Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Rumorpile: Porsche Demands $234 Million From Audi Over the Diesel Emission Mess

      Just what Volkswagen needed, family members fighting

    As if the Volkswagen Group needed more headaches, a new report says there's a bit of infighting between Audi and Porsche.

    German tabloid Bild reports that Porsche is seeking 200 million Euros (about $234 million) from Audi to cover costs from the diesel emission scandal. Reportedly, Porsche management delivered this claim in a letter to their counterparts at Audi. Bild doesn't mention any source, so take this report with a fair amount of salt.

    When reached for comment by Reuters, a Porsche spokesman said internal issues were not open for public discussion. An Audi spokesperson declined to comment.

    This dispute stems from Audi admitting back in November 2015 that its 3.0L TDI V6 was fitted with a defeat device. One of those models using the V6 was the Porsche Cayenne.

    Source: Bild, Reuters

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    The ownership structure set up between Porsche, VW, and Audi is so confusing, I'd have to whiteboard it out to fully understand it.  There are no less than three companies in Germany named Porsche.  

    Porsche SE owns 52% of VW AG... Porsche SE is a holding company.

    VW AG owns 100% of Porsche AG... Porsche AG is a company that builds cars.

    Porsche AG owns 100% of Porsche Consulting GmbH..... not sure what Porsche Consulting GmbH does.

    Audi AG (which trades under the stock ticker NSU, an old company Auto Union acquired) is 100% owned by VW AG, but is legally a separate company from VW.   

    Audi AG also owns Ducati, Lamborghini, and... curiously... Audi Sport GmbH (formerly Quattro GmbH).  Never heard of that last one?  They build cars, but they don't sell to the public.  Audi Sport GmbH builds all of the RS models, sells them to Audi AG who then distributes and sells the vehicles. They also make the S-Line parts for the Audi AG cars.   Why they need this super confusing structure, I don't know.....

     

    So... when the article says Porsche is demanding money from Audi.... it still doesn't narrow down enough who is demanding money from whom.

    I wonder if VAG could shave a bunch more costs by simplifying their corporate structure(s) substantially. 

    • Confused 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The ownership structure set up between Porsche, VW, and Audi is so confusing, I'd have to whiteboard it out to fully understand it.  There are no less than three companies in Germany named Porsche.  

    Porsche SE owns 52% of VW AG... Porsche SE is a holding company.

    VW AG owns 100% of Porsche AG... Porsche AG is a company that builds cars.

    Porsche AG owns 100% of Porsche Consulting GmbH..... not sure what Porsche Consulting GmbH does.

    Audi AG (which trades under the stock ticker NSU, an old company Auto Union acquired) is 100% owned by VW AG, but is legally a separate company from VW.   

    Audi AG also owns Ducati, Lamborghini, and... curiously... Audi Sport GmbH (formerly Quattro GmbH).  Never heard of that last one?  They build cars, but they don't sell to the public.  Audi Sport GmbH builds all of the RS models, sells them to Audi AG who then distributes and sells the vehicles. They also make the S-Line parts for the Audi AG cars.   Why they need this super confusing structure, I don't know.....

     

    So... when the article says Porsche is demanding money from Audi.... it still doesn't narrow down enough who is demanding money from whom.

    I wonder if VAG could shave a bunch more costs by simplifying their corporate structure(s) substantially. 

    WOW :omfg: That is just one big mess and me think the unions is just as much responsible for the mess as the mgmt.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've read of Porsche Consulting in one of the car mags a few years ago.  They do speciality auto engineering consulting for other car makers on the down low. Like helping Hyundai design a cylinder head or Proton design a suspension.  ( not actual examples but hypothetical).   Kind of like what Lotus has done over the years, but without the publicity.  

    There is/was also Porsche Design, not sure where that fit in..they did things like bicycles, purses, laptop cases, etc..

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    20 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    I've read of Porsche Consulting in one of the car mags a few years ago.  They do speciality auto engineering consulting for other car makers on the down low. Like helping Hyundai design a cylinder head or Proton design a suspension.  ( not actual examples but hypothetical).   Kind of like what Lotus has done over the years, but without the publicity.  

    There is/was also Porsche Design, not sure where that fit in..they did things like bicycles, purses, laptop cases, etc..

    Cool, thanks. Porsche Design GmbH is probably 50% owned by Porsche SE and 25% owned by Ducati AG who is owned by Porsche AG who is owned by VW AG who is 50% owned by Porsche SE....

    Lamborghini has a similar design company who is probably owned by...  Oh forget it!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The ownership structure set up between Porsche, VW, and Audi is so confusing, I'd have to whiteboard it out to fully understand it.  There are no less than three companies in Germany named Porsche.  

    Porsche SE owns 52% of VW AG... Porsche SE is a holding company.

    VW AG owns 100% of Porsche AG... Porsche AG is a company that builds cars.

    Porsche AG owns 100% of Porsche Consulting GmbH..... not sure what Porsche Consulting GmbH does.

    Audi AG (which trades under the stock ticker NSU, an old company Auto Union acquired) is 100% owned by VW AG, but is legally a separate company from VW.   

    Audi AG also owns Ducati, Lamborghini, and... curiously... Audi Sport GmbH (formerly Quattro GmbH).  Never heard of that last one?  They build cars, but they don't sell to the public.  Audi Sport GmbH builds all of the RS models, sells them to Audi AG who then distributes and sells the vehicles. They also make the S-Line parts for the Audi AG cars.   Why they need this super confusing structure, I don't know.....

     

    So... when the article says Porsche is demanding money from Audi.... it still doesn't narrow down enough who is demanding money from whom.

    I wonder if VAG could shave a bunch more costs by simplifying their corporate structure(s) substantially. 

    They should radically simplify the corporate structure, just to save $$$$.  The only problem is is that VW Group is partially owned by the German Lander (or state) of Lower Saxony.  Simplifying the corporate ownership structure will probably require privatization first, then a buyout under one owner.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    They should radically simplify the corporate structure, just to save $$$$.  The only problem is is that VW Group is partially owned by the German Lander (or state) of Lower Saxony.  Simplifying the corporate ownership structure will probably require privatization first, then a buyout under one owner.

    Unions will probably resist as they do not want change as it could affect their golden goose.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I hate to say stuff like this, but you can profile people fairly easily.  A certain emboldened member with a smaller view of the world used to get on my case about this.  Go see the world and learn to make inferences.  At any rate, I was boarding a plane in Jacksonville and, in front of me, was a guy with a baseball cap and all I could see was the rear camo effect.  When he got up, I saw Trump 2024.  I felt like saying something to him, along the lines of how is it that the most conservative people support the most depraved individual.  I thought I should skip it since I didn't want to end up in an argument and on a "do not fly" list for some airline.  He was white with salt and pepper hair but had that Charles Bronson brow.  So, you know ... ex-military, high paying trades, utilities, government job ... or alligator trapper.  For all these so-called conservative people, we've never had a first lady (lower case in her case) where you're a k**t hair away from seeing the R/X rated stuff.  I'm originally from SoCal and NOTHING shocks me, but that and the whole circus of everyone involved - extended family, loyal friends - is over the line for me for the job at hand. Houston is not my favorite place.  However, I handle it much better than Dallas or San Antonio, which don't interest me.  I don't like their interior location and the brushy looking mesquite.  Houston has a distinct and attractive downtown.  There's the Space Center.  There are the museums, of which MFAH is free one day of the week.  There's Galveston, and even if the not the nicest beach, water can be so therapeutic, just watching the cruise ships or freight ships come and go.  Lastly, there are some beautiful neighborhoods, with newer homes in the darker red brick, completely hidden in a pine canopy, which is never the case in other big Texas cities.  It reminds of Atlanta, which I very much liked.  So, between that, and the welcoming and freewheeling people, I can hang in H-town for a while and find new indie coffeehouses and eateries.  There's so much food and it's easy to gain weight there.  I agree ... I hate Orlando FL ... a bad knock-off of Las Vegas and Las Vegas is already bad. I've never been to Hawai'i and Alaska.  I'm not so sure I'm interested.  If I have to fly that far, I'll just cross a pond.  I also have an issue with Hawaiians since some of the locals of Samoan stock have issues with haolis, having heard this from white folks I knew who wanted to move there and then came back because of the passive-aggressive discrimination.  The only states are a cluster in the middle in which I have never set foot and it's not that pressing for me - ND, SD, Nebraska, and Montana.  So, I'm at 44 of them and that's good enough for now.
    • Watching "The Hunger Games" why do I feel we are going down a dark path?
    • The question I am hearing from more and more Americans: "Can we RECALL the President and VP?" Sadly, NO is the answer. It would take a motion to add to our constitution to allow a recall of the folks as even the Senate and House members are protected with no way to recall them either.  Interesting is that most states have in their constitution the ability to recall state politicians including the Governor that has happened in a few states over the last Century. Most recent was California.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search