Jump to content
Create New...

Retro


HarleyEarl

Recommended Posts

Guest YellowJacket894

Wow. Thanks for finding these, Harl. I love this truck. 8)

I know for a fact GM had a solid roof GMT-800 Tahoe Sport mule in development. I just wish I could find the photos.

What kind of other content does NetCarShow.com have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Thanks for finding these, Harl. I love this truck. 8)

I know for a fact GM had a solid roof GMT-800 Tahoe Sport mule in development. I just wish I could find the photos.

What kind of other content does NetCarShow.com have?

194477[/snapback]

It's a mix of models, past, present and concepts. Wallpaper sized....nice site for photos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest YellowJacket894

Dart: I'm pretty sure there is a top for the K5 and Blazer concepts in this thread. I can't find one for the K5, but here's a photo that shows that there's a top for the Blazer.

Posted Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest YellowJacket894

It's a mix of models, past, present and concepts.  Wallpaper sized....nice site for photos.

I'm checking it out right now, and I think it's a cool site. I'm bookmarking it. 8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The K5 was very cool but almost a little too short in wheelbase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing how dated this looks now that the 900s are imminent. I'd like to see a two-door 900 Tahoe Z71, but it would have to have a sporty-looking greenhouse, maybe with lift-off hard rear roof sections like the new Wranger, and removable quarter windows.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I ever take ownership of another SUV again, I'll only do so if it's a 2dr. Both of these are great looking concepts (the K5 more so than the Shark) that should have made production. Hell, if I were running the show, I'd have approced these ahead of the Avalanche at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wish that the Tahoe would have never entered production and the K5 would have remained. Because if we all think back to yester-year, then we know that the Tahoe was spawned from the K5 (and I personally don't like the Tahoe because it = short-wheel-base Suburban, and what's the point of that?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly wish that the Tahoe would have never entered production and the K5 would have remained.  Because if we all think back to yester-year, then we know that the Tahoe was spawned from the K5 (and I personally don't like the Tahoe because it = short-wheel-base Suburban, and what's the point of that?).

194870[/snapback]

Completely agree. If I wanted anything the size of the Tahoe, I would just buy a Suburban for the extra space. But, the Tahoe hit the spot for thousands of SUV buyers and couldn't be built fast enough when it debuted. Can't say I understand why those folks bought it instead of the Suburban, but they did. Suburbans are miraculous in how easy they are to drive and park, extremely tight turning radius for such a big vehicle. I don't need one, but I love 'em and would buy one over a Tahoe any day.

That is until they make a 2-door again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, no, no 76ChevyTrucker... remember that we are against GM using alphanumerics for any vehicle names. This is regardless of the fact that the original 1969 BLAZER (yup, it had a real name), was also known as the K5 Blazer (4wd, 1/2 ton is what the K5 stands for - which I'm sure you know that already, being a GM truck fan!). With the TrailBlazer soon departing dealership lots, I think "Tahoe" for the 4-door SUV and "Blazer" for the 2-door SUV wopuld be appropriate enough.

And if I haven't said it enough, come on General Motors - bring back these full-size 2-door SUVs again. Even in limited numbers, I'm sure everyone of them built will sell out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, but even YOU have to admit that the alphanumeric of K5 DOES have a little warm spot in your heart (Hell, I know it does in mine, I would love to have my friend's 1985 K5 Blazer with its wonderfully fuel-injected 572 rat with 8-71 blower on top running on 33s). I wouldn't mind seeing the Blazer nameplate come back, I really wouldn't and have it be STRICTLY a two-door model, 4wd only, and V8-powered only. But we'll have to wait and see, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I agree with you that K5 does bring that warm feeling to my heart. But in today's world where every car manufacturer uses alphanumerics for names, it would just blend in with all the other ones. I'd say go for the Blazer name for the Tahoe's 2-door version, and leave Yukon for the GMC version (I mean, can you really see a "Jimmy" being offered again?) or use TED's suggested nameplate - Brigadier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search