Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone else remember these? The pace, the music, the consistency, the slogans all made for much better car commercials back in the 80s than now. "Oh What a Feeling" with the actor jumping in the air and naming the model made you remember the car. Now it's some lame voiceover reminding you they're "Moving Forward." Snooze. Same with Ford, Chevy, etc. BTW, Dan Gurney's effort for the Celica and Supra was terrific. There's only one I could find.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9Z4G8lQuXy4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qLhiDx4w_U&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMqmZZfxtYM...feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0PqBNkaAxw...feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pG4GunUCAJs

Posted

LoL... "...Ohhhhh, what a felling, Toyota!" FRONT WHEEL DRIVE, 16 Valve FUEL-INJECTED!

I like how little things like that we take for granted on today's cars were made into a big deal. I guess those cars were ahead compared to the competition at the time.

Posted (edited)

If you weren't around in the late 70s-early 80s it's hard to imagine now how far ahead Toyota was back then. While GM was stumbling with X-car rust, brakes, and general $h!iness, Toyota was cranking out electronic fuel-injected, SOHC and DOHC Supras and Cressidas with untouchable reliability, smoothness and near-European handling. 5-speeds, 4-speed O/D automatics, and independent rear suspensions were common throughout the lineup too. The DOHC 16-valve Corollas were WAY ahead of their time for their size/price class. DOHC back then was, to put it mildly, exotic. The Alfa Romeo Spider had it but it was an ancient application even then. Meanwhile, GM competed with pushrod 4 cylinders and Ford with wheezy, unreliable vacuum-hosed challenged Escorts and Lynxs. Toyotas didn't hit the big sales numbers back then because they were priced a little higher because of Reagan's voluntary import quotas and no American assembly until NUMMI. GM and Ford have made HUGE strides compared to then. Still, all car advertising sucks now comparatively.

LoL... "...Ohhhhh, what a felling, Toyota!" FRONT WHEEL DRIVE, 16 Valve FUEL-INJECTED!

I like how little things like that we take for granted on today's cars were made into a big deal. I guess those cars were ahead compared to the competition at the time.

Edited by buyacargetacheck
Posted

The Celica, the Supra, the MR2... proof that at one time Toyotas could be fun. Too bad they've switched to vanilla in the interest of taking over the world.

I especially like that red Celica in the first ad. It's like a Quattro, only more reliable and arguably better looking.

Posted
The Celica, the Supra, the MR2... proof that at one time Toyotas could be fun. Too bad they've switched to vanilla in the interest of taking over the world.

I especially like that red Celica in the first ad. It's like a Quattro, only more reliable and arguably better looking.

I just wish there were more around that haven't been driven/rusted to death.

Posted

The Mark IIIs were great cars. I had an '87 Turbo stick non-sport roof that I got rid of at 160+K miles. Very smooth and sneaky fast. Funny that it was roundly criticized for being heavy at 3500 pounds, in-line with a similar car today. The turbo never gave me any trouble but the valve cover gaskets were starting to leak and the cooling system needed work. As an aside, I was looking at tire prices on-line today. I remember buying replacements for the 225/50VR16 Goodyear Gatorback Eagles back in the late 80s and early 90s that came with that car. $200+ per tire was not unusual. Now you can get an excellent Kumho for a fraction of the price that's as good or better. There's definitely been no inflation in the price of tires over the last 20 years.

I'm gonna bite the bullet and just say it, I love my old Toyotas...

Late/mid 80's:

Posted

Quite a car for the time. Ventilated disc brakes, 4-wheel independent suspension, OHC, EFI, 4 speed auto if you wanted. The autos were even electronically controlled at least in the Supras. The interior design of those cars would hold up in a new car today. Ahead of its time.

The Celica, the Supra, the MR2... proof that at one time Toyotas could be fun. Too bad they've switched to vanilla in the interest of taking over the world.

I especially like that red Celica in the first ad. It's like a Quattro, only more reliable and arguably better looking.

Posted

lol, You need not describe the pros and cons of owning a MKIII to me. I've seen it all. Infact I currently have only 300 miles on a fresh rebuild in my 90T. This car is so unlike Toyota's of today...

8)

s5005083ve8.th.jpg

The Mark IIIs were great cars. I had an '87 Turbo stick non-sport roof that I got rid of at 160+K miles. Very smooth and sneaky fast. Funny that it was roundly criticized for being heavy at 3500 pounds, in-line with a similar car today. The turbo never gave me any trouble but the valve cover gaskets were starting to leak and the cooling system needed work. As an aside, I was looking at tire prices on-line today. I remember buying replacements for the 225/50VR16 Goodyear Gatorback Eagles back in the late 80s and early 90s that came with that car. $200+ per tire was not unusual. Now you can get an excellent Kumho for a fraction of the price that's as good or better. There's definitely been no inflation in the price of tires over the last 20 years.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search