Not a big fan of Japanese cars in general--too many FWD models, but I definitely understand their success and appeal in the US.

Posted
This thread is nothing more than bickering and name calling between 2 different viewpoints. What more can be said by either side?

you're disgusting. see now I've resorted to name calling and bickering.

Posted
you're disgusting. see now I've resorted to name calling and bickering.

Your face is like the face of a person whose face is not attractive.

Posted
Great, another world government conspiracy thread.

well how did you become king then?"

"The lady of the lake, her arms clad in shimmering Semite, held aloft Excalibur, signifying that I Arthur should be king."

"Listen. Strange ladies lying in pools distributing swords is no basis for government...."

"shut up!"

"...Supreme executive power comes from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony...."

"SHUT UP!"

"...Suppose I said I was emperor just cause some watery tart lobed a scimitar at me, why they'd lock me away."

(random Monty Pythonery)

Posted
I could eat sushi more often than Rosie O'Donnell. Liking ethnic food is not what we're talking about here, though. We are talking about a Japanese auto industry that is helped every step of the way by their government, even to the point of restricting imports from other countries. While we, as Americans, do nothing but tear down our home grown industries. We need to change, before it is too late, if it isn't already.
Posted
I could eat sushi more often than Rosie O'Donnell. Liking ethnic food is not what we're talking about here, though. We are talking about a Japanese auto industry that is helped every step of the way by their government, even to the point of restricting imports from other countries. While we, as Americans, do nothing but tear down our home grown industries. We need to change, before it is too late, if it isn't already.

we're alreadying propping them up and on the brink of announcing more money to them. should we teach them to ride thier bikes while we're at it? i love sushi too. tell them [GM] to make product as good as the best sushi and americans will start paying attention again.

Posted
I could eat sushi more often than Rosie O'Donnell. Liking ethnic food is not what we're talking about here, though. We are talking about a Japanese auto industry that is helped every step of the way by their government, even to the point of restricting imports from other countries. While we, as Americans, do nothing but tear down our home grown industries. We need to change, before it is too late, if it isn't already.

I'm with you Ocn, but the comic relief was working for me just now.

Or perhaps I'm just tired and should be sleeping.

Posted
Spontaneous meltdown of all seriousness.

Awesome.

EDIT: Well, almost.

yeah, when a thread has gone on and on round and round and jumped the shark, it's time to divert with some randomness and humour..... calling it a night, I think

Posted (edited)

amaenaideyo_spread.jpg

this'll get me a warning. there's some minimal connection to the humor already present in this thread. and of course a visceral connection.....................trust me i found this on a random search just now, not a hobbyism or anything....

Edited by turbo200
Posted

FWIW, there's absolutely no proof that development of the Prius was 100% funded by the Japanese government. When pressed on his comment, Jim Press clarified that the Japanese government supported battery R&D in general, citing it as an example of cooperation between government and industry - much like the billions already spent on fuel efficiency R&D by the US government (or the $7500 federal Volt tax credit).

This being the internet of course, rumors pass as fact - much like the CNW Marketing "report" that claimed a Hummer did less environmental harm than a Prius.

Posted

i just spent like ten minutes staring at that drawing. it's really....quite...beautifully.....drawn. and you best bow down on your knees in trembling at the offensiveness of my display, dodgeboy.

Posted
amaenaideyo_spread.jpg

this'll get me a warning. there's some minimal connection to the humor already present in this thread. and of course a visceral connection.....................trust me i found this on a random search just now, not a hobbyism or anything....

After seeing that, I forgot the point of this thread....

Posted
The Prius has a mega-warranty on all the really expensive stuff, so the really deep pockets wont be a factor for a long time.

They're here, they're going to be here for a long, long time, get used to it. Quit being so sore that GM missed the boat.

Yea I guess the warranty wouldn't matter too much anyway. Most people will buy a new car every 2-5 years anyway I guess. Now if someone had planned on keeping it then they might have to fork out some money later on, but I can't imagine many people keeping this car FOREVER. They are just throw away cars. As for GM missing the boat I really don't care. They always miss it anyway when it comes to making a car like this. What GM does good at (Sports Cars & Trucks) is what I buy so I don't give a rats ass about 70 MPG lol! Plus I only go 4 miles to work and back so I don't need much gas anyway.

Posted

Sports cars and trucks dont pay the bills. If you need proof of that, just look at the last decade.

We'll probably keep the Prius 4 more years, just depends on circumstances.

Posted
You don't know what you're missing! :AH-HA_wink:

Yeah I do, but if I were driving the little Blue Bugger in the garage every morning, I'd never get to work.

Posted
Sports cars and trucks dont pay the bills. If you need proof of that, just look at the last decade.

We'll probably keep the Prius 4 more years, just depends on circumstances.

Not completely true. If it were not for the money GM made on trucks, they would probably have gone bankrupt a long time ago. GM wanted to sell trucks, because of profit, but needed to sell cars because of CAFE.

And Porsche is doing pretty good with just sports cars and a truck. Don't they control VW now?

I get your point though, because GM is not Porsche. There's not really much GM can do at this point to pay the bills though. They need to get people to buy their cars at higher prices. I think that's the only thing that can save any of the big 3.

Posted

That's the problem tough, for years all of the money has gone to trucks and SUVs and the cars were half assed products at best. Because of this imbalance, when the market shifted away from big trucks to smaller cars and crossovers, GM was left with good trucks and crappy cars compared to much of the competition. Chrysler and Ford are guilty of this too. However Ford at least is showing a real move to balancing out its portfolios.

Posted

"Driven: The 70-MPG 2010 Toyota Prius"

It's not a 70-MPG car; it's a 50-MPG car. I like how the journalist drives on a short 33 mile loop and returns 69.5 mpg based on the MPG meter, then thinks he can spread lies like that. Oh wait, I forgot, the Prius is the original media darling.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search