Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/candi...008gensbs.shtml

supposedly the d's and r's were to busy to fill out the paper work to be on the ballot, for president.

while the lounge rule #2 is being discussed by admins...try to stay objective.

my comment. if it stays this way... this will only be bad for d's and r's

if this changes, just showing the laxness this culture has become with rules/laws.

otherwise this might just shake up the political atmosphere in a good way.

Posted

If thats what the ballot looks like in November, we're in for quite a ride, since neither major party candidate is an eligible write-in, Texas' electoral votes would go to Barr almost by default.

Posted
Uhm, up until today Obama was the presumptive nominee. McCain still is a presumptive.

are you implying they have...a pass?

I'm SURE it will be adjusted. If McCain doesn't/can't win Texas, the race is over now.

that is a good chance, but polls have not shown a post veep jump.

Posted

I didn't see any article or anything accopanying this. Just the table on the Texas' SOS website.

So...are you sure the parties haven't already done the paperwork and the website just has not been updated yet? Or maybe they're holding out until after the conventions to make it seem "official"?

Posted
are you implying they have...a pass?

that is a good chance, but polls have not shown a post veep jump.

I wasn't commenting on who was going to win... I was simply adding up the electoral votes if McCain can't get Texas due to a FUBAR like this.

Posted
I didn't see any article or anything accopanying this. Just the table on the Texas' SOS website.

So...are you sure the parties haven't already done the paperwork and the website just has not been updated yet? Or maybe they're holding out until after the conventions to make it seem "official"?

it's very possible, but if they don't show up by sept, i would think they were late....?

but also, you would think that if what was needed was given to the proper place, it should show up quickly...and since only if something happens before nov, would their names have to be changed, or however that works.

Posted (edited)

Wierd. I'm sure it's just that the website hasn't been updated.. if the 2 main party candidates weren't going to be on the ballot in the 3rd (4th?) largest state, it would be all over the national media by now....

Edited by moltar
Posted

Just stumbled upon something similar from 2004. Bush wasn't officially the candidate before the deadline to get on the ballot in Alabama, yet he won the state by 26%. So this is, indeed, nothing.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search