2008 Refreshed Dakota

[BrewSwillis]

Allpar Link with pics: http://www.allpar.com/trucks/dakota-2008.html

http://www.modernmopars.com/blog/archives/12

2008 Dodge Dakota

February 3, 2007 on 11:06 pm | In General |

Dodge Reveals New 2008 Dakota, offers more power combined with bold styling, versatility and capability

Gallery: http://www.modernmopars.com/blog/images?file=dakota/

2008 Dodge Dakota Sport 2008 Dodge Dakota Laredo

* New 4.7-liter V-8 engine with 290 horsepower (25 percent increase) and 320 lb.-ft. of torque (10 percent increase), with better fuel economy and increased refinement – the only V-8 option available in the segment

* First-for-the-segment standard remote starter

* All-new exterior in Extended Cab and Crew Cab body styles

* New interior features greatest space of any mid-size truck, with 30 cubic feet of interior space in Extended Cab models; 37.1 cubic feet for Crew Cab

* The largest and longest standard cargo bed in its class: 6-foot-6-inches in the Extended Cab

* Best-in-class towing capability of up to 7,050 pounds

* New features include built-in cargo-box utility rails, heated bench seats, under-seat storage system

Chicago – Feb. 7, 2006 – Chrysler Group today unveiled the new 2008 Dodge Dakota mid-size truck with a new engine that not only offers 25 percent more horsepower and 10 percent more torque, but also better fuel economy and increased refinement. The 2008 Dodge Dakota also features new exterior and interior styling, and many best-in-class capabilities. The new truck arrives in dealerships in August.

New for 2008 are striking exterior and interior enhancements that bear signature Dodge styling cues while creating a new persona for Dakota.

“The new 2008 Dodge Dakota was redesigned to broaden its appeal to younger customers with active lifestyles,” said Tom Loveless, Director – Dodge Marketing and Global Communications. “Dodge Dakota will attract 25- to 35-year-old individuals who need a vehicle to meet a variety of needs. Depending on an owners’ lifestyle, the 2008 Dodge Dakota may be equipped for work or play, but every Dakota is equipped with capability and versatility.”

Powertrain selections

Dodge trucks have always earned a reputation as bold, powerful and capable. The powerful and capable parts of the equation in the 2008 Dodge Dakota begin with powertrain choices, which include a new V-8 engine — the only V-8 option available in the mid-size pickup segment.

The new 4.7-liter V-8 offers better fuel economy, power and torque than the previous 4.7-liter High Output engine, while at the same time delivering improvements in refinement. The new 4.7-liter V-8 incorporates two spark plugs per cylinder (the only Chrysler Group engine to do so, other than the 5.7-liter HEMI®), increased compression ratio, improved cylinder-head port flow and a new combustion system. The result is 290 horsepower, a 25 percent increase; and 320 lb.-ft. of torque, a 10 percent increase. The new engine is also capable of operating on E85 ethanol fuel, making the Dodge Dakota equipped with this engine a Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV).

Refinement improvements in the new 4.7-liter V-8 result from significant revisions to the induction system, a lightweight piston/rod assembly and reduced accessory drive noise through lower accessory drive speed. Engine smoothness at idle is enhanced with a new valve-lash adjuster system. The new 4.7-liter V-8 is also equipped with Electronic Throttle Control.

The new 2008 Dodge Dakota comes standard with a 3.7-liter Magnum® V-6 engine producing 210 horsepower and 235 lb.-ft. of torque. The engine also comes with Electronic Throttle Control for positive throttle response, and exhaust gas recirculation to help lower emissions.

A first-for-the-segment remote starter for more convenience is standard on both the 3.7-liter and 4.7-liter engines in the 2008 Dodge Dakota.

The new 2008 Dodge Dakota’s powerplants are backed up by a choice of a six-speed manual transmission, standard on all V-6 equipped 2008 Dodge Dakota models except Laramie; a four-speed automatic with overdrive available with Dakota’s V-6 engine; and a five-speed automatic available on V-8-equipped models.

For more capability when traction is at a premium, the new 2008 Dodge Dakota may be equipped with a transfer case featuring two-wheel drive or four-wheel drive with locked high and low ranges, or an available transfer case with full-time four-wheel drive as well as selections for locked high and low ranges. The 2007 Dodge Dakota is the only pickup in its segment to offer full-time four-wheel drive.

New look, more model choices

In addition to powerful and capable, Dodge trucks are also known as bold.

For that part of the equation, the 2008 Dodge Dakota’s exterior includes a newly styled hood, grille, front fascia, rear spoiler, fenders and headlamps. The front end has been designed to improve aerodynamics and features better fit and gap management. The hood surface was designed to signify power and further amplify the drop-fendered, signature look for Dodge trucks. With these styling enhancements, the “face” of the 2008 Dodge Dakota is better aligned with the rest of the Dodge truck lineup.

Like the Dodge Nitro, headlamps are rectangular units primarily for a contemporary appearance, but also to maximize the surface area for better forward lighting. Reflectors are deep-set behind each lense to achieve a serious demeanor.

All-new fascias better integrate with the restyled grille and incorporate fog lamps. The 2008 Dodge Dakota’s tailgate includes a new spoiler that helps smooth air flow over the rear of the truck to improve fuel economy, and the top surface of the cargo box has a new protective surface.

“The Dodge truck DNA is well-understood in the marketplace. We are creators of trucks with a distinct flair for style and no compromise in function,” said Ralph Gilles, Vice President – Jeep®/Truck and Color and Trim Studios, and Specialty Vehicles, Chrysler Group Design. “We restyled the 2008 Dodge Dakota to reflect that DNA in a package that presents the Dakota as both a sporty lifestyle vehicle and a work truck.”

For 2008, the Dodge Dakota will again be offered in two body styles – Extended Cab and Crew Cab – and six trim levels: ST, SXT, SLT, TRX4, Sport and Laramie.

Interior loaded with form and function

The new 2008 Dodge Dakota’s interior includes a new instrument panel, center console and accent finishes, and several new interior storage choices.

“The interior is designed to provide an ergonomically friendly cockpit with improved comfort, utility and thoughtful storage amenities to complement a variety of lifestyles,” said Gilles.

The 2008 Dodge Dakota Extended Cab’s available Full Swing rear access doors open nearly 170 degrees — unique in the segment — to an interior with class-leading room and seating for five. With rear seats folded, up to 30 cubic feet of storage space is available. A total of six storage hooks are located on the Extended Cab’s rear interior panel.

Separately, the 2008 Dodge Dakota Crew Cab offers best-in-class room – 37.1 cubic feet — and seating for up to six. With rear seats folded, a new under-seat storage system, a first for Dodge Dakota, is easily accessible. This system includes a unique, collapsible and removable cargo management system that enables gear to be organized and taken anywhere.

Other storage options are provided throughout the interior. For example, an additional storage bin is located above the glove box, providing easy access for everyday items. An all-new center console incorporates cup holders with modular inserts and a pull-out bin specifically designed to hold electronics such as an MP3 player (which can be plugged into any of the 2007 Dodge Dakota’s audio systems), cell phone or Personal Digital Assistant. An additional power outlet is also provided.

Seating is available with YES Essentials® Worry Free Fabric, which is stain-resistant, odor-resistant and anti-static. Heated bench seats are available in the 2008 Dodge Dakota for the first time.

Seating options include an available 40/20/40 split-bench front seat with a folding center armrest. The 2008 Dodge Dakota Extended Cab is available with 40/40 rear-folding seats, while Crew Cab models have a standard 60/40 split-folding rear seat.

Electronic choices include AM-FM stereo radios with MP3 capability and available SIRIUS Satellite Radio that delivers more than 125 channels of music, sports, news, talk and weather. Also available as stand-alone options are a 508-watt SoundBox system (available on Extended Cab models) and a DVD navigation system with turn-by-turn directions. A power accessory delay, standard on all 2008 Dodge Dakotas, allows power functions, including radio, to operate after the vehicle is turned off.

Dodge Dakota = versatility

The foundation of the new 2008 Dodge Dakota is a ladder-type frame, with main rails formed to precision tolerances under liquid pressure and fully boxed for strength and rigidity. All 2008 Dodge Dakotas feature independent front suspension with coil-over shock absorbers. The result is identical ride height for two- and four-wheel-drive models, which contributes to smooth ride and handling characteristics.

The 2008 Dodge Dakota continues to offer the largest and longest standard cargo bed in its class: 6-foot-6-inches in the Extended Cab. Built-in utility rails make cargo box tie-downs infinitely adjustable. The 2008 Dodge Dakota’s dual-position tailgate may be secured in a mid-position, which provides support for extra-wide or -long cargo laid on top of wheel wells and extending beyond the end of the bed.

The new 2008 Dodge Dakota also continues to wear the crown for highest tow ratings in the mid-size pickup market, with towing ability of up to 7,050 pounds.

As a complete package, the 2008 Dodge Dakota is as safe as it is capable and versatile. Up front, octagonal front frame rail tips collapse rearward in an impact in order to absorb energy and deter force from the cabin. An anti-lock brake system is standard on rear wheels, and available on all four wheels.

Advance multi-stage driver and front passenger air bags are standard, and supplemental side-curtain air bags are available. Rear head restraints on Crew Cab models, which are designed for the driver’s rearward visibility, have a foam-padded structure for increased protection.

Edited February 5, 2007 by BrewSwillis

[RJB]

I've always liked the Dakota, I have even thought of getting one when my S-10 is close to being thrown away. I did not like the new one at first but I like it now. I am very surprised that Dodge has given it a refresh so soon! The current one has not been out that long has it?

[corvette_dude729]

I actually kind of like it...

[Variance]

Looks like the swelling has gone down on the fat lip.

[Northstar]

I, for one, like the old one better.

[FAPTurbo]

I still don't care much for this generation of Dakota's, but it looks better.

That gain in horsepower is nice too! I'm curious how it will stack up against Nissan's and Toyota's V6's. Last I checked, the V8 was only on par with them.

[Cory Wolfe]

It's an improvement, but still not all that good looking. Sad, considering the last gen was one of the best looking trucks out there.

[Chris_Doane]

Boy that Sport model is not looking good at all. The Laramie is....well....better, but still awkward looking.

[bobo]

It's very dated looking, but Dodge gets credit for continuous improvement.

[RJB]

They've Aspenized the front end.

[ocnblu]

A comprehensive list of small, but effective changes. Nice update. The new front end looks much better, it looks serious, not like this: I wish them success in the market, especially against that "bullfrog peeking over the surface of the pond" Tacoma. I'm still interested in seeing what GM has in store for the GMT355s though.

[caddycruiser]

Well, they fixed what needed it most--the nose (at least to some) and mainly the underpowered 4.7L. The latter is the best improvement, by far.

Also fixed up the interior a bit, even if it does continue on with the hard and inexpensive Chrysler theme.

Edited February 4, 2007 by caddycruiser

[Paolino]

Wow, the exterior is much better--I actually don't hate it.

The interior, well, what is it with Chrysler's love of a sea of gray in their interiors?

[lakefire]

Not crazy about the newer looking dakotas. I still prefer my version:

[Z-06]

What are they trying to compete with Ram or something? That 290 hp is approaching the half ton catagory. I will hold the judgement of the looks till I see it in person.

[Guest YellowJacket894]

I like this generation of Dakota a lot better now. I didn't have much of a problem with the 2005 - 2007 version, but it didn't really have the presence and muscular grace of the 1997 - 2004 version.

Not crazy about the newer looking dakotas. I still prefer my version:

(Except it's not technically mine. But, I am considering a kick ass 5.9 R/T in black.)

[AAS]

I don't like the new (front end) look of Dodge. It really reminds me of their 80's-90's sedans.

[Z-06]

It is time for Chrysler to Hire some better design people. All the latest offerings are either mediocore or just pathetic. It just seems like with the exception of the Charger, Magnum and 300 all products are pukeworthy.

[Intrepidation]

That's a much better V8 now. I officially like the Dakota again. The fixed it's biggest flaw, the nose. The interior looks better too...even if the materials haven't improved much...this is a truck, not a car...so it's forgivable. Also they toned the chrome down...thankfully.

I hope these important updates help the truck sell better....this should have been what the redesigned Dakota was.

Edited February 4, 2007 by Dodgefan

[american_revolution_2005]

This is better than the last but I still don't like it 100%. It is aggressive but boring at the same time. What is with GM and Chrysler? Both newer versions of their midsize trucks looked better before the current generation. The biggest being the Colorado, the S10 was beautiful before, now, I can't stand the Colorado or Canyon.

[NOS2006]

WTF? That's the worst looking truck I've ever seen. And that goes above and beyond the Ranger and Tundra.

[AM6_Cutlass]

Still not as good looking as the previous generation, but a HUGE improvement over the looks of the current model... less chunky and awkward looking. Still missing a regular cab model though.

[BrewSwillis]

WTF? That's the worst looking truck I've ever seen. And that goes above and beyond the Ranger and Tundra.

Didn't you used to like Chrysler? I haven't heard you say a good thing about them in over 6 months!

[CSpec]

Didn't you used to like Chrysler? I haven't heard you say a good thing about them in over 6 months!

Maybe because their cars suck....?

[rosserman]

i like this dakota better than the ones of the past couple of years. I especially like the 290hp the 4.7L puts out now. I will be looking at one when they make it to dealers. It is almost time to replace my 2000 dakota

[maxximus1]

ehhh...not crazy about the interior, it looks too "tupperware" for me.

[daves87rs]

It's CRAPTASTIC!

Great, now I get to see a bunch of these around here...

They can't give them away around here-and they make them even uglier??!!

Gotta agree with NOS on this......

Pass the Advil, Please.

[NOS2006]

Didn't you used to like Chrysler? I haven't heard you say a good thing about them in over 6 months!

Very sad, isn't it? DCX (minus Mercedes) was my favorite make of car. Well, they've made me re-think that the last year or two. The only vehicles I think they have that are worth buying are the 300C/Charger/Magnum and Grand Cherokee. If you'd like, go ahead and count the Wrangler models. I'd also add the Pacifica, but it's being killed. Note that I didn't list the Viper. The Viper is a great vehicle, but for what it is, it should be a hell of a lot more. It's got a terrible interior and, from what I've heard, more problems than any $80,000 vehicle should have. It's quick, fast, and good handling, but bested by a vehicle that costs $10,000 less than it.

Chrysler's design has gone far downhill both inside and outside the vehicles. Next would be their quality. I haven't seen a high-quality vehicle from Chrysler in awhile aside from the vehicles I've listed. All of the Dodge vehicles look the cheap and too similar to each other. A couple Jeeps (and the Caliber) share the same cheap interior while all the Jeeps have managed to become dumbed down "ideas" of small SUVs (note: not "ideals"). Most of the attractive Chrysler vehicles are getting cut while the ones that remain are nothing near where a Chrysler vehicle should be. Next would be their engines. I don't feel that the Chrysler engines are nearly at par with any of the competition. My mom's got a 2005 Durango with the 4.7L Magnum. That engine is nowhere near as powerful or efficient as it should be. Then, take all of the Hemis. Now, I know the 6.1 is getting more HP soon, but the 5.7 and 6.1 are nowhere near the efficiency that they should be; they're all power, no finesse.

Honestly, Chrysler has the potential to be a great company, but over the last little while, I've lost much respect for them. My mom, who has raised on the income of two Chrysler-working parents (who both put in over 25 years with the company before retiring under the Chrysler name), is now starting to move past Chrysler after having not one, not two, but three faulty Dodge vehicles out of her last four (two Durangos and a Caravan). My best friend who has grown up on his retired-from-Chrysler grandfather's wage and has always named Dodge as his favorite brand has lately been telling me how Dodge is moving lower and lower on his rankings of favorite automakers.

I don't know about you or anybody else, but I know how I feel. Chrysler has come a long way from great in the last few years. They should focus on the vehicles they already make moreso than creating all of these sub-par vehicles that they keep coming out with. Chrysler's going downhill and, not only can they not seem to find a way out of it, but it looks like they don't even realize how terrible their products are. I kind of want to feel sorry for them..

Edited February 5, 2007 by NOS2006

[FAPTurbo]

WTF? That's the worst looking truck I've ever seen. And that goes above and beyond the Ranger and Tundra.

Didn't you used to like Chrysler? I haven't heard you say a good thing about them in over 6 months!

Maybe because their cars suck....?

ROFLMAO!

[DetroitNut90]

It's allright...but in typical Chrysler fashion of late, it's interior appears to be a stylized block. Nothing that would really make me want it over another S-Series or a Frontier.

Edited February 5, 2007 by DetroitNut90

[daves87rs]

It's allright...but in typical Chrysler fashion of late, it's interior appears to be a stylized block. Nothing that would really make me want it over another S-Series or a Frontier.

I don't know about that-I think the S-series might have a better interior...

[Nick]

Does anyone else think it looks like a Ranger?

[AAS]

Does anyone else think it looks like a Ranger?

YES!

I forgot to mention that in my earlier post...

[sciguy_0504]

The exterior looks better, more refined and conservative. Kudos to DCX for updating the truck so soon.

[NOS2006]

Does anyone else think it looks like a Ranger?

Yes, but worse.

[Screaming Trees]

Here's mine :twocents:

They gave it a slightly modified Nitro front end. Its ugly

[Mule Bakersdozen LS]

The front end is a bit blander than I'd like (my only real complaint to the underservedly little-fanfare 2006 Rampage concept), but this looks like an improvement, and I haven't seen the interior yet, but if its like the Compass and Caliber abominations, then I'll pass. Glad Dodge finally decided to boost the 4.7-liter V-8 to a reasonable output, at 290hp. But when does the 3.7-liter V-6 get a big boost? And where art thou, regular cab?

[BrewSwillis]

But when does the 3.7-liter V-6 get a big boost? And where art thou, regular cab?

Maybe the 255HP 4.0L V6 will become a mid range engine? Don't really see why they'd offer 3 engine choices though.

[Flybrian]

Maybe the 255HP 4.0L V6 will become a mid range engine? Don't really see why they'd offer 3 engine choices though.

Well, it makes sense:

Base (volume) V6

Midlevel (volume) V8

High-output V8

[daves87rs]

Well, it makes sense:

Base (volume) V6

Midlevel (volume) V8

High-output V8

Agreed.

[TheOtherBear]

I drive an '05, after owning a '97. I wasn't thrilled w/ the styling changes in the '05 year, but frankly, I think it's a better truck than the GenII/III's. Roomier interior, a bit more grunt, and I got used to the styling.

Frankly, although the Frontier and Tacoma do offer more horses on their high-end V6's, I need the bed size for carrying my whitewater gear. The Dakota still fits my need better than the Taco or Nissan, although I think both are good trucks.

The re-design looks okay to me, the added ponies are nice, and my '05 is off-lease in May of next year. If I can get a silver TRX trim with a sunroof, tow package and that new V8, I'm thinking I'll jump.

[ponchoman49]

It looks better overall to me than the outgoing version. And kudos to Dodge for not copying the endless tirade of dull, bland smooth sided garbage thats been pumped out the past couple of years. They kept the body ridge and optional molding thank goodness too for those of us that care what our vehicles will look like down the road. The 290 hp 4.7 looks to be a winner but I wish the interior was less tupperware looking though.