Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

The base price is pretty impressive, but once you start adding some options it doesn't look as good. If you get the sport AT with a sunroof, technology package, XM, and Navigation package, and wood trim, you're looking at close to $40k. Still not bad though.

Posted

It's too bad they don't offer the G35x with the 6-speed manual transmission. My dad has a 2006 G35x and the only thing he dislikes about the car is that the manual wasn't available with AWD.

Posted

It's too bad they don't offer the G35x with the 6-speed manual transmission.  My dad has a 2006 G35x and the only thing he dislikes about the car is that the manual wasn't available with AWD.

209046[/snapback]

After the interior, that's the other big issue I have. Why no 6MT + AWD? Makes no sense to me. That's the combo I'd want.

Posted

After the interior, that's the other big issue I have. Why no 6MT + AWD? Makes no sense to me. That's the combo I'd want.

209048[/snapback]

ditto. pricing is good, it seems. it will even undercut the CTS big time.

Posted

And you'll probably get better resale value, too. Also, $0 servicing for 50K miles.

209161[/snapback]

Well, have fun with your uglier, weaker, slower, worse-equipped BMW with this gorgeous interior...

Posted Image

...that you still paid more for.

Oh, and it's easy to offer free maintenance when you roll the potential costs into the car's price (just a theory).

Posted (edited)

Well, have fun with your uglier, weaker, slower, worse-equipped BMW with this gorgeous interior...

Posted Image

...that you still paid more for.

209171[/snapback]

I'll admit, I prefer the previous Gen BMW's over the current model, but I happen to like the BMW's interior. I like things that are "simple"... nothing too fancy, and that applies to my dashes as well.

It's all matter of preference of course. Plus, I've never liked the G35 much anyway.

Feel free to spend all your (nonexistant) money.

What's that 'sposed to mean?! Them's fightin' words! :lol:

Edited by Captainbooyah
Posted

Well, have fun with your uglier, weaker, slower, worse-equipped BMW with this gorgeous interior...

209171[/snapback]

Let's compare apples to apples, shall we?

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted

Let's compare apples to apples, shall we? 

Posted Image

Posted Image

209271[/snapback]

I prefer the 3er's organic yet Teutonic interior any day. The G's is too techy for me...

Posted

It's hardly a tough call. Just depends on your priorities. If you absolutely need that BMW tag at the front of your car (like 90% of the women around here who drive 328's just for that reason), then get the BMW.

209211[/snapback]

:ohyeah::rolleyes:

Posted

The 3er interior looks pretty good with NAV, actually. Otherwise, it sucks.

The G35's interior is pretty average. The "metal" looks like what it is: gray plastic.

Posted

For about the price of the base G35 (or $950 more dollars as empowah stated) the interior I posted is all you're getting.

The one you posted is at least $3,550 more on top of that.

Posted

I prefer the 3er's organic yet Teutonic interior any day. The G's is too techy for me...

209272[/snapback]

Nope, I still like the G35's a lot better, though the 3 looks better with the Nav.

Posted

The G35's interior is pretty average. The "metal" looks like what it is: gray plastic.

209274[/snapback]

No, it's real aluminum trim. It has been since 2005.

Posted

No, it's real aluminum trim. It has been since 2005.

209277[/snapback]

Well if that's the case it needs to look better than it does. It looks like the painted plastic in the Camry to me.

Posted

Well if that's the case it needs to look better than it does. It looks like the painted plastic in the Camry to me.

209281[/snapback]

It's textured better than it looks in that pic.

Posted

Both G35 and BMW 3 series interiors are nowhere near the competition (Audi, Lexus, Mercedes etc). The only BMW with a truely good interior is the 7 series. All the rest fall short.

Infiniti knows how to make great interiors, it's just that even the updated interior in the G35 doesn't appeal to me. Check out the M35/45 interior for a great interior from Infinity. (spectacular car too; to me, best in class)

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted

It's great pricing, but I don't lust over this car because the looks do nothing for me. I do commend Nissan for having a very competitive, compelling vehicle.

Posted (edited)

It's great pricing, but I don't lust over this car because the looks do nothing for me.  I do commend Nissan for having a very competitive, compelling vehicle.

209291[/snapback]

not only that but this car is going to look silly in a few short years. that interior has way too much going on. it has more buttons than a keyboard and looks like an atm. there is no one single plane.

all the views are skewed and angles are awkward looking to me.

im sure there will be plenty of takers and it is nicely priced and equipped but to quote hyundais call letters, hope you understand

nothing is driveabvle and inexpensive.

notorious cost cutting will reveal the entire undercarriage is made from recycled coke cans and breadsticks. :D

and the motor really doesnt make me go ooooh either. i find it irritating and obnoxious. im sure it performs admirably but id grow tired of it. but hey, to each his own.

im from the less is more school of thought. not the more for less.

Edited by Mr.Krinkle
Posted

It's just their looks. Honestly, they just seem too bland for me. Something about the BMW catches my eye. Of course, I'd buy a CTS over either brand, but that's just my preference.

And Infiniti's interiors are just, in the words of empowah, "too techie" for my liking.

Posted

im sure there will be plenty of takers and it is nicely priced and equipped but to quote hyundais call letters,  hope you understand

nothing is driveabvle and inexpensive.

notorious cost cutting will reveal the entire undercarriage is made from recycled coke cans and breadsticks.  :D

209299[/snapback]

We aren't talking about Kia here. :P

Posted (edited)

there is way too much going on in that G35 interior and the new exterior is rather messy, but you just cannot ignore the performance and value of it. its a strong entry in the field. A4's are so lame.

truth be told, you could likely get into a 9-5 for what a high end G35 or low level BMW would cost you in real dollars, if you wanted more space or something more unique.

One fo the S60 variations might be an alternative here too......like an AWD T5 or something.

that M35 interior is way too complex. what do baseline M35's go for?

Edited by regfootball
Posted

there is way too much going on in that G35 interior and the new exterior is rather messy, but you just cannot ignore the performance and value of it.  its a strong entry in the field.  A4's are so lame.

truth be told, you could likely get into a 9-5 for what a high end G35 or low level BMW would cost you in real dollars, if you wanted more space or something more unique.

One fo the S60 variations might be an alternative here too......like an AWD T5 or something.

that M35 interior is way too complex.  what do baseline M35's go for?

209316[/snapback]

But the 9-5 is ancient and is FWD...plus it has GM parts bin stereo face on it. I want something unique in my interior. Both the M45 and the G35 interiors may be a little busy (though I don't find them to be) but they are very nicely designed and shaped. I've always liked Inifiniti's taste in interior design.

Posted (edited)

Why did you even bother posting if you're this clueless?

209343[/snapback]

wow. are you really just retarded or like to bust chops. it was a joke scotthendersonfan. smoke a spliff and ....lighten up man. find your center.

and the car will be laughed at before the lease is up.

enjoy the prestige of a cut rate bmw with none of the allure, history, mechanics, and satisfaction but dont try to convince me. clueless? the motor is irritating. i think it sounds like $h!. dont tell me otherwise. retard. :rolleyes: its as obnoxious as all this whining about how good a price it is.

if you wait a couple years you can go to a police auction and purchase a seized one for even less money.

why do you have such a hard on for this car anyway? 8)

is it because you like it?

going to work on my chi now. peace man.

Edited by Mr.Krinkle
Posted

Besides the engine and possibly the standard features/pricing, the G does nothing for me. The floating headlights and hood cutline are horrible, IMO, and the rear is plain. The interior does not look like it comes on entry-lux car. The metal does look fake along with the wood, which was not pictured.

The M, on the other hand, is hot all around.

The 3 does little for me, either. Overhyped and too pricey considering what else is offered in the segment. I'd rather have an IS, A4, TL or next-gen CTS.

Posted

Besides the engine and possibly the standard features/pricing, the G does nothing for me.  The floating headlights and hood cutline are horrible, IMO, and the rear is plain.  The interior does not look like it comes on entry-lux car.  The metal does look fake along with the wood, which was not pictured.

The M, on the other hand, is hot all around.

The 3 does little for me, either.  Overhyped and too pricey considering what else is offered in the segment.  I'd rather have an IS, A4, TL or next-gen CTS.

209382[/snapback]

The only thing is the IS isn't much of driver's car...it could have been so much better if Toyota had spent more time on driving dynamics. The chassis is there, the looks are there, the egine and the interior are there. But the V6 lacks a manual, the Nannies get in the way, and it doesn't feel as connected to the road as the BMW or the Nissan. The TL is pretty nice too, but I'm not a fan of the FWD layout...next gen CTS yeah I wanna see that sucker, but I bet it'll be too big for the class.

Posted

Guys which one

This?

Posted Image

Or This?

Posted Image

209271[/snapback]

Or This?

Posted Image

post-1877-1161956771_thumb.jpg

209344[/snapback]

The BMW.

I've sat in both.....and the Infiniti seems too "generic-Japanese" for me. I much prefer the kind of stark, teutonic appearance of the 3-series interior. Plus it feels like it's solid as a rock...

Posted

Guys which one

This?

Posted Image

Or This?

Posted Image

209271[/snapback]

Or This?

Posted Image

post-1877-1161956771_thumb.jpg

209344[/snapback]

I can't tell what the 3rd pic is...it doesn't enlartge properly for me...but I'm Gonna go ahead and guess it's the IS?

I prefer the G35...sure the aluminum doesn't look like metal...it actually reminds me of cloth in it's softness and color...butthe design is so much better to me than BMWs. I respect BMWs cars...but that interior wouldn't look out of place in the early 90's.

Posted

I LOVE the wood in the G35's interior. I think the interior, although a bit busy, looks very nice.

Posted

I can't tell what the 3rd pic is...it doesn't enlartge properly for me...but I'm Gonna go ahead and guess it's the IS?

I prefer the G35...sure the aluminum doesn't look like metal...it actually reminds me of cloth in it's softness and color...butthe design is so much better to me than BMWs. I respect BMWs cars...but that interior wouldn't look out of place in the early 90's.

209399[/snapback]

The picture is of the next-gen CTS interior.

Posted

truth be told, you could likely get into a 9-5 for what a high end G35 or low level BMW would cost you in real dollars, if you wanted more space or something more unique.

209316[/snapback]

Werd. I saw a shiny gray '06 9-5 wagon today, and honestly, it looks amazingly fresh for an eight year old car. The front end looks great in person, and I love the ironed look of the fenders. I'd take one over a technically-superior TL or ES.

Posted

Werd. I saw a shiny gray '06 9-5 wagon today, and honestly, it looks amazingly fresh for an eight year old car. The front end looks great in person, and I love the ironed look of the fenders. I'd take one over a technically-superior TL or ES.

209508[/snapback]

Plus the 9-5 could be construed as a "niche" choice in the marketplace.

For example, in southern California where seemingly EVERYONE has a TL or ES, the 9-5 is less-common.....and somewhat more "special."

I actually strongly considered one before getting the CTS Sport.....but in the end, the Cadillac just seemed like a much-higher quality product overall in terms of ride/handling/structure.

Posted (edited)

The picture is of the next-gen CTS interior.

209418[/snapback]

Posted Image

Whoa...ok screw the G35 (which is still nice) This thing is awesome! :idhitit:

--

Edit: Found an enlarged photo.

Posted Image

Edited by Dodgefan
Posted

Werd. I saw a shiny gray '06 9-5 wagon today, and honestly, it looks amazingly fresh for an eight year old car. The front end looks great in person, and I love the ironed look of the fenders. I'd take one over a technically-superior TL or ES.

209508[/snapback]

which is why i said that about the 9-5....they tweaked it just enough to appeal to someone who wants something unique and kind of tasteful

Posted

which is why i said that about the 9-5....they tweaked it just enough to appeal to someone who wants something unique and kind of tasteful

209601[/snapback]

It's good value, too. You get $4K off sticker if you do European Delivery, plus $2K travel stipend, free maintenance, and 5/100 powertrain warranty.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search