C&D 2008 Highlander review

[pow]

Tested: 2008 Toyota Highlander - Short Take Road Tests

Toyota sharpens its dull knife.

BY STEVE SILER, PHOTOGRAPHY BY DAVID DEWHURST AND THE MANUFACTURER August 2007

The all-new 2008 Toyota Highlander is boring.

Seriously, we haven’t been this bored driving an all-new car since, well, the original Highlander was introduced for the 2001 model year. Yes, with its new version, Toyota has addressed customer complaints regarding the previous model’s lack of style, space, and horsepower. But somehow, in spite of those improvements, the ’08 Highlander exhibits no more charisma than Al Gore hosting a paint-mixing seminar.

Now, this is entirely intentional. Since its introduction, the yawn-inducing Highlander has been a key part of Toyota’s everything-to-everyone strategy of world domination, which seems unlikely to end soon unless Toyota president Katsuaki Watanabe decides to invade Russia. Among other tactics, Toyota’s U.S. strategy now includes selling no fewer than six SUVs, three of them mid-sizers: the Highlander, the rugged and trucklike 4Runner, and the retro FJ Cruiser.

But to be fair, no one makes boring cars quite as compellingly as Toyota, and annual Highlander sales of about 130,000 prove there is a real market for dull knives. And to be even fairer, there is a lot of memorable stuff wrapped in this forgettable package.

Big Outside, Huge Inside

Clearer in person than in pictures is the fact that the Highlander has grown—a lot. Wheelbase, height, and width are each up about three inches, with overall length up four. Say what you want about the billowing skin itself, but Toyota claims the sheetmetal offers improved aerodynamics (the coefficient of drag is 0.34) while ensconcing a truly massive interior.

Which brings us to the real reason to consider a Highlander: space. The ’08 Highlander now has no fewer than 156 cubic feet of interior space—up a whopping 41 cubic feet compared with 2007. Of that, 95 cubic feet of it can be stuffed with gear when all seats are folded (up from 81). That’s five cubes more than a Land Cruiser and only 2 fewer than the gargantuan Nissan Armada.

Brilliant Interior Packaging

Not only is the 2008 Highlander spacious, but it also has many clever solutions for interior flexibility. As expected, the standard third-row seat folds flat, but the second row consists of two individually sliding and reclining buckets (complete with skinny little inboard armrests) with a small center jump seat to hold a third person. When not needed for three-across seating, the center pad can be folded, removed, and handily stowed into a space under the front center armrest. A storage console can then be installed in its place.

All seats—including the driver’s—have about as much contouring as stadium bleachers. And the Highlander’s newfound width actually places door panels (and, consequently, the outboard armrests) so far away that smaller-framed drivers have to lean over to rest their arms on them. Oh, the things companies do for interior-space bragging rights.

Also on the Highlander’s features list is a rearview camera display on mid-grade Sport and top-shelf Limited models. It utilizes the standard 3.5-inch screen in the center of the dash. Naturally, navigation-equipped Highlanders use the large screen instead, leaving the small screen to convey only climate and vehicle data.

Should you order nav, a nice 11-speaker JBL sound system comes along for the ride. And of course, no modern SUV is complete without at least twice as many cup holders as there are seats, and true to form, the Highlander has 14, counting the door pocket bottle holders. That’s a lot of sippy cups and bottled waters—owners would be well advised to use that center-seat area for an onboard Porta Potti.

Driving Impressions

The Highlander now comes standard with a 3.5-liter V-6 (270 horsepower, 248 pound-feet of torque), also found in numerous Toyota products, that sends power through a five-speed automatic to either the front or both axles. (Wait! This can’t be right: Hyundai upstages Toyota with its six-speed Veracruz?) The new Highlander proved to be reasonably quick on our drive along the high-speed, placid mountain roads between Portland, Oregon, and Washington’s Mt. Adams, as well as in our acceleration testing—0 to 60 mph in 7.0 seconds and through the quarter-mile in 15.5 at 91 mph. That’s 1.1 seconds quicker to 60 than the last Highlander we tested (with a 220-hp, 3.0-liter V-6 and four-speed automatic). But quick doesn’t always translate into fun, which we’d prefer. No, this is an extremely quiet, capable kind of quick, rather than the stirring, invigorating kind. In other words, you’ll never wake your slumbering kids with neck-snapping torque. Tow capacity, however, rises to a more than adequate 5000 pounds.

The 3.5-liter engine brings even base Highlanders up to speed—literally—with the hybrid version that was added for 2006. The new Highlander hybrid carries over the old powertrain, which is also rated at 270 combined horsepower. Now that the power scales are even, we definitely prefer the gasoline model on account of its silky five-speed automatic, which offers manual shift control (hybrid models have a CVT) and far superior brake feel than the touchy hybrid’s.

And even though the new, larger Highlander weighs almost 300 more pounds and has an additional 55 horsepower over last year’s Highlander, the ’08 model gets 1 mpg more across the board (2WD: 18 city/24 highway, 4WD: 17/23). Now, that’s progress, and those figures slightly edge out competitors such as the GMC Acadia/Saturn Outlook and Mazda CX-9.

What the Highlander could benefit from is more communication from the electric power steering; a system that is perfectly smooth, saves weight, and offers certain efficiency gains, but lacks character. The brakes felt better, offering sure-footed stops on some of Mt. Adams’s steeper declines. We also found the body resistant to flopping over on its side in corners, although we found relentless understeering characteristics at its 0.74-g limit. But—thank you, Toyota—the stability control can now be fully disabled. The ride, as expected, was quiet and smooth, although with the 19-inch wheels (17s are standard) that come on Sport and Limited models, it can get a bit brittle, particularly on broken Michigan roads.

Wake Me When You’re Fun

So it’s a snore to drive. But then, Toyota rarely tries to engineer its products to outperform its competition, just outsell it. Certainly if it were our $27,985 for a base two-wheel-drive model (rising to $34,835 for a Limited with all-wheel drive), we would prefer more visual and dynamic excitement; something along the lines of the Mazda CX-9 or even the GMC Acadia. But for every one of our kind, it seems there are 10 who will buy a Toyota, no matter how it looks or drives, on account of its peaceful behavior, harmless appearance, and seemingly bulletproof reliability. For them, the Highlander will be a spacious and competent platform from which to launch their not-so-boring lives. And that should ensure its success.

2008 Toyota Highlander Sport

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 7-passenger, 5-door wagon

PRICE AS TESTED: $32,348 (base price: $30,635)

ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection

Displacement: 211 cu in, 3456cc

Power (SAE net): 270 bhp @ 6200 rpm

Torque (SAE net): 248 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 5-speed automatic with manumatic shifting

DIMENSIONS:

Wheelbase: 109.8 in Length: 188.4 in Width: 75.2 in Height: 69.3 in

Curb weight: 4228 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:

Zero to 60 mph: 7.0 sec

Zero to 100 mph: 18.7 sec

Zero to 110 mph: 25.6 sec

Street start, 5–60 mph: 7.2 sec

Standing ¼-mile: 15.5 sec @ 91 mph

Top speed (governor limited): 113 mph

Braking, 70–0 mph: 179 ft

Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.74 g

FUEL ECONOMY:

EPA city/highway driving: 18/24 mpg

C/D observed: 22 mpg

Edited August 15, 2007 by empowah

[toesuf94]

"Wake Me When You’re Fun

So it’s a snore to drive. But then, Toyota rarely tries to engineer its products to outperform its competition, just outsell it. Certainly if it were our $27,985 for a base two-wheel-drive model (rising to $34,835 for a Limited with all-wheel drive), we would prefer more visual and dynamic excitement; something along the lines of the Mazda CX-9 or even the GMC Acadia. But for every one of our kind, it seems there are 10 who will buy a Toyota, no matter how it looks or drives, on account of its peaceful behavior, harmless appearance, and seemingly bulletproof reliability. For them, the Highlander will be a spacious and competent platform from which to launch their not-so-boring lives. And that should ensure its success."

Actually, it is because Toyota gives the damned things away at 0 down and $299 a month - which you will not see with the CX-9 and Acadia/Outlook.

[CSpec]

Wow that was a very smarmy review.

[regfootball]

Toyota rarely tries to engineer its products to outperform its competition, just outsell it.

best

quote

evah

yeah, it will still sell like hotcakes, but clearly C/D is got it out for toyota now. and i like it. there were some VERY vicious shots in that article.

Edited August 16, 2007 by regfootball

[regfootball]

canadian driver dot com highlander blog

The size of the Higlander has me a little confused. From the outside the Highlander looks rather large. From the driving position it feels rather large, even though the light steering allows you to steer easily and helps to make the vehicle feel slightly smaller.

Behind the front row is where everything seems to change. I expected a much larger second row and with the middle seat of the second row being pretty much useless, the Highlander — touted as a seven seater — turns into a vehicle that really can only hold four comfortably.

The third row seats may be useful for small children, but I would certainly not want to be back there for any length of time. So here we have a rather large SUV that can only seat four people. If cargo capacity is your requirement, the Highlander has it, with a boxy design even with just the third row of seats folded down; a good amount of cargo space is available for your shopping pleasure.

The more I drove the Highlander during the course of the week and the more I thought about the content provided in the $41,000 base model Highlander, the more I came to the realization that this vehicle does not equate to a very good dollar-to-content ratio.

I cannot say the Highlander does not provide value, as value can mean many things to many people, but as far as content and features for the dollar the Highlander is lacking. There is nothing in the Highlander that really stands out as exceptional — perhaps a case could be made for the engine.

With the abundance of crossovers/ SUVs and other utility vehicles heading to the market I do not see a compelling reason to jump at the Highlander. The RAV4 provides nearly the same amount of room with more style and the same engine. If you really need the seven seats, you may want to look for something that will provide your passengers with more comfort.

[regfootball]

ouch

[sciguy_0504]

So it's not a sports car...then again, what midsize crossover is?

The 6-speed auto should be standard. I'm guessing there's a capacity issue.

I'm 5'7 and was comfortable in the third row in the current Highlander. I was there for about 1.5 hours, mostly highway driving and someone was sitting next to me.

[regfootball]

the lambdas have very good sporty handling and good firm ride. sounds like the hihglander is a floater.

[RBB]

sounds like the hihglander is a floater.

Must.... resist..... crude-yet-appropriate..... analogy.....

-RBB

[bowtie_dude]

I've always liked C&D's writing style.

[Sixty8panther]

addressed customer complaints regarding the previous model’s lack of style, space, and horsepower.

So let me get this straight, previous customers of the Highlander

BOUGHT a TOYOTA "crossover" Camry Wagon despite its lask of:

1. style

2. space

3. horsepower

Why the hell DID they buy it!?!?! Ever heard of a test drive?

I guess CR must have brainwashed them into thinking the

double-hulahoop T logo on the grille means = JUST BUY IT!

[Lamar]

Must.... resist..... crude-yet-appropriate..... analogy.....

-RBB

LOL!

Seriously though, is Toyota planning on killing the 4Runner or reducing its numbers, since the Highlander now matches it in just about every category?

[biff]

Very interesting analogy. I'm sure all of the Toyota and import loving fans are sure GM or Ford paid them off to publish that.

[regfootball]

So let me get this straight, previous customers of the Highlander

BOUGHT a TOYOTA "crossover" Camry Wagon despite its lask of:

1. style

2. space

3. horsepower

Why the hell DID they buy it!?!?! Ever heard of a test drive?

I guess CR must have brainwashed them into thinking the

double-hulahoop T logo on the grille means = JUST BUY IT!

yeah totally. i think toy viewed the highlander as a larger forester, but now took it upsized to match the acadias, etc.

like every bowl of rice, the more you water it down, the heavier and more doughy it gets.

[pow]

So let me get this straight, previous customers of the Highlander

BOUGHT a TOYOTA "crossover" Camry Wagon despite its lask of:

1. style

2. space

3. horsepower

Why the hell DID they buy it!?!?! Ever heard of a test drive?

I guess CR must have brainwashed them into thinking the

double-hulahoop T logo on the grille means = JUST BUY IT!

Or maybe because it was the only car-like mainstream midsize SUV when first introduced?

[Polish_Kris]

Why the hell DID they buy it!?!?! Ever heard of a test drive?

Resale value, reliability, quality, and refinement... Why else do people buy Toyotas? Obviously not for style.

Very interesting analogy. I'm sure all of the Toyota and import loving fans are sure GM or Ford paid them off to publish that.

Yeah, just like some members on this board have the same conspiracy theories that Toyota is paying the media off, which is crock from both sides, the import fans, and the domestic fans.