Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Autoblog link for full gallery and story: http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/23/sema-20...r-stormtrooper/

SEMA 2007 Preview: Dodge Avenger StormTrooper

Posted Oct 23rd 2007 10:02PM by Sam Abuelsamid

Filed under: Concept Cars, SEMA, Sedans/Saloons, Dodge

The car you see pictured here is what happens when a self-professed Star Wars geek gets to have his way with the latest Dodge mid-sized sedan. While the stock Dodge Avenger looks awkward from some angles, sits a little tall, and is generally unexciting visually, the Avenger StormTrooper largely eliminates those problems. Under the hood, the StormTrooper gets the 4.0L V-6 from the Pacifica crossover while the whole body is lowered over the twenty-inch tires. The white bodywork and dark tinted headlight covers and windows were inspired by the armor of the soldiers in George Lucas' movies. A set of four buckets from a Charger SRT8 adorned in alcantara suede adorn the front and back rows and a pair of mobile PCs provide entertainment for the driver and passengers. The front unit is tied into the powertrain control allowing the driver to tune the engine, while the rear unit allows passengers to play games, watch movies, or surf the net.

They should have also done a Darth Vader edition!!

Edited by BrewSwillis
Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

You know, it's actually not all too bad ...

Posted

I like it- IF something was done with the rear door styling I would like it even more!

:AH-HA_wink:

We have a black Avenger locally that looks pretty danged nice, big wheels, sits low. Clean looking car.

Posted

pretty good. interior work looks nice.

idk, the exterior looks chopped to me?.... maybe it's just a low quality pic...?

Posted (edited)

The rear door seems to be where it "tries too hard". Looks like a Charger inspired concoction of some sort, it would look a heckuva lot cleaner without it IMO.

Edited by CMG
Posted

I actually really like this...and yes that includes the angels eyes. The new front end looks great as does the rear end treatment. The interior looks nice too. The only thing I don't really like is the wheel design.

If I owned an Avenger, and someone made this kit available, I'd snap it up in a second.

Posted
OMG, geeky, yeah. I'm a fan of the Avenger. I like most of what has been done here... perhaps especially the 4.0L engine transplant.
Posted

I could do without the white rims.

The taillights, well Altezza has been overdone.

The rest of it is quite nice!

Badass...

Posted Image

I agree..while I don't hate the tail lights...i prefer the originals I think, and some better wheels. That picture is indeed badass.

Posted

I like all the exterior modifications except for the rear wing spoiler (I always think that this looks really stupid on front wheel drive sedans) and the wheels. The interior is o.k. I was never really impressed with the original interior design, so the interior upgrades don't impress me that much either.

I like the overall exterior design of the Avenger. It looks 100% better than its Chrysler Sebring counterpart. I agree with someone else who stated that the design would work better on a longer wheelbase (it appeared on a different forum topic). The exterior modifications on this show car make it look even better. Now if they could only give the interior a redesign, this wouldn't be a bad car.

Posted

I like all the exterior modifications except for the rear wing spoiler (I always think that this looks really stupid on front wheel drive sedans) and the wheels.

Sounds like you are under the misconception that a spoiler is non-functional on a FWD car. The general idea people seem to have is that a spoiler is there to give downforce on the driving wheels on a RWD car to help it accelerate. Problem with that is since a spoiler depends on air movement for its function, it's worthless from a stop, and not very functional at low speeds where traction is an issue. A spoiler's real function is to provide downforce on the rear wheels at higher speeds, keeping the rear wheels planted during handling maneuvers - something that is functional on any car, regardless where the driving wheels are.

That said, I still agree that spoilers are silly on many cars, because

A) they're designed to look "cool", not provide downforce

B) they look silly, not "cool"

This spoiler might actually be functional, and at least is not huge & uber tacky. Personally, I kinda like it.

Posted

Sounds like you are under the misconception that a spoiler is non-functional on a FWD car. The general idea people seem to have is that a spoiler is there to give downforce on the driving wheels on a RWD car to help it accelerate. Problem with that is since a spoiler depends on air movement for its function, it's worthless from a stop, and not very functional at low speeds where traction is an issue. A spoiler's real function is to provide downforce on the rear wheels at higher speeds, keeping the rear wheels planted during handling maneuvers - something that is functional on any car, regardless where the driving wheels are.

That said, I still agree that spoilers are silly on many cars, because

A) they're designed to look "cool", not provide downforce

B) they look silly, not "cool"

This spoiler might actually be functional, and at least is not huge & uber tacky. Personally, I kinda like it.

Thanks for the education about rear wing spoilers.

Regardless of how functional they may be, I still think they ruin the lines of the car.

Posted

It looks very cool, but for me, GM made the ultimate Storm Trooper car years ago. :AH-HA_wink:

Posted Image

And along the same lines, the ultimate Darth Vader car...

Posted Image

...and you could buy both!

:pbjtime:

Posted (edited)

It looks very cool, but for me, GM made the ultimate Storm Trooper car years ago. :AH-HA_wink:

And along the same lines, the ultimate Darth Vader car...

Posted Image

...and you could buy both!

:pbjtime:

Should be updated.....

Posted Image

Edited by Oldsmoboi
Posted

I like the CTS-V better as the "Vader car" personally. Both fit the bill well, though. I guess the CTS-V feels more spacey/techy, and thus feels like a better fit to me.

Posted

The Sebring would still look like $h!, though. It needs a complete make-over above all else.

I'd say it looked decent in SEMA guise, but I agree...it needs a complete makeover.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search