Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

SPY SHOTS! 2009/10 Opel Insignia (Vectra)

Flybrian

By Flybrian
in Opel/Vauxhall

 Share

Recommended Posts

Flybrian Newbie

Flybrian

Posted
Posted

SPY SHOTS! 2009/10 Vauxhall Insignia
Posted Image
Link to Original Article @ CAROnline


The Vauxhall Insignia, you say? I thought it was the new Vectra

They're one and the same, we hear. Eager to spruce up its repmobile's reputation, Vauxhall and sister firm Opel are planning to drop the Vectra tag in favour of the Insignia name, harking back to the executive-style concept from a few years back.

We've already scooped the new Vectra, and it's destined to follow the sleeker shape of the GTC concept car. It seems that the family car segment is finally throwing off its dull-as-ditchwater reputation, with the arrival of the classier Mondeo and the like.

Posted Image

Concept car looks you say? Seems neat enough...

Ignore all this development hack's testing gear littering the cabin and you're left with exactly how the new Insignia will look inside. And as well as the new design, Opel/Vauxhall hope to raise the quality of the Vectra to move it away from its workaday roots. It's not alone in that pursuit, of course; every manufacturer from Ford to Renault makes similar claims, but those who've seen the car claim it is indeed a step in the right direction.

Our shots were snapped during high-altitude testing in the Rocky Mountain region of Colorado; this car will be sold in the US as well as Europe.

Posted Image

How similar to the show car is it inside?

The basic architecture is identical. The instrument binnacle ahead of the driver is the same, with two small fuel and coolant gauges flanked by the larger speedo and tacho. Even the switchgear is the same as in the GTC concept car (picture on left, above).

The centre console is dominated by a digital display mounted high up, and Vauxhall is finally moving away from the fiddly little buttons that spoil many current Vauxhall interiors. Expect it to be roomy, too - the new model will grow to around 4.8m long, freeing up more space for luggage and limbs.
K-1 Newbie

K-1

Posted
Posted

This thing had better be wider as well. The two things the AURA is really lacking compared to the competition are hip and shoulder room.

Mule Bakersdozen LS Newbie

Mule Bakersdozen LS

Posted
Posted

And it looks like this Insignia/Aura will severely lack headroom here too. I just hope that the trunk space goes up-Chevy Malibu and a Saturn mid-size we won't name had the biggest trunks in their classes, at 17.3 and 17.5 cubic feet respectively. Now Malibu is like 15-something and Aura is 14.9. In this class, that's average, and average is not good enough today, yet people seem to settle for it just fine. (I like the new Malibu and the Aura a lot-that's what I'd get if a mid-size shopper, but the only-average trunk space is a weak spot).

Mule Bakersdozen LS Newbie

Mule Bakersdozen LS

Posted
Posted

4800mm x 0.0394= 189.1" overall length. Same as Pontiac G6; about 1" shorter than today's Aura (190.9"), and 2" less than the 2008 Chevy Malibu, which is at 191" overall.

G. David Felt Grand Master

G. David Felt

Posted
Posted

H'mmmmmmm :scratchchin: Gotta admit it is nice but still just another average auto. Does not blow me away. Course I was not blown away by the concept car or even the malibu. Nicer than the units they replace, but still missing that gotta have it feel. <_<

ehaase

ehaase

Posted
Posted

At least one of these Epsilon II's, maybe not the Aura, need to match the Accord's 106 cubic feet space in interior room, and I agree with Mule that there should be a trunk with at least 17 cubic feet.

loki

loki

Posted
Posted

Isn't that pretty close to the same steering wheel in those far out Buick interior renders we saw?

almost, the renders had much less air bag space

exterior...unknown if better than the new bu, other than lights and grill work.

interior... nice, but nothing that'll blow the competition away from what i see

cire Newbie

cire

Posted
Posted

I think it's a nice evolution of the current Aura. I think they should call it Aura on both sides of the Atlantic and reserve the "Insignia" name for the proposed rear wheel drive flagship sedan.

smk4565 Mentor

smk4565

Posted
Posted

The GTC concept interior was really nice, I hope the Aura interior is close to the concept. The original Aura concept had a nice looking interior also, then they cheaped out on some places, like replacing the driver info display with just an airbag warning light. I see they might do that with not putting the navigation system in. The Accord offers a nav system, GM is going to have to make it an option on the Aura and Malibu.

Epsilon has plenty of size, Aura is 190 inches long, 08 Malibu is 192, Camry and Accord are 191, Fusion is 190. 190 inches long seems to be the magic number for midsize cars.

Robert Hall Veteran

Robert Hall

Posted
Posted (edited)

Slim down that swaying beer gut and you might just be able to get in it! :AH-HA_wink:

Epsilons are narrow because of their European origin (Vectra/9-3), I presume...Europeans have narrower roads and Europeans tend to be trimmer than the typical obese American. Honda knows the size of Americans, though--the new Accord is 3 inches wider than the new Malibu..

Edited by moltar
Oracle of Delphi Newbie

Oracle of Delphi

Posted
Posted

Epsilons are narrow because of their European origin (Vectra/9-3), I presume...Europeans have narrower roads and Europeans tend to be trimmer than the typical obese American. Honda knows the size of Americans, though--the new Accord is 3 inches wider than the new Malibu..

moltar, you have opened up my eyes! Now I see why obese Americans need, no actually crave, obese Holden cars! It explains so much scientifically. Large bodies attract! :AH-HA_wink:

VenSeattle Newbie

VenSeattle

Posted
Posted

Epsilons are narrow because of their European origin (Vectra/9-3), I presume...Europeans have narrower roads and Europeans tend to be trimmer than the typical obese American. Honda knows the size of Americans, though--the new Accord is 3 inches wider than the new Malibu..

Yeah... that explains why the 2008 Accord is the first large sedan Honda has ever made and why GM doesn't offer vehicles larger than the current Malibu...

It's funny, all of a sudden it becomes acceptable or fashionable to build "large" vehicles, once Honda and Toyota do it. However, if a car's dimensions are out of proportion with Honda or Toyota... it's too big or has ancient proportions.

People still complain about the Lucerne's dimensions, yet its overhangs are within an inch of the Avalon's. The wheelbase is where the extra length comes from.

  • 2 weeks later...
silverss/sc Newbie

silverss/sc

Posted
Posted

What a good-looking interior!

Definately agreed . You can see they even caried over the glowing coves around the gauges from the concept ....why else would the coves be tranparent white .

Hopefully they dont cheap out on the materials like they did the new Malibu . They got the dash material finally looking good with a nice satin sheen , and then ruined all the details with all that cheap rattle can looking silver paint . I realize they cant use real aluminum in competively price midsizer , but man ....peer in a few other cars GM . The brushed aluminum coatings at least look close the real thing .

  • 2 weeks later...
Mule Bakersdozen LS Newbie

Mule Bakersdozen LS

Posted
Posted

Yeah but GM needs to learn that its not 1982 anymore, and that narrow 69-70" widths are no longer acceptable in this day and age-personally, I'd prefer it to be 72-73" wide, and the full-size cars no narrower than 76".

Drew Dowdell Grand Master

Drew Dowdell

Posted
Posted

moltar, you have opened up my eyes! Now I see why obese Americans need, no actually crave, obese Holden cars! It explains so much scientifically. Large bodies attract! :AH-HA_wink:

My CTS is the smallest car I've ever owned.

My previous cars were:

'94 Cutlass

'85 Contientnal

'83 Caprice

'85 Toronado

I'm 5'10" 150lbs and I crave another E-body.

thegriffon Newbie

thegriffon

Posted
Posted

My CTS is the smallest car I've ever owned.

My previous cars were:

'94 Cutlass

'85 Contientnal

'83 Caprice

'85 Toronado

I'm 5'10" 150lbs and I crave another E-body.

The new Zetas such as the G8 are officially E-bodies.

91z4me Newbie

91z4me

Posted
Posted

Yeah but GM needs to learn that its not 1982 anymore, and that narrow 69-70" widths are no longer acceptable in this day and age-personally, I'd prefer it to be 72-73" wide, and the full-size cars no narrower than 76".

The STS/new CTS and I believe the Zeta cars are both 72" wide. How much wider do they need to be?
  • 1 month later...
Z-06 Newbie

Z-06

Posted
Posted

I'm sure Chris Doane will have all sorts of things to say about it though.

He has a backup on him (or in him?) just in case.

Drew Dowdell Grand Master

Drew Dowdell

Posted
Posted

People still complain about the Lucerne's dimensions, yet its overhangs are within an inch of the Avalon's. The wheelbase is where the extra length comes from.

But Toyota "styles" the front end to look like a snow plow so it appears shorter.

thegriffon Newbie

thegriffon

Posted
Posted

It defies my logic to spend more than $xx,xxx on a car that's smaller than midisize.

You'd better hurry then. By 2020 you'll need to spend at least $30K to get a midsize sedan, and a compact will be at least $20K, if not $25K (plus inflation).
  • 4 months later...

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search