Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close

Official 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class images

DetroitNut90

By DetroitNut90
in Chrysler

 Share

Recommended Posts

DetroitNut90 Newbie

DetroitNut90

Posted
Posted

Posted Image

Mercedes today unveiled the 2008 C-Class — a totally redesigned version of its bread-and-butter sedan. Designed to compete with the BMW 3-Series, models will range from the basic C180 Kompressor to the 450 horsepower C 63 AMG. The new C-Class reflects Mercedes' updated design language, with design cues from the new S-Class sedan and R-Class crossover.

Leftlane News

Northstar Newbie

Northstar

Posted
Posted

The new C-Class is very average. Aside from the front (which I like) it is either boring (the side), or somewhat ugly (the rear). The interior is very lacking in design originality. It looks like it came from a VW but they forgot to upgrade it to Audi levels for the luxury version. The CTS murders it.

RJB Newbie

RJB

Posted
Posted

Too much Chrysler and too little Daimler.

It looks like a higher-quality Sebring.

I say so too, it has the chunky Sebring interior over the top plastic styling to it.

bobo Apprentice

bobo

Posted
Posted

The front of the car is ok, but the rest looks like the designers weren't really trying. And the interior just looks cheap. Perhaps with wood trim it'll look better.

turbo200 Newbie

turbo200

Posted
Posted

I guess I'll echo what others have said here. It's not bad just underwhelming. The interior will probably be better in person, like the big GL is, and the front end is supremely attractive. The rest of the car is just okay, it's not all that robust or expensive looking.

VenSeattle Newbie

VenSeattle

Posted
Posted

Wow... that interior doesn't look like Mercedes at all. It'd look great in a cheaper car, but this is a Mercedes...

Times two... I really expected more after the new S-Class. I think it'll look better in person also, since most of the interior chrome touches don't seem to show up very well in pictures.

Sixty8panther Newbie

Sixty8panther

Posted
Posted

Not a big fan, but that might change if the new C-class 2 door is a hardtop! :)

sciguy_0504 Newbie

sciguy_0504

Posted
Posted (edited)

The exterior looks good, IMO, but that interior is disgusting for a Benz. Even the new Malibu's interior is better.

Edit: spelling.

Edited by sciguy_0504
MyerShift Newbie

MyerShift

Posted
Posted

Hmm. The interior does look good, but it doesn't look like a Benz. Looks Ford or Korean to me. Rear isn't very good, but I do like the front end.

However, this is the first C-Class that I wouldn't mind having. Even if the S-Class interior is better, it has more electronic $h! and it looks bad to boot. I'll take a car that I can figure out any day over an i-Drive BMW or S-Class.

Z-06 Newbie

Z-06

Posted
Posted
Overall MB could have done a good job. It is a disappointment compared to the new G and definitely compared the CTS. I was worried that the new C would have stole the limelight from the CTS at Geneva. But I think CTS is safe and ready to be at top of the heap.
Flybrian Newbie

Flybrian

Posted
Posted

The big difference is the CTS is an evolution of a dynamic and groundbreaking design. You knew Art & Science would be the mantra, but not to what extent.

With the C-Class, you know its going to be direct translation of the S-Class' styling with no originality of its own. Once you've seen the flagship Benz, you've seen them all.

Z-06 Newbie

Z-06

Posted
Posted

The big difference is the CTS is an evolution of a dynamic and groundbreaking design. You knew Art & Science would be the mantra, but not to what extent.

With the C-Class, you know its going to be direct translation of the S-Class' styling with no originality of its own. Once you've seen the flagship Benz, you've seen them all.

Good point Fly. Except one minor correction. You have seen all of the Benz's after the flagship except the E-class which is the bastard child of their line up. :AH-HA_wink:

gm4life Newbie

gm4life

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hell, order me a 2008 CTS in crimson red... That Benz in the front is sweet, side and interior suck. My friend has a C240 it is a $h!y car hell my 'crude' Bonneville with 1 less cog in the gear box and more weight out performs it. I was very underimpressed with his 38K Benz! I could have a loaded GXP for less (new at sticker) or an SLE with leather, xm radio, 6 disc changer and tape deck for less too. I was disapointed in the size to it was the size of my GRAND PRIX!

Edited by gm4life
Cadillacfan Newbie

Cadillacfan

Posted
Posted (edited)

That's too bad about the interior. I'm sure it's very high quality and uses some of the finest materials in the industry. Unfortunately, the design doesn't reflect that. It looks like it belongs in a much cheaper vehicle and definately not a Mercedes.

The exterior is pretty stylish for the class. I like the new direction for Mercedes styling even if it might be a bit too conservative for some. For those who have yet to see the new S-class in person, I highly recommend it. It looks so good. It's reserved yet sophisticated all at the same time. This follows that design theme and I'm sure it will look just as good on the road. I do agree on the back though. Could've used a little bit more work. Yet, so does the new CTS but the rest of the vehicle is so good, it's a relatively small issue in my book.

Also, I don't think you can really compare this and the CTS together since this is more around the size of the 3-series or the IS and there is still a bit of confusion on whether or not GM is still positioning this vehicle as a 3-series fighter.

Edited by Cadillacfan
Robert Hall Veteran

Robert Hall

Posted
Posted

Not a big fan, but that might change if the new C-class 2 door is a hardtop! :)

I'm sure the next CLK will be a ht like the current one..

regfootball Community Regular

regfootball

Posted
Posted (edited)

that rear shot looks like the new Lancer to me.

the dash says Aveo meets Saturn Outlook, with a hint of VW.

The door panels say Opel vectra or 2008 Saturn Vue.

the exterior I think is a response to try to be as sporty as a BMW. It looks ok to me, just not very affluent like Mercedes typically does.

The interior does look cheap in the photo. Odd that they would go this direction. Of course, the 3 series interior is cheesy too. Did the Germans get to the point where they have to cost cut interiors now? Perhaps.

Well, the CTS I think presents itself much better, at least in photos.

I think actually if the mercedes grille was half the size it would look way better.

Edited by regfootball
Robert Hall Veteran

Robert Hall

Posted
Posted

Overall I like the styling, but...there's something about the greenhouse--specifically the rear door glass area that disturbingly reminds me of the last 2 generations of Civics...the C-pillar and upper rear door just doesn't say MB to me..

MyerShift Newbie

MyerShift

Posted
Posted

Depending on what it looks like in person, I really think I could like this.

It's small, and if they still make it available with a manual, I would drive it.

I know, I am really weird.

AM6_Cutlass Newbie

AM6_Cutlass

Posted
Posted

Good point Fly. Except one minor correction. You have seen all of the Benz's after the flagship except the E-class which is the bastard child of their line up. :AH-HA_wink:

It's too bad the E-Class is the last decent looking car they have left...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search