Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted
Croc... See Sciguy's post to see what I was talking about. It goes above each. The spoiler may give it that affect, as Ocnblu said, though. I hope its the case as it looks horrible. If it was done right... I'd prefer it over body colored.
  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

What happened to the ram air hood?  I thought this thing was supposed to have a hood similar to the 4 Runner... Did GM change that?

[post="24236"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]



The Yukon never had a ram air hood or hood scoop, that was bad info.
Posted

Like the DTS?

[post="24477"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


Yeah, somewhat like the DTS, the STS has the same thing but to a lesser extent (the headlights aren't "pushed" as far back).
Posted
From the first moment I saw it, I thought it was great. The more I look, the better it gets. The interior is much better than the Tahoe's, but does look to similar, as has been mentioned. The side cladding looks similar too, or is my mind playing tricks on me?
Posted
Denali keeps the "electric shaver" grille. The grille should be less trapezoidal. It's too narrow towards the bottom. Could use a touch of chrome over the rear license plate provision as well. Other than that, I like it. The subtle shaping of the taillights is cool. I'm glad the tacky cladding is gone. The fullsizers have always shared interiors, so it doesn't bother me that this is just modded from the already-classy Chevy. As long as the Eskie has a unique inner lining.
Posted (edited)

Here is the official GMC site:
http://www.gmc.com/newvehicles/2007yukon/index.jsp

[post="25289"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


You really see the "Big Envoy" look in that picture of the silver Yukon. Those pictures make it look a LOT better than the initially released ones.

And that interior is just AMAZING!

Also, I really liked the blacked-out taillights on the Denali. Nice touch, GM! Edited by bowtie_dude
Posted (edited)

You really see the "Big Envoy" look in that picture of the silver Yukon.  Those pictures make it look a LOT better than the initially released ones.

And that interior is just AMAZING!

Also, I really liked the blacked-out taillights on the Denali.  Nice touch, GM!

[post="25293"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


Yeah, but the nav does not look nearly as good as it did in the original pics (http://www.gminsidenews.com/naias/GMT900/Yukon/yukh9.jpg) . Here it looks more like what they already have on the market. i am wondering if this pic on the GMC site is of the nav from a Envoy Denali? Edited by envoy03
Posted
So, did anyone see the mileage specs of the Yukon on the website? Or do we just not want to comment on them.

How in the hell do they figure 21mpg combined? I see 21 mpg on the highway and I 15 in the city. You add them together, divide by 2, and you get an average or combined mileage. Am I wrong in thinking that that is how you get a combined mpg?

Oh, wait a minute. I think I've figured it out. GM figure combined mileage by saying 99% is highway and 1% is city. That's how they get the 20.5 and 20.1!! Silly me! :rolleyes:


ENGINES
4.8L V8
• 290 hp
• 290 lb-ft torque
• 15 mpg city/ 19 mpg highway*
ENGINES
5.3L V8
• 320 hp
• 340 lb-ft torque
• 15 mpg city/ 21 mpg highway (2WD)*
• 15 mpg city/ 20 mpg highway (4WD)*
ENGINES
6.2L V8 (Denali Only)
• 380 hp
• 415 lb-ft torque
• 13 miles city/ 19 miles highway*


*Based on GM® testing. Official EPA figures not yet available.

Posted
Those figures appear to be with all 8 cylinders working, otherwise there would be a more dramatic difference between the other two engines, gas mileage-wise.
Posted
Well, I like what I see so far. The Yukon & Tahoe are really nice. :) I like how these vehicles remain GM in appearance but, look more refined than Toyotas. This makes me really excited to see what other future GM products will look like. In one word, WOW
Posted (edited)

Those figures appear to be with all 8 cylinders working, otherwise there would be a more dramatic difference between the other two engines, gas mileage-wise.

[post="26372"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post]


That doesn't make sense. Why would GM shoot themselves in the foot by reporting low numbers? Edited by Derek77
Posted
gotta see it to enjoy it truely... those pictures suck compared to what they really look like... saw the denali and the tahoe at the Anahiem convetion center... and what a beaut they are...
Posted
newbie, did you actually get to sit in them? I'm thinking of going to the show around thursday if i get the chance and want to deal with traffic going down there :)

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search