Jump to content
Create New...
  • Blake Noble
    Blake Noble

    Could BMW be Bidding for Saab?

    G. Noble

    Editor/Reporter

    CheersandGears.com

    Tuesday, 21st February, 2011

    No doubt about it, the drama surrounding the bankruptcy of Saab almost seems scripted enough to be fit for daytime television at times. The latest news to come out of Trollhättan is no exception, now that the Swedish automaker is looking for a new suitor.

    According to a recent post on Saabs United, Saab's bankruptcy administrators have 6 to 7 bidders interested in purchasing the company and that each bidder is serious about building new Saabs. Among Saab's new suitors in particular is a European automaker which, according to Saabs United's rather patulous sources, "is German and located in Munich." There is also information that indicates that this particular company has the desire to build Saabs and their own vehicles on shared platforms.

    Interestingly, Saabs United also notes that the company that wins the Saab deal won't be the highest bidder, but the company that has the best plan for getting Saab back in business.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I believe it would be a dream scenario for SAAB if BMW bought them. SAAB could remain FWD and BMW could remain RWD... no exact market overlap.

    That's probably the thinking.

    I wonder how much Jack Link's I'd have to set out to get Herr Sasquatch to drop his two cents into the cup on this one.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    BMW has plenty of spare cash and really needs a brand that would allow it to sell more small to medium-sized front-wheel drive cars without diluting the brand image of Mini or BMW and without over-crowding the BMW portfolio. Saab could be that brand at a fire sale price, provided BMW presents a solid buisness plan.

    Medium-sized cars aren't a good fit for Mini and small front-drive cars are a bad fit for BMW. In fact, I don't think BMW is exactly happy about their decision to make the next 1er a front-wheel drive model, only making the choice light of new fuel economy regs.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    BMW has plenty of spare cash and really needs a brand that would allow it to sell more small to medium-sized front-wheel drive cars without diluting the brand image of Mini or BMW and without over-crowding the BMW portfolio. Saab could be that brand at a fire sale price, provided BMW presents a solid buisness plan.

    Medium-sized cars aren't a good fit for Mini and small front-drive cars are a bad fit for BMW. In fact, I don't think BMW is exactly happy about their decision to make the next 1er a front-wheel drive model, only making the choice light of new fuel economy regs.

    I see your point yet, why not pull a Scion then and have BMW badge their FWD auto's on a new name and sell it through the BMW or mini dealership. They could easily have built a show floor within a showfloor for this market. No differance than a GMC/Buick Dealership or Toyota/Scion dealership.

    I do not see enough good karma in SAAB to buy it up even at fire sale prices and try to bring it back. I see it as a black hole, but then I coud be wrong. Would not be the first time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I personally see what people are thinking of in tying up wih BMW, but in reality, This is a company that should die and just let the assets go to a company that is already successful and can grow more.

    I really do not see any reason for trying to keep this brand alive. The wasted millions it would take to rebuild their image and build out a new dealership, etc. Rather see BMW put it into their own successful Family of products.

    BMW has plenty of spare cash and really needs a brand that would allow it to sell more small to medium-sized front-wheel drive cars without diluting the brand image of Mini or BMW and without over-crowding the BMW portfolio. Saab could be that brand at a fire sale price, provided BMW presents a solid buisness plan.

    Medium-sized cars aren't a good fit for Mini and small front-drive cars are a bad fit for BMW. In fact, I don't think BMW is exactly happy about their decision to make the next 1er a front-wheel drive model, only making the choice light of new fuel economy regs.

    I see your point yet, why not pull a Scion then and have BMW badge their FWD auto's on a new name and sell it through the BMW or mini dealership. They could easily have built a show floor within a showfloor for this market. No differance than a GMC/Buick Dealership or Toyota/Scion dealership.

    I do not see enough good karma in SAAB to buy it up even at fire sale prices and try to bring it back. I see it as a black hole, but then I coud be wrong. Would not be the first time.

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Cubical, I see the point in regards to the customer base, manufacturing facilities and peopl with experiance building midsize to small size FWD auto's.

    Yet, will the Unions be willing to give up pay/benefits and scale back the number of employees to make it profitable? Big if here I think.

    Dealers as far as I see on the west coast are all closed and gone. The two that I would drive by in Washington are boarded up, no product to sell, no customers. History, so I do not see any value in the dealer base. I am sure some dealers are still open more as a used car lot, but I again wonder if there is any real value there for BMW to get.

    Like I said I could be wrong here, but I get this gut feeling that this is not a road to success for them.

    Edited by dfelt
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    There would be no union....or at least no contract. The buyer would be purchasing SAAB's assets, not the paper company.

    BMW could buy SaaB with the change in their seat cushions.

    Why should they? How does BMW get to do mass market volumes for something like an Accord/Sonata fighter without damaging the main brand?

    Saab can be used to build a credible FWD sedan in both small and medium sizes. Throw in a small and midsize crossover and you have the makings of an actual full line manufacturer.

    Saab wouldn't and couldn't be a luxury brand anymore, however, they could be "premium" along the lines of how VW is generally perceived.

    BMW buying SAAB for that sort of redevelopment is a clear shot across VW AG's rather large bow.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Are there really many dealers left? I don't see any positive value in the brand name.

    Edited by frogger
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Are there really many dealers left? I don't see any positive value in the brand name.

    Probably most of the dealers closed by now, but they could be reopened. The brand had it's fans....better than creating a new brand from scratch...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    SAAB is an existing brand with existing dealers and existing customer base...probably much cheaper to pick up an existing brand than try and create one from scratch...and SAAB has manufacturing facilities and people w/ experience in midsize FWD models.

    Are there really many dealers left? I don't see any positive value in the brand name.

    So I called today the only 3 dealers in washington state that still are listed with the SAAB name and they are all dealerships that have Cadillac's and they say they will service SAABs as any place would but the SAAB dealership is dead. So I would have to think that the dealerships across NA is mostly dead at this point.

    In regards to VW being preceived as a Premium car line, I have to disagree. VW is considered a competitor to Chevy. An entery level car line with some Buick Level auto's. I have yet to run into anyone that considers them premium here on the west coast. If they were there would be more dealers than just the couple that are around.

    I see the point being made for a mid level small to Medium FWD auto division with a couple of CUV's so that BMW does not dilute their brand. Assets being what they are, there might be value to be had, but I think it would truly have to be for pennies on the dollar to pick up all the assets and make a go of it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    i've felt for a very long time, like since the 9-3 came out in 04 that Saab should have been positioned up against VW...more acurately between say VW and Acura at the time so that the 9-3 was a Passat competitor. or at least something that a VW shopper could move up to without much more dough.

    For Saab to maybe come back the same way.......

    Saab had so much potential......

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I can't think BMW would be interested in any more than a quarter of the former SAAB dealers. Most of them are sitting in GM Mega Complexes. If the whole idea is to end up building a BMW-SAAB-Mini-Cooper dealer network, BMW isn't going to want to be selling Saabs next to Cadillacs in an old Hummer building.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Saw on the News today that the SAAB dealerships here in washington have officially removed all logo's and in the case of the dealer down in Tacoma, they remodeled it into a new Audi Dealership which now sits between a Cadillac dealership and a Mercedes dealership.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think BMW has enlarged the mini line as far as it can go and still be recognizable as a mini. I have to wonder if sales for the countryman and clubman are less than expected.

    Is Saab a good fit for BMW remains to be seen. But let's look at it from the other side. As one person said already this is the best possible scenario for Saab.

    The other bidders consist of companies in newly developed nations China/India/Turkey that want a way into western markets. Building a brand takes a long time and Saab although slightly tarnished still has good brand recognition. There is some precedent that this combination can work, geely/volvo, proton/lotus, tata/jag/land rover etc..

    Still I believe BMW has the best chance to get Saab up and running in the shortest amount of time. BMW has experience reviving a dead brand like mini. I also agree that they hope to compete with VW in the mid-range mainstream market.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crash900s, thank's for joining C&G and welcome.

    I think the one thing you didn't mention, but maybe touched on slightly, is that of all the bidders for Saab that are possible, it is unlikely that any of them have the cash that BMW has to complete the transaction and do the job right.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Crash900s, thank's for joining C&G and welcome.

    I think the one thing you didn't mention, but maybe touched on slightly, is that of all the bidders for Saab that are possible, it is unlikely that any of them have the cash that BMW has to complete the transaction and do the job right.

    Both Crash900s comment and yours are the key point to giving SAAB any chance at all. The experiance gained at reviving Mini and the cash is what will allow them to succeed where I see the others only failing.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hmmmm.....a Mini/SAAB/BMW/Roller range actually sort of make sense...

    It does and to me personally it would be a match made in Heaven :)

    Edited by ZL-1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it would be great if BMW snapped up Saab. I'm betting they could turn them around. It's not like Saab has a bad reputation. BMW would get a known brand that still has loyal followers and buyers. With a little patience and a lot of money, I think Saab could be brought back from the dead. GM bought them and let them wither on the vine for a while before making a half assed attempt to give them some new poduct. They never had a chance under GM ownership.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    GM bought them and let them wither on the vine for a while before making a half assed attempt to give them some new poduct. They never had a chance under GM ownership.

    Agreed. GM put way too much on its plate when it bought Saab.

    Edited by black-knight
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BMW would get a known brand that still has loyal followers and buyers.

    All five of them!!

    On paper this seems like a good idea. In practice, I'm pessimistic it'd work. Unless BMW mandated joint SAAB/BMW or SAAB/Mini dealerships, the Scandanavian brand's limited dealer network would hinder the brand. Going toe-to-toe with the Buick's, VW's and Acura's would be a challenge.

    Mini had immediate brand awareness that BMW could milk from the get-go. SAAB has nowhere near the brand cachet.

    That being said, if they could pull it off, it'd be a really cool revival for a brand that even I believe deserved a lot more love than it got.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    BMW would get a known brand that still has loyal followers and buyers.

    All five of them!!

    On paper this seems like a good idea. In practice, I'm pessimistic it'd work. Unless BMW mandated joint SAAB/BMW or SAAB/Mini dealerships, the Scandanavian brand's limited dealer network would hinder the brand. Going toe-to-toe with the Buick's, VW's and Acura's would be a challenge.

    Mini had immediate brand awareness that BMW could milk from the get-go. SAAB has nowhere near the brand cachet.

    That being said, if they could pull it off, it'd be a really cool revival for a brand that even I believe deserved a lot more love than it got.

    The current Saab network would have no affiliation with the "new Saab" at all. BMW could offer Saab franchises to whomever it chooses from the old network, but would more likely team them up with their existing network.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Sending a Christmas eve chuckle your way: Here's Dyan Cannon, who has again poured herself into her clothing, to attend a Lakers game, which she does often. It looks like she can easily fit down many chimneys.  Maybe even into a Christmas gift stocking. I find the different chapters of Dyan Cannon humorous.
    • @Drew Dowdell @Robert Hall @trinacriabob @A Horse With No Name @ccap41 @surreal1272 @oldshurst442  And including all of the C&G members that are here that I do not interact with often enough or those I have forgotten their handles. Wishing each and every one of you a Merry Xmas Eve and Merry Xmas.  To those that do not celebrate Xmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Holidays, Happy time off. Wishing each and every person here a restful end to the year, one of love, respect, relaxation to you and your families. Wishing all the best!
    • MOU means that these companies have signed a "Memorandum of Understanding" to explore the participation, involvement and synergy sharing in relation to the business integration through a joint holding company. Back in August 1st, 2024 Nissan and Honda created a Joint Holding Company for the commencement of a strategic partnership focused on intelligence and electrification. This was to start the consideration towards integration of the two companies. Mitsubishi Motors has now signed onto this MOU to explore the possibility of achieving synergies at an increased level through business participation or integration. In basic terms, the three companies have agreed to join forces in sharing costs to move forward with EV platform R&D while they also look at the ICE "Internal Combustion Engine" gas side of having shared platforms to reduce costs and hopefully save the three auto companies by keeping them alive.  While Nissan and Honda have agreed to move forward in this integration of the two auto companies, Mitsubishi Motors will make a final decision by the end of January 2025 about possibly joining in with the integration of Mitsubishi Motors into this joint 3 auto company venture. Nissan and Honda have already agreed to a full SDV or Software-defined vehicles program moving forward that will allow them to have a solid crucial collaboration of intelligence and electrification for future products. Both companies have stated that the acceleration of technology and the rapid change of the auto industry will allow these two companies to maintain global competitiveness and deliver more attractive products and services for customers worldwide. Nissan global mobility product line merged with Honda four-wheel-vehicles, motor cycles and power products can allow both companies to become more attractive to shareholders and innovation of products to sell to customers worldwide according to the CEOs of both companies. Nissan and Honda have stated the following: Nissan and Honda aim to become a world-class mobility company with sales revenue exceeding 30 trillion yen ($190 Billion U.S. Dollars) and operating profit of more than 3 trillion yen ($19 billion U.S. Dollars). The expected synergies from the business integration at this time are: 1. Scale advantages by standardizing vehicle platforms By standardizing the vehicle platforms of both companies across various product segments, the companies expect to create stronger products, reduce costs, enhance development efficiencies, and improve investment efficiencies through standardized production processes. The integration is projected to increase sales and operational volumes, allowing the companies to reduce development costs per vehicle, including for future digital services, while maximizing profits. By accelerating the mutual complementation of their global vehicle offerings - including ICE, HEV, PHEV, and EV models - Nissan and Honda will be better positioned to meet diverse customer needs around the world and deliver optimal products, leading to improved customer satisfaction. 2. Enhancement of development capabilities and cost synergies through the integration of R&D functions In accordance with the MOU to deepen strategic partnership and the joint research agreement on fundamental technologies dated August 1, the two companies have started joint research in fundamental technologies in the area of vehicle platforms for next-generation software-defined vehicles (SDVs), which is the cornerstone of the field of intelligence. After the business integration, both companies will encompass more integrated collaboration across all R&D functions, including fundamental research and vehicle application technology research. This approach is expected to enable both companies to efficiently and swiftly enhance their technological expertise, achieving both improvements in development capabilities and reductions in development costs through the integration of overlapping functions.   3. Optimizing manufacturing systems and facilities The companies anticipate that optimizing their manufacturing plants and energy service facilities, combined with improved collaboration through the shared use of production lines, will result in a substantial improvement in capacity utilization leading to a decrease in fixed costs.   4. Strengthening competitive advantages across the supply chain through the integration of purchasing functions To fully leverage the synergies from optimizing development and production capacity, both companies intend to boost their competitiveness by improving and streamlining purchasing operations and source common parts from the same the supply chain and in collaboration with business partners.   5. Realizing cost synergies through operational efficiency improvements The companies expect that the integration of systems and back-office operations, along with the upgrade and standardization of operational processes, will drive significant cost reductions.   6. Acquisition of scale advantages through integration in sales finance functions By integrating relevant areas of sales finance functions of both companies and expanding the scale of operations, the companies aim to provide a range of mobility solutions, including new financial services throughout the vehicle lifecycle, to customers of both organizations.   7. Establishment of a talent foundation for intelligence and electrification The human resources of the companies are an invaluable asset, and establishing a strong human resource foundation is crucial for the transformation that will come with the business integration. After the integration, increased employee exchanges and technical collaboration between the companies are expected to promote further skill development. Moreover, by leveraging each company's access to talent markets, attracting exceptional talent will become more attainable. Method of business integration and stock listing Nissan and Honda, with the result of the consideration, plan to establish, through a joint share transfer, a joint holding company that will be the parent company of both companies. This will be subject to approval at each company's general meeting of shareholders and obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities for this business integration, based on the premise that Nissan's turnaround*1 actions are steadily executed. Both Nissan and Honda will be fully owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company*2. Additionally, the companies plan to continue coexisting and developing the brands held by Honda and Nissan equally. Shares of the newly established joint holding company under consideration are planned to be newly listed (technical listing) on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (“TSE”). The listing is scheduled for August 2026. With the listing of the joint holding company, both Nissan and Honda will become wholly owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company and will be scheduled to be delisted from the TSE. However, shareholders of both companies will continue to be able to trade shares of the joint holding company issued during this share transfer on the TSE. The listing date of the joint holding company and the delisting date of both Nissan and Honda will be determined in accordance with the regulations of the TSE. Regarding the organizational structure of the joint holding company, and both companies which will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company after the business integration, the optimal structure for realizing synergies, including the integration of R&D functions, purchasing functions, and manufacturing functions, will be discussed and considered within the integration preparatory committee, with the aim of establishing an organizational structure that enables efficient and highly competitive business operations after the business integration. The CEO's of all three companies had the following to say: Marking the announcement, Nissan Director, President, CEO and Representative Executive Officer Makoto Uchida said: “Honda and Nissan have begun considering a business integration, and will study the creation of significant synergies between the two companies in a wide range of fields. It is significant that Nissan's partner, Mitsubishi Motors, is also involved in these discussions. We anticipate that if this integration comes to fruition, we will be able to deliver even greater value to a wider customer base.“ Honda Director and Representative Executive Officer Toshihiro Mibe said: "At this time of change in the automobile industry, which is said to occur once every 100 years, we hope that Mitsubishi Motors' participation in the business integration discussions of Nissan and Honda will lead to further social change, and that we will be able to become a leading company in creating new value in mobility through business integration. Nissan and Honda will start the discussion from today onwards with an aim to clarify the possibility of business integration by around the end of January in line with the consideration of Mitsubishi Motors." Comment from Mitsubishi Motors Director, Representative Executive Officer, and President and CEO Takao Kato said: “In an era of change in the automotive industry, the study between Nissan and Honda about a business integration will accelerate synergy maximization effects, bringing high value also to the collaborative businesses with Mitsubishi Motors. In order to realize synergies and to make the best use of each company's strengths, we will also study the best form of cooperation.” Upon looking at the press releases, it makes total sense that these companies would look to merge as each company is having a challanging time. Nissan globally has seen a 33.7% reduction in sales taking the estimated 2024 market share to 5.2%.  Honda globally has seen a 9% reduction over all with a 32% reduction in the asian rim leaving them with a 2024 estimated 5.4% market share. Mitsubishi Motors globally has seen a reduction year over year of a 10.7% drop leaving them with a 2024 estimated market share of 4.6%. All three auto companies lag the industry in technology connected auto's, feature / functions and especially EVs. All three companies have seen their profits turn into negative earnings for their respective companies leaving them with no real ability to perform R&D in building EVs to compete in China or the U.S. let alone Europe that has mandates in place for the end of ICE by 2035. End result is it looks like for these companies to survive, merging into one company that shares platforms and technology especially in the software and battery sectors will be the only way to move forward. View full article
    • I think I'm dreaming ... this vehicle would be the oldest of my handful of favorite "blast from the past" cars. A Cutlass Salon coupe in perfect condition, the first year I liked the colonnade Cutlass (and it's last year, of 3, with round headlamps in the colonnade), those huge bucket seats, and, oddly, A/C is there, but with manual windows.  It featured the new but not as popular 260 (4.3L) V8.  It also featured the light enamel blue they didn't repeat.  If the exhaust system is tight, this car will be whisper quiet. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass Salon (Numbers Matching Drivetrain) for sale: photos, technical specifications, description See anything odd?  Come on.  Quick. . . . It has Buick rally wheels instead of Oldsmobile rally wheels. * sigh ... I wonder what time frame this ad goes back to *
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search