Hmm...

[Cory Wolfe]

Hmm... could look nice in my driveway...

[Flybrian]

Those things are like Ford Probes, i.e. I've seen maybe one in good condition.

[bobo]

Sixty8 has had some history with one of those. They're tiny inside, and I find the styling to be fish-like.

[Croc]

Guys why bother...he's already made up his mind.

[daves87rs]

Burn It! Burn IT NOW!

[mustang84]

Not a pretty Mazda at all. Too much Taurus and Hyundai in the front end, even though it predates them both.

Edited August 27, 2006 by mustang84

[ocnblu]

A guy I used to work with has one he's done a lot of custom work to. Not sure if it's the 4 or 6. It's painted bright white.

[Cory Wolfe]

Guys why bother...he's already made up his mind.

185372[/snapback]

Um... I didn't see any mentioning of that until your post. And you don't even know the half of it, quite frankly. Jeesh... I can't make a thread about a car I like? So what that it was inspired by one I saw sitting for sale that was in excellent condition... Means nothing, I tell you! Nothing!

[regfootball]

Hmm... could look nice in my driveway...

185355[/snapback]

v6?

I love those cars.

They aren't pussy rice like the CRX.

[chris]

v6?

I love those cars.

They aren't pussy rice stylish like the CRX.

185456[/snapback]

I don't dig the styling on these cars much.

might I suggest an alternative which you might find more appealing (reliability wise and fun-wise)?

[Croc]

I don't dig the styling on these cars much.

might I suggest an alternative which you might find more appealing (reliability wise and fun-wise)?

185565[/snapback]

Agreed.

[Farkas]

OK, I hate to be teh n00b, but what Mazda is that?

[Cory Wolfe]

v6?

I love those cars.

They aren't pussy rice like the CRX.

185456[/snapback]

Considering even with a 4cyl the CRX is faster...

I don't dig the styling on these cars much.

might I suggest an alternative which you might find more appealing (reliability wise and fun-wise)?

185565[/snapback]

Which are also more expensive... But I dig MX3s and their styling. Very cool little things.

[Flybrian]

A CRX, condition notwithstanding, is a very destitute car. No matter where you're going, it looks like you're heading to or from social services to pick up your welfare check. You may as well get a Ford Festiva because at least you don't have to even get out of the car to fill the tank (I've seen someone do just that).

MX-3s are more original and Preludes can look good. Problem is finding a decent, unmolested, unf@#kedup one.

[NOS2006]

I'm pulling the Ford Aspire card on this one:

[chris]

I see a lot of MX3's around here, and they look pretty tacky and worn out most of the time... I mean, of course it's your choice.

what's your price range anyways?

[mute]

id ruthar have on o' dees

[NOS2006]

Ohhhhkay, lauren errr mute.

[Cory Wolfe]

I see a lot of MX3's around here, and they look pretty tacky and worn out most of the time... I mean, of course it's your choice.

what's your price range anyways?

185633[/snapback]

Not that I'm looking, but an MX3 in perfect condition is cheaper than a Prelude. And I dont even care for the earlier Preludes. I like the 5th gens much better.

[mute]

Ohhhhkay, lauren errr mute.

185644[/snapback]

hah good one . . . i thought everyone had forgotten her . . . its been a while since she was on AIM so i almost did too

but i also dont think her del sol was a turbo vtec

[regfootball]

A CRX, condition notwithstanding, is a very destitute car. No matter where you're going, it looks like you're heading to or from social services to pick up your welfare check. You may as well get a Ford Festiva because at least you don't have to even get out of the car to fill the tank (I've seen someone do just that).

MX-3s are more original and Preludes can look good. Problem is finding a decent, unmolested, unf@#kedup one.

185629[/snapback]

yeah the crx is bait for trash. watch out for your pop cans, someone will melt it into a spolier or make it into a fart can exhaust.

MX-3's are unique.

Preludes are nice, but still are cheesy Hondas. And they look immature.

Edited August 28, 2006 by regfootball

[XP715]

Can't believe nobody's suggested an RX7 yet; why pussy out and get an MX3 when you can have a rotary-powered rear wheel drive rocketship?

[daves87rs]

[Cory Wolfe]

yeah the crx is bait for trash.  watch out for your pop cans, someone will melt it into a spolier or make it into a fart can exhaust.

MX-3's are unique.

Preludes are nice, but still are cheesy Hondas.  And they look immature.

185719[/snapback]

Hah.. your view of Honda is tainted anyways, so just stfu for once. Honda makes a better vehicle than anything you've owned. And well... You do know the MX3 was inspired by the CRX, right? And the CRX was still faster, lighter and probably handled better as well. I love MX3 and even I am not blind to reality, like you.

Can't believe nobody's suggested an RX7 yet; why pussy out and get an MX3 when you can have a rotary-powered rear wheel drive rocketship?

185723[/snapback]

Hmm.. let's see... fuel economy disadvantage, price disadvantage... and... oh! reality!