Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

this is sad. my 83 buick had an antenna that was detachable... and could be a pointer or a temporary weapon, till it got bent.

Posted (edited)

I always liked the look of the rear mounted antenna, seemed to look classy.

I've heard the word aerial used sometimes, but seems very rare.

Edited by HarleyEarl
Posted
Where's balthy? He could answer your question. I always thought one of them was a "dummy", and was put on just for symmetry and cool looks. I could be wong.
Posted

I once saw a radio shop worker install a factory radio in a '59 Chevy that originally had none. He had to drill a hole in the body for the antenna. He looked like he was going to crap himself as he brought drill to metal! :smilewide:

In the other bay of the shop at the time was a late '50s Thunderbird, it was quite odd to walk in and see the two of them like that.

Posted

I've had many Cutlasses, but I do remember one of them, the '74 had the antenna in the windshield. I've read that they had reception problems. I don't ever recall having any issues with it. And then GM stopped making them. Now they are coming back and it's like wow, what a great idea. GM was there 30 years ago.

Posted
Whoa, a trivia question: when did GM first start with the windshield antennae? '69? '70? '71? I don't bemember.
Posted

Do you recall, GM got the rear mounted antenna bug back in the 80s and moved it there I believe on every vehicle except trucks. Even today you see it out back on the Cobalt.

Ford seemed to stay with front right fender, 'American' placement.

Chrysler had some rear mounts, as I recall.

And Euros, seemed to either have rear or roof mounted. You see more and mroe American cars with roof mount. Like the HHR has it in a very classic top of windsheld position. Early American cars sometimes had it there.

The occasional model would have it on the driver's side, it always seemed strange to my eye.

And the Japanese, most often they had it on the front pillar.

Posted

Do you recall, GM got the rear mounted antenna bug back in the 80s and moved it there I believe on every vehicle except trucks. Even today you see it out back on the Cobalt.

Ford seemed to stay with front right fender, 'American' placement.

Chrysler had some rear mounts, as I recall.

And Euros, seemed to either have rear or roof mounted. You see more and more American cars with roof mount. Like the HHR has it in a very classic top of windsheld position. Early American cars sometimes had it there.

The occasional model would have it on the driver's side, it always seemed strange to my eye.

And the Japanese, most often they had it on the front pillar.

Posted

Blu, forgot about the Solstice/Sky twins.....strangest placement of the antenna. Did they do this for anticipated coolness? Which didn't really play out.

Posted
Where's balthy? He could answer your question. I always thought one of them was a "dummy", and was put on just for symmetry and cool looks. I could be wong.

I'm prettty sure they were both functional on the

GMs... why NOT have them be functional? Sure, I

love the look, but if one is not wired in than that's

juststupid and lazy... back in the 1950s & 1960s,

GM was NOT lazy, it was not a hollow shell of its'

former self like today. <_<

---

Now as far as the windshield mounted Antena, my

buddy's '79 Citation and a few of the cars I have

owned and/or driven with them 'recepted' just fine.

Posted
Do you recall, GM got the rear mounted antenna bug back in the 80s and moved it there I believe on every vehicle except trucks. Even today you see it out back on the Cobalt.

Ford seemed to stay with front right fender, 'American' placement.

Chrysler had some rear mounts, as I recall.

And Euros, seemed to either have rear or roof mounted. You see more and more American cars with roof mount. Like the HHR has it in a very classic top of windsheld position. Early American cars sometimes had it there.

The occasional model would have it on the driver's side, it always seemed strange to my eye.

And the Japanese, most often they had it on the front pillar.

LH cars, at least the 2nd gens (not sure about the first gens) had the rear mounted antennas. I like the look better than those mounted on the fender.

Posted
I've had many Cutlasses, but I do remember one of them, the '74 had the antenna in the windshield. I've read that they had reception problems. I don't ever recall having any issues with it. And then GM stopped making them. Now they are coming back and it's like wow, what a great idea. GM was there 30 years ago.

Yeah, a great idea until the windshield gets broken and replacement cost is three times what a normal windshield goes for. Hope you got glass insurance!

And speaking of Cutlasses, my '77 had a windshield antenna as well :smilewide:

Posted

My '78 98 had the windshield antenna and got normal AM/FM reception as far as I can recall. My '79 88 has the optional power antenna mounted on the right front fender.

Posted

From Chevrolet's Hot Ones 1955 - 1956 - 1957 (talking about a hypothetical sales situation):

"The salesoman was warming up to this buyer, so he took him over to the Bel Air on the showroom floor and demonstrated the Wonder Bar radio and left rear antenna ($112.00). The buyer was all smiles, so the salesman suggested a matching dummy right rear antenna ($6.95) to give a sleek and balanced look."

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search