Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    March 2019 Sales Figures

      ...find out who was lucky in the green last month.

    Quarterly:
    Ford Motor Company - Down 1.6% for the quarter, Down 1.6% for the year
    General Motors Co. - Down 7% for the quarter, Down 7% for the year
    Tesla - Up 110% for the quarter, Up 110% for the year

    Monthly:
    Audi of America -  Up 1.1% for the month, Up 9.4% for the year
    BMW of North America - 
    Up 0.4% for the month,  Down 1.9% for the year
    FCA US LLC -  Down 7% for the month, Down 3% for the year
    Genesis Motor America - 
    Honda Motor Co. - 
    Up 4.3% for the month,  Up 2.0% for the year
    Hyundai Motor America -  Up 1.7% for the month, Up 2.1% for the year
    Jaguar Land Rover North America - 
    Down 7% for the month 
    Kia Motors America - Up 10.2% for the month, Up 7.6% for the year
    Mazda North American Operations - Down 19.1%  for the month, Down 15.7% for the year
    Mercedes-Benz USA - Down 2.7% for the month, Down 9.3% for the year
    Mitsubishi Motors North America -  
    Up 36.9% for the month, Up 17.6% for the year
    Nissan Group - Down 7.2% for the month, Down 12.1% for the year
    Porsche Cars North America Inc. -  Up 0.5% for the month, Up 7.7% for the year
    Subaru of America, Inc. - 
    Up 6.0% for the Month, Up 4.7% for the year
    Toyota Motor North America - Down 3.5% for the month, Down 5% for the year
    Volkswagen of America - 
    Up 14% for the month, Up 2.3% for the year
    Volvo Cars of North America, LLC -  Up 16.2%  for the month, Up 9.8% for the year

    Brands (Quarterly):
    Buick -  Down 8.7% - 51,876 QTD / YTD
    Cadillac -  Down 2.0% - 35,995 QTD / YTD
    Chevrolet - Down 7.8% - 452,401 QTD / YTD
    GMC - Down 4.4% - 125,577 QTD / YTD
    Ford - Down 2.1% - 565,274 QTD / YTD
    Lincoln - Up 11.2% - 24,974 QTD / YTD
    Tesla - Up 110% - 30,600 QTD / YTD

    Brands (Monthly):
    Acura - Up 10.4% - 14,408 MTD / 36,385 YTD
    Alfa Romeo - Down 31% - 1,774 MTD / 4,286 YTD
    Audi - Up 1.1% - 20,302 MTD / 14,859 YTD
    BMW - Up 2.9% - 32,228 MTD / 73,888 YTD
    Chrysler - Down 38% - 12,169 MTD / 31,591 YTD
    Dodge - Down 6% - 46,367 MTD / 110,517 YTD
    Fiat - Down 45% - 847 MTD / 2,214 YTD
    Genesis - 
    Honda - Up 7.9% - 134,101 MTD / 333,402 YTD
    Hyundai - Up 1.7% - 61,177 MTD / 147,585 YTD
    Infiniti - Down 23.1% - 13,406 MTD / 34,315 YTD
    Jaguar - Up 13% - 3,679 MTD
    Jeep - Down 11% - 87,328 MTD / 212,804 YTD
    Kia - Up 10.2% - 55,814 MTD / 136,596 YTD
    Land Rover - Down 13% - 9,492 MTD
    Lexus - Up 8.2% - 29,249 MTD  / 66,791 YTD
    Mazda - Down 19.1% - 26,934 MTD / 70,833 YTD
    Mercedes-Benz - Down 4.9% - 27,004 MTD / 71,171 YTD 
    Mercedes-Benz Vans - Up 19.1% - 3,533 MTD / 7,476 YTD
    MINI - Down 16.8% - 3,769 MTD / 8,905 YTD
    Mitsubishi - Up 17.6% - 19,599 MTD / 42,067 YTD
    Nissan - Down 5.3% - 137,365 MTD / 331,536 YTD
    Porsche - Up 0.48% - 4,779 MTD / 15,024 YTD
    Ram Trucks - Up 15% - 51,822 MTD / 137,013 YTD
    Smart - Down 18.2% - 90 MTD / 231 YTD
    Subaru - Up 6.0% - 61,601 MTD / 156,754 YTD
    Toyota - Down 5.1% - 185,696 MTD / 476,923 YTD
    Volkswagen - Up 14% - 37,092 MTD / 85,872 YTD
    Volvo - Up 16.2% - 9,569 MTD / 22,058  YTD

    Edited by Drew Dowdell

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    56 minutes ago, ccap41 said:

    It's surprising to see Alfa down with their hot CUV out now. 

    Apparently not that hot.  Their exteriors are nice to look at, but their interiors leave me flat. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Apparently not that hot.  Their exteriors are nice to look at, but their interiors leave me flat. 

    I've never been in one but I've seen a few and they're quite the looker. It would be tough to take the dive in on Alfa's reliability though. I'm not sure where they are at now but FCA doesn't seem to be too high on reliability lists outside of Ram, Wrangler, GC, and the LX siblings. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The problem with Alfa Romeo is it doesn’t have a 10 year bumper to bumper warranty.

    I could see having an Alfa as a lease for 3 years, wouldn't want one as it ages..

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 minutes ago, Robert Hall said:

    I could see having an Alfa as a lease for 3 years, wouldn't want one as it ages..

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    I just priced one on the website and it came out about $75 a month cheaper than the GLC optioned to the same price.  That's before any discounts on either. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I just priced one on the website and it came out about $75 a month cheaper than the GLC optioned to the same price.  That's before any discounts on either. 

    So $75 a month cheaper isn’t enough to move the needle.    The GLC outsells the Stelvio nearly 10-1. 

    I don’t think the Alfa name has enough cache either and they don’t advertise a lot either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    So $75 a month cheaper isn’t enough to move the needle.    The GLC outsells the Stelvio nearly 10-1. 

    I don’t think the Alfa name has enough cache either and they don’t advertise a lot either.

    I agree with you that they don't advertise enough. They also don't have enough dealers.

    But $550 v. $625 a month is certainly enough to move the needle. 

    I just think people don't know about the Stelvio. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    40 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    So $75 a month cheaper isn’t enough to move the needle.    The GLC outsells the Stelvio nearly 10-1. 

    I don’t think the Alfa name has enough cache either and they don’t advertise a lot either.

    Saw a Stelvio new at the 24hr fitness last night when I went to work out, the sun roof was partially open. I told the person they were calling for rain and he looked at me pissed and said there was nothing he could do as it was no longer functional, being taken in today and so far he had buyers remorse due to the poor quality of the CUV.

    I have to think that anyone that is willing to pay the money these auto's command will look at the reviews and think twice about buying their quality-less auto's.

    • Haha 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Being Italian one would expect the Stelvio to be of low quality and poor reliability, but high style.  At least they aren't known for catching fire spontaneously like Ferraris and Lamborghinis. 

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Robert Hall said:

    Being Italian one would expect the Stelvio to be of low quality and poor reliability, but high style.  At least they aren't known for catching fire spontaneously like Ferraris and Lamborghinis. 

    Yet Italians are well know for stylish quality built boats, why can they not seem to figure this out for the Auto's they build. Just crazy. :P

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    Yet Italians are well know for stylish quality built boats, why can they not seem to figure this out for the Auto's they build. Just crazy. :P

    FIAT owns most if not all Italian automakers.  That is the problem.

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, dfelt said:

    Saw a Stelvio new at the 24hr fitness last night when I went to work out, the sun roof was partially open. I told the person they were calling for rain and he looked at me pissed and said there was nothing he could do as it was no longer functional, being taken in today and so far he had buyers remorse due to the poor quality of the CUV.

    I have to think that anyone that is willing to pay the money these auto's command will look at the reviews and think twice about buying their quality-less auto's.

    Exactly.  $75 a month savings  isn’t enough to get rained on.  They need to lease them for about $400 a month.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    Ding! Winner. 

    Alfa hasn’t figured out how to lease these out yet.  The sales dude who went with me on my Stelvio test drive last week said they conquest some bmws but bmw sets up their lease to hook the first timer and then when you try to return it they knock you with fees so bad for ‘damage’ and other stuff.  They ‘lessen the damages ‘ if you re-lease   And the douche cycle begins and you can’t get out  that’s how bmw does it  

    And yes, a huge warranty would help them sell cars too. 

    9 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Their lease deals must not be as good as the Germans.  I have to imagine buyers fear reliability and steer clear of Alfa’s.

    Yup. 

    If anyone wants to see my test drive of the Stelvio write up I got that in the forum a couple days ago.  Stelvio is nice enough that it should sell. It just needs leasing and incentive programs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Exactly.  $75 a month savings  isn’t enough to get rained on.  They need to lease them for about $400 a month.

    Haha, I agree 400 is the magic number I think for Alfa. And that’s what I told sales guy my cap would be for an Alfa.  ?

    they had one with around a 500 lease. 

    I think if they can lease lease them as cheap as the genesis g70 will eventually end up. Genesis will need to lease those for 400-450. 

    I’ll just wait till some Chevy dealer gets super desperate and find another Malibu to lease for an absurdly low pynt...like 250

    Edited by regfootball
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    Ding! Winner. 

    Alfa hasn’t figured out how to lease these out yet.  The sales dude who went with me on my Stelvio test drive last week said they conquest some bmws but bmw sets up their lease to hook the first timer and then when you try to return it they knock you with fees so bad for ‘damage’ and other stuff.  They ‘lessen the damages ‘ if you re-lease   And the douche cycle begins and you can’t get out  that’s how bmw does it  

    And yes, a huge warranty would help them sell cars too. 

    The Alfa interiors aren't as good as any German car, not even close. So there is one problem, they have performance but the Germans have that too.  And the reliability worries I feel like are a huge obstacle.   You almost know going in it will break so why buy it?  

    Alfa almost has to give these cars away for 5 years and prove they are reliable before masses will pay money for them.  

    3 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    Haha, I agree 400 is the magic number I think for Alfa. And that’s what I told sales guy my cap would be for an Alfa.  ?

    they had one with around a 500 lease. 

    I think if they can lease lease them as cheap as the genesis g70 will eventually end up. Genesis will need to lease those for 400-450. 

    They should be selling Alfa's at $400 a month for 72 months. I get that is $28k, but that is about what people are willing to risk on one of these.  For a hot second Alfa was bragging how the Guilia was the fastest 4-door around the Nurburgring and the Stelvio was the fastest SUV, then Mercedes took both those away about a month later.   So you are getting 2nd place performance with sub par interior and bottom of the barrel reliability.  Not a recipe for success.

    Edited by smk4565
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    What will Peugeot have to give their cars away for the first five to ten years?

    Depends on who they compete with.  If they go into a mass market at a good price, I think people will give them a chance.  Alfa is trying to go against BMW, Audi and Mercedes, those are heavyweights.  I don't think Peugeot has built in negative perception either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, regfootball said:

    What will Peugeot have to give their cars away for the first five to ten years?

    Considering the mess they left when they were here last, that is more like giving it away for 20 plus years to build up enough history of reliable auto's for people to pay a premium. Will not trust a Peugeot. 

    1 minute ago, smk4565 said:

    Depends on who they compete with.  If they go into a mass market at a good price, I think people will give them a chance.  Alfa is trying to go against BMW, Audi and Mercedes, those are heavyweights.  I don't think Peugeot has built in negative perception either.

    I your 40 plus years old, you know the crap they had and how they left people holding the bag of the garbage they tried to sell and then dumped and fled. I do not trust them period. They are just barely 1 step above Alfa that should have stayed in the history books for the garbage it is.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, riviera74 said:

    How did GM get its butt kicked on the sales front?

    Buick and GMC SUVs are a bit dated, there seem to be 5 new crossovers every month hit the market, just in the past year or so you had Atlas, Acent, Palisade, Telluride enter the Traverse segment.  Kona, Passport, etc.  They just keep coming.   Cadillac is struggling, BMW X7 is probably going to outsell the Escalade and Navigator this year, Cadillac and Chevy sedans are dated and sedans industry wide are struggling.  The butt kicking will get worse when you remove Impala, LaCrosse, XTS, Cruze, Volt off the list next year.  I don't think they'll make up that volume it will just go elsewhere, but I don't think GM is playing a market share game either.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

     I don't think GM is playing a market share game either.

    I totally agree with this, unlike GM of past and other American manufactures that ignored Deming and Drucker who ended up going to Japan and teaching them about Quality Management for Profit, Mary is a student of them. 

    Right now Mary knows that if she is able to turn consistent profits and plan for the future, they can take back the market share and leadership role, but this first comes by making sure the company is profitable which she has done even if many of us do not agree with how the auto's are being built now. She is for sure investing in the future and will leave GM with a legacy that will be realized after the fact.

    Profitable GM with Quality will bring market share and long term growth.  Another outstanding CEO was IBM Gerstner hired in 1993 and turned IBM into one of the most profitable service companies and proved he also built a deep bench of leadership by taking his Golden Parachute over 10 years to prove what he built would last and still does today.

    It will be very interesting to watch everyone from the Germans to the Asian and American auto companies and see who becomes the new leader in the EV auto world.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’ve said this for years but I’ll say it again. More and more folks are buying used and CPO for more than obvious reasons. Sales trends over the last few years reflect this. Thank you high priced new cars.  

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Sending a Christmas eve chuckle your way: Here's Dyan Cannon, who has again poured herself into her clothing, to attend a Lakers game, which she does often. It looks like she can easily fit down many chimneys.  Maybe even into a Christmas gift stocking. I find the different chapters of Dyan Cannon humorous.
    • @Drew Dowdell @Robert Hall @trinacriabob @A Horse With No Name @ccap41 @surreal1272 @oldshurst442  And including all of the C&G members that are here that I do not interact with often enough or those I have forgotten their handles. Wishing each and every one of you a Merry Xmas Eve and Merry Xmas.  To those that do not celebrate Xmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Holidays, Happy time off. Wishing each and every person here a restful end to the year, one of love, respect, relaxation to you and your families. Wishing all the best!
    • MOU means that these companies have signed a "Memorandum of Understanding" to explore the participation, involvement and synergy sharing in relation to the business integration through a joint holding company. Back in August 1st, 2024 Nissan and Honda created a Joint Holding Company for the commencement of a strategic partnership focused on intelligence and electrification. This was to start the consideration towards integration of the two companies. Mitsubishi Motors has now signed onto this MOU to explore the possibility of achieving synergies at an increased level through business participation or integration. In basic terms, the three companies have agreed to join forces in sharing costs to move forward with EV platform R&D while they also look at the ICE "Internal Combustion Engine" gas side of having shared platforms to reduce costs and hopefully save the three auto companies by keeping them alive.  While Nissan and Honda have agreed to move forward in this integration of the two auto companies, Mitsubishi Motors will make a final decision by the end of January 2025 about possibly joining in with the integration of Mitsubishi Motors into this joint 3 auto company venture. Nissan and Honda have already agreed to a full SDV or Software-defined vehicles program moving forward that will allow them to have a solid crucial collaboration of intelligence and electrification for future products. Both companies have stated that the acceleration of technology and the rapid change of the auto industry will allow these two companies to maintain global competitiveness and deliver more attractive products and services for customers worldwide. Nissan global mobility product line merged with Honda four-wheel-vehicles, motor cycles and power products can allow both companies to become more attractive to shareholders and innovation of products to sell to customers worldwide according to the CEOs of both companies. Nissan and Honda have stated the following: Nissan and Honda aim to become a world-class mobility company with sales revenue exceeding 30 trillion yen ($190 Billion U.S. Dollars) and operating profit of more than 3 trillion yen ($19 billion U.S. Dollars). The expected synergies from the business integration at this time are: 1. Scale advantages by standardizing vehicle platforms By standardizing the vehicle platforms of both companies across various product segments, the companies expect to create stronger products, reduce costs, enhance development efficiencies, and improve investment efficiencies through standardized production processes. The integration is projected to increase sales and operational volumes, allowing the companies to reduce development costs per vehicle, including for future digital services, while maximizing profits. By accelerating the mutual complementation of their global vehicle offerings - including ICE, HEV, PHEV, and EV models - Nissan and Honda will be better positioned to meet diverse customer needs around the world and deliver optimal products, leading to improved customer satisfaction. 2. Enhancement of development capabilities and cost synergies through the integration of R&D functions In accordance with the MOU to deepen strategic partnership and the joint research agreement on fundamental technologies dated August 1, the two companies have started joint research in fundamental technologies in the area of vehicle platforms for next-generation software-defined vehicles (SDVs), which is the cornerstone of the field of intelligence. After the business integration, both companies will encompass more integrated collaboration across all R&D functions, including fundamental research and vehicle application technology research. This approach is expected to enable both companies to efficiently and swiftly enhance their technological expertise, achieving both improvements in development capabilities and reductions in development costs through the integration of overlapping functions.   3. Optimizing manufacturing systems and facilities The companies anticipate that optimizing their manufacturing plants and energy service facilities, combined with improved collaboration through the shared use of production lines, will result in a substantial improvement in capacity utilization leading to a decrease in fixed costs.   4. Strengthening competitive advantages across the supply chain through the integration of purchasing functions To fully leverage the synergies from optimizing development and production capacity, both companies intend to boost their competitiveness by improving and streamlining purchasing operations and source common parts from the same the supply chain and in collaboration with business partners.   5. Realizing cost synergies through operational efficiency improvements The companies expect that the integration of systems and back-office operations, along with the upgrade and standardization of operational processes, will drive significant cost reductions.   6. Acquisition of scale advantages through integration in sales finance functions By integrating relevant areas of sales finance functions of both companies and expanding the scale of operations, the companies aim to provide a range of mobility solutions, including new financial services throughout the vehicle lifecycle, to customers of both organizations.   7. Establishment of a talent foundation for intelligence and electrification The human resources of the companies are an invaluable asset, and establishing a strong human resource foundation is crucial for the transformation that will come with the business integration. After the integration, increased employee exchanges and technical collaboration between the companies are expected to promote further skill development. Moreover, by leveraging each company's access to talent markets, attracting exceptional talent will become more attainable. Method of business integration and stock listing Nissan and Honda, with the result of the consideration, plan to establish, through a joint share transfer, a joint holding company that will be the parent company of both companies. This will be subject to approval at each company's general meeting of shareholders and obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities for this business integration, based on the premise that Nissan's turnaround*1 actions are steadily executed. Both Nissan and Honda will be fully owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company*2. Additionally, the companies plan to continue coexisting and developing the brands held by Honda and Nissan equally. Shares of the newly established joint holding company under consideration are planned to be newly listed (technical listing) on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (“TSE”). The listing is scheduled for August 2026. With the listing of the joint holding company, both Nissan and Honda will become wholly owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company and will be scheduled to be delisted from the TSE. However, shareholders of both companies will continue to be able to trade shares of the joint holding company issued during this share transfer on the TSE. The listing date of the joint holding company and the delisting date of both Nissan and Honda will be determined in accordance with the regulations of the TSE. Regarding the organizational structure of the joint holding company, and both companies which will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company after the business integration, the optimal structure for realizing synergies, including the integration of R&D functions, purchasing functions, and manufacturing functions, will be discussed and considered within the integration preparatory committee, with the aim of establishing an organizational structure that enables efficient and highly competitive business operations after the business integration. The CEO's of all three companies had the following to say: Marking the announcement, Nissan Director, President, CEO and Representative Executive Officer Makoto Uchida said: “Honda and Nissan have begun considering a business integration, and will study the creation of significant synergies between the two companies in a wide range of fields. It is significant that Nissan's partner, Mitsubishi Motors, is also involved in these discussions. We anticipate that if this integration comes to fruition, we will be able to deliver even greater value to a wider customer base.“ Honda Director and Representative Executive Officer Toshihiro Mibe said: "At this time of change in the automobile industry, which is said to occur once every 100 years, we hope that Mitsubishi Motors' participation in the business integration discussions of Nissan and Honda will lead to further social change, and that we will be able to become a leading company in creating new value in mobility through business integration. Nissan and Honda will start the discussion from today onwards with an aim to clarify the possibility of business integration by around the end of January in line with the consideration of Mitsubishi Motors." Comment from Mitsubishi Motors Director, Representative Executive Officer, and President and CEO Takao Kato said: “In an era of change in the automotive industry, the study between Nissan and Honda about a business integration will accelerate synergy maximization effects, bringing high value also to the collaborative businesses with Mitsubishi Motors. In order to realize synergies and to make the best use of each company's strengths, we will also study the best form of cooperation.” Upon looking at the press releases, it makes total sense that these companies would look to merge as each company is having a challanging time. Nissan globally has seen a 33.7% reduction in sales taking the estimated 2024 market share to 5.2%.  Honda globally has seen a 9% reduction over all with a 32% reduction in the asian rim leaving them with a 2024 estimated 5.4% market share. Mitsubishi Motors globally has seen a reduction year over year of a 10.7% drop leaving them with a 2024 estimated market share of 4.6%. All three auto companies lag the industry in technology connected auto's, feature / functions and especially EVs. All three companies have seen their profits turn into negative earnings for their respective companies leaving them with no real ability to perform R&D in building EVs to compete in China or the U.S. let alone Europe that has mandates in place for the end of ICE by 2035. End result is it looks like for these companies to survive, merging into one company that shares platforms and technology especially in the software and battery sectors will be the only way to move forward. View full article
    • I think I'm dreaming ... this vehicle would be the oldest of my handful of favorite "blast from the past" cars. A Cutlass Salon coupe in perfect condition, the first year I liked the colonnade Cutlass (and it's last year, of 3, with round headlamps in the colonnade), those huge bucket seats, and, oddly, A/C is there, but with manual windows.  It featured the new but not as popular 260 (4.3L) V8.  It also featured the light enamel blue they didn't repeat.  If the exhaust system is tight, this car will be whisper quiet. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass Salon (Numbers Matching Drivetrain) for sale: photos, technical specifications, description See anything odd?  Come on.  Quick. . . . It has Buick rally wheels instead of Oldsmobile rally wheels. * sigh ... I wonder what time frame this ad goes back to *
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search