Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Link to Article

The court documents say GM is seeking C$250,000 from the union local, as well as from each of the five named union members, saying they have "unlawfully blocked and delayed GMC employees and vehicles from entering and exiting the Oshawa facility."
Edited by BigPontiac
Posted

This is getting a lot of press around here. The CAW is having a hissy fit. What is GM supposed to do? Wave a magic wand and make people buy crew cab Silverados? The posers are the first to bail out of the truck market when things get tough! Even if GM has plans to put something else in the plant, that won't happen over night.

In the meantime, it gives GM a chance to kick Hargrove in the balls while he retires! :smilewide:

Posted
This is getting a lot of press around here. The CAW is having a hissy fit. What is GM supposed to do? Wave a magic wand and make people buy crew cab Silverados?

usually i'd agree, but in this case I'm with the CAW. GM bargained in bad faith and deserve to be penalized severely

Posted
usually i'd agree, but in this case I'm with the CAW. GM bargained in bad faith and deserve to be penalized severely

Since we don't really know what was or was not said around the bargaining table (what do all those suits go on about for days and weeks on end anyway?), how can we know how much 'bad faith' there really is.

I suspect a dying union is posturing for optics here and GM is posturing to get more money out of Queens Park and Ottawa, which seems to be happening.

But in any event, the 50% rise in the $C over the past two years and the collapse of the 'poser' truck market has doomed the crew cab production anyway. That is something that CAW cannot change, so the rest is just mere whining.

Posted

What are these people thinking? Why should GM employee them indefinitely to either sit around an idle plant or make cars that sit in a parking lot?

Posted

What does the CAW expect GM to do with trucks they build that that no one wants now? Of course, it's possible that GM could redo the plant to be flexible like Toyota's plants...that would cost big money but would be beneficial in the long run.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search