Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Lexus Shows The HS250h The Door

    gallery_10485_267_31082.png

    Lexus’ HS250h hasn’t been meeting expectations since being introduced back in 2009. Through 2011, Lexus has only sold 2,383 HS250hs, a drop of 72.8% from last year.

    Because of this, Lexus is showing the HS250h the door and is replacing it with another model. Ward’s Auto is reporting the new model will be positioned towards the younger crowd and not towards people moving on up from a Toyota Prius. Also, the new model will be priced much lower than the HS250h which has a base price around $37,030 ($3,495 more than a base Lexus IS.)

    Source: Ward’s Auto (Subscription Required)

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    It had an awful awful interior not at all befitting a Lexus.

    Why not make a hybrid version of the ES? It seems it would be the simplest project to execute.

    It would have been...I think the idea is they thought luxury buyers would prefer a dedicated hybrid--something that looked distinct and not like just another regular car...same idea works with the Prius, maybe not so on a luxury car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm glad that that the three people on C&G that have it in for Hybrids are only here, and not involved in any decision-making or corporate governance whatsoever. Otherwise, we'd still be using Clydesdale's to hoof it to box-socials.

    • Agree 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Several automotive corporate heads have echoed my sentiments. They see very limited return on their investment, saleswise. And they're pretty smart, having climbed the corporate ladder to the top. So... "Clydesdale's" (sic) it is...

    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It used to be that limited returns did not prevent companies from taking risks. GM posted a $6.3 Billion profit for the first half of this year, and is selling a lot of cars like the Cruze. They should continue to innovate. That is what will bring prices down in time. Those CEO's will come to regret their decision in the future, as that is what happens often in the technology industry.

    If the tech industry had the same mindset, I wouldn't be making this post on a 500 gram tablet.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Prius is about the only thing Toyota has going for themselves at the moment. So I don't think it was a poor return on investment at all. The Fusion and Escape hybrids have improved Ford's green cred substantially. A full 50% of MKZ sales are of the hybrid. The Volt is a green "halo" vehicle that helps to sell a whole bunch of Cruze Ecos to people who are already manly enough that they don't need to compensate with vehicle badging. GM had a few stumbles with Hybrid technology at first, but I'm getting the impression that it was an issue with the overall organization rather than the cars themselves. Buick's largest sedan is now available as a hybrid and gets just about the same highway fuel economy as the smallest Honda hybrid. Nissan is raking it in with the Leaf and even though the rest of their lineup is withering on the vine, they are still selling well.

    The only one who has failed hard with hybrids is Honda; they've made very few technology advancements at all and the rest of the cars are falling behind fast. The plus side is that their hybrid technology is among the cheapest to produce due to its simplicity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What exactly is "green cred"? I honestly just do not think the giant majority of customers care about that phrase.

    And because I joke about "man cards", it makes me, and the car I chose, somehow not worthy? Simply because I wanted a car with normal sheetmetal thickness, no complicated air shutters in the bumper, no underbody shields, no hard-to-clean wheels, and no stinkin' green badge? Should I have my phone ready to record a video if I happen to park next to a Prius and leave my car running?

    Is Nissan REALLY "raking it in" with the Leaf? You're claiming their investment has been returned and the Leaves are raking in pure profit?

    Just because Buick's "largest sedan" is available as a hybrid, it is automatically a success in the market? Um... no.

    Show me something that says vehicle customers are clamoring for electrification, for hybridization? I do not believe they are.

    The Chevrolet Volt was hyped more than any car before production began than any car I can remember in my lifetime. If any electric/hybrid was going to change the market, it was the Volt, because it is the best execution of the concept. Yet now people are backing out of the so-called "waiting list" to get one... people are seeing a lack of value in the car. They're buying conventional small economical cars, which TRUMP the Volt, the Prius and the Leaf in cost to benefit ratio.

    So... no. I just don't see the big to-do over hybrids and electrics. There is no seismic shift toward them from a real-world perspective.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What exactly is "green cred"? I honestly just do not think the giant majority of customers care about that phrase.

    And because I joke about "man cards", it makes me, and the car I chose, somehow not worthy? Simply because I wanted a car with normal sheetmetal thickness, no complicated air shutters in the bumper, no underbody shields, no hard-to-clean wheels, and no stinkin' green badge? Should I have my phone ready to record a video if I happen to park next to a Prius and leave my car running?

    Is Nissan REALLY "raking it in" with the Leaf? You're claiming their investment has been returned and the Leaves are raking in pure profit?

    Just because Buick's "largest sedan" is available as a hybrid, it is automatically a success in the market? Um... no.

    Show me something that says vehicle customers are clamoring for electrification, for hybridization? I do not believe they are.

    The Chevrolet Volt was hyped more than any car before production began than any car I can remember in my lifetime. If any electric/hybrid was going to change the market, it was the Volt, because it is the best execution of the concept. Yet now people are backing out of the so-called "waiting list" to get one... people are seeing a lack of value in the car. They're buying conventional small economical cars, which TRUMP the Volt, the Prius and the Leaf in cost to benefit ratio.

    So... no. I just don't see the big to-do over hybrids and electrics. There is no seismic shift toward them from a real-world perspective.

    Toyota has moved 109k of those rotten little Pruises so far this year. As a car, it is pretty crappy in just about every measurable way. Its only redeeming quality is its fuel economy, yet it is still selling.

    The Lacrosse eAssist is just now reaching the dealers, so we can't yet pass judgement on it, however if the MKZ is any indicator, 50% of buyers opt for the hybrid (a statistic that is skewed slightly by the fact that you cannot buy AWD and a Hybrid at the same time in that model, and in the north east, AWD may win the options game)

    As for the Leaf, I am claiming that Nissan is getting a ton of good marketing out of the car and they are managing to keep sales growing for the rest of their lineup despite having back of the pack products.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am surprised more people didn't want to pay $40k for what appears to be a Corolla Hybrid, oh wait, no I'm not. (and I know it is an Avensis, but people that the Toyota dealer don't). What a terrible car this was. The CT200h is just as bad.

    A hybrid ES350, errrr ES250h, is a no brainer. Then they'd be expanding appeal of an existing product rather than making a whole new car to get 3,000 sales a year. Problem with Lexus is that they build a boring car for old people. Lexus cashed in big on the baby boomers, but that current lineup has little appeal to Gen X and Gen Y. One thing that kept BMW strong for so long is they can appeal to young and old.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've seen the HS, actually I don't think it's done all that badly design wise, most definitely considering its a hybrid.

    It's got an identity problem though. Prius is a name, it's a brand. What's an HS?

    An ES hybrid yes, makes more sense.

    New Prius V or whatever, saw one on the road, it's gonna rake in more cash for Toyota. A larger hybrid, just as nerdy, a perfect move up vehicle. "Hey, I'm still a greendork, just a bigger one now!"

    MKZ hybrid sells so much because its a no cost option. Lincoln was genius to bury the cost in a Lincoln Fusion. Helps pay for it.

    Ford will stupidly kill the Escape hybrid when the new body comes out. Mistake on both counts. I think it will take a couple years for sales to come back on the Escape when they switch from box to egg. Eventually people will accept it and move on, but Ford will have to make up a whole lot of sales with the Edge to offset that loss. Perhaps Ford sees an overall hybrid demand drop. Maybe the next Escape will be all electric. Current hybrid owners can get a Focus electric to keep on the cutting edge. Ford will still sell a ton of Fusion / MKZ hybrids. And yet they are not nerdwagons.

    I think an ES hybrid would be about the only hybrid Lexus really needs but selling Lexus with hybrids means they can make money off hybrids to help continue to develop their system.

    Overall I think until hybrids become a minor price diff, and integrate into more existing models, they will still be seen as dorkwagons and most of society doesn't want to anymore be caught looking like one of those ladies yelling at the truck owner. Psychotics and overzealous folks. I think people wouldn't mind a hybrid if its got a normal wrapper and won't cost much. I think the era has passed where people are striving to pretend they are ecoconscious.....they realize it doesn't make them superior.

    Hybrids still freak out some folks with battery fears and those who don't want to deal with the winter issues.

    eAssist is sensible as a path. For Buick to have that is pretty good.

    Edited by regfootball
    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The HS was too dorky-looking, and not in a cool way. I didn't have a problem with the interior. Part of the sales problem of the HS is also the success of the CT200h, which is selling at around 1,500 a month, and I think the projection was 1,000. A hybrid ES is also a no-brainer.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Prius has pretty much moved to the mainstream as the efficient, practical, and rational midsize family car alternative. AFAIK, it's Toyota's third best selling car, and it's set to overtake Camry in the near future.

    If Lexus offered an ES300h, I could easily imagine that making up half of all ES sales.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Posts

    • Sending a Christmas eve chuckle your way: Here's Dyan Cannon, who has again poured herself into her clothing, to attend a Lakers game, which she does often. It looks like she can easily fit down many chimneys.  Maybe even into a Christmas gift stocking. I find the different chapters of Dyan Cannon humorous.
    • @Drew Dowdell @Robert Hall @trinacriabob @A Horse With No Name @ccap41 @surreal1272 @oldshurst442  And including all of the C&G members that are here that I do not interact with often enough or those I have forgotten their handles. Wishing each and every one of you a Merry Xmas Eve and Merry Xmas.  To those that do not celebrate Xmas, Happy Hanukkah, Happy Holidays, Happy time off. Wishing each and every person here a restful end to the year, one of love, respect, relaxation to you and your families. Wishing all the best!
    • MOU means that these companies have signed a "Memorandum of Understanding" to explore the participation, involvement and synergy sharing in relation to the business integration through a joint holding company. Back in August 1st, 2024 Nissan and Honda created a Joint Holding Company for the commencement of a strategic partnership focused on intelligence and electrification. This was to start the consideration towards integration of the two companies. Mitsubishi Motors has now signed onto this MOU to explore the possibility of achieving synergies at an increased level through business participation or integration. In basic terms, the three companies have agreed to join forces in sharing costs to move forward with EV platform R&D while they also look at the ICE "Internal Combustion Engine" gas side of having shared platforms to reduce costs and hopefully save the three auto companies by keeping them alive.  While Nissan and Honda have agreed to move forward in this integration of the two auto companies, Mitsubishi Motors will make a final decision by the end of January 2025 about possibly joining in with the integration of Mitsubishi Motors into this joint 3 auto company venture. Nissan and Honda have already agreed to a full SDV or Software-defined vehicles program moving forward that will allow them to have a solid crucial collaboration of intelligence and electrification for future products. Both companies have stated that the acceleration of technology and the rapid change of the auto industry will allow these two companies to maintain global competitiveness and deliver more attractive products and services for customers worldwide. Nissan global mobility product line merged with Honda four-wheel-vehicles, motor cycles and power products can allow both companies to become more attractive to shareholders and innovation of products to sell to customers worldwide according to the CEOs of both companies. Nissan and Honda have stated the following: Nissan and Honda aim to become a world-class mobility company with sales revenue exceeding 30 trillion yen ($190 Billion U.S. Dollars) and operating profit of more than 3 trillion yen ($19 billion U.S. Dollars). The expected synergies from the business integration at this time are: 1. Scale advantages by standardizing vehicle platforms By standardizing the vehicle platforms of both companies across various product segments, the companies expect to create stronger products, reduce costs, enhance development efficiencies, and improve investment efficiencies through standardized production processes. The integration is projected to increase sales and operational volumes, allowing the companies to reduce development costs per vehicle, including for future digital services, while maximizing profits. By accelerating the mutual complementation of their global vehicle offerings - including ICE, HEV, PHEV, and EV models - Nissan and Honda will be better positioned to meet diverse customer needs around the world and deliver optimal products, leading to improved customer satisfaction. 2. Enhancement of development capabilities and cost synergies through the integration of R&D functions In accordance with the MOU to deepen strategic partnership and the joint research agreement on fundamental technologies dated August 1, the two companies have started joint research in fundamental technologies in the area of vehicle platforms for next-generation software-defined vehicles (SDVs), which is the cornerstone of the field of intelligence. After the business integration, both companies will encompass more integrated collaboration across all R&D functions, including fundamental research and vehicle application technology research. This approach is expected to enable both companies to efficiently and swiftly enhance their technological expertise, achieving both improvements in development capabilities and reductions in development costs through the integration of overlapping functions.   3. Optimizing manufacturing systems and facilities The companies anticipate that optimizing their manufacturing plants and energy service facilities, combined with improved collaboration through the shared use of production lines, will result in a substantial improvement in capacity utilization leading to a decrease in fixed costs.   4. Strengthening competitive advantages across the supply chain through the integration of purchasing functions To fully leverage the synergies from optimizing development and production capacity, both companies intend to boost their competitiveness by improving and streamlining purchasing operations and source common parts from the same the supply chain and in collaboration with business partners.   5. Realizing cost synergies through operational efficiency improvements The companies expect that the integration of systems and back-office operations, along with the upgrade and standardization of operational processes, will drive significant cost reductions.   6. Acquisition of scale advantages through integration in sales finance functions By integrating relevant areas of sales finance functions of both companies and expanding the scale of operations, the companies aim to provide a range of mobility solutions, including new financial services throughout the vehicle lifecycle, to customers of both organizations.   7. Establishment of a talent foundation for intelligence and electrification The human resources of the companies are an invaluable asset, and establishing a strong human resource foundation is crucial for the transformation that will come with the business integration. After the integration, increased employee exchanges and technical collaboration between the companies are expected to promote further skill development. Moreover, by leveraging each company's access to talent markets, attracting exceptional talent will become more attainable. Method of business integration and stock listing Nissan and Honda, with the result of the consideration, plan to establish, through a joint share transfer, a joint holding company that will be the parent company of both companies. This will be subject to approval at each company's general meeting of shareholders and obtaining necessary approvals from relevant authorities for this business integration, based on the premise that Nissan's turnaround*1 actions are steadily executed. Both Nissan and Honda will be fully owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company*2. Additionally, the companies plan to continue coexisting and developing the brands held by Honda and Nissan equally. Shares of the newly established joint holding company under consideration are planned to be newly listed (technical listing) on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (“TSE”). The listing is scheduled for August 2026. With the listing of the joint holding company, both Nissan and Honda will become wholly owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company and will be scheduled to be delisted from the TSE. However, shareholders of both companies will continue to be able to trade shares of the joint holding company issued during this share transfer on the TSE. The listing date of the joint holding company and the delisting date of both Nissan and Honda will be determined in accordance with the regulations of the TSE. Regarding the organizational structure of the joint holding company, and both companies which will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the joint holding company after the business integration, the optimal structure for realizing synergies, including the integration of R&D functions, purchasing functions, and manufacturing functions, will be discussed and considered within the integration preparatory committee, with the aim of establishing an organizational structure that enables efficient and highly competitive business operations after the business integration. The CEO's of all three companies had the following to say: Marking the announcement, Nissan Director, President, CEO and Representative Executive Officer Makoto Uchida said: “Honda and Nissan have begun considering a business integration, and will study the creation of significant synergies between the two companies in a wide range of fields. It is significant that Nissan's partner, Mitsubishi Motors, is also involved in these discussions. We anticipate that if this integration comes to fruition, we will be able to deliver even greater value to a wider customer base.“ Honda Director and Representative Executive Officer Toshihiro Mibe said: "At this time of change in the automobile industry, which is said to occur once every 100 years, we hope that Mitsubishi Motors' participation in the business integration discussions of Nissan and Honda will lead to further social change, and that we will be able to become a leading company in creating new value in mobility through business integration. Nissan and Honda will start the discussion from today onwards with an aim to clarify the possibility of business integration by around the end of January in line with the consideration of Mitsubishi Motors." Comment from Mitsubishi Motors Director, Representative Executive Officer, and President and CEO Takao Kato said: “In an era of change in the automotive industry, the study between Nissan and Honda about a business integration will accelerate synergy maximization effects, bringing high value also to the collaborative businesses with Mitsubishi Motors. In order to realize synergies and to make the best use of each company's strengths, we will also study the best form of cooperation.” Upon looking at the press releases, it makes total sense that these companies would look to merge as each company is having a challanging time. Nissan globally has seen a 33.7% reduction in sales taking the estimated 2024 market share to 5.2%.  Honda globally has seen a 9% reduction over all with a 32% reduction in the asian rim leaving them with a 2024 estimated 5.4% market share. Mitsubishi Motors globally has seen a reduction year over year of a 10.7% drop leaving them with a 2024 estimated market share of 4.6%. All three auto companies lag the industry in technology connected auto's, feature / functions and especially EVs. All three companies have seen their profits turn into negative earnings for their respective companies leaving them with no real ability to perform R&D in building EVs to compete in China or the U.S. let alone Europe that has mandates in place for the end of ICE by 2035. End result is it looks like for these companies to survive, merging into one company that shares platforms and technology especially in the software and battery sectors will be the only way to move forward. View full article
    • I think I'm dreaming ... this vehicle would be the oldest of my handful of favorite "blast from the past" cars. A Cutlass Salon coupe in perfect condition, the first year I liked the colonnade Cutlass (and it's last year, of 3, with round headlamps in the colonnade), those huge bucket seats, and, oddly, A/C is there, but with manual windows.  It featured the new but not as popular 260 (4.3L) V8.  It also featured the light enamel blue they didn't repeat.  If the exhaust system is tight, this car will be whisper quiet. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass Salon (Numbers Matching Drivetrain) for sale: photos, technical specifications, description See anything odd?  Come on.  Quick. . . . It has Buick rally wheels instead of Oldsmobile rally wheels. * sigh ... I wonder what time frame this ad goes back to *
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search