Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm surprised Bush didn't upgrade to a Hummer based limo a few years back..would have been appropriate for the 'War President', and put sponsor decals on it like a NASCAR--decals for Halliburton, Blackwater, Exxon, etc. . :)

Edited by moltar
Posted

Actually - Obama would have a ZIL 41047 for the state limo.

Posted
OK can we just cut all bull$h! and get back to the car. :rolleyes:

OK: It's fugly!!! Couldn't they make something functional yet elegant for a President's limo? Presidents deserve style too :P

Posted

They slapped an Escalade front and the tired STS rear on it? This thing is pathetic.

Posted
OK: It's fugly!!! Couldn't they make something functional yet elegant for a President's limo? Presidents deserve style too :P

Agreed.

If I was stuck with that job, I'd want an armored version of the Sixteen.

Posted
Still ugly. Why do they bother trying to make it look like a Cadillac?

Exactly, the damn A-pillar is as thick as a medium sugar maple tree.

Just throw the armor on a H2, it will look less awkward.

Better yet just give him a freekin APC with an Escalade

grille, a 5-foot wide Cadillac-style LED CHiMSL, 22 inch

rims & call it a day!

The story of how Lincoln got the Whit House contract

for a few decades by default as a result of the Truman

Dewey debacle is an interesting one. I, for one, am

happy the commander in Chielf has a Caddy, not some

tarted up Fordproduct... if only on paper.

Posted
Agreed.

If I was stuck with that job, I'd want an armored version of the Sixteen.

F*** yeah! ....but still a true pillarless hardtop.

Now that would be funny... seeing interlocking glass

that's 5" thick and designed to gell & catch armored

piercing rounds and yet its got to also seal in terms

of weather sealing & also dropp down into the doors!

Hell yesh! :spin:

Posted

Say what you will 68 but I still think this would make a bitchin' Presidential Limo

Lincoln-Continental-Concept-008.jpg

In fact I'd buy one too because I'm in love with the looks of the 1961-64 Continental (it's my favorite design) and would kill for anything styled to evoke it. Unfortunately all I get to satisfy me is the front end of the MKX Crossover (:huh:)

Posted

Oh the '61-64 Continentals are among my favorite FoMoCo cars

and def. my favorite post-WWII Lincolns. That concept was just

a little too soft but still very nice overall, too bad Lincoln will

never actually build anyhing worth buying. The Town Car, even

last year was still a relevant and nice product but it should have

cost about $12,000 less than what Ford was tryting to get for

them.... for krissake the damn car has barelly had an update in

10+ years and the chassis makes the W-body look "new-ish" by

comparison, which is scary.

If someone, Ford OR GM made the investment to design a BOF

car ground up with todays technology as far as hydroforming,

crumple zones, side impact & rollover protection they could

REALLY have something special. Now that gas is $4/gallon even

that 1.5% chance that GM would bring back the B-body is dead.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
Posted

i have to say, seeing the car on TV today it looked great. It was very substantial and had a nice wide stance to it. It looked like a truck disguised as a car, exactly what it is, which I think is cool.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search