Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Quick Drive: 2017 Dodge Durango GT and Jeep Grand Cherokee Summit

      What do you talk about when you don't have much to say?

    Sometimes, you find yourself scratching your head as you struggle to think if any more can be said about a vehicle. The two vehicles seen here, the 2017 Dodge Durango and Jeep Grand Cherokee have been reviewed by me numerous times - Durango has two, while the Grand Cherokee stands at three. Not much has changed on either vehicle since I last reviewed them. This puts me in a bit of quandary: What do I talk about? The answer was to delve into the trims themselves and figure out if they are worth the cash.

    The Grand Cherokee seen here is the top-line Summit. Jeep updated this trim last year with new front end treatment consisting of a new grille and LED fog lights. The exterior changes for the Summit do sharpen up the Grand Cherokee, a design which should be noted that has been around since 2011. One design touch we really like are the set optional 20-inch aluminum wheels as they dress up the Grand Cherokee quite nicely. The larger wheels don’t affect ride quality as the Grand Cherokee’s suspension turns bumps into light ripples. Road and wind noise are kept to very acceptable levels.

    The interior now has the option of the “Signature Leather-Wrapped Interior Package” that brings a leather covering for the dash and center console, and premium leather upholstery for the seats and door panels. My test vehicle came with this package and I am not sure its worth the $4,995. The key reason comes down to the leather used for the seats. I can’t tell the difference between the leather upholstery used for this package and the one used on lesser trims. Aside from this, the Summit retains many of the plus points found on other Grand Cherokees such as a roomy interior, simple infotainment system, and excellent build quality. 

    The Summit begins at $50,495 for two-wheel drive and $53,495 for four-wheel drive. Our test vehicle came to an as-tested price of $60,675 with the leather package, skid plates, and 20-inch wheels. The upside to the Summit is you get most everything as standard such as navigation, premium audio system, sunroof, heated and ventilated front seats, and a power liftgate. Personally, I would skip all of the options as fitted to our test vehicle and get a base Summit.

    Now on to the Durango. This one is the GT which can be best described as the R/T minus the V8. This means you get similar exterior tweaks such as a body color grille surround, black mesh inserts, LED daytime running lights, and 20-inch wheels finished in black. Our model came with the Brass Monkey appearance package which adds brushed bronze wheels and blacked-out badges. This makes for a mean looking crossover that doesn’t break the bank - the Brass Monkey package will only set you back $595. The GT is also quite confident in the bends with minimal body roll and nicely weighted steering. 

    Downsides? The Durango is starting to show its age inside. Various materials and the plain design put the Durango towards the back of the pack of the current crossover crop. Also, the value equation for the Durango can go downward with the number of options you add. The test Durango seen here comes with an as-tested of $49,660 with most the option boxes ticked. Not an absurd amount for a three-row crossover, but the Durango is missing out on features that many models feature such as adaptive cruise control, automatic braking, and compatibility for Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.

    You may have noticed that I haven’t mentioned the powertrain. That’s because both models feature the same 3.6L Pentastar V6 producing 295 horsepower and paired with an eight-speed automatic. I have written a lot about this powertrain on both models before and my opinion hasn’t changed. The engine offers strong low-end power and minimal NVH levels. The automatic transmission, for the most part, does a decent job of being in the right gear at the right time. Though we found the transmission to be somewhat slow to respond whenever heavy throttle was suddenly applied. Fuel economy for both models landed around 20 mpg.

    Both the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango are still competitive in their respective classes, despite getting up there in age. Just be careful with your option selection as it can make both models very poor values.

    Disclaimer: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles Provided the Vehicles, Insurance, and One Tank of Gas

    Year: 2017
    Make: Dodge
    Model: Durango
    Trim: GT
    Engine: 3.6L 24-Valve VVT with ESS
    Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic, All-Wheel Drive
    Horsepower @ RPM: 295 @ 6,400
    Torque @ RPM: 260 @ 4,000
    Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 18/25/21
    Curb Weight: 4,987 lbs
    Location of Manufacture: Detroit, Michigan
    Base Price: $40,095
    As Tested Price: $49,660 (Includes $1,095 Destination Charge)

    Options:
    Premium Group - $2,395
    Rear Entertainment System- $1,995
    Safety/Security and Convenience Group - $1,195
    Second-Row Captain Chairs - $995
    Trailer Tow Group IV - $995
    Brass Monkey Appearance Group - $595
    Second-Row Console - $300

    Year: 2017
    Make: Jeep
    Model: Grand Cherokee
    Trim: Summit
    Engine: 3.6L 24-Valve VVT with ESS
    Driveline: Eight-Speed Automatic, All-Wheel Drive
    Horsepower @ RPM: 295 @ 6,400
    Torque @ RPM: 260 @ 4,000
    Fuel Economy: City/Highway/Combined - 18/25/21
    Curb Weight: 4,952 lbs
    Location of Manufacture: Detroit, Michigan
    Base Price: $53,995
    As Tested Price: $60,675 (Includes $995 Destination Charge)

    Options:
    Signature Leather-Wrapped Interior Package - $4,995
    Summit California Edition - $995
    Skid Plate Group - $295

    Edited by William Maley


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    1 hour ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    So far I'm happy w going the CPO route w my 14 GC.  The differences between the 14 and 17 are prettty minor.  

    The addition of Android Auto would cinch it for me.  I am holding out on a vehicle purchase as long as I possibly can till I can get what I want with Android Auto. The only exception would be if I found an excellent integrated looking aftermarket 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The addition of Android Auto would cinch it for me.  I am holding out on a vehicle purchase as long as I possibly can till I can get what I want with Android Auto. The only exception would be if I found an excellent integrated looking aftermarket 

     

    True, UConnect has been improved and the older systems can only upgrade to a certain level...Apple Car Play would be nice, but I live without it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    True, UConnect has been improved and the older systems can only upgrade to a certain level...Apple Car Play would be nice, but I live without it.

    UConnect is excellent even in old versions. I want to get something that is going to be a long term purchase.  We paid for NAV in the Encore and use our phones to navigate today.  I need NAV, but I'm not paying for it again.   Android Auto is superior to Car Play (which seems kinda forgotten by apple lately) and they just added Waze to AA.  Either one is better than none though. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, regfootball said:

    I'll check back in 10 years, FCA's whole product line will probably still be the same.

    Hardly.  We have a new Wrangler and Ram coming and a Wrangler pickup, the MCE for the Cherokee has already been seen testing, the Renegade is only 3 years old, the Compass is brand new, New LX replacements are coming in 2021 as will replacements for the GC and the Durango along with a good chance the Journey replacement will be based on the Dodge/Alfa platform as the others.  The Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer are coming and signs are pointing to the return of a Ramcharger as well, all based on the new Ram platform.  Your average vehicle uses the same platform for 10 to 15 years and similar styling.  The 08 to 17 Accords for example were based on the same platform with similar styling, and the Camry is finally changing platforms after roughly 15 years.  Remember, the only reason we got a new malubu for 16 was because the 13 to 15 models were total duds.  They are still making the last gen MImpala introduced in 06 and the crrent Impala hasn't seen any real updates since it came out in 14. 

    Also, GM for example already said they are increasing the times between major updates and redesigns. 

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Until FCA US gets sold...then all that is thrown out.

    Agree, I can see a new Chinese owner dumping everything and moving to their own unified platforms. Especially with a focus on Hybrid and EV's.

    This implies to me that the Big Hemi's are in their last Hurrah!

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    Agree, I can see a new Chinese owner dumping everything and moving to their own unified platforms. Especially with a focus on Hybrid and EV's.

    This implies to me that the Big Hemi's are in their last Hurrah!

    Well that's already the case.  FCA is reportedly working on a twin-turbo version of the pentastar V6 and even a hybrid 4-cylinder for the Ram and possibly Wrangler. 

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    As an aside, I didn't realize the US-market JK generation Wrangler were all V6s...hasn't been a US market 4cyl Wrangler since the last TJ in '06. 

    Hmm.. I hadn't realized that either. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/16/2017 at 10:52 AM, dfelt said:

    Agree, I can see a new Chinese owner dumping everything and moving to their own unified platforms. Especially with a focus on Hybrid and EV's.

    This implies to me that the Big Hemi's are in their last Hurrah!

    @ocnblu My friend you can down vote all my EV posts you want but the future is not going to go backwards. China has made it very clear that starting next year and moving forward they are on an aggressive 5 year hybrid / EV everything only for their country. It is why the Grand Wagoneer is a Hybrid first before anything else as Jeep has stated they will sell it in China as well as the US. 

    Trust me when I say you will come to love the Torque Monsters that EV's can be with high speed.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/19/2017 at 11:40 PM, dfelt said:

    @ocnblu My friend you can down vote all my EV posts you want but the future is not going to go backwards. China has made it very clear that starting next year and moving forward they are on an aggressive 5 year hybrid / EV everything only for their country. It is why the Grand Wagoneer is a Hybrid first before anything else as Jeep has stated they will sell it in China as well as the US. 

    Trust me when I say you will come to love the Torque Monsters that EV's can be with high speed.

    Indeed, the future is coming whether you, or anyone, likes it or not.

    I've adjusted my thinking here as well.  When the Pruis and Insight were the only hybrid options, I never would have considered one. But now there are hybrid options that I'm looking into.  I'd prefer to go plug-in if possible, right now, the only one(s) that meets our needs are the Volvo XC60 PHEV and XC90 PHEV.  The Benz's and BMW's EV only ranges are too short to be worthwhile.  The Volvo is bare minimum (20 miles) in the XC60.  Here in hilly western PA, using Pure mode which favors EV as much as possible would probably produce some good results by regenerating on the downhills and using gas on the up hills.   If Toyota made a plug in Highlander or Honda made a plug in Pilot, that might get us over there. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    The real world is always the ultimate test, and electrified vehicles do not pass.  They continue to flunk.

    Maybe in your reality, but I don't think Tesla owners think that way... the real world isn't all an Amish paradise..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    The real world is always the ultimate test, and electrified vehicles do not pass.  They continue to flunk.

    How do you justify that they have flunked? They are growing and CA just showed that 5% of all auto sales are electrified. 

    Back at the beginning, if we use what ever justification you are trying to apply to EV's you would have to say that the early 1900's ICE auto's failed. So they should have just quit and not continued to build and design auto's?

    Please expand on your statement that they continue to flunk?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/24/2017 at 3:31 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    I like electrified vehicles because they offer better torque delivery than plain gasoline engines. 

    Yes but you shoot your wad early and the recovery time is too long before you can go again.  Real men know this is not optimal.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, ocnblu said:

    Yes but you shoot your wad early and the recovery time is too long before you can go again.  Real men know this is not optimal.

    So Mr. Musk and all His Tesla X drivers that beat ICE equal CUV's are not men then? :o

    Interesting :scratchchin:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, dfelt said:

    So Mr. Musk and all His Tesla X drivers that beat ICE equal CUV's are not men then? :o

    Interesting :scratchchin:

    How can you be a man when you're locked inside your fancy golf cart with those stupid doors dfelt

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/27/2017 at 8:22 AM, ocnblu said:

    Yes but you shoot your wad early and the recovery time is too long before you can go again.  Real men know this is not optimal.

    I don't take advice on being manly from a guy who's manliness is so fragile a taller overdrive gear and an underbody shield on a Cruze can be shattered by it. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/27/2017 at 8:22 AM, ocnblu said:

    Yes but you shoot your wad early and the recovery time is too long before you can go again.  Real men know this is not optimal.

    You've got much to learn, young padawan...

    Oh...Good morning Mr. Tyler, going...down?

    If you are a REAL man...It really is not about how long before shooting your load...

    Dont take my word for it...straight from a lady...

     

    tenor.gif

    And if you really cant understand all that what is going on...you are completely hopeless.

     

    Now back to cars...and electric vehicles

     

     

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • ^^^  I think the last pic is an AI generated picture.    YUCK!!! I mean, if it is one, its a GREAT image, the technology is both awesome and scary. Very real. But fake...and that is the yuck part of it all.  The fakeness.  I like REALITY.  
    • I became a hater when I realized Toyota is just another same ole same ole corporate greed company like any other and when I realized that they had sheeple followers that they had brainwashed thinking that Toyota can never do any harm.  It wasnt a right away hatred either.  It took time. I first noticed something was off about Toyota with the aforementioned engine sludge thing.  And it took years after that when I started questioning folk that drove Toyotas and then incident after incident happened and yet nobody ever was pissed about Toyota's failures.  It all came to a boiling point with me with the unintended acceleration debacle and had it NOT for Toyota settling out of court of billions of dollars, I myself would have chucked it to stupid drivers, but Toyota plead guilty quietly and paid that tremendous fine.  And it peeved me more to see that AMERICAN media kept that quiet also, but also downplyed the WHOLE thing by them ALSO blaming the American driver coming up with excuse after excuse defending Toyota.  And then I read (call it a consipracy theory if you want to) a report (not on the internet) that Japanese automakers convinced the American buyer to perform their regular maintenance at the dealerships and when their was a problem akin to catastrophic failure with the vehicle, the dealership would repair the problem without the owner knowing about the problem and all that was also subsidized by the Japanese government and the WORST offenders of this were Nissan, Toyota, Mitsubishi and Subaru in the 1980s.  Another reason why I dont like this company is that they stopped producing cars for the enthusiast for a little while.  Boring appliance after boring appliance made especially for dumb people that would be better off using public transportation. And in more recent times, better calling an Uber.   I like some cars of theirs. I have pointed this out plenty of times.  No need for me to justify what cars and trucks I like from them.  But you did mention the Lexus LC500 and yeah!  THAT would be one awesome creation.  Id take mine in coupe form though. But if I was doing this car MY way, Id LS/LT swap it.  Nothing crazy done to the engine, just with enough HP and torque to best Lexus' original efforts.  500HP and 500ft/lbs.  In HP, its not much more than what Lexus done, but its the torque figures that make the difference in my make belief dream LC 500. 
    • I actually like the look but at near 9,000 lbs., holy smokes! Instant pot hole maker lol..
    • The LC500 is just a damn fine looking car, regardless of who makes it. Lexus mucks up a lot of exteriors (and not just with the "predator" grill) but the LC500 is not one of them.   I feel you on that. A year ago, it was my right hip (post surgery) and I was doing the same thing as you for a few weeks lol. Rest and recover.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search