Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/10/news/compa...rtune/index.htm

im still not buying into this whole thing. any change really wouldnt be evident until at least 3 years. i dont know if thats conservative or not.

the best thing he got going for him is if the smaller euro cars made their way here.

nonetheless it seems overly complex and just unnecessary. maybe if this were 10/15 years ago talks like this might have made some more sense.

the clio seems like a neat little car though. probably do real well here.

Edited by Mr.Krinkle
Posted

Its like I've said once before, I don't see where any partnership is going to bring major advancements to GM. Now with Carlos running the show its like Krinkle said, three years before we see anything happen. How about we tell Kirk and York to go and screw a rough 2x4 and wait to see what is REALLY going to happen with GM instead of throwing a 3 year old-esque temper tantrum becuase what you got isn't exactly what you wanted it to be and things are happening just like you want them to.

Posted

GM already has amazing, small cars that do well overseas in what Opel and

Vauxhall sell. GM does not need small Renaults as much as Renault needs access to GM's dealer network.

Why is this guy chastising GM for bringing out the Tahoe in this market? Although he throws GM a bone by adding that these products were planned three years ago, the real fact is GM owns the large SUV market and pundits would be trashing GM two years from now when other makes had overtaken the aging Tahoe: damned if you do, damned if you don't.

I just don't think GM needs this kind of diverson of resources and energy when things seem to be bottoming out. What is K really up to? I am becoming increasingly wary of his true motives.

Posted

I saw this in a BMW magazine ad the other day and I think it applies to GM as well:

“The ability to say no to compromise is a rare thing these days. Many companies would like to be able to say it, but so few have the autonomy to actually do it.

As an independent company, BMW can say no. No, we will not compromise our

ideas. No, we will not do it the way everyone else does it. No, we will not

factor designs down to the lowest common denominator. No, we will not sell out

to a parent company who will meddle in our affairs and ask us to subject our

cars to mass market vanilla-ism.

By maintaining our autonomy and ability to say no, we can make sure

great ideas live on to become ultimate driving machines.”

Posted (edited)

I don't want more Renaults stinking up our streets. The forty-two Alliances left are enough.

165457[/snapback]

exactly no one needs them and all these hints/speculations are nothing new or groundbreaking. it wont speed up "progress" any faster and if anything would only be a hinderance.

somethings el stinko in this deal. im thinking along the lines of greed, shock or massive ego stroke/glorification.

hey, at lest theyre gonna explore it. some good can come out of it.

Edited by Mr.Krinkle
Guest YellowJacket894
Posted

Thinking about it, a GM-Renault alliance would get us nowhere. (I used to think it wouldn't be so bad.) The only plus side would be that GM could dip into the Infiniti rear-drive platform bin and get a few cars for Pontiac, Buick, and Chevy.

Improving + Improving = Improving for a longer period of time. Kirk should shove his old, wrinkly lips up his ass and shut up his old rusty trap. If he wants GM to make progress, his way is not the way to go.

Maybe Ghosen should mentor Wagoner and show him a few ropes. That sounds better.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search