Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think the title is self explanatory.

Feel free to post anything pre-1945,

Although I've always felt that a true

Pre-War car is 1939 or earlier.

I mean wouldn't a 1942 Chevy be a

Mid-WW2 car? My brain hurtz now.

-----

5o5bp5.jpg

2zi0t55.jpg

1936hudsonstraight8bycohu7.jpg

19392balfa2bromeo2btipoaz1.jpg

193738pontiacsa0.jpg

Posted
Posted

Wow... talk about good DEAL$.

1901oldsmobilecurveddaset9.jpg

w600.png

Posted

Sixty Eight,

The last time I went to the New Hope auto show, I specifically got these shots for you. They were lost on a dead laptop for a while, but I recently recovered them. So here ya go:

Ultra rare Lincoln. Aluminum body. Was a barn find. One of a very very small number.

IMG_1082.jpg

IMG_1115.jpg

This was the best car of the show for multiple reasons....

IMG_1104.jpg

IMG_1118.jpg

IMG_1094.jpg

Hot Packard

IMG_1091.jpg

IMG_1093.jpg

Buicks

IMG_1097.jpg

IMG_1112.jpg

Jaguar. Don't know the year, but looks pre-war enough.

IMG_1105.jpg

I have more that you'll like, but they aren't pre-war. :neenerneener:

Posted

Wow... that V16 Cadillac is just gorgeous. Thank You.

Looks like either a '30 or '31.

The Packard, 1928? Buick Rumbeseat Roadster

& late 1920s Packard are quite stunning as well.

The photo of the '38 Buick makes me regret, for

about the 3,000th time in recent months that I

did not buy that running/driving '38 Buick Sedan

that was for sale a few years back for $2,800.

The Lincoln's headlighs are awkward, the grille

says late 1930s but the headlights, nice as they

are with their reverse teardrop covers, say 1941.

Same reason I always find Pierce Arrows, even

the really stunning ones, slighty awkward. The

headlights belong inboard on pre-war cars.

The Jaguar is quite interesting, not my cup of tea

but nice. Just make sure Balthazar does not see

it, those recesed grilles are not to his liking. :P

That "Jaguar" prob. still wears the pre-war "SS"

(Swallow Sidecar) identification.

Posted

>>"Ultra rare Lincoln. Aluminum body. One of a very very small number."<<

I know where there's an aluminum-bodied '33 Model KB V-12- gorgeous restoration. Not sure which model it is, but the owner tells me there were only 15 originally built.

>>"Jaguar. Don't know the year, but looks pre-war enough."<<

Well -snif- being it's a jag, and all that that stylistically implies.... could be a '73. :P

>>"The Lincoln's headlights are awkward, the grille says late 1930s but the headlights, nice as they are with their reverse teardrop covers, say 1941."<<

Agreed. In actuality, that's a Model K, largely unchanged '36-39. Same guy who owns the '33 has a '39 limo. I love the whole face of this gen Model K, including the headlights. If they were not so well integrated, I could see an arguement against them, like -as you mentioned- the Pierce-Arrow's.

>>"Just make sure Balthazar does not see it, those recesed grilles are not to his liking."<<

Well, they are aesthetically idiotic.

Posted
>>"Jaguar. Don't know the year, but looks pre-war enough."<<

Well -snif- being it's a jag, and all that that stylistically implies.... could be a '73. :P

LOL thanks! I got a chuckle out of that!

Posted
Posted

That '27 Chevy is awesome too!!! :)

Posted

The Bugatti 57G: Where to begin...? It's a plethora of "cheap" & "poor execution" :yuck:

As far as the most aerodynamic car of its era being the

Rumpler Tropfenwagen, I would argue a few others,

but Balthazar has done it already done so with the

Dymaxion & Scarab...

Posted (edited)

An offbeat independent I hope to own some day is a 1934-1935 Hupmobile Aerodynamic Eight:

34hupmobile.jpg

Edited by XP715
Posted

The Hupmobile is gorgeous but too modern for me.

Headlights should be on pods. :P

36plymjn6.jpg

Posted

LoL @ WMJ. That Chevy is awesome, it also has more glass

than my house, reminds of British Phone Booth.

72788156lp3.jpg

Posted

one of my favorite cars of all time, second only perhaps

to the Tiger Hunt V16, this is the Red Devil!

1931_Cadillac_V16_red.jpg

LoL :)

00_Prop-drive.jpg

Here's some of my own photos from car shows of the past few years.

DSCN6830.jpg

DSCN6832.jpg

DSCN6831.jpg

DSCN7274.jpg

DSCN7247.jpg

DSCN7155.jpg

DSCN7162.jpg

DSCN7217.jpg

DSCN7262.jpg

Posted

Hahahaha-ha! :spin:

I know exactly where THIS thread is going now, &

after much arguing some smarta$$, (trying to help?)

will inevitably post:

"Twin-Propeller drive > front or rear propeller drive."

(Is the Cessna SkyMaster the equivalent of Areal AWD?)

foto102gvw4.jpg

------

.

.

.

.

l

Since you mentioned it, here's a REAR-propeller drive car,

although it's only "pre-war" if you're talking Desert Storm

or the Falkland Islands War. :smilewide:

avemizarns1.jpg

w330.png

Posted

Gotta love the Submarine shaped Alfa.

As far as the 57G.... uh, where do I start, it's the ANTITHESIS of the Atlantic.

For one thing the stone guards on the headlights look like a redneck with two

weeks in high school shop class experience made them with a rusty sawzall

& a $250 welder from wal*mart.

the body is a blob, the mini-windshield is useless and while it would correct on

a teen's or twenty's spartan race car it looks dumb on this.

And an exotic car/race car should NOT have chicken wire for a grille. :alcoholic:

(just MHO) :soapbox:

Posted

The 57C is very crude, it's true. All that could & probably should be excused when the vehicle in question is a purpose-built race car... just don't hold it up as a thing of beauty (which it wasn't). That wasn't asked for in the opening post. I for one don't find the 57C either beautiful or interesting, even among race cars.

I recall the early '60s Pontiac stock cars- they wrapped the acrylic steering wheel rims with electrical tape and fashioned a crude upholstered bolster mounted on a bent metal tube, coming up on the inside of the factory bucket seat, to keep the driver in place. Factory stuff was beautiful, but the race car modifications were, yes, crude. 2 different purposes, tho.

Posted

True, I just felt like stating my opinion.

Max Balchowsky's cars used to kick a$$ & take names,

yet they were very rudimentary, ultra-spartan & hand

built using junkyard parts. That's cool, I know Buick

provided him with motors but he still was a one-man

operation, well, one man & one dog primarily. :spin:

But this is BUGATTI we're talking about. You'd think

they had a better budget after building all those over

the top exotic cars. Although I guess producing six

Royalles but only selling two for almost-profit might

have hurt them bad enough financially to have laid-off

their entire design staff for a few years. Har-har.

Posted

This car always fascinated me, especially the back wheels.

1938mercedesbenzg4sr1.jpg

1938 Mercedes Benz G4 (as in 4WD). Note the 4 rear wheels on 2 axles.

Only 38 of these were ever produced, primarily for the upper military elite of the 3rd Reich. One was given to Italian dictator Benito Mussolini, and others were used in the occupation of Austria and Czechoslovakia. After the war, they were used in fire brigades.

Posted

Yes, the 57G is rather crude being a purpose built race car, but I love the overall shape of it- one of the first single bow designs on a car- and of course I appreciate any car that has been designed with aerodynamics in mind (regardless of how effective it is in that regard.) With some refinements I think it would've made a great, modern looking road car.

Posted

There's another very unappealing car. Very poor continuity.

It's like a Kit Car made in China based on a genric design that

is trying to emulate a 1980s Morgan, 1970s Triumph & modern

Aston Martin all at once. That thing makes a Solstice Targa

look like a Cobra Daytona by comparison. :blink:

Posted

Sorry my honesty comes off insulting, but I'd thather have

a Hyundai Pony than that thing... it honestly looks like a

Chinese attempt at a Corvette or Viper.

Posted
Posted

Hey WMJ:

Are you sure that's not a spy shot of the upcoming Chinese made

2011 "Aerodynamical Efficient Quoting" by Red Flag Motors? :P

Posted (edited)

pffft- the Stationette owns the Martinette up & down (but it's a '48).

-- -- -- -- --

'41 Chrysler Thunderbolt retractable coupe - 6 built :

1941_Chrysler_Thunderbolt_Show_Car-Daiml

1937 Hunt House Car :

Copy_of_Hunt_housecar_web.jpg

1937%20Hunt%20Housecar%205.JPG

Edited by balthazar
Posted
Posted
Posted
I still wouldn't turn my nose up at it ...

Yeah, reupholster the seats, ditch the lameo steering wheel, get some wide whites on wires, and that would be a sweet weekend car show toy.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search