Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Volkswagen To End Production Of Current Phaeton Next March

      Next March, Volkswagen Will End Production of the Phaeton

    We knew it was coming, it was just a matter of when. In March, Volkswagen will end production of the current Phaeton at the Dresden plant. A pet project of former Chairman Ferdinand Piëch, the Phaeton never gained traction in the luxury flagship market for over a decade. Last year, Volkswagen only built 4,000 Phaetons.

     

    Volkswagen will bring back the Phaeton nameplate in 2020 for a fully electric luxury sedan.

     

    As for the Dresden plant where the Phaeton is built, it will be renovated to build an upcoming electric vehicle. Carsten Krebs, a spokesman at the factory tells Bloomberg that the renovation will take about year to complete.

     

    Source: Bloomberg

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Surprised it took this long to kill off a money loosing, sad attempt at a luxury auto at VW. Wonder how much the unions had sway in regards to this. I think VW has plenty more auto's to kill off as it cleans house and moves to be a better run, more profitable company.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It wasnt a sad attempt at luxury though...

    Cadillac in 2015 STILL does not have a car worthy of this Phaeton...as the CT6 is not available yet...

     

    It really is embarrassing that it took Cadillac THIS long to get a car going in this league...a DECADE...

     

    HA! MORE THAN A DECADE!!!!

     

    Sorry if you dont agree, but the Phaeton was an engineering marvel. It just wore the wrong badge on the hood.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dead!

    Dead as a doornail.

    .... though I don't know what is particularly dead about a door nail.

    I wouldn't think a door nail to be the deadest bit of iron muggary in the trade...

    Why not dead as a door knob? or a door knocker?

    Well, nail, knob, or knocker, the Phaeton is dead. </with appologies to Charles Dickens>

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It wasnt a sad attempt at luxury though...

    Cadillac in 2015 STILL does not have a car worthy of this Phaeton...as the CT6 is not available yet...

     

    It really is embarrassing that it took Cadillac THIS long to get a car going in this league...a DECADE...

     

    HA! MORE THAN A DECADE!!!!

     

    Sorry if you dont agree, but the Phaeton was an engineering marvel. It just wore the wrong badge on the hood.

    The Phaeton was VW version of the Cadillac Catera. The car was too small for most Americans, no rear room and a funky weird layout of the dash. Only thing interesting was the engineering feet with the motor. Other wise this auto was a failure like the Catera.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It was a Bentley in VW clothing. Essentially, it was better than the A8 at one point.

     

    It's like the Chevy Camaro in that respect. But it was also to a nonsensical degree, to uplift a brand by giving it the means to produce a sedan that underneath is an ultra-luxury behemoth.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It was a Bentley in VW clothing. Essentially, it was better than the A8 at one point.

     

    It's like the Chevy Camaro in that respect. But it was also to a nonsensical degree, to uplift a brand by giving it the means to produce a sedan that underneath is an ultra-luxury behemoth.

    That is exactly what I wanted to say...but I figured I did not want to waste my energy trying to explain what the Phaeton was/is...This car debuted in 2002...You know...13 years have passed...if people havent learned what this car was all about in 13 years, there is no sense in me wasting my time and energy trying to teach.

     

    I was ignorant about this car in 2002. I hated it. I hated VW for it. But sometime between 2002 and 2015, I read up on it and learned about it and soon, my hatred disappeared at the same rate as my ignorance...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The original Phaeton was a great piece of engineering. They sold it under the wrong brand. You have luxury brands to sell luxury cars. Now the thing is so dated and last it's prime it is sad. This is a mercy killing for sure.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It was a Bentley in VW clothing. Essentially, it was better than the A8 at one point.

     

    It's like the Chevy Camaro in that respect. But it was also to a nonsensical degree, to uplift a brand by giving it the means to produce a sedan that underneath is an ultra-luxury behemoth.

    That is exactly what I wanted to say...but I figured I did not want to waste my energy trying to explain what the Phaeton was/is...This car debuted in 2002...You know...13 years have passed...if people havent learned what this car was all about in 13 years, there is no sense in me wasting my time and energy trying to teach.

     

    I was ignorant about this car in 2002. I hated it. I hated VW for it. But sometime between 2002 and 2015, I read up on it and learned about it and soon, my hatred disappeared at the same rate as my ignorance...

    For what the Phaeton can do and was engineered to do, I respect it. I admire them as cars, and as a big lux sedan lover, I've looked into them on the used market. However, I cannot get around the extremely expensive care and feeding of them... even by German Uber Sedan standards.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    It was a Bentley in VW clothing. Essentially, it was better than the A8 at one point.

     

    It's like the Chevy Camaro in that respect. But it was also to a nonsensical degree, to uplift a brand by giving it the means to produce a sedan that underneath is an ultra-luxury behemoth.

    That is exactly what I wanted to say...but I figured I did not want to waste my energy trying to explain what the Phaeton was/is...This car debuted in 2002...You know...13 years have passed...if people havent learned what this car was all about in 13 years, there is no sense in me wasting my time and energy trying to teach.

     

    I was ignorant about this car in 2002. I hated it. I hated VW for it. But sometime between 2002 and 2015, I read up on it and learned about it and soon, my hatred disappeared at the same rate as my ignorance...

    For what the Phaeton can do and was engineered to do, I respect it. I admire them as cars, and as a big lux sedan lover, I've looked into them on the used market. However, I cannot get around the extremely expensive care and feeding of them... even by German Uber Sedan standards.

     

    I am not  surprise  at all from what you are suggesting to me that the Phaeton is one finicky vehicle.

    I believe you, sir. I have no reasons to doubt you.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

    It was a Bentley in VW clothing. Essentially, it was better than the A8 at one point.

     

    It's like the Chevy Camaro in that respect. But it was also to a nonsensical degree, to uplift a brand by giving it the means to produce a sedan that underneath is an ultra-luxury behemoth.

    That is exactly what I wanted to say...but I figured I did not want to waste my energy trying to explain what the Phaeton was/is...This car debuted in 2002...You know...13 years have passed...if people havent learned what this car was all about in 13 years, there is no sense in me wasting my time and energy trying to teach.

     

    I was ignorant about this car in 2002. I hated it. I hated VW for it. But sometime between 2002 and 2015, I read up on it and learned about it and soon, my hatred disappeared at the same rate as my ignorance...

    For what the Phaeton can do and was engineered to do, I respect it. I admire them as cars, and as a big lux sedan lover, I've looked into them on the used market. However, I cannot get around the extremely expensive care and feeding of them... even by German Uber Sedan standards.

     

    A luxury car for people under 5' 10" tall. Had some great engineering but over all was over rated.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

     

     

    It was a Bentley in VW clothing. Essentially, it was better than the A8 at one point.

     

    It's like the Chevy Camaro in that respect. But it was also to a nonsensical degree, to uplift a brand by giving it the means to produce a sedan that underneath is an ultra-luxury behemoth.

    That is exactly what I wanted to say...but I figured I did not want to waste my energy trying to explain what the Phaeton was/is...This car debuted in 2002...You know...13 years have passed...if people havent learned what this car was all about in 13 years, there is no sense in me wasting my time and energy trying to teach.

     

    I was ignorant about this car in 2002. I hated it. I hated VW for it. But sometime between 2002 and 2015, I read up on it and learned about it and soon, my hatred disappeared at the same rate as my ignorance...

    For what the Phaeton can do and was engineered to do, I respect it. I admire them as cars, and as a big lux sedan lover, I've looked into them on the used market. However, I cannot get around the extremely expensive care and feeding of them... even by German Uber Sedan standards.

     

    A luxury car for people under 5' 10" tall. Had some great engineering but over all was over rated.

     

    Not over rated, but rather UNDER rated hence why it is no longer.

    Like Ive stated before, wrong badge on the hood.

     

    About the 5'10" thing...

    I highly doubt that...I have sat in one, but Im fairly short...Ill just go with Jeremy Clarkson...

     

     

    I take it that Clarkson is one tall gent...6.'4" high...I googled...and google told me 1.96 meters in which I used google conversion after that...and he seems to fit quite snuggly in the driver's seat...and quite comfilly   in the back with that nice tall blonde...

    so...sorry DFELT if I doubt your assumption...

     

    And seeing this car is practically the same as a Bentley Continental GT in which many many NBA superstars bought...Allen Iverson, Kobe Bryant, NFL guys like RG III and Darren McFadden

     

     

    Bentley-Continental-GT-mc.jpg

     

    I dont think what you are saying holds too much water....sorry.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Having been in the actual auto. Once I have the front seat set, getting out, only kids could sit behind me. At 6'6" the sedan fails to hold 4 adults in my family. German and all tall like me so I stand by my remarks and clearly they moved the drivers seat up to allow him to have room for the tea bit.

     

    Any tall person can fit in any car if you do not worry about fitting others in. For me, this car fails due to the roof line and lake of headroom in the backseat as I hate the coupe look. While this has a bit more headroom over the new trend of all auto's looking like coupes, it still fails for a big person like me. 

     

    I will stay with my full size SUV's thank you, :)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Having been in the actual auto. Once I have the front seat set, getting out, only kids could sit behind me. At 6'6" the sedan fails to hold 4 adults in my family. German and all tall like me so I stand by my remarks and clearly they moved the drivers seat up to allow him to have room for the tea bit.

     

    Any tall person can fit in any car if you do not worry about fitting others in. For me, this car fails due to the roof line and lake of headroom in the backseat as I hate the coupe look. While this has a bit more headroom over the new trend of all auto's looking like coupes, it still fails for a big person like me. 

     

    I will stay with my full size SUV's thank you, :)

     

    Your last sentence is what gives your bias away...

     

    @ 6'6" tall, there arent many vehicles that fit your body anyway...and so probably the ONLY vehicles you fit in ARE fullsized SUVs...so THAT makes it less of an engineering problem from VW and more of a genetic deformality  on your part... :o

     

    Dont take the last thing that I said too personal, I just have height envy. You are exactly 1 foot taller than I...

    OK...maybe 11.5 inches taller. Im 5'6 1/2"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    Having been in the actual auto. Once I have the front seat set, getting out, only kids could sit behind me. At 6'6" the sedan fails to hold 4 adults in my family. German and all tall like me so I stand by my remarks and clearly they moved the drivers seat up to allow him to have room for the tea bit.

     

    Any tall person can fit in any car if you do not worry about fitting others in. For me, this car fails due to the roof line and lake of headroom in the backseat as I hate the coupe look. While this has a bit more headroom over the new trend of all auto's looking like coupes, it still fails for a big person like me. 

     

    I will stay with my full size SUV's thank you, :)

     

    Your last sentence is what gives your bias away...

     

    @ 6'6" tall, there arent many vehicles that fit your body anyway...and so probably the ONLY vehicles you fit in ARE fullsized SUVs...so THAT makes it less of an engineering problem from VW and more of a genetic deformality  on your part... :o

     

    Dont take the last thing that I said too personal, I just have height envy. You are exactly 1 foot taller than I...

    OK...maybe 11.5 inches taller. Im 5'6 1/2"

     

     

    No offense taken :roflmao: Just an American Born full German where I am average for my family. My sisters are a bit shorter at 6'2" and 5' 10" tall. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If your sisters are blonde and blued eyed, I think Id be in love.  :wub:

    Id gladly be at their mercy. 

    Nothing is more sexier than a tall, blonde, blue eyed German girl.

    OK...Nordic girls in general. Norwegian, Finnish, Swedish, German....

     

    But alas, I bagged myself a Greek Goddess. I dont know how I did it, but I did it.

    She has a face worthy  to launch a 1000 ships across an ocean....

    And best of all, a heart of gold....

    Edited by oldshurst442
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If your sisters are blonde and blued eyed, I think Id be in love.  :wub:

    Id gladly be at their mercy. 

    Nothing is more sexier than a tall, blonde, blue eyed German girl.

    OK...Nordic girls in general. Norwegian, Finnish, Swedish, German....

     

    But alas, I bagged myself a Greek Goddess. I dont know how I did it, but I did it.

    She has a face worthy  to launch a 1000 ships across an ocean....

    And best of all, a heart of gold....

    Very Cool, Greek woman are freakin hot to me especially brunettes with brown eye's! :D

     

    Oldest and tallest sister takes after my moms side of the family, Blonde and Blue eye, very German.

    My middle sister takes after my dads side brunette and brown eyes.

     

    Then little ol me is Hazel eyes with brunette hair.

     

    Go figure, I tease my mom all the time about are you sure I am not the milk mans son? But then I look just like dad, so nope. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If this thread in actuality is about how to bag an awesome female companion for holy matrimony....

     

    I'm game!! Gimme all the quick-tip quickies!

     

    So yes, all I have to be is like a stealth wealth Phaeton of a truck....and to Old's point about heart of gold...4.2L V8, yes, yes.....great point there. So, 6.2 should cover nicely...

     

    Okay so I just have to get a VW Phaeton kind of lady while I'm transforminated into GMC Denali, emphasis on Precision and a life theme like Eminence Front from Jeep Comanche....

     

    Yes. Anything more gents?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Argh.  This is a question I almost want to avoid. The A380 is incredible.  Yes, I had a roundtrip through AA on British.  They have a small economy section at the back, upstairs.  Then I flew a one way from Italy to New York-JFK on an Emirates "fifth freedom" flight segment.  They have economy taking the entire main level, with none upstairs. Economy seats are a little wider on the A380 ... definitely on Emirates, at least.  It was an outstanding flight because of that.  On British, I paid for an economy seat upstairs and the curvature of the exterior translates into windows that are too sloped and with an odd and bigger void in between the cabin and the exterior.  I will be sitting downstairs if there is a future flight on one. The 747-8 isn't as comfortable in economy because the seats are traditional economy width.  I feel more comfortable in one because I know it.  It's also much more photogenic all the way around.  You feel good when it pulls up to the gate and you see that beautiful and proportioned machine through the big glass windows. The humidification is good on both planes. It's really sad that no more passenger quadjets are being produced.  It's easier to get onto an A380 if Europe bound (British, Lufthansa, Emirates, and others via connections, with Air France holding back).  For a 747-8, Lufthansa is the only choice and I am grateful to them for that.
    • My car has a supposed 525 mile highway crusing range on a full tank (19.5 gallons).   I haven't fully tested that since I tend to fill up at 1/2 tank when on road trips..but I have recorded averages of 29.5 and 30 mpg on road trips, which is pretty good for a comfortable 4200lb AWD sedan..
    • @trinacriabob in your flying in recent years, have you had a trip on an A380?    If so, how does it compare to the larger Boeings? 
    • Right.  It's not the aircraft themselves, but the haste and sloppiness.  ("Haste makes waste.")  This 777 X is ambitious and the folding wingtips are novel.  They will be very late with delivering this plane.  I now like some Boeing and some Airbus.  It's a mix.  In the recent past, I took a ride on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner and I definitely like it more than the Airbus 350 (even though the Airbus 350 has that photogenic curved winglets).  The cabin fatigue from flying is much reduced on the Dreamliner. Yesterday, I was on two domestic Boeing 737 Max 8 segments back to back on Southwest.  I like its newer features - ambient lighting, larger bins, a little quieter.  So, if it's working, it's a very nice rendition of the 737.  It's too bad that their newest version of this storied workhorse had to be tainted.  I get on and sigh.  If it keeps a clean track record going forward, people may be less weirded out as the statistics may become better. It is.  However, I'm not a fan of the leg design, which is also now popular on sofas.  The biggest turnoff for me in sofas - when I bought a sleeper for another room with the last stimulus money - was the amount of product that had nailheads all over the place.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search