Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051110/bs_nm/autos_gm_shares_dc

DETROIT (Reuters) - Shares of General Motors Corp. (NYSE:GM - news) fell more than 6 percent on Thursday, spiraling to a 23-year low, after Banc of America Securities warned of an increased risk of bankruptcy at the financially struggling auto giant.

The stock's decline -- which could add to pressure on Chairman and Chief Executive Rick Wagoner to launch a more aggressive revival plan for the automaker -- also came after it said late on Wednesday that it had overstated financial results for 2001 by as much as $400 million.

GM said the accounting error stemmed from the way it booked credits from suppliers. The accounting for credits from suppliers was one of the reasons GM was recently targeted for investigation by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the company said.

In a note to clients, Banc of America analyst Ron Tadross said he was cutting his target price on GM to $16 from $18.

Citing "increasing evidence that hidden liabilities exceed hidden assets" at GM, Tadross also said he was raising its risk of bankruptcy over the next two years to 40 percent from 30 percent.

"Existing liquidity may only be enough to get through a bankruptcy reorganization," Tadross said.

GM shares were down $1.68, or 6.78 percent, at $22.96 in mid-morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange after falling to a 13-year low on Wednesday.

The Detroit-based Old Economy icon has lost about $3 billion this year as it grapples with high health-care and commodities costs, a steady erosion of U.S. market share and sputtering sales of big sport utility vehicles, its longtime cash cows, due to high gasoline prices.
Posted
Just pull a Chrysler "Lee Iacoca" already before another brand bites the dust! :angry:
Posted
Being that I work in the accounting industry (and have for 11 years), I can shed a little bit of light in this area. Actg firms woo large clients by showing them large cost savings that can be had by various accounting "strategies" (I've actually seen a pitch for one of the non-domestic automotive giants, promising tax savings of $110m/year) -- (they bit on that, btw). Basically, your actg firms were playing fast and loose with the rules, all in a race to pitch themselves to large companies. This is largely why we now have the Sarbannes-Oxley stuff.
Posted

Being that I work in the accounting industry (and have for 11 years), I can shed a little bit of light in this area.  Actg firms woo large clients by showing them large cost savings that can be had by various accounting "strategies" (I've actually seen a pitch for one of the non-domestic automotive giants, promising tax savings of $110m/year) -- (they bit on that, btw).  Basically, your actg firms were playing fast and loose with the rules, all in a race to pitch themselves to large companies.  This is largely why we now have the Sarbannes-Oxley stuff.

[post="41472"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


Yup. He's right. Accounting is very subjective, and there are a lot of things firms can do "legitimately" to make themselves look better for investors or worse for tax breaks depending on the situation.
Posted
http://www.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=13795

General Motors on Wednesday said it will restate its financial statements for 2001 because they were overstated by about $300 million to $400 million.

Accounting errors led to the wrong figures for net income from continuing operations, which were overstated by about 25 to 35 percent,

GM in its filing also said it will restate financial statements for periods after 2001 that may be affected by the erroneous accounting.


Ooops Oh yeah "Errors" Made the stock look good.
They were pounding out those huge dividends the whole time.
Posted
As far as GM is concerned, they were errors. The accounting firm is the one responsible for using deceptive and sneaky accounting "rules." Rules is a huge misnomer in accounting, though. It's more like "practices" because the rules are very bendable.
Posted
*cautiously raises eyebrow*

Wait ... let me get this straight ... an accounting error has produced the most-recent problem at GM?

Hmm...if that's the case, is it possible that the "beancounters" have been wrong the last few years in dictating which vehicles are axed and which vehicles are produced by GM?

Hmph.

What _else_ could go wrong?


Cort, "Mr MC" / "Mr Road Trip", 32swm/pig valve/pacemaker
MC:family.IL.guide.future = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort/
Models.HO = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort/trainroom.html
"It's a no-win situation" ... Michael Bolton ... 'How Can We Be Lovers?'

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search