Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

The WSJ reported that GM will entertain a pact with other companies, should the N-R deal fall through. It sounds almost like Rick has planned out the outcome of the 90 review. Well anyway, I got to thinking about VW. What do you guys think of those companies coming together in some capacity?

VW wouldn't threaten GM in North America at all and the 2 companies would be a juggernaut in Europe, Asia, and South America. Unlike Nissan-Renault, VW does have some good technology and masterful interior making that could actually help GM in America.

On the downside, VW is plagued with their own problems too, but not to the extent of Ford.

Posted

VW does have some nice things to share, like DSG and Quattro. But I don't think that an alliance between the 2 would make sense in Europe, Asia, and SA, since GM does very well on its own in those markets.

Posted

Don't know if this is an aside or not, but I'd love to see a nice TDI diesel version of the Cobalt. And VW makes good TDI diesel engines.

Posted

Don't know if this is an aside or not, but I'd love to see a nice TDI diesel version of the Cobalt.  And VW makes good TDI diesel engines.

168704[/snapback]

Actually the TDI engines we got in the states were not up to the snuff of the 08 emissions. The Fiat common rail diesels and izuzu diesels are more than up to snuff and we should see them in the US in just a few years.
Posted

VW's new 1.4L SUPERCHARGED for LOW RPM's AND TURBOCHARGED for MID to HIGH RPM's I4 with the HP+TORQUE of a small V6 is nice! I see a interesting FUEL EFFICENT future there! But besides that and some other TECH that GM allredy is WORKING ON why would they NEED VW?

Posted

VW's new 1.4L SUPERCHARGED for LOW RPM's AND TURBOCHARGED for MID to HIGH RPM's I4 with the HP+TORQUE of a small V6 is nice! I see a interesting FUEL EFFICENT future there! But besides that and some other TECH that GM allredy is WORKING ON why would they NEED VW?

168756[/snapback]

Twin charged engines are not anything new. Honda or maybe Suzuki has had one in production for years in the Japanese market. There is a BIG downsize to twin charging. Number one is weight. Turbos add weight, superchargers add weight and both together add a lot of weight. Also the internal components must be beefed up a LOT to handle the extra boost and associated pressures.

And with all that extra weight and rotating mass will hurt fuel economy, especially in the city.

Posted

Ford, VW & Honda are all WAY less appealing to me than Nissan/Renault.

Posted

I would prefer no partner at all.

But given a choice Honda or VW would be the two who have the most to offer GM in the field of small engine tech.

If gas stays as it is the small car programs will be the most important thing in the future.

But on the other hand how about a W 427 in a new Vette?

Beside we GM employees could get their discount on the Bently or Lambo.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search