Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

Noticed the latest Trade sitting in the living room, so I read through it. Some interesting vehicles in it. I'm used to just seeing 80's junk in it...

1970 Plymouth Road Runner, matching numbers, mint condition, multiple show winner. $39,000, OBO.

1970 Chevrolet Camaro, 4 speed, partially completed. $7000, OBO.

1935 Plymouth touring sedan, with title, can be restored. $3900, OBO.

1967 Chevrolet Impala SS, 396, auto, a/c, bucket seats, console, new interior, 42k miles, fresh original engine, fresh trans. $16,900.

1965 Chevy II Nova station wagon, 4 door, restoration started. $2500.

1960 Ford Thunderbird, 2 door, rare 430 V8, auto, a/c, bucket seats, unrestored cond, great project car. $1200, OBO.

1964 Pontiac LeMans, original 64 GTO hood, 4 speed trans and emblems, 71 GTO 400 V8, 24, 632 miles, excellent frame, needs restored. $6500, OBO.

Just thought I'd post about it...

Posted

Heh. In my paper, were two Camaro's.

One 1968 with a rebuilt V8 for $3500, and a 1969 with a dropped in 454 for $5000.

I'd love either one, and could afford the initial costs...

...but realistically, I'd enjoy just leasing the new Camaro... or perhaps a two year old Mustang. :AH-HA_wink:

Posted

I think I want to get a Cadillac Catera for kicking around, for a second car. Maybe, or maybe I just want to get rid of my car altogether and get an automatic car, stick in this city, in the primarily city driving I do, sucks!

Posted

Hmm... this might be the sexiest non concept Grand Am GT I've seen. Clicky

Well, the tail lights are fairly ridiculous, but other than that its pretty nice. Seats in the back look like they might be kinda dirty...which immediately makes me wonder what went on back there.

Posted

Posted Image

1935 Plymouth you say.... :blink: $3900 is either cheap for beater/driver

or a bit too much if it's some rotted out shell with a missing drivetrain.

Posted

Well, if anybody is looking and ends up seeing a 1967, 1970-73, 1987-1992 Camaro with a running 350, automatic, and T-Tops let me know! My dad wants one as a project car.

Posted

That's a goodlooking GA, Vipes. I'd like to see an SE coupe (less cladding) in that color, done like that (except with the factory, dark GT taillamps), without a spoiler. That would be righteous.

Hehe, I just realized what I posted. OK, an SE coupe, in that color, with darkened headlights, factory, smoked GT taillamps, tinted windows, and those rims. Sweet.

Posted

Heh. In my paper, were two Camaro's.

One 1968 with a rebuilt V8 for $3500, and a 1969 with a dropped in 454 for $5000.

I'd love either one, and could afford the initial costs...

...but realistically, I'd enjoy just leasing the new Camaro... or perhaps a two year old Mustang. :AH-HA_wink:

I haven't seen Camaros that cheap....cool :thumbsup:

Posted

That's a goodlooking GA, Vipes. I'd like to see an SE coupe (less cladding) in that color, done like that (except with the factory, dark GT taillamps), without a spoiler. That would be righteous.

Hehe, I just realized what I posted. OK, an SE coupe, in that color, with darkened headlights, factory, smoked GT taillamps, tinted windows, and those rims. Sweet.

Heh... well, the SE looks too cheap to me. I can overlook cladding. If I had the money to buy a GA like that... and the extra to do some custom work, I'd just smooth the cladding out, like the Hot Wheels and GXP concepts.
Posted
I wish I had a picture to post of that red SE coupe of this generation Pontiac built with "3.4L H.O." performance parts. It was a sweet, clean little car.
Posted

1969 Camaros are usually basketcases for $5000, add the 454 and it's

almost certain to be a rotted out, buttered up rlling disaster on wheels.

Back in 2002 when I bought my 1968 for $5000 it was because I had

given up on finding even a I6 powered '69 automatic.

Posted (edited)

Fiero? Hmm... 1988? Go on. GT? Mmm... 5spd? Awesome... T-Tops? Hmm... How much? $13,500? What? Oh hell no. Clicky. Then, there is this one for half as much, minus the T-Tops. Clicky... I'm a Pontiac mood as you can see.

Edited by blackviper8891
Posted

1969 Camaros are usually basketcases for $5000, add the 454 and it's

almost certain to be a rotted out, buttered up rlling disaster on wheels.

Back in 2002 when I bought my 1968 for $5000 it was because I had

given up on finding even a I6 powered '69 automatic.

Well, there goes my hope...

Though I would take any years of that Camaro.....

Posted

Seems like the best bang/$ right now is a 3rd gen.

Buy a solid one for like $800 and drop in a $3000

SBC mated to a 6-speed and you've got a hell of

a muscle car for less money than a beat up 120

horsepower FWD Honda Civic.

Posted

Seems like the best bang/$ right now is a 3rd gen.

Buy a solid one for like $800 and drop in a $3000

SBC mated to a 6-speed and you've got a hell of

a muscle car for less money than a beat up 120

horsepower FWD Honda Civic.

Hmmm....

Got any good pics of those... :thumbsup:

Posted

An associate of T.W. just traded his 1984 Camaro for a Turbo G.P.

Posted

Last night SpeedingPenguin & I drove down in the Q45 to Sturbridge so I could

take a 2nd look at the '59 Buick. God I want that damn car, like LAST WEEK.

On the way back in 01* cold we're driving down Rt.20 when out of the corner

of my eye in a dark dirt parking lot next to a steel building I see the nose of a

1980s Cadillac. Even though it's a split second glance I'm almost sure it's a

Bustleback Seville, def. either that or a Fleetwood Brougham, so I get over to

the breakdown lane and back up a few hundred feet. It turns out to be a 1984

Seville with ~85K miles and a rebuilt Jaser engine. It's rotted and tacky, gold

and bronze TT, fake continental kit built into the trunk, chrome straps on the

rear and a sunroof.

The guy poured $3900 into it for the motor and and a bunch of other repairs

so natrually :rolleyes: he's asking $2400.

Posted
Odd? Not in this case. :AH-HA_wink: The Mark VII is a lot nicer than the square box Mark VI, and I like it better nowadays than the Mark VIII. The Mark IV and the Mark VII are my favorites of the Mark series. Good choice, imo, and from what I understand, this model's air suspension has proven more reliable than the others. For a Ford engine, you can't beat the 302 for reliability and ease of modification. You should ditch the Millenia for this.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search