Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

No, it is more the two-door Blazer idea with the back cap off. If I were to choose between this and the Avalanche, I would buy this hands down. This is about FUN....not practicality. And I'll side with fun anyday.

Edited by HarleyEarl
Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

Wow. Thanks for finding these, Harl. I love this truck. 8)

I know for a fact GM had a solid roof GMT-800 Tahoe Sport mule in development. I just wish I could find the photos.

What kind of other content does NetCarShow.com have?

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

What's that you say? Want this in a pill form instead of a suppository?

Posted Image

There ya go.

Posted

I'm all for fun too, but something WITHOUT a roof just screams impractical to me.

I mean, with a ragtop, at least you can put it up. What do you do with this thing when it starts raining, other than hide it inside??

Posted

Wow. Thanks for finding these, Harl. I love this truck. 8)

I know for a fact GM had a solid roof GMT-800 Tahoe Sport mule in development. I just wish I could find the photos.

What kind of other content does NetCarShow.com have?

194477[/snapback]

It's a mix of models, past, present and concepts. Wallpaper sized....nice site for photos.

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

Dart: I'm pretty sure there is a top for the K5 and Blazer concepts in this thread. I can't find one for the K5, but here's a photo that shows that there's a top for the Blazer.

Posted Image

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

It's a mix of models, past, present and concepts.  Wallpaper sized....nice site for photos.

I'm checking it out right now, and I think it's a cool site. I'm bookmarking it. 8)

Posted

The K5 was very cool but almost a little too short in wheelbase.

Posted

Dart: I'm pretty sure there is a top for the K5 and Blazer concepts in this thread. I can't find one for the K5, but here's a photo that shows that there's a top for the Blazer.

Posted Image

194490[/snapback]

Luv that!!

Posted

I had a pic of the GMT800 2-door mule, but it's now lost on my dead hard-drive.

It was white and looked good as well as being much more practical than the K5.

68: agreed on the wheelbase thing. (I have other problems with the K5 as well)

Posted
It's amazing how dated this looks now that the 900s are imminent. I'd like to see a two-door 900 Tahoe Z71, but it would have to have a sporty-looking greenhouse, maybe with lift-off hard rear roof sections like the new Wranger, and removable quarter windows.
Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

They've aged well. :D

I think I posted these in. . .April I think at the earliest.

Posted

If I ever take ownership of another SUV again, I'll only do so if it's a 2dr. Both of these are great looking concepts (the K5 more so than the Shark) that should have made production. Hell, if I were running the show, I'd have approced these ahead of the Avalanche at the time.

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

Seems very Jeep Grand Cherokee...not Chevy.

I think I get what you mean. It's probably because of how the taillamps touch the C-Pillar.

Posted

I honestly wish that the Tahoe would have never entered production and the K5 would have remained. Because if we all think back to yester-year, then we know that the Tahoe was spawned from the K5 (and I personally don't like the Tahoe because it = short-wheel-base Suburban, and what's the point of that?).

Posted

I honestly wish that the Tahoe would have never entered production and the K5 would have remained.  Because if we all think back to yester-year, then we know that the Tahoe was spawned from the K5 (and I personally don't like the Tahoe because it = short-wheel-base Suburban, and what's the point of that?).

194870[/snapback]

Completely agree. If I wanted anything the size of the Tahoe, I would just buy a Suburban for the extra space. But, the Tahoe hit the spot for thousands of SUV buyers and couldn't be built fast enough when it debuted. Can't say I understand why those folks bought it instead of the Suburban, but they did. Suburbans are miraculous in how easy they are to drive and park, extremely tight turning radius for such a big vehicle. I don't need one, but I love 'em and would buy one over a Tahoe any day.

That is until they make a 2-door again.

Posted

No, no, no 76ChevyTrucker... remember that we are against GM using alphanumerics for any vehicle names. This is regardless of the fact that the original 1969 BLAZER (yup, it had a real name), was also known as the K5 Blazer (4wd, 1/2 ton is what the K5 stands for - which I'm sure you know that already, being a GM truck fan!). With the TrailBlazer soon departing dealership lots, I think "Tahoe" for the 4-door SUV and "Blazer" for the 2-door SUV wopuld be appropriate enough.

And if I haven't said it enough, come on General Motors - bring back these full-size 2-door SUVs again. Even in limited numbers, I'm sure everyone of them built will sell out.

Posted

Yeh, but even YOU have to admit that the alphanumeric of K5 DOES have a little warm spot in your heart (Hell, I know it does in mine, I would love to have my friend's 1985 K5 Blazer with its wonderfully fuel-injected 572 rat with 8-71 blower on top running on 33s). I wouldn't mind seeing the Blazer nameplate come back, I really wouldn't and have it be STRICTLY a two-door model, 4wd only, and V8-powered only. But we'll have to wait and see, I guess.

Posted

Oh, I agree with you that K5 does bring that warm feeling to my heart. But in today's world where every car manufacturer uses alphanumerics for names, it would just blend in with all the other ones. I'd say go for the Blazer name for the Tahoe's 2-door version, and leave Yukon for the GMC version (I mean, can you really see a "Jimmy" being offered again?) or use TED's suggested nameplate - Brigadier.

Posted

That's what I'm thinking, bring back the Blazer nameplate for tha two-door variant of the Tahoe. Then actually have the Tahoe for the four-door. And finally let GMC keep what they've got and be happy.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search