Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

abc news

GM CEO Shoves Environmental Protester

GM CEO Rick Wagoner Lightly Pushed an Environmental Activist Who Approached Him at LA Auto Show

By BRIAN ROONEY

Nov. 29, 2006 — - The chairman and CEO of General Motors today gave a shove to a protester at the Los Angeles Auto Show who asked for a pledge to make GM the leader in fuel economy by 2010.

"I appreciate your support and I'm sorry, you have to leave now," GM chairman Rick Wagoner said, giving a push to Matt Leonard of the Rainforest Action Network.

Leonard, and Mike Hudema of the environmental organization Global Exchange, walked onto the stage at the Los Angeles Auto Show near Wagoner's podium carrying a large "pledge form" for Wagoner to sign. Both men were wearing suits and went to the podium unchallenged, quietly behaving as if they were part of the program.

Leonard said, "I have with me a pledge for Rick to sign here committing General Motors to become the leader in fuel economy by 2010. Rick, could you do the honors?"

Wagoner quickly replied, "I think my speech spoke for itself," before telling the two men to "take it away."

The incident occurred just after GM's chief had delivered a morning speech about the company's plans for green vehicles, including plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell cars, in an effort to find new forms of propulsion.

boy, these envirowhackos have balls. and no tact or diplomacy skills.

Edited by regfootball
Posted (edited)

At least they were in suits, and clean cut and reasonably professional.

Maybe if more environmentalists were like that, instead of looking and smelling like they just came from Woodstock, people would take them seriously.

Edited by Captainbooyah
Posted

They barge onstage and Wagoner's the prick, huh?  Sure he was short with them, but, uh...can you really blame him?

222357[/snapback]

Um - who said Wagoner's the prick?

Posted

committing General Motors to become the leader in fuel economy by 2010.

Hell freezes over?

Let's see, they would only have to dump every single SUV and truck they make.

Environmental activists need to think up realistic goals if they want to get anywhere.

Posted (edited)

Um - who said Wagoner's the prick?

223370[/snapback]

Just the fact that people felt the need to publish and release the video online seems to me like an offhand way of saying "Look at what GM did! Shame!"

At least slightly, I could just be used to hearing negative press on GM.

Edited by AxelTheRed
Posted

Just the fact that people felt the need to publish and release the video online seems to me like an offhand way of saying "Look at what GM did!  Shame!"

At least slightly, I could just be used to hearing negative press on GM.

223476[/snapback]

They need to improve their security at these things. The top corporate guys are always targets for nut jobs, whether envirowackos or terrorists.

Posted

They need to improve their security at these things. The top corporate guys are always targets for nut jobs, whether envirowackos or terrorists.

223491[/snapback]

That would have been cool if security had come forward and tasered and batoned that dude...

Posted

Note to self: install Cadillac 500 V8 into Datsun ASAP.

I think we need to speed up global warming and my

little 2.4 liter I6 is not doing enough. An 8.2 liter V8

will do quite nicelly, no catallitic converter of course!

Posted

Hell freezes over?

Let's see, they would only have to dump every single SUV and truck they make.

Environmental activists need to think up realistic goals if they want to get anywhere.

223452[/snapback]

Not quite Einstein... it's not 1986 you know.

The Corvette Z06 gets better fuel economy

with a huge 7 liter V8 than most midsize

cars got a couple decades ago.

I'm not sure if you've noticed btu GM is not

building 1979 Suburbans anymore with big

carburation and 1960s technology.

Considering the variety, performance and size

of GM's vehicles their fuel economy numbers

are much better than HONDAsor TOYOTAs.

I'd love to compare the Seqoia to the some

simillar product, like a Trailblazer EXT or Tahoe.

Since the Ridgeline has no frame or any

amount of durablle construction it probably

does alright but the tradeoff of such a $h!ty

vehicle is NOT worth it.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search