Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Volkswagen Plans A Change To Its Corporate Structure

      Instead of 12 Autonomous Companies, Volkswagen Considers Consolidating Them To Just Four Companies

    During the reign of former Volkswagen Chairman Ferdinand Piëch, the company was arranged in such a way where each of the twelve brands were given autonomy to encourage competition between them. Many believed this arrangement made controlling almost impossible and was slow to react to changes in the marketplace. But with Piëch out the company, there appears to be a change incoming in how the company is structured.

     

    German publication Handelsblatt reports that Volkswagen will restructure the decentralized system into four holding companies for the 12 brands. Here's how it will break down,

    • Holding Company 1: Volkswagen, Skoda, and Seat to be under the leadership of Former BMW manager Herbert Diess.
    • Holding Company 2: Audi, Ducati, and Lamborghini to be under the leadership of current Audi CEO Rupert Stadler.
    • Holding Company 3: Bentley, Bugatti, and Porsche to be under the leadership of Porsche CEO Matthias Mueller
    • Holding Company 4: MAN, Scania, and Volkswagen Commercial to be under the leadership of former Daimler trucks boss Andreas Renschler


    This new structure is designed to improve efficiency and help make faster decisions. Each head will be on Volkswagen's board.

     

    Now with this possible change, a number of positions will be cut. Such positions include the groupwide head of sales and marketing.

     

    Source: Reuters via Automotive News (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Doesn't seem all that different than what they do now.  Porsche was sort of always it's own thing, and Audi/Lamborghini are already part of one unit.  But I am sure some changes were to happen once Piech was gone because he fought the rest of the board all the time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    - Will the brands still be encouraged to compete with each other between the 4 holding companies?

     

    - Will the brands still be encouraged to compete with each other within their proper holding company?

     

    I understand Holding Company #4 (MAN/Scania/VW commercial) cant really have a friendly competition with any other Holding company....but will there be friendly competition between Man and Scania?

     

    What about low end Audi and VW...because a VW CC can actually fight for market share with an Audi A4 and a lower end A6...ditto with a Passat...

     

    How will platform sharing be made with Holding Company #1 without VW becoming a General Motors from the 1980s and 1990s?

     

    Hell, how will platform sharing be made between Holding Company #2 and #1 without this arrangement becoming like GM from the '80s and '90s?

     

    Piech promoted competition...the success behind that strategy was that each VW brand had its own image...kinda like how GM's brand hierarchy was before the 1980s...when all of GM's brands had their own engines and marketing teams etc...

     

    Im curious because it seems that VW is acknowledging how GM failed and they want to avoid the same mistakes GM made...I cant read the full article so I dont know the answers to the questions I posed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    - Will the brands still be encouraged to compete with each other between the 4 holding companies?

     

    - Will the brands still be encouraged to compete with each other within their proper holding company?

     

    I understand Holding Company #4 (MAN/Scania/VW commercial) cant really have a friendly competition with any other Holding company....but will there be friendly competition between Man and Scania?

     

    What about low end Audi and VW...because a VW CC can actually fight for market share with an Audi A4 and a lower end A6...ditto with a Passat...

     

    How will platform sharing be made with Holding Company #1 without VW becoming a General Motors from the 1980s and 1990s?

     

    Hell, how will platform sharing be made between Holding Company #2 and #1 without this arrangement becoming like GM from the '80s and '90s?

     

    Piech promoted competition...the success behind that strategy was that each VW brand had its own image...kinda like how GM's brand hierarchy was before the 1980s...when all of GM's brands had their own engines and marketing teams etc...

     

    Im curious because it seems that VW is acknowledging how GM failed and they want to avoid the same mistakes GM made...I cant read the full article so I dont know the answers to the questions I posed.

     

    The article doesn't have the answers to that either. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    - Will the brands still be encouraged to compete with each other between the 4 holding companies?

     

    - Will the brands still be encouraged to compete with each other within their proper holding company?

     

    I understand Holding Company #4 (MAN/Scania/VW commercial) cant really have a friendly competition with any other Holding company....but will there be friendly competition between Man and Scania?

     

     

     

     

    Maybe Porsche will take on MAN and Scania w/ a performance heavy truck... ;)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Definitely need this as 300 hp in aa 5,000 lb car or whatever these weigh is adequate but not a lot.  I imagine it is easy to go to the Lyriq's 500 hp motors, swap in some better brakes and beef up the suspension a bit.   They should V-series all Cadillacs, especially if selling in China where they have all these 1,000 hp or 1,500 hp cars.
    • This thing is huge, I don't know why it is so big.  Unless they plan to kill off the LS, which they say they are not doing. The interior looks too sparse and boring.  Good that they did hybrid and full EV.   Looks too much like the Camry, and the moldings on the doors look weird.  I am so sick of plastic moldings tacked on doors, why can't car companies just make a metal door without cladding and molding all over it like a 1990s Pontiac.
    • Eron started out as a Legit business, a merger between Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth but then changed under CEO Kenneth Lay into energy trading and utilities, and I agree with you that they did commit fraud on many levels, but the review by the SEC showed that the last few years just before the collapse was when this all happened. So, two companies wanting to become bigger, merge, continue to have success and then move into other areas of possible growth, but due to incompetence by the executives on risky trading and other areas started to inflate profits to hide the trading losses.  The CEO was like a Gambling addict who wanted more and more and yet as he lost, he figured he could hide it till he struck it big and then right side out the company. Sadly, at the expense of so many people he destroyed the company and many employees and investors savings. I have NOTHING against the Technology or the people at Tesla who created very solid Motors, Controller boards and battery packs. My issue is with the person who bought himself a CEO position and the constant lies even now at the quarterly report on what Tesla will deliver. He now hides things, and I suspect the use of AI, Robots, FSD, Robotaxi, etc. are all used to conceal the shaky nature of Tesla. I do suspect Tesla is playing a house of cards and is not as secure as they tend to present. IMHO
    • That is not what Enron was doing. I think you need a refresher on what happened at Enron. Enron committed legitimate fraud to their shareholders in conjuncture with their accounting firm. There have also been MANY regulatory changes because of Enron's fraud. This lead to more checks and balances along with the most notably change in accounting, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Look that up and why it came about.  I know you don't like Tesla nor the CEO, but I don't think they are committing fraud. 
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search