Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

The new 2008 Opel Vectra is obviously very close to introduction based on how many times it has been turning up at the far end of spy camera lenses lately. The latest images that have appeared show a couple of views of the new car with all the striped mylar photoshopped away to give us a clean look at the first vehicle built on General Motor's Epsilon II platform.

The car pictured here will be appearing stateside in about two years wearing Saturn badges as the new Aura. Variants with different bodies will also appear as the next next Chevy Malibu, Saab 9-3 and 9-5, and possibly even more.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted

Wow, I'm honestly disappointed.

I hate the shape of the tail lights...they look Korean...and the headlights/front end look like the Epica...it lost it's aggressiveness and it will loose the Aura's clean Euro-styling in favor of Korean.

Hopefully those were part of the Photoshop chop....and it looks better than this, but so far I'm let down.

Posted

Interesting..looks like a retouched photo, but I like the rear quarter creases and the decklid treatment...not so sure about the front door upturned crease, seems like an afterthought...

Posted

I believe these are just chopped spyshots...nothing more.

I'm starting to agree with you there after looking at the picture more closely.
Posted (edited)

Yeah, in fact, I could've sworn I've seen these exact same images (same angles at least) somewhere else as camo'd spyshots. You can even kinda tell because the chop shares the same kind of matte finish that black camo gives off, as well as some other things, like ravenfreak pointed out (lack of hood line), among other things that give it a very strong "chopped" appearance.

edit: upon further inspection, the chrom doesn't fit in at all with the lighting, that opel badge on the rear doesn't fit at all, same goes for the contrast on the taillights, and even the lines (same goes for the headlights, and there would be no reason for the headlights to have a matte finishe like that either). If you look close enough, there is still camo on part of the rear passenger windows, and in the first shot if you look really close you can see the edge of the camo on the hood (looking through the passenger side door through the windshield).

Edited by Nick
Posted

I retract my comment from the other thread. I don't see the Altima any more...I see the Sebring.

Posted (edited)

Invisible Exhausts.

Not quite...Lots of manufacturers hide their exhausts behind the bumpers on some models. Still just a chop though. Edited by Nick
Posted

Agreed.

It looks accurate, though. Sort of sad considering it doesnt look all that great.

The European press apparently thought the real thing looked fantastic.

Posted

The European press apparently thought the real thing looked fantastic.

Oh, what do those Europeans know?! Their car's aren't so great... :P

Posted

"Looks" are not everything in the sedan market. Ask any Camry owner and they will simply say 'my car looks nice', not "fantastic"!

Quality, value, economy, and overall performance are alot more important to many buyers then "it looks great!"

Posted

But if it "looks great" on top of "Quality, value, economy, and overall performance" then it's not just keeping up with the competition, it will have an edge.

Good enough isn't good enough. It must be stunning and excellent in every category. That is how you gain sales.

Posted

It's not that hard to design a car that looks good. I mean, come on...it's no harder or more expensive (or at least it shouldn't be) to design a car to look good than it is to design a car that looks bad, or even bland for that matter.

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

Chop details of the GTC on that and you might be headed somewhere.

Posted

Yeah, in fact, I could've sworn I've seen these exact same images (same angles at least) somewhere else as camo'd spyshots. You can even kinda tell because the chop shares the same kind of matte finish that black camo gives off, as well as some other things, like ravenfreak pointed out (lack of hood line), among other things that give it a very strong "chopped" appearance.

That's what they say in the article:

"The latest images that have appeared show a couple of views of the new car with all the striped mylar photoshopped away to give us a clean look at the first vehicle built on General Motor's Epsilon II platform. "

Posted

I like my 2007 AURA better... hopefully the new EPII AURA looks nothing like the ones shown here (except the red Vauxhall). If it does, Saturn will definitely be losing me as an owner in the sedan market.

Posted

That's what they say in the article:

"The latest images that have appeared show a couple of views of the new car with all the striped mylar photoshopped away to give us a clean look at the first vehicle built on General Motor's Epsilon II platform. "

:lol:

The fact that you were the first to pick up on it shows nobody ever reads the articles...

Posted

I'll wait until the real deal to form a complete opinion but I hope the next Aura will look better than this photoshops lead me to believe.

Posted

This is definitely Photoshopped... and not a very good one at that. Some details looks much sharper than others and requisite gap lines are missing.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search