Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
this seems more of a lowered SRX type crossover then a true useful wagon... it looks real hot, but like Camino said, a bit small

Interesting... To me it looks like a wagon.

EDIT - I mean wagon in the sense of the new Commodore wagon, not 1970's Ford LTD wagons.

Re size, my guess is this will be 5-Series sized just like the Sedan is.

Edited by ZL-1
Posted

hot.....and based in reality. the saab effect is there in c-pillar along with the raising beltline, but that's no problem as it looks distinct, and that effect works well on the Saab and also works well with the C-pillar design here. the raised beltline even works better with a wagon shape than the sedan. this will look really good, better than the sedan imo.

Posted
Geez, save the Saab taillights for the Saab vehicles.

If you look closely, the taillights have that minifin look that the Provoq concept had, all the way from top to bottom.

Posted

I don't think the roof-to-bumper taillights work very well here, but the rest looks good.

Posted

Although it's executed better than any other wagon that uses this treatment, I pray Cadillac will not follow suit by running the taillights all the way up to the roof. Pointless & too 'me-too'.

Posted

I really doubt the blind spot is going to be that big. I guess this is for SRX owners who bought it for being a sporty wagon, while the BRX will be for SRX owners who bought it because it can haul a family around.

Posted

If you look closely you can see the way the fins go across the roof.

I don't think they could have pulled that off with out making the tail lights go all the way up

And seeing how the fins are now Cadillacs new design trend, again, i think it is totally justified.

It looks very good.

Posted (edited)

They won't do it. They didn't do it for the SRX, they won't do it for the CTS wagon. I also fully expect it to have a more traditional greenhouse.

Edited by Croc
Posted
They won't do it. They didn't do it for the SRX, they won't do it for the CTS wagon. I also fully expect it to have a more traditional greenhouse.

They seem to be doing it with the Provoq/BRX and the CTS coupe. Why not the wagon?

Posted
this seems more of a lowered SRX type crossover then a true useful wagon... it looks real hot, but like Camino said, a bit small

That's pretty much what the SRX was... a CTS wagon with a crossover suspension.

Now if they DO make an AWD version to replace the SRX and compete with the Allroad and XC70, that would be interesting.

Posted

the greenhouse is the exact same from the sedan. at least that element I don't expect will change for the production version. I really like the taillights and hope these actually reflect the production model, as the article strongly claims to. a lot of the illustrations/depictions for past GM cars have been accurate, and I don't see how Cadillac's best interest would be served in keeping with the SRX design theme.

Posted

I think it is beautiful! Finally a domestic wagon that's actually worth a damn! And I like the taillights very much. Who thought that the Cadillac fins would find a modern interpretation on a 21st century wagon? Now, if only I can afford one when I graduate, I might be supplementing the Jeep with one of these instead of replacing it with another Grand Cherokee!

Posted
2.9D and a 6spd. would be sweet. Love the rear window too. A good looking sedan makes a better looking coupe and hell even a good looking wagon.

QFT

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search