Jump to content
News
Reviews
Discussons
Activity
Create New...
Close
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    By William Maley •

    Quick Drive: 2018 Mazda6 Signature

      The turbo makes the difference

    The Mazda6 is a prime example of how making various improvements throughout the lifecycle can make a vehicle. Since the first model I drove back in 2014, Mazda has been messing around with various aspects such as the interior and NVH levels. Last year saw Mazda make some key changes to 6 with the big news being the introduction of a turbocharged 2.5L four-cylinder from the CX-9 crossover. This was to address one of the major shortcomings of the sedan, lackluster performance when it comes to making a pass or merging onto a freeway. There are some other minor changes to go with the updated engine that help make the Mazda6 feel a bit more rounded.

    • The turbocharged 2.5L four-cylinder produces 227 horsepower (250 on premium fuel) and 310 pound-feet of torque. This is paired with a six-speed automatic to the front wheels. 
    • I praised this engine in the CX-9 I drove back in the summer with a linear flow of power and no hint of turbo lag. Those carry over to the 6, along with the feeling of confidence that you’ll be able to pass or merge onto a freeway without any issue. It was quite startling how quick the 6 accelerated from 45 to 70 on a freeway on-ramp, only taking a few seconds. The six-speed automatic works seamlessly with the turbo engine, providing snappy up and downshifts.
    • One other trait of the turbo engine I was impressed with was NVH levels. There was barely any engine noise or the whoosh of the turbo when accelerating.
    • Mazda hasn’t messed with the 6’s chassis with the addition of the turbo engine. It still has the planted feeling and minimal body roll that imparts a lot of confidence to a driver. Steering is quick and provides the right balance of weight and feel.
    • One surprise is how the 2018 model rides slightly better than the 2017 model as bumps are better isolated. This might be 
    • Exterior enhancements are small with a new grille design, LED headlights, and the 19-inch wheels. But they do a surprising job of keeping of the 6’s exterior looking fresh.
    • The enhancements for the interior really help Mazda’s ambition to become more premium. The dash has been slightly restyled and now comes with stitched upholstery and natural wood trim. The climate control system has been redesigned that makes it slightly easier to use.
    • Mazda has started rolling out Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility on the 6 for 2018 via an update. My test car had had the update, but I was unable to try it out as I could not pick the option in the system. I’m not sure of the issue, but I hope to try it once again in a future Mazda product.
    • The turbo engine is only available on the Grand Touring, Grand Touring Reserve, and Signature. My test 6 was the top-line Signature that carries a base price of $34,750. With destination and some options, the as-tested price came to $36,140. If I was to buy one, I would drop down to the Grand Touring Reserve which begins at $31,750. I would lose out on the 360-degree camera system, Nappa leather upholstery, and digital gauge cluster. But I would keep a number of desirable features such as the ventilated front seats, heated steering wheel, heads-up display, and power front seats.
    • Every Mazda6 review has seen me come to the same conclusion; the sedan is so close to being considered one of the best, but it is missing a certain thing. But this conclusion is different. Mazda has been able to fix the various issues I have complained about over the past few years and now have a very compelling midsize sedan. It's a shame that the 6 along with other midsize sedans are being overshadowed by the likes of crossovers. But for those who still have their heart set on a sedan, then I have no issue in recommending the 6 as an option worthy of consideration.

    Disclaimer: Mazda Provided the 6, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas

    2018 Mazda6 Signature Gallery

    Year: 2018
    Make: Mazda
    Model: 6
    Trim: Signature
    Engine: Turbocharged 2.5L Skyactiv-G Four-Cylinder
    Driveline: Six-Speed Automatic, Front-Wheel Drive
    Horsepower @ RPM: 227 @ 5,000 (Regular), 250 @ 5,000 (Premium)
    Torque @ RPM: 310 @ 2,000 rpm
    Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 23/31/26
    Curb Weight: 3,560 lbs
    Location of Manufacture: Hofu, Japan
    Base Price: $34,750
    As Tested Price: $36,140 (Includes $890.00 Destination Charge)

    Options:
    Machine Gray Paint - $300.00
    Scuff Plates - $125.00
    Cargo Mat - $75.00

    Edited by William Maley

    Go to articles

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    ykX

    ykX 1,712

    Posted (edited)

      On 10/16/2018 at 11:08 PM, regfootball said:

    Per Car and Driver

    2018 Mazda6 signature

    C/D TEST RESULTS:
    Zero to 60 mph: 6.4 sec
    Zero to 100 mph: 16.0 sec
    Zero to 130 mph: 33.3 sec
    Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 6.7 sec
    Top gear, 30–50 mph: 3.2 sec
    Top gear, 50–70 mph: 4.2 sec
    Standing ¼-mile: 14.9 sec @ 97 mph
    Top speed (drag limited, mfr’s claim): 149 mph
    Braking, 70–0 mph: 184 ft
    Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.81 g

    C/D FUEL ECONOMY:
    Observed: 21 mpg
    75-mph highway driving: 36 mpg
    Highway range: 590 miles

     

     

    2018 Buick Regal Sportback FWD (just sayin)  Mazda continues to underwhelm, all the time, time to stop glorifying their run of the mill

    C/D TEST RESULTS:
    Zero to 60 mph: 5.6 sec
    Zero to 100 mph: 13.8 sec
    Zero to 130 mph: 28.8 sec
    Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 6.1 sec
    Top gear, 30–50 mph: 2.9 sec
    Top gear, 50–70 mph: 4.0 sec
    Standing ¼-mile: 14.2 sec @ 101 mph
    Top speed (governor limited): 131 mph
    Braking, 70–0 mph: 162 ft
    Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.87 g

    C/D FUEL ECONOMY:
    Observed: 24 mpg
    75-mph highway driving: 31 mpg
    Highway range: 490 miles

    Expand  

    And this is what Car and Driver wrote about both (pure numbers don't tell the whole story):

    Buick:

    HIGHS: Dapper styling, hatchback versatility, compliant ride, peppy turbo engine.

    LOWS: Middling interior materials, heavy (manual) liftgate, uninspiring dynamics.

    Mazda:

    HIGHS: Superb driving dynamics, class-above interior look and feel, pretty darn pretty.

    LOWS: Virtually no options, no hybrid or plug-in versions, top turbo engine lacks real verve.

    VERDICT: A sports sedan impersonating a mid-size family sedan.

    _______________

    Sorry, even according to C&D not even close

     

    Edited by ykX
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    regfootball
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:13 AM, William Maley said:

    Is the review in question? 2018 Buick Regal Sportback FWD

    I'm going to burst some bubbles here. I recently just sat in a Regal Sportback over the weekend at a local auto show (more on that in an upcoming Afterthoughts) and I hate to say it, I was disappointed. Many of the plastics used were somewhat middling and didn't feel as nice as the one found in the Mazda, let alone the recent Hyundai Sonata and even the Toyota Camry XSE. For a car that stickered around $38,000, it made me shake my head. The cars just listed - sticker between $2,000 to $6,000 less.

    Now I'll give the Regal that it has the easier infotainment system to use. I'm quietly hoping that Mazda gets their act together and introduces something modern in the next year.

    Is the Mazda6 the be all, end all midsize sedan? No. There are some areas that would make me hesitate to recommend the 6 like the stiff ride. It does some things quite well that it has earned a place in the sedans I would recommend which includes the Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid and Hyundai Sonata.

    I'm withholding comment on the driving dynamics of the Regal till I can get my hands on one. On paper, it may seem like the better car. But I have a sneaking suspicion that I would still pick the 6. 

    Expand  

    You’re right about the Regal interior.  It does come off better in the tan combo. The 6 is one of that cars strong points. 

    I just keep seeing The 6 get praised so much in buff books and the whole ‘when the  Mazda 6 gets a turbo it will the king ‘ and they finally put something other than their mid pack base engine in there and it isn’t near as fast as GM’s ubiquitous 2.0. 

    That was sort of the main point. 

    Buicks handling is not sporting material but it’s a decently quiet cruiser. 

      On 10/17/2018 at 1:30 AM, A Horse With No Name said:

    Honest question where does the Camry fall short compared to the 6 the Malibu and the Sonata?

    I find the Fusion awkward enough that I told the rental car company to stop sending them to me for our school debate trips.

    DTS was a nice car. I like them.

    Expand  

    I think the new Camry with sport package and v6 got some decent buff book reviews lately so yes that is a completely legit question. 

    I want to see this new Altima coming out.  Accord is fugly and deceptively tight inside. New Altima with turbo is worth waiting to see imo 

      On 10/17/2018 at 12:02 PM, ykX said:

    And this is what Car and Driver wrote about both (pure numbers don't tell the whole story):

    Buick:

    HIGHS: Dapper styling, hatchback versatility, compliant ride, peppy turbo engine.

    LOWS: Middling interior materials, heavy (manual) liftgate, uninspiring dynamics.

    Mazda:

    HIGHS: Superb driving dynamics, class-above interior look and feel, pretty darn pretty.

    LOWS: Virtually no options, no hybrid or plug-in versions, top turbo engine lacks real verve.

    VERDICT: A sports sedan impersonating a mid-size family sedan.

    _______________

    Sorry, even according to C&D not even close

     

    Expand  

    I never said the Buick with 2.0 was a sport sedan. I was merely pointing out that Mazda’s turbo is still not fast after all this time waiting for it  

    If you’re looking at 35k for a Mazda it’s maybe time to look into a near Lux marque or just get a CPO Audi or BMW. 

     

    And mazda JUST NOW getting CarPlay SMH

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ykX
      On 10/17/2018 at 12:21 PM, regfootball said:

     

    If you’re looking at 35k for a Mazda it’s maybe time to look into a near Lux marque or just get a CPO Audi or BMW. 

     

    And mazda JUST NOW getting CarPlay SMH

    Expand  

    Unlike Audi or BMW Mazda will not require thousands of dollars to keep it running, $35k is average now for a loaded mid size sedan.

    You are right about Carplay/Android Auto, GM did great by offering it one of the first manufacturers.  But Honda for example just recently started to offer it also, and Toyota starting to do it just now as well.  Mazda is tiny compared to all these giants.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
      On 10/16/2018 at 11:06 PM, dfelt said:

    FYI, I have been in the CT6, very nice car, but the rear I cannot fit in without the front seat pulled up and I slouch. Still not big enough for my body. Yes I am the exception to many here.

    Expand  

    If you're too big for the back of a CT6 then why do you even care about the ATS and CTS, let alone a Mazda 6.I have to believe the CTS is larger than a Mazda6. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:23 PM, ccap41 said:

    If you're too big for the back of a CT6 then why do you even care about the ATS and CTS, let alone a Mazda 6.I have to believe the CTS is larger than a Mazda6. 

    Expand  

    The Mazda 6 has 99.7 cubic feet of interior volume, the CTS has 97.    

    The Mazda 6 has 3 inches more rear leg room, and about the same hip, head and shoulder room.  (all within an inch).   

    So they are very close dimensionally for rear cabin dimensions.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:27 PM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    The Mazda 6 has 99.7 cubic feet of interior volume, the CTS has 97.    

    The Mazda 6 has 3 inches more rear leg room, and about the same hip, head and shoulder room.  (all within an inch).   

    So they are very close dimensionally for rear cabin dimensions.

    Expand  

    Good to know. Good to know.

    And I assume the CT6 is even larger than the Mazda6? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    William Maley
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:30 AM, A Horse With No Name said:

    Honest question where does the Camry fall short compared to the 6 the Malibu and the Sonata?

    Expand  
     

    The Camry has a few issues. One is that it doesn't feel as solid as the other three. Close the door on the Camry and it has a very tinny-sound. The other three don't that. Next is the value argument. That XSE I drove awhile carried a pricetag of $35,333 for the four-cylinder. If I want the V6, I need to add another $2,000. That price doesn't include everything you might want such as navigation, heated rear seats, etc. It gets worse as you climb down the lineup as some models don't get certain features. For example, if you want two USB ports, you need to get into the XLE or XSE - otherwise, you're only getting one.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:23 PM, ccap41 said:

    If you're too big for the back of a CT6 then why do you even care about the ATS and CTS, let alone a Mazda 6.I have to believe the CTS is larger than a Mazda6. 

    Expand  

    While I am very tall and muscular, as we well know, the bulk of America is getting bigger in girth and as such, I tend to think about everyone when it comes to a car, CUV, SUV, Truck that can hold people comfortably. 

    I believe that all levels of auto's can be built to hold people comfy and not just be a driver focused auto. The only way change comes about is by pounding the drum for change.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:37 PM, ccap41 said:

    Good to know. Good to know.

    And I assume the CT6 is even larger than the Mazda6? 

    Expand  

    Yes. 

    CT6:
    Rear Head Room 38.00 in 
    Rear Leg Room 40.40 in 
    Rear Shoulder Room 56.20 in 
    Rear Hip Room 53.50 in
    and XTS:
    Rear Head Room 37.80 in 
    Rear Leg Room 40.00 in
      Rear Shoulder Room 56.30 in
    Rear Hip Room 54.30 in
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:46 PM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Yes. 

    CT6:
    Rear Head Room 38.00 in 
    Rear Leg Room 40.40 in 
    Rear Shoulder Room 56.20 in 
    Rear Hip Room 53.50 in
    and XTS:
    Rear Head Room 37.80 in 
    Rear Leg Room 40.00 in
      Rear Shoulder Room 56.30 in
    Rear Hip Room 54.30 in
    Expand  

    Wow, those are very similar. 

      On 10/17/2018 at 1:41 PM, dfelt said:

    While I am very tall and muscular, as we well know, the bulk of America is getting bigger in girth and as such, I tend to think about everyone when it comes to a car, CUV, SUV, Truck that can hold people comfortably. 

    I believe that all levels of auto's can be built to hold people comfy and not just be a driver focused auto. The only way change comes about is by pounding the drum for change.

    Expand  

    You're going to be disappointed in 100% of autos that aren't full size SUVs. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    regfootball
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:37 PM, ccap41 said:

    Good to know. Good to know.

    And I assume the CT6 is even larger than the Mazda6? 

    Expand  

    The CT6 is larger, but the CT6 has a 'big hood'.....CT6 has a large back seat but not entirely as much as one would believe with the wheelbase and size of the car.

    A car like the S class has always bragged about leg room in the back seat being a big deal.  So maybe not in midsize class, but for sure in the lux class, it is fair to say that if someone is looking at a luxury car, leg room is a big consideration.

      On 10/17/2018 at 1:41 PM, dfelt said:

    While I am very tall and muscular, as we well know, the bulk of America is getting bigger in girth and as such, I tend to think about everyone when it comes to a car, CUV, SUV, Truck that can hold people comfortably. 

    I believe that all levels of auto's can be built to hold people comfy and not just be a driver focused auto. The only way change comes about is by pounding the drum for change.

    Expand  

    CAFE and government pressure to keep making vehicles smaller is why mainstreams cars are getting whacked in size.  If you want size, then you must pay (suburban, big crossovers, etc.)

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
      On 10/17/2018 at 2:39 PM, regfootball said:

    The CT6 is larger, but the CT6 has a 'big hood'.....CT6 has a large back seat but not entirely as much as one would believe with the wheelbase and size of the car.

    A car like the S class has always bragged about leg room in the back seat being a big deal.  So maybe not in midsize class, but for sure in the lux class, it is fair to say that if someone is looking at a luxury car, leg room is a big consideration.

    CAFE and government pressure to keep making vehicles smaller is why mainstreams cars are getting whacked in size.  If you want size, then you must pay (suburban, big crossovers, etc.)

    Expand  

    So true and spot on in regards to rear seat and leg room.

    Yup you have also nailed it for cafe, as to why all I own is SUV's.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
      On 10/17/2018 at 2:39 PM, regfootball said:

    CAFE and government pressure to keep making vehicles smaller is why mainstreams cars are getting whacked in size.  If you want size, then you must pay (suburban, big crossovers, etc.)

    Expand  

    I'm pretty sure CAFE has to do with footprint and that's why vehicles have gotten larger and not smaller.

    @Drew Dowdell(It won't allow me to tag anybody else for some reason) but  doesn't CAFE have to do with the footprint of the vehicle as well as the fuel economy? Isn't that why we need a CAFE score of like 50mpg and not literally 50mpg. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
      On 10/17/2018 at 1:37 PM, William Maley said:

    The Camry has a few issues. One is that it doesn't feel as solid as the other three. Close the door on the Camry and it has a very tinny-sound. The other three don't that. Next is the value argument. That XSE I drove awhile carried a pricetag of $35,333 for the four-cylinder. If I want the V6, I need to add another $2,000. That price doesn't include everything you might want such as navigation, heated rear seats, etc. It gets worse as you climb down the lineup as some models don't get certain features. For example, if you want two USB ports, you need to get into the XLE or XSE - otherwise, you're only getting one.

    Expand  

    If I go for a mid sized sedan and want to keep it a long time...do you think these trade offs are worth it for long range durability and resale or would I be better off to look at something else?

    Agree on the Camry not feeling as solid...

    Thinking BRZ or Miata may well be next car...but seriously thinking Sedan also.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
      On 10/17/2018 at 5:39 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    Thinking BRZ or Miata may well be next car...but seriously thinking Sedan also.

    Expand  


    I'm so disappointed in the BRZ...

    I think they're great looking cars but I looked into getting more power out of them and they're basically dogs unless you throw boost at them and that's disappointing. 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWcGW-wlOEg

     

    Edited by ccap41
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
      On 10/17/2018 at 5:47 PM, ccap41 said:


    I'm so disappointed in the BRZ...

    I think they're great looking cars but I looked into getting more power out of them and they're basically dogs unless you throw boost at them and that's disappointing. 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWcGW-wlOEg

     

    Expand  

    You are soooo right...absolutely.

    Two things drive me that direction-would like to start autocrossing again and that particular chassis does well at a lot of venues here in Ohio.

    Also, wife and family like them so it is a much easier sell at home than a Camaro, Mustang, Miata, or Focus ST.

    Were it just me and I had my choice of anything it would be mustang GT first Choice Civic Type R second choice...Golf R might well come in third.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall
      On 10/17/2018 at 5:39 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    If I go for a mid sized sedan and want to keep it a long time...do you think these trade offs are worth it for long range durability and resale or would I be better off to look at something else?

    Agree on the Camry not feeling as solid...

    Thinking BRZ or Miata may well be next car...but seriously thinking Sedan also.

    Expand  

    You have or had a Miata previously, right?   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ccap41
      On 10/17/2018 at 5:51 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    You are soooo right...absolutely.

    Two things drive me that direction-would like to start autocrossing again and that particular chassis does well at a lot of venues here in Ohio.

    Also, wife and family like them so it is a much easier sell at home than a Camaro, Mustang, Miata, or Focus ST.

    Were it just me and I had my choice of anything it would be mustang GT first Choice Civic Type R second choice...Golf R might well come in third.

    Expand  

    Right?!?

    I thought about looking into a used one as a toy last week and thought I'd look up what can be done to get about 200whp and a couple grand gets you almost jack sh!t?!? Super disappointing.

    Does your future toy need to have a back seat? I would think the Mustang's V8 would make it an easy sell to the kiddos...less so to the wifey... 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
      On 10/17/2018 at 6:04 PM, ccap41 said:

    Right?!?

    I thought about looking into a used one as a toy last week and thought I'd look up what can be done to get about 200whp and a couple grand gets you almost jack sh!t?!? Super disappointing.

    Does your future toy need to have a back seat? I would think the Mustang's V8 would make it an easy sell to the kiddos...less so to the wifey... 

    Expand  

    Kids love love love the idea of a Mustang GT...wife feels the exact opposite.

      On 10/17/2018 at 6:05 PM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I've thinking a lot about the toy thing lately...for summers on Ohio backroads. 

    Expand  

    Foe me...it is how bland everything else on the market is...I am only going to live so long.

      On 10/17/2018 at 5:53 PM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    You have or had a Miata previously, right?   

    Expand  

    A couple of them. Would not mind an S2000 either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall
      On 10/17/2018 at 6:21 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    Kids love love love the idea of a Mustang GT...wife feels the exact opposite.

    Foe me...it is how bland everything else on the market is...I am only going to live so long.

    Expand  

    Yeah, I'm approaching 50...I want to have fun again driving.  I love driving my Jeep, but really want a sports car of some sort. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    ykX

    ykX 1,712

    Posted (edited)

      On 10/17/2018 at 6:21 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    Kids love love love the idea of a Mustang GT...wife feels the exact opposite.

    Expand  

    I am in the same boat, really want Mustang GT but also interested in Miata, BRZ is not doing it to me for some reason.   

    I checked, Mustang commands enormous insurance rates (even higher than a Corvette).  Miata would be fun for autocross and more economical to upkeep and run, but it is like buying a bike, will be very limited use due to the size and also lack of power is bothering me a bit.  Mustang GT would be a awesome and much more useful due to a back seat for kids, more comfortable interior but much more expensive to run.

    Wife will be questioning all the choices but she just got a bigger house and renovated kitchen, I think I deserve to get something as well.

    Edited by ykX
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    G. David Felt
      On 10/17/2018 at 5:39 PM, A Horse With No Name said:

    If I go for a mid sized sedan and want to keep it a long time...do you think these trade offs are worth it for long range durability and resale or would I be better off to look at something else?

    Agree on the Camry not feeling as solid...

    Thinking BRZ or Miata may well be next car...but seriously thinking Sedan also.

    Expand  

    I think you should get this my friend!

     

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    A Horse With No Name
      On 10/17/2018 at 6:26 PM, ykX said:

    I am in the same boat, really want Mustang GT but also interested in Miata, BRZ is not doing it to me for some reason.   

    I checked, Mustang commands enormous insurance rates (even higher than a Corvette).  Miata would be fun for autocross and more economical to upkeep and run, but it is like buying a bike, will be very limited use due to the size and also lack of power is bothering me a bit.  Mustang GT would be a awesome and much more useful due to a back seat for kids, more comfortable interior but much more expensive to run.

    Wife will be questioning all the choices but she just got a bigger house and renovated kitchen, I think I deserve to get something as well.

    Expand  

    Which is what makes GTI, WRX, ST, RS, R, and ST more than just letters in a soup bowl.

      On 10/17/2018 at 6:54 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    I'll be the oddball here and say that for a 2-seater toy I would get a Sky Red-Line.  260 HP would be plenty for me and I don't autocross. 

    Expand  

    Finding them not beaten to death is a bit of an issue. We looked at that for one of my sons friends. What is out there has pretty much been ridden hard and put away wet.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    loki
      On 10/17/2018 at 6:54 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    I'll be the oddball here and say that for a 2-seater toy I would get a Sky Red-Line.  260 HP would be plenty for me and I don't autocross. 

    Expand  

    I liked how the sky looked more than the solstice. and compared to the miata.... driving dynamics would play a part in that decision

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall

    I liked the Sky styling more, and the interior more than the Solstice.   But the newest ones are both about 10 years old now, and the interior plastics in both were pretty nasty.   I wouldn't want to fool around with another old car.   For a sports car, I think I'd be more inclined to get a recent Miata or Fiat Spyder.    But I also like hefty coupes like the Challenger R/T & SRT, and hefty convertibles like the Mustang GT...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell
      On 10/17/2018 at 10:43 PM, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I liked the Sky styling more, and the interior more than the Solstice.   But the newest ones are both about 10 years old now, and the interior plastics in both were pretty nasty.   I wouldn't want to fool around with another old car.   For a sports car, I think I'd be more inclined to get a recent Miata or Fiat Spyder.    But I also like hefty coupes like the Challenger R/T & SRT, and hefty convertibles like the Mustang GT...

    Expand  

    Split the difference and look at the Camaro. I found even the V6 to be very fun and sporty. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Robert Hall
      On 10/18/2018 at 1:47 PM, regfootball said:

    Good to know!  But but the crossfire is a Mercedes I thought German cars were reliable and lasted forever!!

    Expand  

    They are reliable, but maintenance is expensive as they age...remember the old adage, if you can't afford a new Mercedes, you can't afford a used one.  Old German cars are money pits.

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Drew Dowdell
      On 10/18/2018 at 1:47 PM, regfootball said:

    Good to know!  But but the crossfire is a Mercedes I thought German cars were reliable and lasted forever!!

    Expand  

    That's because people consider them sunk investments.... they can't possibly trade them in because they just spent $7,000 getting it road worthy again.

     

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    regfootball

    I'm gonna do a bit of a flip flop on all the Mazda6 revisions.  I still would tend to think adding the turbo should have added some more go juice, but they do out of the Japanese automakers tend to put the most effort into interiors.  I think if you prefer Japanese marques I can understand (after 4 years) why someone would be enthusiastic.  The Hondas, Toyotas and Nissans have been a bit of a hot mess the last few years in terms of interiors and styling.

    One thing about the Mazda6, the Mazda CX5 has this too.  Part of where you would normally expect the center stack to be filled in with controls between the top and where they put the climate controls at the bottom is just kind of blank wasted space. 

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    regfootball
      On 10/18/2018 at 2:24 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    That's because people consider them sunk investments.... they can't possibly trade them in because they just spent $7,000 getting it road worthy again.

     

    Expand  

    I still remember from my stint selling cars, a great customer, who was from another country and was in on work visa for a large company in it was either finance or computers or some high level management thing. When he moved his family here he had to buy cars.  So the first thing he does is buy a new (used) BMW.  He always wanted a BMW.  What was the next thing he had to do?  He had to put 4 grand into the BMW like a week after he bought it.... LOL  I don't even remember what he bought from me, i think it was a truck.  LOL

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • trinacriabob
      2025 Toyota Camry LE (HEV) Hybrid ... and trying it out for 3 days

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      I was upgraded in a rental contract and, while going up by one category is not a big deal, getting to try out the new hybrid Camry was somewhat of a big deal.  The latest and current Camry only features hybrid powertrains.  The base 2.5 liter 4-cylinder engine, which was previously naturally aspirated, continues forward, but is assisted by an electric motor.  To make the powering on and off work, a CVT is now the standard transmission, when Camry had an excellent 8-speed automatic transmission for many years.  This vehicle had front wheel drive, but AWD is also available.  The V6 engine and ICEs are no longer available. Getting used to this car doesn’t take much time.  Having already driven another rented hybrid – a Honda Accord – all I needed to know is that turning the key does not fire up an engine, but makes the car ready to move in EV mode, at least initially. With 2.5 liters, the Camry pulls away nimbly and with agility, even with a minimally feathered pedal.  It doesn’t take much.  It’s fun to watch the centered power display setting move between eco and power modes.  If stomped on, the engine responds very quickly.  Surprisingly, stomping on it produces a more notable than expected engine hum.  The cabin remains mostly quiet and handling is predictable, neither firm nor vague, with some rougher pavement making it less quiet.  The transmission feels very much like a CVT, but a well behaved one.  Still, drivers with old school tastes can lament the absence of the very last slick shifting 8-speed automatic that came standard in the Camry.  I know I do.  However, the current CVT behaves well because it doesn’t have that “stuck” feeling when pushed, but the spool is more of an exhaust node than the winding out and high rpm droning caused by the variable gearing. The Camry’s exterior was freshened up and they worked off the last model.  It’s a compendium of small changes that, together, amount to a lot.  The front lights are narrower and cleaner.  The “appliance” grille is more understated than it once was.  (Sadly, it’s the more expensive versions where the grille is more flared, and even overworked.)  The rear lights are thinned out, complete with a boomerang effect, as they wrap around the rear fender edge and add to the horizontal look of the rear lip and the monolithic bumper panel.  Also, the almost retro, and not too effective, sweep of the rear pillar (think ‘72 Caprice coupe) is gone and the side profile of the windows is cleaner, perhaps a larger rendition of what was done with the Corolla.  Most of the vantage points look better than those of the previous Camry. Inside, the Camry is also much improved.  The dashboard is organized in cleaner volumes.  The dash has a simple main instrument pod.  In its center is a round dial, whereby the upper part displays the speed and eco/power, and the lower part, through toggling, provides other information – direction, tire pressure, trip information and mileage, or even graphics of the flow of energy involving the engine and the battery.  There is no dedicated tachometer; however, the temperature and fuel gauges remain.  Around the main circle are small digital readouts for the exterior temperature, the time, the odometer, and the remaining range.  Filling up this hybrid showed close to 500 miles of range.  Not only that, the fuel cap is on the driver’s side and, like the trunk, they can be remotely opened by buttons in the interior. That said, there is none of that capless fuel filler stuff! Being a Camry LE meant the lower grade fixtures inside.  Sadly, this meant a urethane steering wheel.  Sometimes, a mere leather steering wheel imparts the feeling of better handling and a smoother ride.  It’s that equipment choices and groupings seem to work together to give a vehicle its feel. The LE seats are nicely upholstered in a tougher, durable fabric with slightly contrasting parts.  The front headrests can scoot all the way down and they actually point forward so the driver and passenger can use them without having to lean their heads all the way back.  Headrests for rear seat passengers are integrated into the seating and do not have features to adjust them. The infotainment system is on its screen which is engaged to the dash, but moved slightly forward, and creates a cleaner look because it does not go up over the top of the cowl.  Fortunately, it remains a touch screen.  The functions are easy to work with, but I had a little bit of finicky interactions with Bluetooth and Android Auto.  Climate control has toggles instead of dials and they are easy to work with.  I will only say that the center vents of the climate control system do not work that quickly and powerfully.  Beneath this small panel are the cubby, a charging pod for a phone, and the flat console surface for the shift lever.  I found the console a little high for my taste.  Possibly to accommodate the new mechanical set-up, there is no storage cubby underneath the console as one sees on larger GM products, for example – both SUVs and even the last-gen Buick LaCrosse.  However, the console box is amply sized. In addition to being able to look over the hood, visibility is commendable all the way around.  Except for being a little shoehorned into the Camry’s cockpit, the front of the cabin feels spacious and the legroom is also good.  (I had to push the lever to get the seats to move upward, which provided a view over the top of the hood, as evidenced by seeing the paint color, and which I prefer.)  They have retained good cabin space in the rear of the cabin.  Also, the trunk has a decent amount of usable capacity for this genre and for having kept this sweeping roofline.  I again want to state how pleasing it was to control the trunk, in addition to the fuel door, from a bar of buttons on a panel at the lower left part of the dashboard rather than on the floor near the door.  There are 5 functions and they were thoughtful about putting the (auto) lights control onto this bar, and all the way to the left, such that it can easily be noticed from behind the steering wheel.  The new Camry shows a lot of thought as to how the driver connects to the car through its controls and functions, and this is one of the areas where this Camry shines. While I didn’t calculate fuel mileage, I know that I added only 3.5 gallons of regular unleaded fuel to cover one jaunt of about 160 miles of mixed driving.  This seems close to the EPA estimate. The little green EV icon shone quite a bit. I imagine that this is a very easy car to live with over the long haul.  For Camry, this powertrain is obviously a new combination, but it’s technology that Toyota and other Asian marques have worked with for quite a while.  I mostly took note that, apart from the major powertrain change, there is the evident synergy of the many small changes that make this a more nicely packaged vehicle than the last Camry. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
    • Drew Dowdell
      Genesis News: Genesis Reveals Gran Coupe and Gran Convertible Concepts at the 2025 Seoul Mobility Show

      By Drew Dowdell · Posted

      The BYD Han interior does look really good.  Shame the outside looks like a 2-generations-ago Civic.
    • Drew Dowdell
      Genesis News: Genesis Reveals Gran Coupe and Gran Convertible Concepts at the 2025 Seoul Mobility Show

      By Drew Dowdell · Posted

      No one cares about that amount of horsepower in this class. These are chauffeur driven vehicles. Up until electrics came around, most were trundling around with 2.0T 4-cylinders or diesels.  While Genesis is still relatively new to us in the the U.S., they've made such strides on interior quality that I'd put them up against MB dollar for dollar. The nicest of the Chinese EVs sedans, the NIO ET7 is a pretty good looking car though I kinda think it looks like a Model-3 had it's way with a Buick Envista. It would do really well in the US up against the Teslas, but it is still not playing in the luxury ballpark with Genesis (or Benz or Audi) when it comes to design and materials.  Low end EQE Sedan rival? Sure. G90 rival? No.
    • smk4565
      Genesis News: Genesis Reveals Gran Coupe and Gran Convertible Concepts at the 2025 Seoul Mobility Show

      By smk4565 · Posted

      Well 25% tariff added to it, which makes a G90 like $125,000, and probably dead in the water in the US.  The Chinese have luxury cars with over 1,000 hp for less than the price of a G90.  I don't know that they are really going to compete there either.  Unless they come up with some  next gen EV tech and have full self driving and impeccable build quality or something.
    • trinacriabob
      Random Thoughts Thread

      By trinacriabob · Posted

      The thing is that Panera offers a better laptop and hot drink environment than does Starbucks and they cash in on that.  It's "space rental." The tab for a HALF chicken avocado chipotle sandwich and a small CUP of baked potato soup (both good, not great) was absurd.  Coffee, tea, and lemonade are roughly the same. I go there because it's near a friend's condo and it's better for having a discussion than a fairly nice Starbucks nearby.  A Starbucks has to have an excellent interior for me to go there and pay their now crazy prices for coffee and tea.

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

I've whitelisted
Continue without support

This Article

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search