Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

MT is all gushing for themselves over their latest issue, they have a minivan comparo. But get this, Sedona, Quest, Caravan, Odyssey.

WHERE'S THE SIENNA? I'm no Toyota banger, but its clear the Sienna is one of the segment leaders.

To top it off, they tested a Quest with a list price of over 40 grand. They could have just as easily tested an S model in the high twenties because they tested a Sedona with an MSRP of about 25 grand. "And its such a great value". Damn thing didn't even have power doors!

Yet the Sedona takes 2nd even though the Quest has the nicer interior and handle the best of the bunch. The Sedonas second row doesn't even fold flat. The Odyssey takes first, no biggie that was to be expected.

MT has lost it. They compare 4 vehicles, don't include the segment leader and there is a 15 thousand dollar spread in a price sensitive segment.

What a bunch of dumbphux. Another case of pandering to the Koreans.

Edited by regfootball
Posted

MT is all gushing for themselves over their latest issue, they have a minivan comparo.  But get this, Sedona, Quest, Caravan, Odyssey.

WHERE'S THE SIENNA?  I'm no Toyota banger, but its clear the Sienna is one of the segment leaders.

To top it off, they tested a Quest with a list price of over 40 grand.  They could have just as easily tested an S model in the high twenties because they tested a Sedona with an MSRP of about 25 grand.  "And its such a great value".  Damn thing didn't even have power doors!

Yet the Sedona takes 2nd even though the Quest has the nicer interior and handle the best of the bunch.  The Sedonas second row doesn't even fold flat.  The Odyssey takes first, no biggie that was to be expected.

MT has lost it.  They compare 4 vehicles, don't include the segment leader and there is a 15 thousand dollar spread in a price sensitive segment.

What a bunch of dumbphux.  Another case of pandering to the Koreans.

I wouldn't call it pandering to koreans but MT lost it when they named the Ridgeline the truck of the year....

in any rate .... I have hard time finding nay professional or semi professional auto rags that have any cred in my eyes because of the glaring omissions in their articles and lack of accountability..

For comparos .. people finally need to get this straight - either price match (all cars are close to each other on price, and you compare features) or feature match (get each car with perfectly identical features/options and then compare prices)... anything else is alchemy or whicraft (pick one)

Igor

Posted

I wouldn't call it pandering to koreans but MT lost it when they named the Ridgeline the truck of the year....

in any rate .... I have hard time finding nay professional or semi professional auto rags that have any cred in my eyes because of the glaring omissions in their articles and lack of accountability..

For comparos .. people finally need to get this straight - either price match (all cars are close to each other on price, and you compare features) or feature match (get each car with perfectly identical features/options and then compare prices)... anything else is alchemy or whicraft (pick one)

Igor

exactly

Posted

The Sedona is like what would happen if the Odyssey went to the fair and had its picture drawn by a $h!ty sketch artist.

Posted

Yea it's pitiful they put the Quest in rather than Sienna I mean come on Odyssey, Sienna, and Grand Caravans are the best sellers with Sedona newcomer with all the features you need. Maybe if the Sienna was in the comparsion it would win!!! Just a thought but yea I find motor trend or car and driver always giving all the glory to Honda on everything they make so this is no surprise... which annoys me very much.

Posted

Maybe if the Sienna was in the comparsion it would win!!!

Nah, the Odyssey beats the Sienna on so many different levels. Although the Sienna would probably beat the rest of the pack.

Posted (edited)

I don't think the Uplander is really competitive against the other minivans though some of its parts are from the Venture like the doorhandles and the seat design is very similar to the Venture its really outdated although I did read an article a while ago about GM's next minivans in 2009 or something with spaceship design as their next inspiration for design.

From Autoweek:

GM hopes new sport vans will revive sales in minivan segment

JASON STEIN | Automotive News

Posted Date: 7/20/05

DETROIT -- General Motors is developing a new line of minivans with a radically different look in an effort to revive its sales in the segment.

GM will launch at least three new minivans for the 2009 model year on the automaker's Lambda architecture, a platform designed for front-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive minivans and sport wagons.

Current Chevrolet, Saturn and Pontiac minivans, known internally as U vans, will move to the Lambda architecture. GM may not replace the Buick Terraza minivan, supplier and company sources say.

Production will begin in 2008. GM hasn't announced a location. A year later, GM will offer extended-wheelbase versions of its minivans.

GM began building its crossover sport vans - vehicles based on GM's existing minivan architecture but with SUV-like front ends - last year at its Doraville, Ga., plant. GM's Lambda architecture will debut early in 2007 with sport wagons built at a new plant in Lansing, Mich.

Sources say the new minivans will offer fold-flat seating similar to the minivans offered by the Chrysler group, along with a radical, rounded exterior design.

A GM insider says the GM minivans "look like spaceships."

GM could use a minivan sales boost. It sold more than 300,000 minivans a year from 1997 to 2000, but sales have declined steadily ever since. Last year GM sold 157,169 minivans.

Through the first six months of this year, GM sold 87,524 minivans and held 14.8 percent of the minivan market, down from 15.3 percent a year earlier. Through June, segment leader Chrysler sold 226,908 units and held 38.4 percent, up from 34.0 percent.

The Buick Terraza, Chevrolet Uplander, Pontiac Montana SV6 and Saturn Relay are new for the 2005 model year. But GM hasn't gained any ground with the new minivans.

GM uses the term "architecture" to signify a common set of components, performance characteristics, a common manufacturing process, a range of dimensions and connecting points for key component systems.

Link: http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=102800

Edited by Moto_08
Posted

MT has lost it.  They compare 4 vehicles, don't include the segment leader and there is a 15 thousand dollar spread in a price sensitive segment.

Who is THE segment leader? Not the Toyota...

I agree with what you are saying about not including the Sienna but it is also quite unfair to include the Caravan being how old the design is at this point (also with a new one in the wings)

Posted

Who is THE segment leader?  Not the Toyota...

I agree with what you are saying about not including the Sienna but it is also quite unfair to include the Caravan being how old the design is at this point (also with a new one in the wings)

163888[/snapback]

what is "coming next fall" never matters in comparos - it deserves a mention in the text, but if it is a 2006 Minivan comparo, it is a 2006 minivan comparo... period...

and Sienna is the segment leader, because it was over previous gen Odyssey, and since then no one has pitted them against each other to see how they measure up..

Actually this is true of many other segments.. no comparos of Compacts has Corola in it, I have seen very few comparos with the trucks, the SUV's etc ...

This lets Toyota keep the image of the leader, because no one has a chance to challenge it ... can you imagine the embarrassment, should the Corolla end behind the like of Kia Spectra i na compact comparo? and well behind Civic and Mazda3?

given my above post, I think this was deliberate move by Toyota - but if it was, MT etc should explicitly say it - "Toyota refused to give us a comparo vehicle - you readers can think why they would do it.

Igor

Posted

Who is THE segment leader?  Not the Toyota...

I agree with what you are saying about not including the Sienna but it is also quite unfair to include the Caravan being how old the design is at this point (also with a new one in the wings)

163888[/snapback]

the odyssey and sienna are co segment leaders. what have you been smoking?

the caravan is included because it is the ICON, it still sells like hotcakes, and it can be had for a lot less money.

Posted

what is "coming next fall" never matters in comparos - it deserves a mention in the text, but if it is a 2006 Minivan comparo, it is a 2006 minivan comparo... period...

and Sienna is the segment leader, because it was over previous gen Odyssey, and since then no one has pitted them against each other to see how they measure up..

Actually this is true of many other segments.. no comparos of Compacts has Corola in it, I have seen very few comparos with the trucks, the SUV's etc ...

This lets Toyota keep the image of the leader, because no one has a chance to challenge it ... can you imagine the embarrassment, should the Corolla end behind the like of Kia Spectra i na compact comparo? and well behind Civic and Mazda3?

given my above post, I think this was deliberate move by Toyota - but if it was, MT etc should explicitly say it - "Toyota refused to give us a comparo vehicle - you readers can think why they would do it.

Igor

163900[/snapback]

did the article even mention the Sienna? I don't think it did!

Posted (edited)

what is "coming next fall" never matters in comparos - it deserves a mention in the text, but if it is a 2006 Minivan comparo, it is a 2006 minivan comparo... period...

and Sienna is the segment leader, because it was over previous gen Odyssey, and since then no one has pitted them against each other to see how they measure up..

Actually this is true of many other segments.. no comparos of Compacts has Corola in it, I have seen very few comparos with the trucks, the SUV's etc ...

This lets Toyota keep the image of the leader, because no one has a chance to challenge it ... can you imagine the embarrassment, should the Corolla end behind the like of Kia Spectra i na compact comparo? and well behind Civic and Mazda3?

given my above post, I think this was deliberate move by Toyota - but if it was, MT etc should explicitly say it - "Toyota refused to give us a comparo vehicle - you readers can think why they would do it.

Igor

163900[/snapback]

Wow somebody else that has figured out anything in Motor Trend is based on highest bidder. Let's face it, the car companies could teach the record companies a little bit about payola. As if nothing ever shows up for any test without being "juiced", either the writer or the car.

BTW, who invented the word "comparo"? This person would be a good example for public execution. Crime being the spreading of stupidity by example.

Edited by Angry Dad
Posted

what is "coming next fall" never matters in comparos - it deserves a mention in the text, but if it is a 2006 Minivan comparo, it is a 2006 minivan comparo... period...

and Sienna is the segment leader, because it was over previous gen Odyssey, and since then no one has pitted them against each other to see how they measure up..

Actually this is true of many other segments.. no comparos of Compacts has Corola in it, I have seen very few comparos with the trucks, the SUV's etc ...

This lets Toyota keep the image of the leader, because no one has a chance to challenge it ... can you imagine the embarrassment, should the Corolla end behind the like of Kia Spectra i na compact comparo? and well behind Civic and Mazda3?

given my above post, I think this was deliberate move by Toyota - but if it was, MT etc should explicitly say it - "Toyota refused to give us a comparo vehicle - you readers can think why they would do it.

Igor

163900[/snapback]

Good point. The Sienna just had a face-lift for 2006, I'm surprised they wouldn't want to try their luck against the Odyssey.

I did my own comparison through Edmunds (and Honda/Toyota websites to fill in the holes). The Odyssey definately beats the Sienna in many areas. HP, MPG, features, technology.

Posted

Wow somebody else that has figured out anything in Motor Trend is based on highest bidder. Let's face it, the car companies could teach the record companies a little bit about payola. As if nothing ever shows up for any test without being "juiced", either the writer or the car.

BTW, who invented the word "comparo"? This person would be a good example for public execution. Crime being the spreading of stupidity by example.

163948[/snapback]

car and driver i think founded that word

Posted

Good point. The Sienna just had a face-lift for 2006, I'm surprised they wouldn't want to try their luck against the Odyssey.

I did my own comparison through Edmunds (and Honda/Toyota websites to fill in the holes). The Odyssey definately beats the Sienna in many areas. HP, MPG, features, technology.

163964[/snapback]

don't foget ugly. the odyssey is defintely more ugly

Posted

Actually, I would have to disagree with you on that statement.  The Odyssey is much more attractive then the Sienna.

164024[/snapback]

+1

Posted

It will be a cold day in the nether regions when I'd buy a minvan... any minivan.

With that said, what struck me most in this thread wasn't the missing competitors in M/T's comparison, but the fact that one of these things topped 40K!

Who in the hell pays 40K for a minivan? :blink:

Posted

'07 Siennas will be available with the 3.5L 270 hp V6 and six-speed auto. M/T should do a follow-up comparo with the two leaders.

Posted

the odyssey is much fuglier than the sienna and even the sedona.  damn that new odyssey is frickin hideous

164157[/snapback]

Agreed. Although the previous version looked pretty nice, IMO.

Posted

Agreed. Although the previous version looked pretty nice, IMO.

164193[/snapback]

I would not even say that ... I will say thing Show me a minivan that is not ugly

seriosly.. I know one day I will be driving one, and I do not make fun of anyone that drives one, because they are incredibly versatile, but they all are F-U-G-L-E-Y....

maybe with a couple exceptions like Mazda5 and Ford SMax and next gen Mazda MPV/Premacy) .. but Mazda5 is hlardly a minivan and the other two are not coming to US .

Igor

Posted

The Sienna is way better looking than the Odyssey because it's design is more simple and the Odyssey is just like the Accord the front doesn't match the rear like Odyssey's front is nice then the rear just doesn't fit the way the vehicle looks just like the 06 Accord oh and those hideous lines along the rearmost window camoflauge those door tracks gosh!!!

Posted

the current odyssey is so frickin slab sided and bloated and its front is overbearing, the sides are too busy and the whole form is too blocky. its got a fat ass. D-

the sienna at least looks normal and inoffensive and proportioned just right. too bad the grille and lights are so bad.

the caravan is a nice design, but the whole vehicle is so dated now.

the new sedona is selling like hot cakes around here. the outside is nice to look at but the interior is still third world korean cheap, even if its laid out nice.

for me it comes down to, the quest is the sportiest and now they fixed the interior. it still lakcs the split 3rd row. GLARING oversight on their part.

Posted (edited)

The Sienna is way better looking than the Odyssey because it's design is more simple and the Odyssey is just like the Accord the front doesn't match the rear like Odyssey's front is nice then the rear just doesn't fit the way the vehicle looks just like the 06 Accord oh and those hideous lines along the rearmost window camoflauge those door tracks gosh!!!

164582[/snapback]

:o Now there's a run-on sentence if I ever saw one.

[editted for spelling]

Edited by siegen
Posted

Chryslers previous generation minivans weren't ugly. They were quite attractive, really.

Thank you.

Posted (edited)

the odyssey and sienna are co segment leaders.  what have you been smoking?

the caravan is included because it is the ICON, it still sells like hotcakes, and it can be had for a lot less money.

163936[/snapback]

So the segment leader is who you like? Not who is selling the most?

Take a look at this article: (January 2005) http://www.thecarconnection.com/Industry/D...S192.A8022.html

"2004 Minivan Sales Numbers:

Chrysler/Dodge 384,832

Toyota Sienna 159,119

Honda Odyssey 154,238"

Ok - that one was too old - how about a newer one? (February 2006)http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11256369/from/RSS

"In 2005, the Dodge Caravan had a 20.4 percent U.S. market share and the Chrysler Town & Country 16.3 percent, according to Power Information Network, a J.D. Power and Associates division. The Honda Odyssey held 15.7 percent of U.S. minivan sales, the Toyota Sienna about 14.5 percent and the Nissan Quest about 3.6 percent, according to PIN."

Sounds to me DCX=36.7% Market Share while Honda=15.7% and Toyota=14.5%

So now I ask my question again...

Who is THE segment leader?  Not the Toyota...

163888[/snapback]

:pokeowned: So what have YOU been smoking? Edited by torobud
Posted (edited)

i don't think segment leader is always defined by biggest sales. best product is more appropriate...i.e. the cobalt sells more than the mazda3 but the mazda3 is a better car

Edited by regfootball
Posted

i don't think segment leader is always defined by biggest sales.  best product is more appropriate...i.e. the cobalt sells more than the mazda3 but the mazda3 is a better car

165536[/snapback]

While I respect your opinoin I don't think you can go by feelings (ie you feel that one car is better than another) I believe you have to go by sales because it all boils down to it being part of the Auto BUSINESS where the almighty $$$ rules...
Posted

I wouldn't call it pandering to koreans but MT lost it when they named the Ridgeline the truck of the year....

Igor

162329[/snapback]

MT lost it when they named the 1991 Chevy Caprice Classic as the Car of the Year.

Posted (edited)

While I respect your opinoin I don't think you can go by feelings (ie you feel that one car is better than another) I believe you have to go by sales because it all boils down to it being part of the Auto BUSINESS where the almighty $$$ rules...

165726[/snapback]

then the corolla is better than the cobalt too and the camry is the best car EVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

lots of people watch that whore Oprah every day but that doesn't make her a very good / or any sort of real journalist.

Edited by regfootball
Posted

then the corolla is better than the cobalt too and the camry is the best car EVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

lots of people watch that whore Oprah every day but that doesn't make her a very good / or any sort of real journalist.

166659[/snapback]

I would never try to say I like Oprah or think she is the best - but she IS the segment leader which is what we were discussing...

I hate Corrolas and Camrys but I know they are segment leaders too...

Posted

The Sedona is like what would happen if the Odyssey went to the fair and had its picture drawn by a $h!ty sketch artist.

162502[/snapback]

I think not....considering that the last one sucked, lexus always copuies bmw,

and the odyessy is a good minivan, a copy is a good thing, plus the interior and satey features are better.

Guest YellowJacket894
Posted (edited)

MT lost it when they named the 1991 Chevy Caprice Classic as the Car of the Year.

166381[/snapback]

At first I didn't get it, but I pondered "What's so bad about the Caprice getting that honor?" The Cap' was one of last real American cars in construction and MT awarding it that honor was kind of like a three gun salute at a funeral.

The Ridge-Fire and Cricket getting the honor was a shame and probably Honda's PR and Advertising Department's money at work.

Edited by YellowJacket894
Posted

True, the prev gen Yaris hatch (Echo hatch) was nice, the current one looks like pikachu

169730[/snapback]

Posted Image

Posted Image

:blink:

Christ I hate that little bastard... and that pokemon too.

Posted

Thanks Captain, I have just about weaned my kids off of that annoying show and was hoping to never see that creature again. <_<

The Yaris does look more depressed though...

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search