Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What's Your Real MPG?

Starting with 2008-model vehicles, the Environmental Protection Agency is revising its tests to better reflect real-world driving conditions.

but here's the thing.... my CTS and Avalanche seem to get exactly the 2007 numbers. I'd be disappointed if I was getting the 2008 numbers simply on past performance.

Edited by Oldsmoboi
Posted

Manual Cobalt numbers: 22 city 31 hwy

22 mpg = 10.7 l/100km.

The only time I ever see numbers as high as 10.7 only my mileage readout is when I'm angry in a traffic jam and jumping ahead at near WOT.

What are these morons doing to test these cars?

Posted

Wow, these numbers are terrible.

The Silverado drops to 14/18 for 4WD with the 5.3 and 13/17 for the 6.

The Tundra 4.7 is 13/17, but it doesn't have the 5.7?

The Titan is 9/12 !?! with 4WD!

Posted

Wow, these numbers are terrible.

The Silverado drops to 14/18 for 4WD with the 5.3 and 13/17 for the 6.

The Tundra 4.7 is 13/17, but it doesn't have the 5.7?

The Titan is 9/12 !?! with 4WD!

Tundra 2WD 5.7 - 14 City 16 Combined 18 Hwy

Tundra 4WD 5.7 - 13 City 14 Combined 17 Hwy

Posted

Manual Cobalt numbers: 22 city 31 hwy

22 mpg = 10.7 l/100km.

The only time I ever see numbers as high as 10.7 only my mileage readout is when I'm angry in a traffic jam and jumping ahead at near WOT.

What are these morons doing to test these cars?

They're driving like Americans. :P

I admit my gas numbers are low because I don't exactly baby the car. But I've gotten 34 mpg highway, as previously advertised. It's just that most of my driving takes place in "city" conditions. And I usually don't meet 24 mpg in the city.

Posted

If automakers had to use these numbers for CAFE...........

We shouldn't be shocked by these numbers at all. We were told before on what to expect, but I guess seeing the numbers makes it shocking for some reason. It really opened my eyes.

Posted (edited)

but, I'm thinking these numbers are now making the cars under-rated. Cobalts and Malibus regularly see over their 2007 EPA rating now.... they'll be even higher over their EPA ratings afterwards.

Edited by Oldsmoboi
Posted (edited)

Looks like the Prius would get approx. 48 city, 45 highway. Fun.

Meanwhile, my Millenia is calculated to get 18 city, 24 highway if it were to be tested under the new ratings... :lol: Course, my Grand Am is estimated to get 19 city, 29 highway...

Edited by blackviper8891
Posted

About 10-15 percent drop across the board. Smaller cars have been hit hard though.

Prius got a serious whack in the city driving conditions.

Posted

What's the significance of the Aveo in that graphic? Is it the median entry or something?

no, i was just looking to see what a "compact"car rating would do, but my entry was to show the bently, how can a V-12 engined car be called a compact anything (of the same era)
Posted

no, i was just looking to see what a "compact"car rating would do, but my entry was to show the bently, how can a V-12 engined car be called a compact anything (of the same era)

By interior passenger volume. Remember how the Hyundai Sonata was 'more spacious than a BMW 760i'? It is. So is a '98 LeSabre. Big deal.

Posted

Wow, these numbers are terrible.

The Silverado drops to 14/18 for 4WD with the 5.3 and 13/17 for the 6.

The Tundra 4.7 is 13/17, but it doesn't have the 5.7?

The Titan is 9/12 !?! with 4WD!

Those Titan numbers are with E85. Ram gets the same numbers, Silverado gets 10/14.

This isn't going to help the ethanol cause, that's for sure.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search