Jump to content
Create New...
  • William Maley
    William Maley

    Don't Expect A High-Performance Stinger Anytime Soon

      It's going to be a while

    Hyundai-Kia's performance head said there is more performance to be unlocked in the Stinger, but it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

    “The car technically has more potential no doubt, but at this point there is no plan to do more,” said Albert Biermann to Motoring.

    “We have to launch this car and see how it does in the market place. What kind of customers do we get? What would be their next requirement from Kia? I think first we need to establish some sort of customer base of these kinds of cars and then maybe next steps can happen. But we need to do this carefully. Step by step."

    In the meantime, Biermann suggested that Kia could do GT variants of existing models - think changes to the exterior, suspension, and powertrain. We know there are GT versions of the Optima and Rio in the cards. Once this happens, Kia might consider hopping up the Stinger.

    “At a later stage, when the GT is more established into a stronger sub-label within Kia, then maybe at some point we need a GTR or something,” said Biermann.

    “But for now there is nothing going on.”

    Source: Motoring

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    4 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It will already have higher performance for the dollar than most cars in that price class anyway. 

    I'm betting they're leaving room for Genesis to use a version.

    Thinking you are correct on the Genesis version.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It will already have higher performance for the dollar than most cars in that price class anyway. 

    I'm betting they're leaving room for Genesis to use a version.

    Agree too..

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually after doing a bit of research and checking this out, I would have to without any question whatsoever put it above the Fusion Sport and maybe above the 300 as a car I would actually buy.

    Would also buy this over the Nissan Maxima from the other thread...

    Sheet metal is much more interesting than the Acura TLX SH-AWD also...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    It will already have higher performance for the dollar than most cars in that price class anyway. 

    I'm betting they're leaving room for Genesis to use a version.

    I highly doubt that considering Biermann's comments made last month,
     

    Quote

    What will not happen is any N version of Genesis models according to Biermann. This is a surprising reversal from last year as Biermann said that Genesis vehicles were in the plans for N in the next five years. No reason was given as to why.

     

     

    • Thanks 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Since Genesis is it's own brand, they probably wouldn't use Hyundai's 'N' sub-brand but their own, maybe 'P' for performance... ;)

     

    Edited by Cubical-aka-Moltar
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Since Genesis is it's own brand, they probably wouldn't use Hyundai's 'N' sub-brand but their own, maybe 'P' for performance... ;)

     

    P and low output Stinger do not sound like a good combination...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The problem with just doing a more powerful version is the price point. A $50,000 or $60,000 Kia isn't going to sell.  The K900 proves that, the Cadenza is a sales did also.  Their path to success here is Optima level interior with with rear drive and turbo 4 and 6 cylinder engines priced $30-40k.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hyundai and Kia make their bread and butter vehicles with such low expense that adding a low volume high margin product like this is just toying with the market.  Where GM can't support an SS here, Kia is just playing with resources and seeing if they hit a nerve.

    The Genesis is a dud though in terms of drive.  I hope this is better.

    The pulled Optima styling is a bit of a miss here for me because they had the opportunity to pull Kia into the 2020's here.  Instead, its a warmed over Optima.  Doesn't make it bad, just tired.

    I do like the hatch though.  That saves it.  And the interior is in with the theme.

    For a lot of people this package makes more sense than a Camaro.  Camaro has no backseat, and not much else plus is claustrophobic.  This ventures off into Teslaville.  This sort of packaging may become more what boomers look for in a sports car.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, regfootball said:

    Hyundai and Kia make their bread and butter vehicles with such low expense that adding a low volume high margin product like this is just toying with the market.  Where GM can't support an SS here, Kia is just playing with resources and seeing if they hit a nerve.

    The Genesis is a dud though in terms of drive.  I hope this is better.

    The pulled Optima styling is a bit of a miss here for me because they had the opportunity to pull Kia into the 2020's here.  Instead, its a warmed over Optima.  Doesn't make it bad, just tired.

    I do like the hatch though.  That saves it.  And the interior is in with the theme.

    For a lot of people this package makes more sense than a Camaro.  Camaro has no backseat, and not much else plus is claustrophobic.  This ventures off into Teslaville.  This sort of packaging may become more what boomers look for in a sports car.

    Agree that boomers might like this more in terms of a sports car.  For me...couple of years my youngest will be away at college.  35K would buy a nice used Boxster or Cayman...

    Edited by A Horse With No Name
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    The problem with just doing a more powerful version is the price point. A $50,000 or $60,000 Kia isn't going to sell.  The K900 proves that, the Cadenza is a sales did also.  Their path to success here is Optima level interior with with rear drive and turbo 4 and 6 cylinder engines priced $30-40k.  

    The K900 proves nothing.  As a car, I like it, but it looks too much like an Optima for that price. It also has zero sporting intentions, it rides as soft as an LS460.  The Stinger does not look like an Optima. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The K900 proves nothing.  As a car, I like it, but it looks too much like an Optima for that price. It also has zero sporting intentions, it rides as soft as an LS460.  The Stinger does not look like an Optima. 

    Stinger actually looks good, the more I look at it the more I like it...it does have the Kia Family language all over it...and does look a bit like an Optima IMHO.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Stinger actually looks good, the more I look at it the more I like it...it does have the Kia Family language all over it...and does look a bit like an Optima IMHO.

    Have you seen one in person yet? The long, low hood will let you know this is no camcord competitor.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    50 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    Have you seen one in person yet? The long, low hood will let you know this is no camcord competitor.

    No I have not...but I have checked out quite a few photographs...and I really kind of like it!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The K900 proves nothing.  As a car, I like it, but it looks too much like an Optima for that price. It also has zero sporting intentions, it rides as soft as an LS460.  The Stinger does not look like an Optima. 

    So if they bring out a V8 Stinger for $65,000 is anyone going to buy it?  Or will they just buy a BMW or Audi instead.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    So if they bring out a V8 Stinger for $65,000 is anyone going to buy it?  Or will they just buy a BMW or Audi instead.

    $65,000 gets you a 4 cylinder in a German car the Stinger's size. You make a compelling case.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Agree that boomers might like this more in terms of a sports car.  For me...couple of years my youngest will be away at college.  35K would buy a nice used Boxster or Cayman...

    sure, 4 cylinders now for the new ones!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    $65,000 gets you a 4 cylinder in a German car the Stinger's size. You make a compelling case.

    I like the Stinger,  but it's appeal is the value play.  If it costs as much as a German car that appeal is gone.   The V6 Stinger does 0-60 in 4.9 seconds, same as a $56,000 BMW 540i.  Good value, but I can't see Kia putting a twin turbo V8 in the Stinger and then having to charge way more money.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    I like the Stinger,  but it's appeal is the value play.  If it costs as much as a German car that appeal is gone.   The V6 Stinger does 0-60 in 4.9 seconds, same as a $56,000 BMW 540i.  Good value, but I can't see Kia putting a twin turbo V8 in the Stinger and then having to charge way more money.

    Not all of us feel like blowing 60 grand on a car...Thirty for a John Cooper Works Mini hard top for me and I would be satisfied.

    And while I prefer German cars and have two sitting in my driveway, they are not the only cars on the planet.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Which is why the Stinger shouldn't be super high performance and 60 grand.  I read in South Korea it might start at like $27k, which if it is priced like that in the USA, it is incredible value.  The Stinger needs to target the Camaro and Mustang (and Challenger/Charger), go after the sports car buyer who wants more practicality, but doesn't want to give up the performance.  The Stinger is only 2 inches longer than a Camaro or Mustang.  That is Kia's formula for success with this car.   Going after luxury sedans is suicide, when you have sales of a lot of luxury sedans down 20% as buyers go to crossovers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I like it more than the 5 door Regal or any fwd based entry lux, maybe more than most rwd entry lux as well, kind of over loving the c300.  Just based on pics, initial reviews, and an auto show exterior view from 20 feet away.

    A shooting brake version would be awesome.

     

     

    Edited by frogger
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    Which is why the Stinger shouldn't be super high performance and 60 grand.  I read in South Korea it might start at like $27k, which if it is priced like that in the USA, it is incredible value.  The Stinger needs to target the Camaro and Mustang (and Challenger/Charger), go after the sports car buyer who wants more practicality, but doesn't want to give up the performance.  The Stinger is only 2 inches longer than a Camaro or Mustang.  That is Kia's formula for success with this car.   Going after luxury sedans is suicide, when you have sales of a lot of luxury sedans down 20% as buyers go to crossovers.

    I don't think they will be drawing from the same pool of buyers.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, frogger said:

    I like it more than the 5 door Regal or any fwd based entry lux, maybe more than most rwd entry lux as well, kind of over loving the c300.  Just based on pics, initial reviews, and an auto show exterior view from 20 feet away.

    A shooting brake version would be awesome.

     

     

    Agree on a shooting brake version.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Stinger is in a weird place in the market. It's not a Camaro/Mustang, too small to be a Charger, not premium enough to be an A7, substantially more powerful and sporty than a Regal Sportback. 

    However, that also makes it rather unique and it might catch a small but solid following. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The Stinger is in a weird place in the market. It's not a Camaro/Mustang, too small to be a Charger, not premium enough to be an A7, substantially more powerful and sporty than a Regal Sportback. 

    However, that also makes it rather unique and it might catch a small but solid following. 

    Kia needs to do something to bring a little excitement to the brand...I like it...kind of a unique vehicle.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The Stinger is in a weird place in the market. It's not a Camaro/Mustang, too small to be a Charger, not premium enough to be an A7, substantially more powerful and sporty than a Regal Sportback. 

    However, that also makes it rather unique and it might catch a small but solid following. 

    The Camaro is 188-190 inches long, the Mustang 188.4 and the Stinger is 190.  So it is sized right there with those cars has turbo 4 base, probably priced the same, it just has 4 doors.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    The Camaro is 188-190 inches long, the Mustang 188.4 and the Stinger is 190.  So it is sized right there with those cars has turbo 4 base, probably priced the same, it just has 4 doors.

    who cares how long it is.... seriously....

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    who cares how long it is.... seriously....

    What I am saying is that it is the same size as a Camaro or Mustang with similar performance and price to those 2 but with way more practicality.  Kia should be targeting sports car buyers you want more a more practical car.  Not targeting 3-series drivers who won't consider a Kia and who are going to buy an X3 anyway because they want to get out of a sedan and into an SUV for more practicality.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, smk4565 said:

    What I am saying is that it is the same size as a Camaro or Mustang with similar performance and price to those 2 but with way more practicality.  Kia should be targeting sports car buyers you want more a more practical car.  Not targeting 3-series drivers who won't consider a Kia and who are going to buy an X3 anyway because they want to get out of a sedan and into an SUV for more practicality.  

    I think it will be a different sort of buyer all together.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, smk4565 said:

    What I am saying is that it is the same size as a Camaro or Mustang with similar performance and price to those 2 but with way more practicality.  Kia should be targeting sports car buyers you want more a more practical car.  Not targeting 3-series drivers who won't consider a Kia and who are going to buy an X3 anyway because they want to get out of a sedan and into an SUV for more practicality.  

    I don't think there will be much Mustang/Stinger cross shopping though I agree with you that there should be.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I don't think there will be much Mustang/Stinger cross shopping though I agree with you that there should be.

    Personally a huge part of me would rather have the Stinger...it a fresh idea rather than a remake of a fifty years old one.

    If it is enough cheaper than a three series I could see cross shopping... especially if you are like me and have three kids in College.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, A Horse With No Name said:

    Personally a huge part of me would rather have the Stinger...it a fresh idea rather than a remake of a fifty years old one.

    If it is enough cheaper than a three series I could see cross shopping... especially if you are like me and have three kids in College.

    I could never cross shop a Stinger with a Mustang or Camaro simply because a coupe would never be allowed.  The fact that the Regal Sportback is interesting to him and is a hatchback means that the Stinger is a possibility.  I like the looks of the Regal and especially the interior better though. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    23 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    I could never cross shop a Stinger with a Mustang or Camaro simply because a coupe would never be allowed.  The fact that the Regal Sportback is interesting to him and is a hatchback means that the Stinger is a possibility.  I like the looks of the Regal and especially the interior better though. 

    Like I said, car shopping with a significant other makes life interesting.  I really liked the Regal and LaCrosse but my wife did not.

    For the $34K this costs I would be buying  John Cooper Works MINI or saving a little bit of coin and getting a Golf R.

    Regal would also I think have better sound deadening than the Stinger....I like listening to Music when I drive, this is a real consideration for me.

    Also entering into the Calculus...GM has much better paint and rust proofing than KIA IMHO....living in Ohio....that would be a consideration.

    But with my youngest a Junior in High school this year....and probably going away to college when she graduates...I think I have bought my last practical car.

    MINI JCW FTW, I think...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, A Horse With No Name said:

    Like I said, car shopping with a significant other makes life interesting.  I really liked the Regal and LaCrosse but my wife did not.

    For the $34K this costs I would be buying  John Cooper Works MINI or saving a little bit of coin and getting a Golf R.

    Regal would also I think have better sound deadening than the Stinger....I like listening to Music when I drive, this is a real consideration for me.

    Also entering into the Calculus...GM has much better paint and rust proofing than KIA IMHO....living in Ohio....that would be a consideration.

    But with my youngest a Junior in High school this year....and probably going away to college when she graduates...I think I have bought my last practical car.

    MINI JCW FTW, I think...

     

    We're in such an odd situation.  We have no kids nor any plans for kids, yet we need to plan our vehicle purchases around hauling some combo of our 7 nieces and nephews, or my in-laws around. As much as we like the Encore, it was really a mistake on our part going with a vehicle that small. 

    Unless I find an Avalanche, my choices are likely going to be Durango / Explorer / Tahoe.   His will either be pre-owned CTS or leased Regal Sportback... or if things really change for us, a new S90. 

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, Cubical-aka-Moltar said:

    Sounds like you need a minivan. 

    The Pacifica almost has me convinced....

    But I'd like to do a bit of mild off-roading. So Avalanche/Tahoe are at the top of my list. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    17 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    We're in such an odd situation.  We have no kids nor any plans for kids, yet we need to plan our vehicle purchases around hauling some combo of our 7 nieces and nephews, or my in-laws around. As much as we like the Encore, it was really a mistake on our part going with a vehicle that small. 

    Unless I find an Avalanche, my choices are likely going to be Durango / Explorer / Tahoe.   His will either be pre-owned CTS or leased Regal Sportback... or if things really change for us, a new S90. 

    After having test drove many times the Ford Explorer in all trims, the only one worth considering is the Explorer Sport. Durangos just rock as do Tahoes. I would probably take either Durango or Tahoe with the V8's over the TTV6 of the ford. Plus I actually think the fit and finish is better in those two. Course the Son choose the Jeep GC over the Explorer and Durango. He loves his Jeep's.

    8 minutes ago, Drew Dowdell said:

    The Pacifica almost has me convinced....

    But I'd like to do a bit of mild off-roading. So Avalanche/Tahoe are at the top of my list. 

    Hyrbid Tahoe, Yukon or Escalade. They are awesome and I wish GM would bring them back.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, dfelt said:

    After having test drove many times the Ford Explorer in all trims, the only one worth considering is the Explorer Sport. Durangos just rock as do Tahoes. I would probably take either Durango or Tahoe with the V8's over the TTV6 of the ford. Plus I actually think the fit and finish is better in those two. Course the Son choose the Jeep GC over the Explorer and Durango. He loves his Jeep's.

    I'd like the Jeep GC too... but if I'm going to get that type of vehicle, I'm thinking a 3-row is preferable.   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Durango is nice.....as is the Tahoe.  Had a '15 Tahoe as a rental a couple years ago, really enjoyed driving it...quite nice for a BOF full size, drove better than the previous gen Yukon I had driven.  I don't need a 3-row, so the GC is fine for me..75% of the time it's just me in the car. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jeep GC would be my choice 100 percent...

    1 hour ago, Drew Dowdell said:

     

    We're in such an odd situation.  We have no kids nor any plans for kids, yet we need to plan our vehicle purchases around hauling some combo of our 7 nieces and nephews, or my in-laws around. As much as we like the Encore, it was really a mistake on our part going with a vehicle that small. 

    Unless I find an Avalanche, my choices are likely going to be Durango / Explorer / Tahoe.   His will either be pre-owned CTS or leased Regal Sportback... or if things really change for us, a new S90. 

    A larger vehicle would make sense in so many ways....and you could get rid of the Honda...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • google-news-icon.png



  • google-news-icon.png

  • Subscribe to Cheers & Gears

    Cheers and Gears Logo

    Since 2001 we've brought you real content and honest opinions, not AI-generated stuff with no feeling or opinions influenced by the manufacturers.

    Please consider subscribing. Subscriptions can be as little as $1.75 a month, and a paid subscription drops most ads.*
     

    You can view subscription options here.

    *a very limited number of ads contain special coupon deals for our members and will show

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Have traveled extensively by Amtrak. Sadly, I think it will be cut by the incoming administration. If I had your ability to move to Italy, I would leave before sunset.
    • This cherry one is in "cherry" condition, it seems.  There are some 45 photos.  It's somewhere in Massachusetts.  What a boulevardier.  What a beauty. https://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/caprice/1995/vin/1G1BL52W1SR117012/?radius=6000 It seems like people are taking to these Caprice Classics posthumously, given the prices on cleaner ones with lower miles.   This is a base model, given the upholstery, and 200 hp indicates the 4.3 L V8, which is enough to pull this car around and, in 4th gear, return very good highway mileage.  
    • Amtrak is an interesting beast. I have taken the Coast Starlight once, from Sacramento to Portland.  You sleep on it, in your seat, and the Siskiyou Pass is slow going and I believe you can see Shasta.  Even the cheap seats are extremely roomy. I have taken the Pacific Surfliner once, from L.A. Union Station to San Diego.  It's funny that several subway lines meet at L.A. Union and, even during rush hour, it doesn't feel crowded ... because it's L.A. and not NYC. I have taken the Cascades once from Portland to Seattle.  The price was right, the route is clean and green, and the train cars are not as tall and only 1 level. I have taken the train from Fort Lauderdale to Tampa. I don't remember the route's name. It is said to often run late.  It did.  Lauderdale is next to Metrorail.  A real helpful Cuban guy checked you in and a sassy Black guy was the conductor.  The people were the trippiest of any train ride I've been on.  A little edgier and it could have had some Jerry Springer value. When we were kids, my parents would take us cross-country on the Amtrak Santa Fe to Chicago, followed by another train to New York.  The only part I remembered was the eerieness of the Petrified Forest under thunderstorm skies and all the small bodies of water in Missouri.  I was told that there would be water moccasins in there.  We'd allow for 3 to 4 days in the New York area with relatives as a buffer before sailing from the city to Italy.  It was done in reverse if coming the other way.  My parents were a little weird this way. (The apple didn't fall far from the tree.) Two segments on TWA or Pan Am 747s would have shaved a lot of time off this trip! The U.S. is way behind in good train service.  California High Speed Rail is way behind schedule.  They are still working on the Merced-Fresno-Bakersfield segment. The Republicans hate the plan.  It's always better to build these projects sooner than later.  If anything, this project could further growth in California's interior since its coveted coastal metro areas are not feasible options for most people anymore.  Having people trampling along the route and in those inland areas makes for a "multiplier effect." Don't get me started on topics like this.
    • Hyundai says the WAIT is over for the 2025 IONIQ 5 family of SUVs available now at your local dealership. The question to ask is are the available choices including financial able to drive customers into the dealership? To start with, let's look at what Hyundai is offering from a financial standpoint since the biggest complaint is always the price of an EV. Hyundai Financial is offering two ways to help get you into a new IONIQ 5, Financing as low as 0.99% interest, APR for up to 60 months for qualified buyers or leasing as low as $199 per month for 24 months. $3,999.00 due at lease signing, for qualified lesses, excludes registration, tax, title, and license, 10,000 miles per year including the $7,500 EV lease bonus. All this with a starting price of $42,500, EPA estimated range up to 318 miles, power up to 320 hp / 239 kW and Ultra-Fast Charging from 10-80% in 20 minutes. Let's start with the Ultra-Fast charging of 10% to 80% in 20 minutes. The press release photos show a Tesla supercharger, and yet the Hyundai is an 800V/350kW DC Ultra-Fast charging EV that will come with an adapter so that these NACS ported EVs can charge at the CCS charging stations where one can get this 20 min fast charge. Tesla Superchargers have 350kW charging coming but currently only in a few locations, so most of the time you will be using if you charge at a Tesla Supercharging station, a 400V charger, so expect 30 minutes to charge to 80% at 250kW or if you charge at home from 10% to 100% on a 240V level 2 charger in about 7hrs. This is where Hyundai is pushing to give you the right tools as with the 2025 IONIQ 5, Hyundai is also currently including a Complimentary ChargePoint Home Flex Level 2 EV charger or you can take a $400 charging credit good at any ChargePoint station that includes EVgo, Shell Recharge or ChargePoint station. The ChargePoint network is 87,000 chargers across the U.S. Hyundai has made it very clear that the ChargePoint charger is free, but installation is not included. The good point is Hyundai has already connected to have available electricians who can do the installation and they walk you through the process via the Hyundai Home Marketplace app. If the buyer / lease chooses to go with the $400 charging credit with ChargePoint, they have two years to use the credit before it expires. Hyundai offers the IONIQ 5 in multiple trims in what they consider a trifecta family.  IONIQ 5 Family core with Key specifications: SE Standard Range Starting MSRP $42,500 RWD: 245-miles all-electric range 125kW (168 hp) SE Starting MSRP $46,550 RWD: 318-mile all-electric range RWD: 168kW (225 hp) AWD: 290-mile all-electric range AWD 74kW + 165kW (320 hp)  SEL Starting MSRP $49,500 RWD: 318-mile all-electric range RWD: 168kW (225 hp) AWD: 290-mile all-electric range AWD 74kW + 165kW (320 hp)  HDA 2: Highway Driving Assist 2 Wireless device charging Limited Starting MSRP $54,200 RWD: 318-mile all-electric range RWD: 168kW (225 hp) AWD: 290-mile all-electric range AWD 74kW + 165kW (320 hp)  Vision roof Premium Head-up display (HUD) V2L Hyundai IONIQ 5 Standard Gallery IONIQ 5 XRT The dark side per Hyundai's own website of off-road rally racing inspiration. XRT  MSRP to be announced early 2025 18-inch XRT wheels with all-terrain tires 23mm or 1-inch lifted and tuned suspension XRT Front and rear bumpers Blacked-out styling accents Exclusive interior details and badging Hyundai IONIQ 5 XRT Gallery IONIQ 5 N edition The Bolder world performance car of the year for 2024 N edition Starting MSRP $66,100 0-60 mph in 3.25 seconds with N Grin Boost 162 mph top speed. 478kW (641 hp / 568 lb-ft of torque) Lowered 5.6-inch ground clearance with tuned suspension 221 mile range / 84kW battery pack Performance interior and badging Performance features: N Battery Preconditioning N race mode N Pedal mode or special tuned one pedal drive mode N Brake regeneration N Drift Optimizer mode N Torque Distribution N launch Control Mode N Grin Boost mode N e-shift  N Track SOC N Active Sound + Hyundai IONIQ 5 N Gallery The family of Hyundai IONIQ 5 comes with a three year or 36,000-mile warranty and a 10-year/100,000-mile Hybrid/electric battery warranty and 24/7 roadside assistance. With the growing EV charging infrastructure and the addition of the Tesla Supercharging stations network, getting around even on road trips across North America has become so much easier than one would have thought. One can check out more about the Hyundai IONIQ 5 family of autos here: 2025 IONIQ 5 | Electric SUV, Overview | Hyundai USA So this then brings us back to the original question posed, So will the choices and financial incentives drive customers into the dealerships and have them taking home a new EV? Sound off on what you think. View full article
    • @A Horse With No Name If you want to see a VAST array of American Iron, take the Amtrak train from Chicago to Seattle. It was AMAZING to see all the lined up trucks and cars from just about every make lined up in the fields by the train tracks heading west. It is an amazing site to see all the old autos rusting away in the fields as well as some of the abandoned small towns that the trains go by. You could also do the Seattle to Chicago ride. Still amazing sites to behold. Empire Builder Seattle To Chicago    
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • My Clubs

×
×
  • Create New...

Hey there, we noticed you're using an ad-blocker. We're a small site that is supported by ads or subscriptions. We rely on these to pay for server costs and vehicle reviews.  Please consider whitelisting us in your ad-blocker, or if you really like what you see, you can pick up one of our subscriptions for just $1.75 a month or $15 a year. It may not seem like a lot, but it goes a long way to help support real, honest content, that isn't generated by an AI bot.

See you out there.

Drew
Editor-in-Chief

Write what you are looking for and press enter or click the search icon to begin your search