Jump to content
Create New...
  • Drew Dowdell
    Drew Dowdell

    Mercedes X-Class to be Xed Out

      ...well that didn't last long...

    The Best or Nothing.... Or A Nissan.  Almost exactly two years ago we showed you pictures and a report of the forthcoming Mercedes-Benz X-Class. Now unnamed sources have told Germany's Automobilwoche (Automobile Week) that Mercedes' recent profit warning and a board review of the portfolio have caused the company to put the X-Class on the chopping block.

    The X-Class is based in the Nissan Navara with some upgrades to the suspension and a Mercedes-esque interior.  Much of the interior bits are straight from the Mercedes parts bin. The X-Class starts at about $41,000 in base trim and goes up to about $66,000 in top trim, quite a lot of coin for a small pickup.

    Pricing wasn't the only factor limiting sales.  The X-Class was never offered in the biggest truck market, the U.S., instead it was only sold in Europe, Australia, and South Africa.  In those three markets, the company moved only 16,700 units last year.  The X-Class is built at Nissan's plant in Barcelona, Spain where the Nissan Navara and Renault Alaskan are built.

    Mercedes backed out of plans to build the X-Class for South American markets in Argentina back in February, perhaps signaling then the truck's fate.  Further, Daimler may end their partnership with Nissan - Renault as part of a cost saving measure. This would largely be achieved by ending shared projects like the X-Class and the Smart For Two which shares platforms with the Renault Twingo.  The Infiniti QX30 which shares with the Mercedes-Benz GLA has already been canceled

    Daimler is trying to save $6.75 billion by 2021 with another $2.25 billion from the Daimler trucks division. In doing so, 10,000 jobs could be cut.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    18 minutes ago, dfelt said:

    ...they will never understand the individualistic nature of die hard, hard core Truck buyers that will never leave their birth truck for another brand.

    It goes even deeper; it’s such an ingrained Americana thing that it doesn’t have to be One Brand Only, but it sure as hell is unlikely to be a Japanese brand.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Toyota could literally buy Ford Motor company outright, they have that much money.    They can also hire 1,000 American engineers to design and build a new Tundra, they could buy Rivian out too.  Toyota made $17 billion last year with very little full size truck profit, that is insane, Ford would lose money without the F150.  If Toyota spend even 1/5th of last year’s profit on a new Tundra it would be best in class.

    It is embarrassing that Toyota is so lazy with the Tundra.  Even the Tacoma and 4Runner, update that stuff.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    And Apple could buy Ford, GM, and FCA and look where their automobile efforts landed because they realized it isn't as easy as they thought. 

    Best in class does not mean best in sales. That's been gone over at least a million times already. Wasn't the Tundra best in class in 07-08 when it first came out? YUP. 

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota could literally buy Ford Motor company outright, they have that much money.    They can also hire 1,000 American engineers to design and build a new Tundra, they could buy Rivian out too.  Toyota made $17 billion last year with very little full size truck profit, that is insane, Ford would lose money without the F150.  If Toyota spend even 1/5th of last year’s profit on a new Tundra it would be best in class.

    It is embarrassing that Toyota is so lazy with the Tundra.  Even the Tacoma and 4Runner, update that stuff.  

    What a lazy statement. Apple could buy all the German brands but would it mean anything? No and neither would Toyotas ability to hypothetically buy Ford. That’s just lazy talk when your previous arguments haven’t worked. Two things. The domestics will probably never get the mainstream market and the Japanese and Germans will never get the American full size truck market. 

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Toyota could literally buy Ford Motor company outright, they have that much money.    They can also hire 1,000 American engineers to design and build a new Tundra, they could buy Rivian out too.  Toyota made $17 billion last year with very little full size truck profit, that is insane, Ford would lose money without the F150.  If Toyota spend even 1/5th of last year’s profit on a new Tundra it would be best in class.

    It is embarrassing that Toyota is so lazy with the Tundra.  Even the Tacoma and 4Runner, update that stuff.  

    You call Toyota lazy but at least they have the ability and the means to build their own truck without borrowing someone else’s truck just to watch it turn into yet more vapor ware. 

    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, surreal1272 said:

     The domestics will probably never get the mainstream market and the Japanese and Germans will never get the American full size truck market.

    The domestics LOST the mainstream market (despite their best efforts) somewhere between 1985-1995.  The only thing that keeps Ford and GM running well (and FCA from suffering the fate of Hudson and Nash) are the trucks and BOF SUVs.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, riviera74 said:

    The domestics LOST the mainstream market (despite their best efforts) somewhere between 1985-1995.  The only thing that keeps Ford and GM running well (and FCA from suffering the fate of Hudson and Nash) are the trucks and BOF SUVs.

    Except for one thing- the mainstream market has long & steadily embraced the SUV & truck AS mainstream. 
    GMC sold 311K units in 1986, they sold 556K last year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 7/17/2019 at 7:38 PM, riviera74 said:

    What were the sales of the Lincoln Mark LT compared to the Cadillac Escalade EXT?

    Also, I am not sure if Cadillac CAN make a true luxury pickup given the predominance of the GMC Sierra Denali, which already fetch Cadillac prices.

    Lincoln Mark LT was sold from 2005 to 2008 US / Canade and till 2014 in Mexico.

    image.png

    Cadillac Escalade EXT was sold from 2002 to 2015 for North America.

    image.png

    Data from the following web site: http://carsalesbase.com 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was just rewatching Grand Tour Season 3 and there was an episode were they tested three European trucks, Ranger, VW and Mercedes Benz.   So after they used the bed to carry some heavy stuff on each of them, MB rear bed sides got bent so badly they could not close the rear gate.  Didn't happen in Ranger or Amarok.  Basically after torturing all three of the trucks they said MB was "rubbish", Amorok was ok but the only one they liked was the Ranger.  

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, ykX said:

    I was just rewatching Grand Tour Season 3 and there was an episode were they tested three European trucks, Ranger, VW and Mercedes Benz.   So after they used the bed to carry some heavy stuff on each of them, MB rear bed sides got bent so badly they could not close the rear gate.  Didn't happen in Ranger or Amarok.  Basically after torturing all three of the trucks they said MB was "rubbish", Amorok was ok but the only one they liked was the Ranger.  

    Sooooooo, MB cannot build a competitive truck even with the foundation from another truck maker.

    @smk4565 will not like this but I am sure he will find some way to blame everyone but MB and move the goal post again..............

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I watched that episode and the problem is the Nissan Navara that underpins the X-class.  Which is why it was a sales dud.  A 100% Mercedes truck would do better but they don’t want to put money into something like that.

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, smk4565 said:

    I watched that episode and the problem is the Nissan Navara that underpins the X-class.  Which is why it was a sales dud.  A 100% Mercedes truck would do better but they don’t want to put money into something like that.

    Obviously with cutting of products, the money pit of money to spend on whatever MB wants is not true. There are limits and MB cannot and chooses to not bother trying to compete in the Trucks market.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Very cool read and video on how Tires are made. Where Are Michelin Tires Made And Who Owns The Brand?
    • This is an interesting read. Korea is the only country with EVs that are head-to-head with China and in some ways better. This nanotube technology will allow Korea to move way farther forward than the U.S. in automotive options. Advances in carbon nanotube applications enhance battery dry process
    • I got a better idea for Trump: Instead of Canada becoming the 51st state, Id prefer for the US to become Canada's 4rth Territory.  Not even province status. In order for the United Stated Territories of America to become a full blown province, Americans would have to prove their allegiance and loyalty to the Royalty of King Charles the Third since Canada is a Federal Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy of the British Commonwealth realm.  Trump's job and title would be a perfect revival for an old tradition.  King Charles the Third's court jester. And we could throw him a bone...and have a playing card named after him since he likes those kinds of things    
    • Im glad to get that off my chest  
    • This is what Andy Palmer said, the dude of what the article in the link is about.     "Hybrids are a road to hell. They are a transition strategy, and the longer you stay on that transition, the less quickly you ramp up into the new world," Palmer said. "If you just delay transitioning to EVs by diluting it with hybrids then you are more uncompetitive for longer, and you allow the Chinese to continue to develop their market and their leadership. I honestly think it's a fool's errand," he added.   And him being the dude that helped engineer the Nissan Leaf and was later the dude in charge of Nissan's EV department, I am 100% in agreement with him.  And I would also like to add: The Chinese government pushed and pushed hard for EVs.  Pushed hard not only on the global stage but MOSTLY got ALL Chinese people ON BOARD with EVs.  They had several reasons to do so.  China has lots and lots of minerals and important ingredients to make said batteries. An essential part of EV transition.  But most IMPORTANTLY, China WANTS to REPLACE the USA for being the defacto country  in political, social, economical influence in the world that the USA enjoyed since the end of WW2 in 1945.  And since they knew they lacked behind in ebery metric that would push them to that status, they had only one move to make. It was a Hail Mary pass, but kit was to dominate in the the tech world and it happened to be in the automobile realm. EVs. And while China was seeking to dominate in this arena, and CAREFULLY nurtured it, the USA phoqued themselves over.  Idiot Americans were fooled to believe ALL the negative commentary on EVs. Uneducated morons liked the drill baby drill commentary. Smart but greedy fools failed to see what was coming next and failed even further to see the threat that is China and ITS technological breakthroughs.  ALL from morons that had biased reasons to be anti-EV. From the Joe Rogans and Alex Jones of the world that thrive from clicks for the podcast youtube and other shytty platforms to anti-EV biases from Big Oil.  And lastly, stupid politicians that failed American citizens in different decades from keeping Americans poor and stupid by not giving them educations. By PURPOSELY DEFUNDING the American school system, by PURPOSELY lying to them on DIFFERENT subjects and while these American politicians were greedily looking to make America into a fascist, oligarch world, they failed to see and acknowledge the OTHER threats the world was giving to the US OTHER than the war threats.  The technological warfare.   Exactly the OPPOSITE of what the Chinese regimes were on about EVs.  And if Trump decides to cut EV subsidies, even of only to allow Tesla to sell, the Chinese are building European factories to build EVs there. Slowly.  They are FLOODING the market with Chinese EVs as we speak in Europe.  The next step is to flood North America with Chinese EVs. The starting point IS Mexico.  If one is educated, one could see the disaster that is to come for GM, Ford.  Stellantis is going to get the disaster first in Europe.  Chinese EVs are going to flood Mexico.  INEXPENSIVE Chinese EVs.  Then WILL come the factories in Mexico.  So much for the "NOBODY WANTS EVs" rhetoric that the uneducated, wrongfully informed Americans (and Canadians to some degree) keep on spewing...   Its really IS a big deal. I SEE that rhetoric play about the failure of VW and Stellantis and even GM when these fools squeal about how they are failing because they have put all their monies on EVs.  The thing is, they didnt put their monies FAST enough on EVs and also concetrated on producing ICEVs when they should have just NIXED them waaaay before.  Of course that is Monday morning quarterbacking from me as I say that, but I ALSO saw the writing on the wall about EVs being THE future.  Had Americans NOT been LIED to about this whole thing about scare tactics about EVs, GM and Ford would have ALL the working EVs RIGHT NOW not ONLY to shut down Tesla, but to even shut down Chinese EVs. Elon Musk could have TAKEN China ALL to himself if he was 5% the visionary he thinks he is.   But he was too busy STILL selling us on colonizing Mars...  Whatever happened to that super loop thing anyway?  Yeah...a billion dollar boondoggle that had everybody fooled.  Chinese politicians, engineers and all around smart folk must be STILL laughing at all the gullible Americans and greedy fools that the US has churned out the last 15 years...    But hey...   Now lets keep on shopping because its the Christmas season and we should all consume because its good for the economy while we wait for tariffs to hit us because Canada and Mexico reasons, because our eggs are expensive while we get fleeced by insurance companies but we dont want healthcare because communism and education education education but Ivy Leaguers  they too smart so they elitist but Democrats wanting to forgive student debt no good but keep on having insanely expensive school tuitions while other areas in the country and young folk not having ACCESS to an education while calling some countries of the world as shytehole countries while ALSO keep on having school shootings because teachers arent packing but also those shytehole country folk  are eating the dogs and they are eating the cats.  
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search