Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, which door panel looks the most luxurious and which looks the least? Rank them from most to least if you'd like.

P.S. If you know what car these belong to, please don't say it now. I'm just curious if anyone else thinks the same as I do.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted (edited)

Well, I don't know what any of them come from, so here goes. They all suffer from excess plastic and plasticy wood.

#1: bad- a giant oversized grab handle & cheesy fiberglas carpeting.

#3: bad- (I'm ignoring the curtain), looks lux but not a cohesive design.

#4: awful- way too 'space-shippy'

#5: bad- had better be in an SUV- too blocky for a car.

#6: OK- bland

#7: awful- way too 'space-shippy'

Only one I find tolerable (or 'good') would be #2

Edited by balthazar
Posted

In order of "luxuriousness"...

3 - it's luxurious in a neo-classical suburb mansion sort of way; kinda gaudy, but sure, it's luxurious

5 - my favorite one of the bunch; contemporary, art deco; tradition expressed in a very modern and artful manner

6 - business-like luxury; cold and unemotional design, but the switchgear almost look 'engineered'

7 - clean, simple, soft, kinda generic

2 - generic and lacking in modern industrial design, but pleasant nevertheless

4 - looks cheap; a mishmash of unharmonious shapes and cutlines

1 - welcome to 1973

None of these pictures or color combinations are particularly flattering or revealing.

Posted

In order of "luxuriousness"...

3 - it's luxurious in a neo-classical suburb mansion sort of way; kinda gaudy, but sure, it's luxurious

5 - my favorite one of the bunch; contemporary, art deco; tradition expressed in a very modern and artful manner

6 - business-like luxury; cold and unemotional design, but the switchgear almost look 'engineered'

7 - clean, simple, soft, kinda generic

2 - generic and lacking in modern industrial design, but pleasant nevertheless

4 - looks cheap; a mishmash of unharmonious shapes and cutlines

1 - welcome to 1973

None of these pictures or color combinations are particularly flattering or revealing.

You and I think almost exactly alike. I would have to go:

3

5

6

7

4

1

2 (it stinks)

Posted

Answers revealed for the interested.

I did this because I was originally surprised at how damn lousy the LS460's door panel looked for the money it supposedly commands. The door lock tumbler is even painted plastic.

I might do another 'shocker' soon.

Posted

I did know the mercedes-bach from the curtain, but I was thinking #5 was range rover. It has some appeal, even tho it's so blocky (now I know why).

Cadillac has the most artistic application of wood of any of them- flows nicely.

Posted

Answers revealed for the interested.

I did this because I was originally surprised at how damn lousy the LS460's door panel looked for the money it supposedly commands. The door lock tumbler is even painted plastic.

I might do another 'shocker' soon.

Interestingly... here's an Armor-Alled up '01 LS430.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted

Am I the only one that thinks for the price that the Phantom and Mayback are, their door panels are jokes?

I like the Phantom's door panel... simple, classy. I know what is in the car, so the door panel need not be exciting or flashy;
Posted

Am I the only one that thinks for the price that the Phantom and Mayback are, their door panels are jokes?

Just because the designs aren't great doesn't mean they aren't swathed in leather and genuine wood.

As for the LS460, well, I don't think it's that bad. It's all nice materials for the most part, though not as good as the S550. Design is the only thing that someone could really have much of a problem with, IMO.

Posted

I'd take that door panel from the late 70's F-series over half the $h! shown in this thread. In particular, Rolls-Royce ought to be ashamed of themselves.

Posted

I see nothing wrong with the Phantom's door trim panel. You can bet it is built with the best materials. The Maybach's is also very fine looking, like furniture in a smoking lounge.

In the others, save the Town Car, I see some design similarities... smooth, flat arcs dominate, with tightly pulled materials.

Posted

Interesting how the answers are all over the place. The only one I really thought was really horrible was the Rolls.

Caddy: I like this one quite a bit though the DTS is of no interest to me generally. To me the clean lines and the simplicity of design make this my kind of luxurious.

Lincoln: Though obviously very dated, not terrible to look at.

Lexus: I had to go back and look at this one three times to get a grip on how I feel about it. My first impression was "yuck, that looks cheap!" When I went back and looked again, I got the impression of quality materials. The third time I realized that I hate the design (shapes etc.) but the materials and workmanship seem quite good.

Jag: I expect alot more from Jaguar.

Benz: This one Does look cheap.

Maybach: Overblown and gaudy, especially bad use of the wood (too much and oddly shaped).

Posted

Just looking at the pictures, I could only identify the Maybach and the Benz. I thought the DTS was something along the lines of a Saturn Aura. My personal favorite was the Rolls, though I thought it might be a Land Rover.

As for the Lexus interior, everything in there feels like quality, though I could take or leave the styling.

And the Ford F-150 interior, circa 1977, that was when trucks were trucks. Nice quilted hard plastic interior door panels and rock hard bench seat.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search