Jump to content
Create New...

SEMA 2006: Chevrolet Colorado Z-71 Plus


Recommended Posts

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted (edited)

Posted Image

Posted Image

SEMA 2006: Chevrolet Colorado Z-71 Plus

The 2007 Chevy Colorado Crew Cab Z71 Plus is an off-road enthusiast’s dream interpretation of one of Chevrolet’s most popular trucks – the just right-sized Colorado crew cab. Keeping with the rugged Z71 image, the suspension has been fitted with HUMMER H3-derived components, front and rear. Custom-milled 20 x 9-inch alloy wheels are wrapped with aggressive 285/50R20 off-road tires. Underneath the restyled front fascia, hood and fenders is a powerful 320-horsepower 5.3L V-8. Fuel enters the Colorado via a unique, racing-style ITW spherically actuated fuel fill system. The cargo box bed and rear bumper were restyled and a roof rack/light bar was added. The custom paint job combines light green metallic, bright aluminum and light charcoal for a stunning high tech look. The leather interior is upscale yet durable.

Vehicle highlights

  • 320-hp 5.3L V-8 with Hydra-Matic 4L65 transmission

  • Restyled front fenders, hood, fascia, grille, bed and rear bumper

  • Roof rack/light bar, chrome tow hooks, custom tonneau cover

  • Tri-color paint: light green metallic accented with fine bright aluminum and light charcoal

  • TYE LED taillamps and custom driving lamps

  • Custom-machined 20 x 9-inch alloy wheels

  • Aggressive off-road 285/50R20 tires

  • Increased ground clearance

  • HUMMER H3 suspension components

  • High-performance brakes: 15-inch front rotors with six-piston calipers; 14-inch rear rotors with four-piston calipers

  • ITW SAFF (spherically actuated fuel fill) refueling system that replaces traditional door and cap with a custom ball valve

  • Flowmaster cat-back custom exhaust system

  • Ruggedly luxurious leather interior with Dusty Olive bolsters, woven inserts and Pumice piping

  • Matching door panels, instrument panel and steering wheel with bright exterior color trim bezels

  • Kenwood speakers

  • Magellan portable GPS – eXplorist XL Series
Edited by YellowJacket894
Posted

I'm not too sold on the face, but this is exactly what the H3T should be, except with maybe an I6 as a standard engine.

Hell, maybe this should become an option package for the Colorado itself. The V8 couldn't hurt :AH-HA_wink:

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

A very bold look is in store for the 2008 Colorado. And is a V8 a possibility, too?

The Dakota may just have to start looking over its shoulder.

Posted

the front looks kinda silly to me... close off the hood intake and add....something to the "mouth"... otherwise, looks good

Posted

:o

That is sexy as hell. I know this has to portend the '08 production truck. I am imagining it toned down just a tad for production. Way hot. Love it!

Posted
This would not be a super-expensive facelift, as the zig-zag side contours on the current truck don't extend into the doors. I really like the smoother side contours, the normal looking wheel arches, and the face. I don't really care for the '94 S-10-inspired rear bumper situation though.
Posted

I like the WTC inspired grill, but I'm not too sure about the headlights...

Oh and the exhaust tips are sweet.

Posted

Give it:

1. More of a rear bumper

2. Different headlights

3. The top of the grille should match up with the bottom of the grille (where they meet the crossbar)

Then it would be perfect. It looks great as is.

Posted

The front end is much better then the current one. GM needs to get serious in this segment so it can catch up with the competition. Something that the current Colorado failed to do. Next step, put some serious money into that interior and drop in a V6 and a V8.

With this concept, it appears that GM may be listening to the complaints of the critics and fans and will beef up the Chevy/GMC twins.

Posted

Front end: :yuck:

The rest: :thumbsup:

It's kinda like my ZR5...and I like the V8 addition. But the front I can live without.

Posted

:pbjtime: YEA Baby, this is HOT! This is what I expected the first time Chevy rolled out this truck, a In your face version of it.

Build it and they will come! :idhitit:

:pokeowned:

Posted

The headlights make it look sleepy, but other than that, I like it.

They should ofer the I-6 tho, since they won't be needing it for the Trailblazer, I hope they don't kill the engine. It is too good to waste...

Posted

Well yeah, but an engine 4 cylinders in depth seems to fit better than one 6 cylinders in depth.

And it is pretty much a guarantee that a production version of this facelift will be toned down.

Posted

This is much better looking than the generation 1 Colorado / Canyon with their I want to be a Lamborgini when I grow up wheel arches. I love the front facia. The sides could be toned down a little for production (as often happens with these things) and still look very good. It is so good to see GM style coming back from the dark days of the '00 Impala.

Posted

For all the nay-sayers, this is exactly what Chevy needs. Designs that polarize will enstill that "gotta have" feeling, especially to the core customer base that would be shopping mid size trucks. Hopefully the powers that be will not ponder this design to long. If they do, we will end up with some watered-down, P.O.S. wonder bread design custom taylored to apease some idiotic focus group. Sure a tamer version of the truck won't offend anyone, but nobody would feel passionate about it either. Please Chevy, don't step on the designers toes!!!

Posted

How about this: think of concept vehicles as "slingshots". The purpose of a concept vehicle is to push the design envelope, to shock the onlooker, to polarize public opinion. Then, for production, the final design is brought back from the extreme just enough to appeal to more people on both sides of the fence. The first glimpse has to be a shock to gain attention and force an emotional response.

I am remembering an S-10 concept truck, painted chartreuse and black, that previewed the new-for-1994 production truck. It was wild, eliciting much the same passionate response as this Colorado concept. Then the design was tempered for the assembly line. This is just one example, as just about every concept vehicle is used for this purpose.

Concept vehicles are useful tools for manufacturers to advance their design language and make something "new" stick in the public's mind, but they're almost always made more "sane" for production.

Posted

The leather interior is upscale yet durable.

Vehicle highlights

  • Ruggedly luxurious leather interior with Dusty Olive bolsters, woven inserts and Pumice piping

       

  • Matching door panels, instrument panel and steering wheel with bright exterior color trim bezels

       

  • Kenwood speakers

       

  • Magellan portable GPS – eXplorist XL Series
Any pics of the interior?
Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

Decka: I don't know if there are any interior pics. Some unofficial ones may surface sometime soon, though.

Ocnblu: You were saying something about this . . . ?

Posted Image

1993 Chevrolet Highlander concept (I wish GM would've kept the name for production.)

Posted (edited)

Yes, that's it, Mr. Jacket. Compare this to the stock '94 S-10 ZR2. See how it is a bit more outrageous than the production truck. Front, sides, rear, all appreciably different, but the essence is there. (Neat sliding 3rd door!)

Prediction: The '08 Colorado will be a toned down version of this concept. Use this S-10 as a point of reference.

You can see realtime photos of the SEMA Colorado at Autoweek magazine's website show coverage.

Edited by ocnblu

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search