Jump to content
Create New...

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article...3/1002/BUSINESS

BY JUSTIN HYDE

FREE PRESS WASHINGTON BUREAU

May 23, 2006

A federal judge may soon rule whether General Motors Corp. will face a national class action accusing GM of selling millions of vehicles with a faulty coolant.

The suits stem from GM's use of Dex-Cool, a coolant it first introduced in its vehicles in 1995 and sold in more than 35 million cars and trucks between 1995 and 2004. According to GM, 14 federal and state lawsuits seeking class-action status have been filed against GM over a variety of engine problems linked to Dex-Cool.

Customers have complained of problems ranging from small coolant leaks to complete radiator and engine failure. Court documents show that GM has received tens of thousands of repair requests related to Dex-Cool and engine gaskets in the affected models and considered recalls for some models.

The company has issued several technical bulletins to its dealers about cooling-related problems in the engines, but says it prefers to handle customer complaints on a case-by-case basis.

When GM introduced the orange-colored Dex-Cool, it said in owners manuals that Dex-Cool could last up to five years or 100,000 miles without being replaced, and later extended Dex-Cool's life to 150,000 miles. Dex-Cool uses a different set of chemicals to protect engine parts than traditional green-colored coolant, which requires more frequent replacement, and GM was the first U.S. automaker to use it.

Attorneys for the owners say that clause means GM should repair any Dex-Cool-related problems, even if they crop up outside the engine's typical 3-year or 36,000-mile engine warranty.

"What we're looking for is to have GM step up and honor its warranty obligation," said Eric Gibbs, a San Francisco attorney and one of the lead lawyers for the owners. "There's a significant public interest in this problem, no question about that."

GM claims that the owners manual clause was not a warranty, but a service interval. In its court filings, the automaker says Dex-Cool "has performed without problems in the vast majority of GM vehicles."

"The recent motion to certify a class action is unfortunate," said GM spokeswoman Geri Lama, "and the situation with our customers has been grossly overstated through unsubstantiated allegations in statements which have not been proven in court and will be vigorously defended."

Six of the federal lawsuits have been consolidated in a federal court in East St. Louis, Ill. U.S. District Judge G. Patrick Murphy could rule at any time whether the cases, which have about 100 named plaintiffs, should be granted class-action status, meaning they could represent millions of former and current GM owners.

Three similar lawsuits has been filed in Canada, while a state lawsuit in Missouri has already won class-action status, a decision GM is appealing.

The troubles blamed on Dex-Cool range from leaking coolant to blown engines, and often include failed intake manifold gaskets, pieces that rest between the engine block and the air intake to prevent coolant and oil from leaking. Replacing a gasket usually runs about $700, but a bad gasket can cause enough damage that the engine has to be replaced.

Mixing Dex-Cool with another coolant can cause other problems, and GM doesn't recommend using other coolants in Dex-Cool engines, although some mechanics do swap coolants.

About 110 complaints of coolant leaks in the GM vehicles targeted by the lawsuit have been filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, according to a Free Press review. The agency rejected a call for a defect investigation in 2002, saying the problems weren't safety related and was therefore outside its purview.

Many of the complaints say the problems appear to begin around 60,000 miles, well beyond the engine's warranty but sooner than many customers believe they should have problems with their cooling systems. A few have been reported as early as 20,000 miles.

Mark Reynolds, a radiator repair shop owner in San Carlos, Calif., says he sees one or two GM vehicles a week with Dex-Cool problems. A typical repair requires flushing the cooling system and in some cases taking the radiator apart.

"It's a shame -- vehicles in their fourth or fifth year with this awful, gooey mud attacking the top of the radiator cap and fouling up the radiator," he said.

GM has argued against certifying the lawsuit as a class action, noting that state courts in Michigan and California have already turned down similar lawsuits. It contends that the plaintiffs want to represent past and present owners who don't have any problems, and that they "complain of just about everything that can go wrong with a vehicle, attributing every bit of it to Dex-Cool."

Lama said if a GM customer has a problem beyond the warranty, GM has a process for dealing with it through its dealers.

"The first priority of General Motors and its dealers is helping our customers," Lama said.

Contact JUSTIN HYDE at 202-906-8204 or [email protected].

Copyright © 2006 Detroit Free Press Inc.

Posted

The scum sucking lawyers are at it again. "Please pay my client because they were too stupid to replace their coolant."

Posted

The scum sucking lawyers are at it again. "Please pay my client because they were too stupid to replace their coolant."

Exactly. I've always replaced coolant at 50k myself. Green or Dex Cool. When I changed my Dexcool in my 03 S-10 at 50k, it was still pretty and red with no signs of any problems. I changed it anyways. My truck is now at 104k and going up daily. I checked the coolant the other day and it looks fine.

If more people would read their owners manual and just learn the basics, I reckon about 90 percent of the Dex Cool problems wouldnt happen.

Posted

Exactly. I've always replaced coolant at 50k myself. Green or Dex Cool. When I changed my Dexcool in my 03 S-10 at 50k, it was still pretty and red with no signs of any problems. I changed it anyways. My truck is now at 104k and going up daily. I checked the coolant the other day and it looks fine.

If more people would read their owners manual and just learn the basics, I reckon about 90 percent of the Dex Cool problems wouldnt happen.

they tell us at the dealership to tell people the dexicool is good for 5 years or 150k miles...

Posted

The troubles blamed on Dex-Cool range from leaking coolant to blown engines, and often include failed intake manifold gaskets, pieces that rest between the engine block and the air intake to prevent coolant and oil from leaking.

Since when is a bad gasket the problem of Dex-Cool?

Posted

Since when is a bad gasket the problem of Dex-Cool?

... sounds like those engines had more then 40k miles on them...

my toyota did all of these things left me on the side of the road for 5 hours and cost over 1500$ to fix the engine... do you see me in line to sue? :stupid:

Posted

they tell us at the dealership to tell people the dexicool is good for 5 years or 150k miles...

A good buddy of mine though that is a GM Tech told me to change it around 50 to 75K miles. Reason being if for some reason your forgot to keep the fluid level at the proper level or air got into the cooling system, it could cause the DexCool to sludge. He said however changing it at 50k to 75k was the safest thign to do with it.

Posted (edited)

My 95 S-10 had terrible problems with the cooling system. Head gasket replacement, bad water pump, cracked radiator, overheated several times. I changed the coolant repeatedly due to sludging, I flushed the thing out probably a dozen times in the 8 years I owned it, including the work that was done. When I traded it, it was well on the way to needing another head gasket done. By this time I had also accumulated about 180k miles and chalked the problems up to age. My mechanic even recommened that I switch to green coolant, but I told him Dex-Cool was what it came with, Dex-Cool was what it will keep. It was a great truck other than the cooling system problems, so I really don't hold anything against GM.

Edited by thedriver
Posted

Those "magic little tabs" you can buy at Walmart. They simply seal any tiny seepage that may happen anywhere in the system. If they are used as directed they work effectively. They are not however intended to be placed into the overflow tank. Rather, they are to be placed directly into one of the radiator hoses. Lots of people have placed them in the overflow tanks which has the effect of clogging the hoses back to the radiator - not good.

If GM is guilty of anything, they are guilty of not communiticating what they were changing about the coolant and why. Most people including MANY MANY professional mechanics I know (not do-it-yourselfers) are ignorant about coolant and tried to use the methods and practices they used with the old, green, change it every year coolant. These approaches do not work with contemporary engines and the technologies used to build them. On top of this, most often the "sludging" people have referred to with respect to Dexcool has been the result of mixing the old green stuff in with Dexcool. Again, not good.

Many things are to blame here, not just the coolant.

The coolant itself is nasty stuff. When I was still working at the dealership we noticed it liked to eat radiator hoses on cetain vehicles.

The gaskets are another issue. I don't know if they are made of Silly Putty or what but they just don't have the look, feel and performance of quality gaskets like those from Mr. Gasket or Fel-Pro.

Also, GM has told us we are supposed to take these magic little tabs we are supposed to crush up and put in the cooling system to solve the leaking issues. All I have noticed they have done is dye the overflow bottle orange and clog the radiator.

Posted

Um, I'm all for this case. GM isn't backing anybody with similar problems. I blew a intake manifold gasket at only 35,000 miles.. replaced it.. and then 15,000 miles later I spun a bearing only to later find out that it's because coolant got into the oil (because of the previously blown gasket) and seized the bearing. GM said they are not responsible.

Posted

All right, I've done this once before, but if you mix Dex-cool antifreeze with another antifreeze, it turns to gray play-doh (essentially) and you're screwed. Now the reason (so I've been told by many people in the repair industry) that the reason that GM went to Dex-Cool is because a majority of their vehicles had lots of aluminum components in the cooling system, the radiator core, heater core, heads, blocks, etc were all, or at least partly aluminum and that the traditional (green) coolant caused too many corrosion problems, therefore they changed formulations on the coolant and dyed it orange (or red, or pink, or whatever shade of color-blind you are) and called it Dex-Cool. I normally don't recommend coolant swapping at all, if that's what it came with, put it back in there because obviously it was put there for a reason OTHER than "it looks purdy". I backflushed and refilled the coolant system in my Impala at 100,000-miles and it wasn't sludged or anything at all. Another thing that people have to look at is the quality of water that they're mixing with the coolant. Distilled water is best simply because its been heavily filtered and purified to the best of the bottler's ability to remove chemicals and minerals that can be found in regular tap water, which can reduce Dex-Cool's ability to protect and cause it to sludge.

Posted

Hmm... The 97 Achieva had all sorts of coolant-related problems before the engine finally caught fire...

I'll be bringing this to my parents' attention.

Posted

Hmm... The 97 Achieva had all sorts of coolant-related problems before the engine finally caught fire...

I'll be bringing this to my parents' attention.

You do that. I'll be happy to point out my '97 STS is STILL running without any coolant problems after 122K miles. Somehow it hasn't caught fire yet either. Maybe we'll see each other in court testifying.

Posted

It's the same stuff you can buy at Walmart, specifically "Bar's Leaks Gold" or something close. Supplied by the same company to GM.

The magic tabs we recieved were straight from GM. They told us we were to grind them to a fine powder and pour the powder into the top of the radiator with the engine running to help circulate the stuff through the system. I've used the Wal-Mart ones before to fix leaks on my own 3800 in my Delta 88 and they have worked just fine. I don't know if GM uses a different formula for their tabs or what, but they don't seem to work as advertised.

Posted

You do that. I'll be happy to point out my '97 STS is STILL running without any coolant problems after 122K miles. Somehow it hasn't caught fire yet either.  Maybe we'll see each other in court testifying.

Then again it could be the fault of the previous owner not changing the coolant before we got the car at 115k. The car had various leaks over the course of its next 40-50k miles and finally combusted... externally.

I'm not saying screw GM... But my parents could use whatever compensation they may be able to get out of this lawsuit, if it's ruled in the class's favor.

Posted

Large corporations are paralyzed to admit problems or mistakes because someone will sue. NO vehicle is perfect, and with forensic auditing these days, problems or even trends can be spotted easily.

I would have to suggest that the spottiness of this "problem" has to be related to something other than the coolant itself or the gaskets. Why is it that one Venture will go 100k miles with no problems, yet another require two gaskets in the same time frame? And I do know of customers putting in the green anti-freeze, rather than Dex-Cool.

I doubt this can be proved in Court. How can someone prove their vehicle was never tampered with, never had green fluid put in it or some other contaminant. Impossible.

Posted

This is why it's tough to prove these kinds of things thankfully.

Large corporations are paralyzed to admit problems or mistakes because someone will sue.  NO vehicle is perfect, and with forensic auditing these days, problems or even trends can be spotted easily.

  I would have to suggest that the spottiness of this "problem" has to be related to something other than the coolant itself or the gaskets.  Why is it that one Venture will go 100k miles with no problems, yet another require two gaskets in the same time frame?  And I do know of customers putting in the green anti-freeze, rather than Dex-Cool.

  I doubt this can be proved in Court.  How can someone prove their vehicle was never tampered with, never had green fluid put in it or some other contaminant.  Impossible.

Posted

Lack of maintenance is the problem , not bad chemistry , Some BLOODSUCKING lawywers are trying to get rich . When the tech says you need intake gaskets , do them , it is really a low cost of ownership considering that the plugs and wires are 100k items and most gm stuff can go 20k miles without an oil change , haha , seen it just the other day .....................

Posted

Lack of maintenance is the problem , not bad chemistry , Some BLOODSUCKING lawywers are trying to get rich . When the tech says you need intake gaskets , do them , it is really a low cost of ownership considering that the plugs and wires are 100k items and most gm stuff can go 20k miles without an oil change , haha , seen it just the other day .....................

Read my earlier post, dude.. No intake gasket should go bad at 35k miles. No motor should spin a bearing at 50k because of the earlier gasket problem/coolant leakage into oil.
Posted

I can't speak to the intake gasket issue but I can't see how GM is responsible for the spun bearing. The dealer should have been aware of the potential for coolant to be in the oil and changed it. Sue them.

Read my earlier post, dude.. No intake gasket should go bad at 35k miles. No motor should spin a bearing at 50k because of the earlier gasket problem/coolant leakage into oil.

Posted

Of course. Makes sense right?

So, is Dex cool the reason why Brakes don't last on the Grand Ams?

Haha!

Posted (edited)

your right i should sue toyota...

I don't have a problem with GM at all. In fact, I'm still waiting until I can buy a new Camaro from them. All I want is a little retribution; my car was unlucky compared to others which had better luck. This clearly isn't a problem any car should have, be it an Aveo or an XLR.

I can't speak to the intake gasket issue but I can't see how GM is responsible for the spun bearing. The dealer should have been aware of the potential for coolant to be in the oil and changed it. Sue them.

I change my own oil in auto class. There is a drain bucket where we're to drain the oil or other fluids being changed into or else we can't change our fluids. Using it, one cannot see what comes out of the car; the fluid goes straight down to the bottom. Even so, if coolant was in the oil, the damage would've already been done enough to where I'd have to pull the engine to clean everything out anyway. It's not the dealer, mine, or my auto teacher's fault the gaskets went bad so damn early.

And, to end this post, I just want to add that I'm not looking for a full $1500 refund for everything we had to replace.. just a little would be nice to see that GM cares. Obviously I care about my car, or it wouldn't be 8 years old with only 55,000 miles. If I care, why wouldn't GM? It's very stereotypical of Toyota/Honda/etc. to seem to not care, but GM? Come on.

Edited by NOS2006
Posted

Proper maintenance is always, always needed. Yes, the vast majority of engine components should not and do not crap out at low mileage but some do. Like someone else said, no car is perfect. However, it is on the owner if something crapped out and regular maintenance would have kept it in shape.

That being said, GM techs should have not mixed two different types of coolant (if they did). If there were so many problems, especially early in a car's life with regular maintenance completed, GM should admit the problem and pay up.

Posted

Well, GM needs to STOP ADVERTISING the fact that Dex-Cool can last 5 years or 150,000 miles. Apparently it can't if GM Techs and GM dealership mechanics tell people to change it at 50k or 75k. This is where I have the problem. Most average joe's don't maintain their cars right anyway. So if you're that type of person and sold a vehicle on the fact that the platinum tip spark plugs can go for 100k and the coolant can go for 150k, but problems develop at 20k, 50, or 75k - whose to blame? GM, that's who. I'm a devout GM-koolaid drinker here, but come on! If people are told things last that long, then they should. If GM wants you to change it at 50k, then stop ADVERTISING a much longer life span. I too hate all of these lawsuits, but if GM is doing something wrong then someone has to "let them know".

Posted

Are you kidding? I'm sure you're eager to run out a buy things just because they've been advertised in a particular way. I *guarantee* there are exceptions and qualifications to the 5/150k advertisement.

The problem with the coolant issue isn't so much the 5/150k statement. There have been statements of coolant longetivity long before Dexcool came around. The problem is the ramifications of having failed coolant. In the old iron block days the worst that would happen if you let the coolant fail is a rusted out radiator or heater core. With today's aluminum block "next technology" engines, when you let the coolant fail, you'll lose a head gasket and every other nasty thing that can happen to an engine. People are complaining because they can't neglect things the way they used to and have arguably minor things happen. If you don't maintain, you're gonna have big problems.

This goes back to a point I've made before, the main reason for changing coolant on a frequest schedule ISN'T to maintain a low freeze temperature (remember the old anti-freeze testers with the little balls that told you how cold you could go without freezing?) No, the main reason to swap coolant regularly is to maintain the anti-corrosive properties. Without it you're dead. I have talked to seasoned mechanics that don't understand this point.

Well, GM needs to STOP ADVERTISING the fact that Dex-Cool can last 5 years or 150,000 miles.  Apparently it can't if GM Techs and GM dealership mechanics tell people to change it at 50k or 75k.  This is where I have the problem.  Most average joe's don't maintain their cars right anyway.  So if you're that type of person and sold a vehicle on the fact that the platinum tip spark plugs can go for 100k and the coolant can go for 150k, but problems develop at 20k, 50, or 75k - whose to blame?  GM, that's who.  I'm a devout GM-koolaid drinker here, but come on!  If people are told things last that long, then they should.  If GM wants you to change it at 50k, then stop ADVERTISING a much longer life span.  I too hate all of these lawsuits, but if GM is doing something wrong then someone has to "let them know".

Posted

Are you kidding? I'm sure you're eager to run out a buy things just because they've been advertised in a particular way. I *guarantee* there are exceptions and qualifications to the 5/150k advertisement.

The problem with the coolant issue isn't so much the 5/150k statement. There have been statements of coolant longetivity long before Dexcool came around. The problem is the ramifications of having failed coolant. In the old iron block days the worst that would happen if you let the coolant fail is a rusted out radiator or heater core. With today's aluminum block "next technology" engines, when you let the coolant fail, you'll lose a head gasket and every other nasty thing that can happen to an engine. People are complaining because they can't neglect things the way they used to and have arguably minor things happen. If you don't maintain, you're gonna have big problems.

This goes back to a point I've made before, the main reason for changing coolant on a frequest schedule ISN'T to maintain a low freeze temperature (remember the old anti-freeze testers with the little balls that told you how cold you could go without freezing?) No, the main reason to swap coolant regularly is to maintain the anti-corrosive properties. Without it you're dead. I have talked to seasoned mechanics that don't understand this point.

So the 5/150 stands for how long you can go with that coolant to keep the car cool, but doesn't indicate at all the corrosion-disabling chemical's life?
Posted

This thread makes me glad I didn't second-guess my service advisor, when he told me they would be changing the coolant (around the 51k mile service window).

Posted

Experience is worth something. :)

This thread makes me glad I didn't second-guess my service advisor, when he told me they would be changing the coolant (around the 51k mile service window).

Posted

That's not really what my point was although i rambled on about the corrosion inhibitor. My point WTR to the 5/150 was that these figures are under ideal conditions. Your mileage may vary.

Consider it like the extended engine oil periods we see now. 6000 to 9000 miles without an oil change. While I understand GM has oil life monitors and the quality of oil continues to improve, I still change my oil every 3k or so miles. Why take a change in ruining an engine for the cost of a few oil changes? Particularly with Northstar engines, you're talking about some big bucks.

Back to the coolant, I personally change mine every year, maybe two but no longer. Again, why take the chance? Again with the Northstar, bad coolant means bad headgasket which is a one maybe two time event on one of the engines before the block is useless. Seems like cheap insurance to change the coolant frequently, particularly as many miles as I put on a car.

So the 5/150 stands for how long you can go with that coolant to keep the car cool, but doesn't indicate at all the corrosion-disabling chemical's life?

Posted

Well, GM needs to STOP ADVERTISING the fact that Dex-Cool can last 5 years or 150,000 miles.  Apparently it can't if GM Techs and GM dealership mechanics tell people to change it at 50k or 75k.  This is where I have the problem.  Most average joe's don't maintain their cars right anyway.  So if you're that type of person and sold a vehicle on the fact that the platinum tip spark plugs can go for 100k and the coolant can go for 150k, but problems develop at 20k, 50, or 75k - whose to blame?  GM, that's who.  I'm a devout GM-koolaid drinker here, but come on!  If people are told things last that long, then they should.  If GM wants you to change it at 50k, then stop ADVERTISING a much longer life span.  I too hate all of these lawsuits, but if GM is doing something wrong then someone has to "let them know".

well my problem with them advertising that... is the hoses, dont last that long...

you might have coolant that will last forever... but it will still need to be changed around 75k miles when those hoses start to get a little dry and cracked...

Posted

I don't have a problem with GM at all. In fact, I'm still waiting until I can buy a new Camaro from them. All I want is a little retribution; my car was unlucky compared to others which had better luck. This clearly isn't a problem any car should have, be it an Aveo or an XLR.

I change my own oil in auto class. There is a drain bucket where we're to drain the oil or other fluids being changed into or else we can't change our fluids. Using it, one cannot see what comes out of the car; the fluid goes straight down to the bottom. Even so, if coolant was in the oil, the damage would've already been done enough to where I'd have to pull the engine to clean everything out anyway. It's not the dealer, mine, or my auto teacher's fault the gaskets went bad so damn early.

And, to end this post, I just want to add that I'm not looking for a full $1500 refund for everything we had to replace.. just a little would be nice to see that GM cares. Obviously I care about my car, or it wouldn't be 8 years old with only 55,000 miles. If I care, why wouldn't GM? It's very stereotypical of Toyota/Honda/etc. to seem to not care, but GM? Come on.

when my toyota's factory headgasket was defective, and all the coolant blew out the exhaust, it cost me a lot of money too... but i'm not banging down toyotas door to pay for everything... there was no preventative maintance i could have done to fix the problem before it was caused...

Posted (edited)

Well, GM needs to STOP ADVERTISING the fact that Dex-Cool can last 5 years or 150,000 miles.  Apparently it can't if GM Techs and GM dealership mechanics tell people to change it at 50k or 75k.  This is where I have the problem.  Most average joe's don't maintain their cars right anyway.  So if you're that type of person and sold a vehicle on the fact that the platinum tip spark plugs can go for 100k and the coolant can go for 150k, but problems develop at 20k, 50, or 75k - whose to blame?  GM, that's who.  I'm a devout GM-koolaid drinker here, but come on!  If people are told things last that long, then they should.  If GM wants you to change it at 50k, then stop ADVERTISING a much longer life span.  I too hate all of these lawsuits, but if GM is doing something wrong then someone has to "let them know".

Bingo. If the stuff can't last for the time it's advertised without eating gaskets, then it is just plain lies. The anti-corrosive part of the equation is equally as important as the "anti-freeze" part. Lying to customers about a 150k interval is not something to be proud of, and it is absolutely the worst way to try to sell a few extra cars. Nobody will convince me that this junk actually lasts that long. I have seen just in this thread plenty of people who believe that frequent coolant changes would eliminate most of the issues brought up in the lawsuit and I agree.

Unfortunately, while GM shouldn't have overestimated their "super coolant", there would still be lazy dirtbags who would completely ignore service intervals, even if they were supposed to change the coolant every 5k miles, and then try to suck GM out of even more money that they DON'T have.

Edited by bcs296
Posted (edited)

I agree they shouldn't of started advertising the 5 year change intervals. They just tried that to sell more cars and in the end they got burned again. there are plenty of morons that don't do any maintenance. Tell them to change something every year and they'll do it every 2 or 3. These are the people who will see 5yrs/150 and never change it. There's probably tons of 95,96,97's out there that have never had the dexcool changed. :stupid:

Edited by I hope GMRULES again
Posted

I agree they shouldn't of started advertising the 5 year change intervals. They just tried that to sell more cars and in the end they got burned again. there are plenty of morons that don't do any maintenance. Tell them to change something every year and they'll do it every 2 or 3. These are the people who will see 5yrs/150 and never change it. There's probably tons of 95,96,97's out there that have never had the dexcool changed. :stupid:

Yup. My fiancee has a 96 Blazer. Antifreeze was never changed until I did it for her(it was at 100k). I yelled(but not really) at my aunt for going to put green antifreeze in her coolant tank. Evidently it seems that routine maintenance is pretty rare these days.
Posted

A thousand bucks to replace hoses? Get another mechanic.

You're whining about changing hoses on a 7 year old vehicle? How long do you think they SHOULD last?

Last year I had to spend ~1K on replacing hoses on my 98 Chevy cargo van. It had only 75K miles at the time, way too early for that kind of problem IMO.

Posted

Read my post:

http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums/index...ndpost&p=144757

The 5/150 number is just an estimate. Your mileage may vary. What numbers would YOU use?

Bingo. If the stuff can't last for the time it's advertised without eating gaskets, then it is just plain lies. The anti-corrosive part of the equation is equally as important as the "anti-freeze" part. Lying to customers about a 150k interval is not something to be proud of, and it is absolutely the worst way to try to sell a few extra cars. Nobody will convince me that this junk actually lasts that long. I have seen just in this thread plenty of people who believe that frequent coolant changes would eliminate most of the issues brought up in the lawsuit and I agree.

Unfortunately, while GM shouldn't have overestimated their "super coolant", there would still be lazy dirtbags who would completely ignore service intervals, even if they were supposed to change the coolant every 5k miles, and then try to suck GM out of even more money that they DON'T have.

Posted

A thousand bucks to replace hoses? Get another mechanic.

You're whining about changing hoses on a 7 year old vehicle? How long do you think they SHOULD last?

Longer than that.

Posted

Guys, this isnt blood sucking lawyers, I usually dont like this kind of $h!. But it pisses me off when you open the overflow tank in the 05 cavalier and see nice clear liquid, then you open the one in the century, and see good old muddy dex-cool.

It's not my fault it's like this, hell I know about these problems and we've bitched at out dealership to flush the coolant (f@#king extended warranty!).

But nope, "it's supposed to be like that".

Or how about those good old faulty IMG's? Those are always fun.

Oh, and we cant forget my friend Piston Slap that gets worse year after year, kilometere after kilometere. Nothing like starting your car on a hot summer day and hearing the sound of metal heavily hitting metal.

I'm not a bloodsucking lawyer, i'm a pissed off customer. I really love the car, but i'm pissed that all these problems are just waiting to happen (or already happening, thx piston slap + muddy coolent).

The funny thing, is all of this is gm's cheapness. A service bulletin, where if someone complains about piston slap, read it and it's only cylinders 1-4, because 5-6 have a teflon coating, so they dont slap, isnt that funny? GM cheaped out! But who knows if we can trust a stealership to properly REBUILD the engine. This weekend or next, i'm going there and bitching about everything, and telling them to fix everything. While theres still extended warranty. The car is at 80 000 km (50 000 miles).

It shouldnt sound and feel like it's on it's last stretch, and dont give me this bull$h! about maintenance, when your under warranty, you gotta do EVERYTHING.

Posted

Somebody topped it off with the green stuff.

nope, our cavalier is an 05, without muddy dex-cool

our 02 buick, is muddy

Posted

Again, it will be interesting to see what REAL evidence there is in court. We could go back and forth about this all day.

It is amazing what people have come to expect of their vehicles. Seven years for belts and hoses? I had a customer (a woman!) who freaked when she discovered that when her brother had borrowed her Venture he had taken it upon himself to put Prestone coolant in it. She knew because I had informed her, as I do all my customers.

Nobody reads that damned owners manual. Like when people bitch about the ride on the Malibu, but nobody noticed that the tire pressure was supposed to be different front to back.

People spend so much damned time trying to save $5 a month when they BUY the damned vehicle that they never bother to find out how to maintain it.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search