Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Lincoln To Stick With MK(Insert odd letter here) Naming Scheme

    William Maley

    Editor/Reporter - CheersandGears.com

    January 17, 2012

    If you’re one of those people who doesn’t understands Lincoln's alphabet soup naming and just wished the brand would return to using actual names, you’re not going to be happy with this news.

    Last year, Ford CEO Alan Mulally hinted that Lincoln would drop the MK-alphabet soup and go back to using actual names.

    But it looks like that idea has gone into the trash. At the 2012 Detroit Auto Show, Lincoln showed off the MKZ Concept, indicating the Zephyr name probably wouldn't be revived.

    "What I've learned in my career is it's product that matters, not the name," said Jim Farley, Ford's marketing chief to reporters.

    In a separate interview, Mulally said he had come to terms with the current naming structure at Lincoln.

    Source: USA Today

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    They should have 1 sports coupe called the Mark (insert #) and that's it! Lincoln is so downscale that the only thing that can class it up are some classy names. Town Car, Continental, Cosmopolitan, Versailles, etc.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One thing weird w/ their naming scheme is there is no progression...MKZ is the junior car to the MKS instead of the other way around...MKT sort of fits relative to MKS, though...

    mercedees is just as messed up really; B, C, E, then S. suvs : G is the most expensive, then GL, then R, then M, then GLK. Then the sprinter, which fit's the 'pattern' nowhere.

    Personally, I abhor overtly simplistic naming schemes, like it's aimed at children.

    Lincoln MK( ) is the pits, tho.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nobody remembers the MK vehicle names. They always get the wrong last letter. This to me is a high indicator of a failed naming strategy.

    Cadillac is nearly as forgettable with their scheme, but I think with the first letter being the variant instead of the last, it helps a smidge to ease confusion. Just a smidge.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Someone made a case in the ivory tower and got to keep their job since they justified this terrible naming scheme. They should have that person get in front of the camera and answer the crazy questions.

    I agree with everyone Their Naming sucks!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That would be a fun thing to do and bring attention to the total lack of imagination in the auto industry for names.

    WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE

    BMW, MB, Cadillac, Audi, Porsche, Lincoln,

    Who else follows the stupid letters or numbers thing.

    Names always are better IMO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    MK-I; MK-II; etc. would make for an interesting naming progression, and one based on MK as Mrk something... That would be Alhpanumerics with a connection to Licoln's past prosperity :AH-HA:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The lack of a strong design theme is what bothers me most... by leaving the silhouette basically similar to Fords they end up with the perception that they are just Fords with a fancy grille. Buick may use all the same platforms as Chevy, but there is substantially better visual differentiation between the brands.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The lack of a strong design theme is what bothers me most... by leaving the silhouette basically similar to Fords they end up with the perception that they are just Fords with a fancy grille. Buick may use all the same platforms as Chevy, but there is substantially better visual differentiation between the brands.

    That was true for a very long time, but the new MKZ looks nothing like a Fusion, so hopefully that's the first step in finally giving Lincoln it's own identity with each subsequent model they release. I find the new MKZ very distinctive and appealing from the A-pillar back. I think the front needs some work, but it overall its great design and hopefully a sign of good things to come.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have no problem if there was ONE 'MK-' name, but when they're all of the same ilk, bleck.

    I agree that the MKZ (I had to googleimage it to see if I was referencing the right one) is distinctive and expressive.

    I just saw that 'self-steer' vid- the techies will eat it up but all it will do is enable texting while driving. Well, if a grandchild was driving their grandparent's car, that is.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The lack of a strong design theme is what bothers me most... by leaving the silhouette basically similar to Fords they end up with the perception that they are just Fords with a fancy grille. Buick may use all the same platforms as Chevy, but there is substantially better visual differentiation between the brands.

    That was true for a very long time, but the new MKZ looks nothing like a Fusion, so hopefully that's the first step in finally giving Lincoln it's own identity with each subsequent model they release. I find the new MKZ very distinctive and appealing from the A-pillar back. I think the front needs some work, but it overall its great design and hopefully a sign of good things to come.

    Side Profile Screams Volvo to me. The Rear is truly a break and does not say Rebadged Ford. The front end is just plain awful IMHO.

    I have no problem if there was ONE 'MK-' name, but when they're all of the same ilk, bleck.

    I agree that the MKZ (I had to googleimage it to see if I was referencing the right one) is distinctive and expressive.

    I just saw that 'self-steer' vid- the techies will eat it up but all it will do is enable texting while driving. Well, if a grandchild was driving their grandparent's car, that is.

    I agree that their whole MK........... naming system will end up confusing people as the 3rd letter does nothing to tell you if it is a car, CUV, SUV, Hybrid, Truck etc.

    I have come to the feeling that most auto companies have lost any common sense in their ability to name auto's with a solid market driving name and auto identity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    >>"the 3rd letter does nothing to tell you if it is a car, CUV, SUV, Hybrid, Truck etc."<<

    No; I reject this overly-simplistic system. Rampant homogenization is draining the last shreds of soul out of automobiles.

    If a person can't look at an SUV and tell it's an SUV without reading a code letter, screw 'em.

    And as for more & more OEMs stuffing engine liters into vehicle 'names', screw their lack of creativity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    >>"the 3rd letter does nothing to tell you if it is a car, CUV, SUV, Hybrid, Truck etc."<<

    No; I reject this overly-simplistic system. Rampant homogenization is draining the last shreds of soul out of automobiles.

    If a person can't look at an SUV and tell it's an SUV without reading a code letter, screw 'em.

    And as for more & more OEMs stuffing engine liters into vehicle 'names', screw their lack of creativity.

    It's not that. It's that in discussion saying "I drive a Lincoln MKX" and then the person says "Is that the car or the SUV?" Even worse is Lincoln MKT.... "OH I loved that Lincoln Truck!"

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    But that's dumbing your entire identification system down to the LCD- who wants to do that?? The vast majority of consumers have no earthly idea what a E350 is, more probably identify it as a cube van than a mercedees 4-dr.

    No manufacturer should bend over to the clueless. So some don't know what it is by the moniker alone in conversation, either they learn these things or continue to look stupid.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • INTERIOR PHOTOS Front cabin view as seen from the driver's door; cup holder and console/armrest position are shown Front cabin view as seen from the front passenger's door Centered view of the dashboard and the gear selector in its smaller console Main instrument pod; tire pressure readings shown with one shade of illumination Main instrument pod; drive mode shown with another shade of illumination Rear seating area space View over to the rear of the cabin and the rear pillar; note that the headrests can be pushed down so as to eliminate the gap with the top of the rear seats Rear storage space without pushing forward the split rear seats - - - - - END OF PHOTOS
    • EXTERIOR PHOTOS Its unique side view as seen on CA-1 in San Mateo County Front angled view Rear angled view
    • But we don't really need 600 mile EVs.  What we need are EV's that replace the 100 kWh battery with a lighter, cheaper 75 kWh battery and get the same range.  
    • Was out and about in my neighborhood this afternoon and saw not one but two Cadillac ELRs within a couple blocks…a dark red one and a pearl white one.   Also saw two CT6s (dark gray and black) and a CT4 V series in bright blue.  
    • Keep in Mind that Mercedes came to the party late. Kia/Hyundai/Genesis were the first investor with Factorial Energy for Solid state and then a year later Mercedes joined the investors party. Both have prototype assembly lines that come online this spring to actually product production grade battery packs. Right now, both are using hand-built versions and have pretty much the same range. Genesis RV90 EV SUV is supposed to have the first battery packs from the Hyundai Assembly line in them when they go on sale next year. That would put them ahead of Mercedes. Bigger part is when both companies push it through out their whole product portfolio to maximize the performance while minimizing cost. I can imagine the G90 Long wheelbase sedan above having this battery pack and being in the 600 mile plus range. We are in exciting times, and it will be interesting to watch how Mercedes and Kia/Hyundai/Genesis maximize these solid-state battery packs.
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search