Jump to content
Create New...
  • G. David Felt
    G. David Felt

    Lucid Air Electric Car Achieves EPA Rating of 520 Miles of Range

      Beating the current competition by over 100 miles, the Lucid Air Dream Edition R is the longest-range electric car.

    The Lucid Group of Newark California announces today, the 16th of September 2021 a new standard in the advanced luxury EVs. The Lucid Air Dream Edition has received an official EPA rating of 520 miles of range, the longest-range rated electric vehicle ever rated by the EPA delivering over 100+ miles of range over the closest competitor.

    The Lucid Air Dream Edition achieves 520 miles of range while delivering 933 horsepower and will sit along side the Lucid Air Dream Edition Performance model at 1,111 horsepower and the Grand Touring version at 800 horsepower. 

    To quote Peter Rawlinson, CEO and CTO of the Lucid Group:

    “I’m delighted that our Lucid Air Dream Edition Range has been officially accredited with a range of 520 miles by the EPA, a number I believe to be a new record for any EV. Crucially, this landmark has been achieved by Lucid’s world-leading in-house EV technology, not by simply installing an oversize battery pack,”

    Lucid is using their race proven 900V battery technology in conjunction with BMS technology, miniaturized drive units, coupled with their Wunderbox technology in deliverying ultra-high efficiency, enabling further travel on less battery energy. To quote Lucid, "The next generation of EV has truly arrived!"

    The complete family of Lucid Air vehicles have received their official EPA rating testing on versions with both 19" and 21" wheels. The Lucid family of cars which have 6 models now take the top six positions for overall EPA range rating among EVs as well as the highest MPGe ratings in the Large vehicle class.

    Official EPA AWD ratings:

    • Lucid Air Dream Edition 19" wheels - 520 miles of Range (837 km) @ 933HP
    • Lucid Air Dream Edition 21" wheels - 481 miles of Range (774 km) @ 933HP
    • Lucid Air Dream Edition Performance 19" wheels - 471 miles of Range (758 km) @ 1,111HP
    • Lucid Air Dream Edition Performance 21" wheels - 451 miles of Range (726 km) @ 1,111HP
    • Lucid Air Grand Touring 19" wheels - 516 miles of Range (830 km) @ 800HP
    • Lucid Air Grand Touring 21" wheels - 469 miles of Range (755 km) @ 800HP

    Lucid does remind potential customers that EPA estimated ranges are meant to be a general guideline for consumers when comparing vehicles and can change up or down based on driving style. These ratings are based on the Lucid battery pack of approximately 113 kWh.

    Lucid will also have lower levels of auto's to come following the production of the current 6 models. The following models will be released at a future date:

    • Lucid Air Pure - 480 HP and 406 estimated range
    • Lucid Air Touring - 620 HP and 406 estimated range

    Pricing is as follows for the Lucid electric cars:

    • Air Pure starting from $77,400
    • Air Touring starting from $95,000
    • Air Grand Touring starting from $139,000
    • Air Dream Edition Range and Performance starting from $169,000

    Lucid Configurator is available here: Configurator | Lucid Motors

    Lucid is truly going after the highest end luxury auto market and is making a statement by surpassing the Tesla S Long Range electric car that currently has a 405 miles EPA range (652 km).

    Lucid believes they have brought together following their company's mission statement of sustainable energy by creating the most captivating electric vehicles, centered around the human experience. The interior is a modern 21st century luxury of comfort driving experience. Lucid features a luxurious full-size interior space in a mid-size exterior footprint.

    Production of the Lucid Air auto line is being done at Lucid's new factory in Casa Grande, Arizona.

    To quote Motor Trend in their review of the Lucid Air Dream Edition R in a drive from Los Angeles to San Francisco California and back to the Lucid HQ in Newark California, this 445 mile trip was covered with 72 miles of range to spare, "This is a Mic Drop". Motor Trends Jonny Lieberman put's it this way: "Remember range anxiety? As with internal combustion engines, it's a thing of the past!"

    In reviewing the information Lucid has released to date along with their pictures of of the exterior and interior of the cars, it appears a line has been drawn in the sane in regards to Luxury levels for the interior with the highest level of fit n finish.

    Tesla, Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Porsche, Cadillac, Lincoln, Lexus, Infinity, Genesis, etc. are you luxury auto lines listening? Are you paying attention to the new bar in electrical efficiency and luxury expectations?

    Welcome to the Lucid Air Revolution!

    Lucid Air Officially EPA-Rated at 520 Miles of Range | Lucid Motors

    Media Room | Lucid Motors

    An absolute triumph of efficiency, Lucid Air achieves 520 miles of range. | Lucid Motors

    Compare Side-by-Side (fueleconomy.gov)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

      On 9/16/2021 at 4:21 PM, balthazar said:

    Something about it (nose & tail) is coming off as very early '00s to me.

    Expand  

    What EV doesn't look bad to you? What one would you allow in your driveway? (Not trying to be a dick, genuinely curious because you seen to greatly dislike most everything new and/or EV)

    • Agree 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 4:08 PM, balthazar said:

    Range is great.

    Design is meh.

    Pricing is insanely high.

    Expand  

    Yet even the EQS cannot compete with what this has to offer at the price point.

    Right now this is making Tesla and Mercedes, heck even Porsche looking pathetic when you take performance and range into consideration.

    I was going to post pictures of the Tesla S Plaid, EQS and Porsche and yet the ability seems to not be working right now.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 5:44 PM, ccap41 said:

    What EV doesn't look bad to you? What one would you allow in your driveway? (Not trying to be a dick, genuinely curious because you seen to greatly dislike most everything new and/or EV)

    Expand  

    Tier 1 Taycan is very slick- Balthy like.
    Model S hasn't a thing wrong with it exterior-wise, it's just old.

    Tier 2 : I like the proportions of the Lyriq, but some of the details I do not. Have to see better/more pics, but it's a 'meh' so far.
    I think the Hummer is a very well-done heritage design, but it's so far outside my realm I have to jack it down.
    Lucid can go in here; it's not bad, but like I said above...
    I like the Rivian's exterior other than the front- that's a no-go for me, but I wouldn't call it 'bad'.

    Not much else worth commenting on. F-150 Lightning is just an altered F-150, it doesn't really 'qualify' as a 'BE design'.

    - - - - - 
    Oh; no foreign vehicles allowed (to live) in my driveway.
    So tho from the design perspective I'd rate the Taycan #1, (even disregarding the price), I wouldn't own one.
    I could live with a Rivian as far as looks go, but the current body configuration is of no use to me.

    Edited by balthazar
    • Thanks 2
    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 9:39 PM, balthazar said:

    Tier 1 Taycan is very slick- Balthy like.
    Model S hasn't a thing wrong with it exterior-wise, it's just old.

    Tier 2 : I like the proportions of the Lyriq, but some of the details I do not. Have to see better/more pics, but it's a 'meh' so far.
    I think the Hummer is a very well-done heritage design, but it's so far outside my realm I have to jack it down.
    Lucid can go in here; it's not bad, but like I said above...
    I like the Rivian's exterior other than the front- that's a no-go for me, but I wouldn't call it 'bad'.

    Not much else worth commenting on. F-150 Lightning is just an altered F-150, it doesn't really 'qualify' as a 'BE design'.

    - - - - - 
    Oh; no foreign vehicles allowed (to live) in my driveway.
    So tho from the design perspective I'd rate the Taycan #1, (even disregarding the price), I wouldn't own one.
    I could live with a Rivian as far as looks go, but the current body configuration is of no use to me.

    Expand  

    Could a Rivian R1S perhaps be a useful conveyance for Mrs. Balth (price aside).

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Pretty sure that would be outside her comfort zone, size-wise.

    And although that clock is ticking, she still has to take her mother to appointments, a person who would never be able to climb up into an SUV.

    I think once said clock stops, she may seriously consider getting back into a Mustang.
     

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 9:50 PM, balthazar said:

    Pretty sure that would be outside her comfort zone, size-wise.

    And although that clock is ticking, she still has to take her mother to appointments, a person who would never be able to climb up into an SUV.

    I think once said clock stops, she may seriously consider getting back into a Mustang.
     

    Expand  

    What's the opinion on the Mustang Mach E then?

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 4:21 PM, balthazar said:

    Something about it (nose & tail) is coming off as very early '00s to me.

    Expand  

    yes.

    I said this about the Lucid air a while back

      On 2/21/2021 at 6:53 PM, oldshurst442 said:

    lucid air.JPG

     

    Ah...yes!  I see (GM) Oldsmobile W-Body written all over it now that youve mentioned it.  

    Image result for Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme W-body

    I also see 4rth gen Trans Am from the side profile.  (Dont ask.  Explaination in the random thoughts thread...)

    All in all, Lucid Air could easily pass off as a General Motors product of the 1990s that has evolved to today.  The rounded aerodynamic body lines. The C Pillars.  The rounded front and rear quarter panels.  GM products from the late 1980s to the early 2000s all had that kind of styling.  

    Yeah...I feel right at home when looking at the Lucid Air.  I like it a lot.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Expand  

     

      On 2/21/2021 at 5:54 AM, oldshurst442 said:

    I figured out why I like the Lucid Air as much as I do.

    The C Pillar and rounded rear quarter panel remind me of a 4rth gen F-Body Firebird. Even if the rear quarter panel is soooo short on the Lucid and sooooo long on the Pontiac. 

    The rake of the front windshields of both vehicles also seems to be the same angle which also lends to my illusion of sameness and hence why I like the Lucid Air...because I LOVE the 4rth gen F-Body.  Its just a 4 door (EV) Trans Am in my eyes. 

    OK...maybe its a far fetched figment of my imagination.  But its still MY personal fantasy produced by MY brain that WAS NOT elicited by the use of recreational drugs, but from MY awesome natural intellect, mental capacity and wit. 

    (Should I go with a smug emogi to show how my intelligence is somehow superior to yours?   :closedeyes:

    Or should I go with a hipster dufus emogi cheering to show how "innocent" I may be in the "real world"? :cheering:)

    Maybe Ill just go with a laughy emogi to show that this post is serious and funny at the same time instead! :smilewide:

    Image result for lucid air ev

    Image result for 2002 firebird side

     

    Expand  

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 10:07 PM, Drew Dowdell said:

    What's the opinion on the Mustang Mach E then?

    Expand  

    Oh yeah; the Mach-E. Me; I think it looks pretty good- for a sports-inspired SUV I’d put it in Tier 1.
    Not sure what the missus thinks of it- I pointed it out to her but she didn’t have more than a ‘it’s cute’ response.

    She really doesn’t seem interested in a BE vehicle.


    Asking…

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    She says the front (Mach-E) ‘looks generic’ but she likes the rear. Told it’s $43K to start, no real reaction. Wasn’t aware it was electric (upon seeing the pic). When asked if she’d consider one, she said yeah; she’d look at it. When asked if she’d rather this or a Mustang coupe, she said ‘Oh yeah; the coupe’.
    I told her she’d have to plug it in every other night and she said ‘Oh God, I’d never get anywhere!’ [note; she’s been home from work for about 2.5 hrs, and I just reminded her for the 2nd time her cell is still locked in her car.]

    • Haha 4
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 11:12 PM, balthazar said:

    She says the front (Mach-E) ‘looks generic’ but she likes the rear. Told it’s $43K to start, no real reaction. Wasn’t aware it was electric (upon seeing the pic). When asked if she’d consider one, she said yeah; she’d look at it. When asked if she’d rather this or a Mustang coupe, she said ‘Oh yeah; the coupe’.
    I told her she’d have to plug it in every other night and she said ‘Oh God, I’d never get anywhere!’ [note; she’s been home from work for about 2.5 hrs, and I just reminded her for the 2nd time her cell is still locked in her car.]

    Expand  

    Her commute is that long?

    she may say she wants a mustang, but  in my observation of women of a particular generation… they say that but end up in a small to mid-size crossover anyway for practicality reasons.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    She had one years back, then 5 sedans since. She says she doesn't care for SUV / CUVs.
    That certainly could change if she test drove a bunch (sorry, online sales outlets!).

    She's wistfully mentioned the Mustang coupe over the years. We test-sat in one around 10 years ago & she really liked that (a number of generations since hers). Our practicality reasons have narrowed to just her mother upon occasion, so we don't need more than a coupe for her.


    Her commute is about 45-50 miles/day, tho she just restarted 3 days in / 2 days home this week (which was discontinued in March 2020).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It has awesome range and horsepower, average styling and interior and it costs too much.  And doesn't have a dealer or service network, probably will be hard to find parts if it is involved in an accident.  I like that interior more than a Tesla with the yoke steering wheel, but the Tesla looks better on the outside I think.

    I also thought it was interesting that the 730 hp EQS is badged "53" because AMG always does a "63" so there must be more coming.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ^ I agree that the exterior isn't a game changer, but disagree; the interior fits the 'luxury' bill fine.
     

      On 9/17/2021 at 1:23 AM, smk4565 said:

    730 hp EQS is badged "53" because AMG always does a "63" so there must be more coming.

    Expand  

    What needs to be "coming" is an emergency redesign of the entire exterior.

    • Thanks 1
    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 2:08 AM, balthazar said:

    ^ I agree that the exterior isn't a game changer, but disagree; the interior fits the 'luxury' bill fine.
     

    What needs to be "coming" is an emergency redesign of the entire exterior.

    Expand  

    Wind tunnel is a factor, which I think they need to throw out the window.  Also their lead designer says traditional 3 box sedans will die with EV's because of how thick the floor is with the battery, it makes the vehicle taller and the sedan look doesn't work.  Although I am not a fan of jelly bean cars.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 2:08 AM, balthazar said:

    What needs to be "coming" is an emergency redesign of the entire exterior.

    Expand  

    All of this!!

      On 9/17/2021 at 12:20 PM, Robert Hall said:

    That terrarium interior would get insanely hot in AZ....and isn't it built there? 

    Expand  

    Yes it is and I think you know the answer to that. Hell yes, it'll be hot but at least there you can legally have an "Arizona" tint on your car to mitigate some of that heat. You also know that some folks don't seem to care there either. My cousin had a loaded BLACK Tahoe with a BLACK leather interior that hardly ever spent time in her garage. Some folks are just nuts there lol, us my point. That interior will not stop most potential buyers there.

    • Haha 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 1:16 PM, surreal1272 said:

    All of this!!

    Yes it is and I think you know the answer to that. Hell yes, it'll be hot but at least there you can legally have an "Arizona" tint on your car to mitigate some of that heat. You also know that some folks don't seem to care there either. My cousin had a loaded BLACK Tahoe with a BLACK leather interior that hardly ever spent time in her garage. Some folks are just nuts there lol, us my point. That interior will not stop most potential buyers there.

    Expand  

    Doesn't like there is any provision for a sunshade either..  yeah, I remember having the dark tint on cars when I lived there. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/16/2021 at 9:39 PM, balthazar said:

    Tier 1 Taycan is very slick- Balthy like.
    Model S hasn't a thing wrong with it exterior-wise, it's just old.

    Tier 2 : I like the proportions of the Lyriq, but some of the details I do not. Have to see better/more pics, but it's a 'meh' so far.
    I think the Hummer is a very well-done heritage design, but it's so far outside my realm I have to jack it down.
    Lucid can go in here; it's not bad, but like I said above...
    I like the Rivian's exterior other than the front- that's a no-go for me, but I wouldn't call it 'bad'.

    Not much else worth commenting on. F-150 Lightning is just an altered F-150, it doesn't really 'qualify' as a 'BE design'.

    - - - - - 
    Oh; no foreign vehicles allowed (to live) in my driveway.
    So tho from the design perspective I'd rate the Taycan #1, (even disregarding the price), I wouldn't own one.
    I could live with a Rivian as far as looks go, but the current body configuration is of no use to me.

    Expand  

    Thanks. I was jsut curious as it seemed like any EV you dogged hard for its looks (and of course price - which I completely agree with).

    I dig the Rivians. They're quirky but they don't feel like they're quirky just to be quirky, like most EVs. 

    The Taycan has grown on me. It originally just seemed awkward but I really like it now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 1:16 PM, surreal1272 said:

    My cousin had a loaded BLACK Tahoe with a BLACK leather interior that hardly ever spent time in her garage. Some folks are just nuts there lol, us my point. That interior will not stop most potential buyers there.

    Expand  

    There were so many black SUVs in the Phoenix area.  I bought one..my Jeep..but I did get the black & cream interior.  My Jeep just has the factory window tint, not Arizona tint (it was only in AZ a short time, having come from So Cal).   I remember a coworker that had an FJ Cruiser and a Highlander, both black w/ black interiors... 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Found this on a Lucid Forum to be of interesting Context for the all glass roof on Rivian and Lucid auto's.

    A Rivian “guide” (personal sales representative) answered a series of questions posed by a Rivian reservation holder. Some of the answers possibly shed light on some issues that have been raised about Lucid Airs and might help us understand what could be going on at Lucid on these matters.

    Electrochromic Dimming Glass

    The technology required for curved glass was too expensive at present. The Rivian glass roof will not have a retractable shade, but Rivian is using a tint that actually blocks more light than electrochromic glass – less than 2% of the total spectrum gets through. (Lucid is making similar claims about the performance of their tint in southwest desert conditions.)

    Interesting Tech Piece | Lucid Owners - Lucid Motors Forum

    Then we have a .21 coefficient of drag which makes me think that Mercedes took the easy way out of designing the ugly jelly bean look of the EQS.

    Lucid Air | Lucid Motors

    Watch the auto run videos here where you see that the glass roof seems to be electrochromic glass as it darkens or maybe just the way they video'd. They do state the following which makes me think they are taking a tint approach like Rivian.

    Quote:

    Glass Canopy

    A roof with a view.

    Lucid Air is further opened up by its incredible Glass Canopy. This optional solid glass roof spans the entire cabin almost without interruption – giving everyone in the car a gorgeous view of the sky above. And while it’s crystal clear to your eyes, the Glass Canopy has a slew of protective interlayers to block out heat and sunlight.

    Lucid Air | Design | Lucid Motors

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Lucid

    lucid-air-exterior-09.jpg

    Tesla

    Snag_9be6ef3.png

    Porsche

    Snag_9c00dfd.png

    Mercedes

    Snag_9bf4425.png

    Even Audi e-tron sedan that is coming to market and pretty much a Porsche with a redesign on the front is better looking than the EQS.

    Snag_9c22053.png

    I would honestly take an Audi or Porsche over these other cars from a exterior design standpoint, but like @balthazar has stated only American auto's in my driveway.

    But everyone knows I am an SUV/Truck man, so either Rivian, GM or Ford at this point.

    So this is my options:

    Snag_9d10967.pngSnag_9d2bdbe.pngSnag_9d7137b.pngMustang-Mach-E_02.jpg

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 5:56 PM, ccap41 said:

    From the above list, my exterior aesthetics list in order of favorite to least favorite...

    1: Porsche

    2: Audi

    2B: Tesla

    2C: Lucid

     

    Large Gap

     

    5: Mercedes

     

    Expand  

    Be interesting to see if Cadillac ever adds an electric car. I kind of doubt it at this time as I think this is a shrinking field of desire. I think Cadillac did right with the Lyriq.

    Snag_9ddad4d.png

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 6:08 PM, David said:

    Be interesting to see if Cadillac ever adds an electric car. I kind of doubt it at this time as I think this is a shrinking field of desire. I think Cadillac did right with the Lyriq.

    Snag_9ddad4d.png

    Expand  

    I think the Celistiq is intended to have a car-like form. 

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 2:13 AM, smk4565 said:

    Wind tunnel is a factor, which I think they need to throw out the window.  Also their lead designer says traditional 3 box sedans will die with EV's because of how thick the floor is with the battery, it makes the vehicle taller and the sedan look doesn't work.  Although I am not a fan of jelly bean cars.

    Expand  

    The overall shape of a vehicle has little to do with the drag coefficient. A 1998 Lexus LS or MB E-Class is 0.27. A 1998 Miata is 0.38, 97 Celica GTS is 0.37. Both the Miata and Celica have higher drag coefficients than a 2011 Sienna at 0.309
     

    One of the worst is the G-Class at 0.53 and is only beaten for last place by a Wrangler soft top with the top off at 0.58

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 6:08 PM, David said:

    Be interesting to see if Cadillac ever adds an electric car. I kind of doubt it at this time as I think this is a shrinking field of desire. I think Cadillac did right with the Lyriq.

    Snag_9ddad4d.png

    Expand  

    They'll have to do a sedan, unless they too will be an SUV only brand.

      On 9/17/2021 at 5:56 PM, ccap41 said:

    From the above list, my exterior aesthetics list in order of favorite to least favorite...

    1: Porsche

    2: Audi

    2B: Tesla

    2C: Lucid

     

    Large Gap

     

    5: Mercedes

     

    Expand  

    EQS will probably outsell all of them globally.  Although I am not a fan of the EQS or EQE looks, I much prefer the S-class or E-class looks.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1. Audi E-Tron GT

    Of course in the most conspicuous paint theme possible. 

    If I ever had more money than God...  (why God???!!! Why do we say God...we SHOULD be saying the Devil...) Id buy this, and do a Tesla drivetrain, hardware and software swap on this...  A GM Ultium swap wouldnt be a bad idea either. 

    The Audi RS e-tron GT is an electric Gran Turismo with serious punch |  Driving

     

    2.   TIED

    A)  Lucid Air

    Lucid: Tesla hasn't cracked it, we can take it to whole new level of range  and efficiency - Electrek

    Very Oldsmobile-ish

    Very 1990s early 2000s.  Which I feel very comfortable with.

    For how long tho?  

    Lucid Motors Getting Ready For Its Close Up

    1997 PONTIAC FIREBIRD T-TOP COUPE

     

    B)

    Even though I feel that the Model S is loooong in the tooth. I feel because of the lack of nice designs in the EV word yet, the Model S still stands out as a looker. 

    With the little lip crease they did in the front, it pops just enough to look fresh. The back end needs a LOT of help. It hasnt been refreshed and it desperately needs it.   

    Tesla new Model S/X refresh: 12 new features yet to be announced - Electrek

     

    Its like the Dodge Challenger.  Its an old design.  But it still works.  But for how much longer?  

     

    3.  TIED

     

    A)  Porsche Taycan

    Porsche Taycan Starts At $150,900, Most Expensive Is $241,500

     

    and

    B) Hummer EV SUV

    2024 GMC Hummer EV SUV Debuts Its Broad Bod For March Madness

     

    The Porsche is in 3rd place because I have gotten tired of the front end so soon. I think its because its got the Porsche family face on it and Im tired of seeing it. The ONLY car I like seeing that face is on the 911.  

    The Hummer is not a vehicle Id be comfortable be seen in. Its NOT because of the 'phoque you' styling of it. But because of the SHEER size of it. I LOVE the fact that is a TRUCK of THAT magnitude. Its just that its a truck of that magnitude...   Not my style.  GREAT for an Arnold Swartzennegar,   or a Conor McGregor. Not for me.  Still LOVE the truck though. 

     

    4) Custom Look Mustang Mach E GT

    Ford Mustang Mach-E GT "Shorty" Goes for the Custom Look - autoevolution

    Mustang Mach-E GT widebody "Shorty" - why not?

     

    For an SUV...  I could go for this.  It doesnt got the presence and size of the Hummer.  But its got a certain sizzle that I would feel good about being inside it telling the world:  "hey...look what I got!   Yeah...its a Mustang! Got a problem???!!!  No! it got no V8! Its tall, 4 doors and its electric...  And best thing yet! Its a FORD!  Put THAT in your pipe and smoke it!" 

     

    Edited by oldshurst442
    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 10:29 PM, smk4565 said:

    EQS will probably outsell all of them globally.  Although I am not a fan of the EQS or EQE looks, I much prefer the S-class or E-class looks.

    Expand  

    That's unfortunate that they'll be rewarded for the ungodly looks, but I do agree that it'll likely sell the best. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

      On 9/17/2021 at 10:29 PM, smk4565 said:

    EQS will probably outsell all of them globally.  Although I am not a fan of the EQS or EQE looks, I much prefer the S-class or E-class looks.

    Expand  

    I would not bet on this as while badge snobs will take it due to the MB logo, customers are showing they are not willing to be as loyal as some people think they are. 

    Example is that Hardcore Apple Fans have lined up for the less than inspiring Apple 13 phone, but it is not selling like past phones and Samsung has clearly surpassed phone sales compared to Apple.

    Every Dog has their day and then the Flees bite. The style could turn off many as other Luxury options in this class surpass in exterior style alone.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd have to rank them like this:

    1) Audi eTron GT

    2) Audi eTron GT ?

    3) Lucid Air

    4) Porsche Taycan (tie)

    4) Tesla Model S (tie)

    6) Mercedes EQS

    I really, really like the look of that Audi.  The proportions and styling of that car really do it for me.

    I also am a big fan of both the Rivian and the Hummer.  I don't think the Mustang Mach-e looks that bad either.  Someone in my neighborhood had a cyber orange GT parked in their driveway when I went for my lunch time walk yesterday and it didn't look half bad. Truth be told, the only one of these that would have even the smallest chance of ever winding up in my driveway is the Rivian.  Maybe a Lyriq if that back end ever grows on me.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • I was upgraded in a rental contract and, while going up by one category is not a big deal, getting to try out the new hybrid Camry was somewhat of a big deal.  The latest and current Camry only features hybrid powertrains.  The base 2.5 liter 4-cylinder engine, which was previously naturally aspirated, continues forward, but is assisted by an electric motor.  To make the powering on and off work, a CVT is now the standard transmission, when Camry had an excellent 8-speed automatic transmission for many years.  This vehicle had front wheel drive, but AWD is also available.  The V6 engine and ICEs are no longer available. Getting used to this car doesn’t take much time.  Having already driven another rented hybrid – a Honda Accord – all I needed to know is that turning the key does not fire up an engine, but makes the car ready to move in EV mode, at least initially. With 2.5 liters, the Camry pulls away nimbly and with agility, even with a minimally feathered pedal.  It doesn’t take much.  It’s fun to watch the centered power display setting move between eco and power modes.  If stomped on, the engine responds very quickly.  Surprisingly, stomping on it produces a more notable than expected engine hum.  The cabin remains mostly quiet and handling is predictable, neither firm nor vague, with some rougher pavement making it less quiet.  The transmission feels very much like a CVT, but a well behaved one.  Still, drivers with old school tastes can lament the absence of the very last slick shifting 8-speed automatic that came standard in the Camry.  I know I do.  However, the current CVT behaves well because it doesn’t have that “stuck” feeling when pushed, but the spool is more of an exhaust node than the winding out and high rpm droning caused by the variable gearing. The Camry’s exterior was freshened up and they worked off the last model.  It’s a compendium of small changes that, together, amount to a lot.  The front lights are narrower and cleaner.  The “appliance” grille is more understated than it once was.  (Sadly, it’s the more expensive versions where the grille is more flared, and even overworked.)  The rear lights are thinned out, complete with a boomerang effect, as they wrap around the rear fender edge and add to the horizontal look of the rear lip and the monolithic bumper panel.  Also, the almost retro, and not too effective, sweep of the rear pillar (think ‘72 Caprice coupe) is gone and the side profile of the windows is cleaner, perhaps a larger rendition of what was done with the Corolla.  Most of the vantage points look better than those of the previous Camry. Inside, the Camry is also much improved.  The dashboard is organized in cleaner volumes.  The dash has a simple main instrument pod.  In its center is a round dial, whereby the upper part displays the speed and eco/power, and the lower part, through toggling, provides other information – direction, tire pressure, trip information and mileage, or even graphics of the flow of energy involving the engine and the battery.  There is no dedicated tachometer; however, the temperature and fuel gauges remain.  Around the main circle are small digital readouts for the exterior temperature, the time, the odometer, and the remaining range.  Filling up this hybrid showed close to 500 miles of range.  Not only that, the fuel cap is on the driver’s side and, like the trunk, they can be remotely opened by buttons in the interior. That said, there is none of that capless fuel filler stuff! Being a Camry LE meant the lower grade fixtures inside.  Sadly, this meant a urethane steering wheel.  Sometimes, a mere leather steering wheel imparts the feeling of better handling and a smoother ride.  It’s that equipment choices and groupings seem to work together to give a vehicle its feel. The LE seats are nicely upholstered in a tougher, durable fabric with slightly contrasting parts.  The front headrests can scoot all the way down and they actually point forward so the driver and passenger can use them without having to lean their heads all the way back.  Headrests for rear seat passengers are integrated into the seating and do not have features to adjust them. The infotainment system is on its screen which is engaged to the dash, but moved slightly forward, and creates a cleaner look because it does not go up over the top of the cowl.  Fortunately, it remains a touch screen.  The functions are easy to work with, but I had a little bit of finicky interactions with Bluetooth and Android Auto.  Climate control has toggles instead of dials and they are easy to work with.  I will only say that the center vents of the climate control system do not work that quickly and powerfully.  Beneath this small panel are the cubby, a charging pod for a phone, and the flat console surface for the shift lever.  I found the console a little high for my taste.  Possibly to accommodate the new mechanical set-up, there is no storage cubby underneath the console as one sees on larger GM products, for example – both SUVs and even the last-gen Buick LaCrosse.  However, the console box is amply sized. In addition to being able to look over the hood, visibility is commendable all the way around.  Except for being a little shoehorned into the Camry’s cockpit, the front of the cabin feels spacious and the legroom is also good.  (I had to push the lever to get the seats to move upward, which provided a view over the top of the hood, as evidenced by seeing the paint color, and which I prefer.)  They have retained good cabin space in the rear of the cabin.  Also, the trunk has a decent amount of usable capacity for this genre and for having kept this sweeping roofline.  I again want to state how pleasing it was to control the trunk, in addition to the fuel door, from a bar of buttons on a panel at the lower left part of the dashboard rather than on the floor near the door.  There are 5 functions and they were thoughtful about putting the (auto) lights control onto this bar, and all the way to the left, such that it can easily be noticed from behind the steering wheel.  The new Camry shows a lot of thought as to how the driver connects to the car through its controls and functions, and this is one of the areas where this Camry shines. While I didn’t calculate fuel mileage, I know that I added only 3.5 gallons of regular unleaded fuel to cover one jaunt of about 160 miles of mixed driving.  This seems close to the EPA estimate. The little green EV icon shone quite a bit. I imagine that this is a very easy car to live with over the long haul.  For Camry, this powertrain is obviously a new combination, but it’s technology that Toyota and other Asian marques have worked with for quite a while.  I mostly took note that, apart from the major powertrain change, there is the evident synergy of the many small changes that make this a more nicely packaged vehicle than the last Camry. - - - - - PHOTOS FORTHCOMING
    • The BYD Han interior does look really good.  Shame the outside looks like a 2-generations-ago Civic.
    • No one cares about that amount of horsepower in this class. These are chauffeur driven vehicles. Up until electrics came around, most were trundling around with 2.0T 4-cylinders or diesels.  While Genesis is still relatively new to us in the the U.S., they've made such strides on interior quality that I'd put them up against MB dollar for dollar. The nicest of the Chinese EVs sedans, the NIO ET7 is a pretty good looking car though I kinda think it looks like a Model-3 had it's way with a Buick Envista. It would do really well in the US up against the Teslas, but it is still not playing in the luxury ballpark with Genesis (or Benz or Audi) when it comes to design and materials.  Low end EQE Sedan rival? Sure. G90 rival? No.
    • Well 25% tariff added to it, which makes a G90 like $125,000, and probably dead in the water in the US.  The Chinese have luxury cars with over 1,000 hp for less than the price of a G90.  I don't know that they are really going to compete there either.  Unless they come up with some  next gen EV tech and have full self driving and impeccable build quality or something.
    • The thing is that Panera offers a better laptop and hot drink environment than does Starbucks and they cash in on that.  It's "space rental." The tab for a HALF chicken avocado chipotle sandwich and a small CUP of baked potato soup (both good, not great) was absurd.  Coffee, tea, and lemonade are roughly the same. I go there because it's near a friend's condo and it's better for having a discussion than a fairly nice Starbucks nearby.  A Starbucks has to have an excellent interior for me to go there and pay their now crazy prices for coffee and tea.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

This Article

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search